BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Pisgah Alabama condominium expert witness Pisgah Alabama tract home expert witness Pisgah Alabama Medical building expert witness Pisgah Alabama parking structure expert witness Pisgah Alabama custom home expert witness Pisgah Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Pisgah Alabama housing expert witness Pisgah Alabama concrete tilt-up expert witness Pisgah Alabama institutional building expert witness Pisgah Alabama hospital construction expert witness Pisgah Alabama retail construction expert witness Pisgah Alabama townhome construction expert witness Pisgah Alabama multi family housing expert witness Pisgah Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Pisgah Alabama production housing expert witness Pisgah Alabama office building expert witness Pisgah Alabama industrial building expert witness Pisgah Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Pisgah Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Pisgah Alabama custom homes expert witness Pisgah Alabama low-income housing expert witness Pisgah Alabama
    Pisgah Alabama expert witness concrete failurePisgah Alabama architect expert witnessPisgah Alabama construction expert witnessesPisgah Alabama contractor expert witnessPisgah Alabama delay claim expert witnessPisgah Alabama architecture expert witnessPisgah Alabama construction safety expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pisgah, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pisgah Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Huntsville/Madison County Builders Association
    Local # 0148
    2804 Bob Wallace Ave SW
    Huntsville, AL 35805

    Pisgah Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    The Greater Morgan County Builders Association
    Local # 0124
    PO Box 2623
    Decatur, AL 35602

    Pisgah Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Jackson County Chapter
    Local # 0150
    PO Box 130
    Scottsboro, AL 35768
    Pisgah Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of The Muscle Shoals Area
    Local # 0140
    PO Box 419
    Florence, AL 35631

    Pisgah Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Athens Limestone Home Builders Association
    Local # 0170
    21672 New Garden Rd
    Elkmont, AL 35620

    Pisgah Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dekalb Chapter
    Local # 0123
    213 Grand Ave SW
    Fort Payne, AL 35967
    Pisgah Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Marshall County
    Local # 0152
    428 E N Carlisle St
    Albertville, AL 35950

    Pisgah Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pisgah Alabama


    California Ranks As Leading State for Green Building in 2022

    Naples, Florida, Is Getting So Expensive That City Workers Can’t Afford It

    From Singapore to Rio Green Buildings Keep Tropical Tenants Cool

    Assessments Underway After Hurricane Milton Rips Off Stadium Roof, Snaps Crane Boom in Florida

    CGL Insurer’s Duty To Defend Broader Than Duty To Indemnify And Based On Allegations In Underlying Complaint

    Seattle’s Newest Residential Developer

    Hunton Insurance Lawyer, Jae Lynn Huckaba, Awarded Miami-Dade Bar Association Young Lawyer Section’s Rookie of the Year Award

    Construction Robots 2023

    Exploring the Future of Robotic Construction with Dr. Thomas Bock

    Contractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for Hurricanes

    SFAA Commends U.S. Senate for Historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill

    No Exception for Willful and Wanton Conduct: Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies the Economic Loss Rule

    No Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims

    No Signature? Potentially No Problem for Sureties Enforcing a Bond’s Forum Selection Clause

    Top 10 Lessons Learned from a Construction Attorney

    Seattle Independent Contractor Ordinance – Pitfalls for Unwary Construction Professionals

    Balestreri Potocki & Holmes Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Star

    1st District Joins 2nd District Court of Appeals and Holds that One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims

    Why Should Businesses Seek Legal Help Early On?

    Home Prices Up, Inventory Down

    Insurer in Bad Faith For Refusing to Commit to Appraisal

    Texas House Passes Medical Damages Reform: What It Means for Insurance Defense Attorneys

    Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects

    A Discussion on Home Affordability

    Georgia Amends Anti-Indemnity Statute

    Partner Jonathan R. Harwood Obtained Summary Judgment in a Case Involving a Wedding Guest Injured in a Fall

    Safety, Technology Combine to Change the Construction Conversation

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    How New York City Plans to Soak Up the Rain

    See the Stories That Drew the Most Readers to ENR.com in 2023

    Bay Area Firm Offers Construction Consulting to Remodels

    To Ease Housing Crunch, Theme Parks Are Becoming Homebuilders

    Getting U.S to Zero Carbon Will Take a $2.5 Trillion Investment by 2030

    Five Keys to Driving Digital Transformation in Engineering and Construction

    Midwest Team Secures Resolution of Matter for Homeowners’ Association Client, Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees

    Appellate Court reverses district court’s finding of alter ego in Sedgwick Properties Development Corporation v. Christopher Hinds (2019WL2865935)

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Hotel Owner & Manager in Tenant’s Lawsuit

    “But it’s 2021!” Service of Motion to Vacate Via Email Found Insufficient by the Eleventh Circuit

    Illinois Appellate Court Address the Scope of the Term “Resident” in Homeowners Policy

    Insurer’s Optional Appeals Process Does Not Toll Statute of Limitations Following Unequivocal Written Denial

    California Court of Appeal Finds Coverage for Injured Worker Despite Contractor's Exclusion

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Denial of Construction Defect Claim

    “You’re Out of Here!” -- CERCLA (Superfund) Federal Preemption of State Environmental Claims in State Courts

    Deck Police - The New Mandate for HOA's Takes Safety to the Next Level

    Jersey Shore Town Trying Not to Lose the Man vs. Nature Fight on its Eroded Beaches

    Travelers Insurance Sues Chicago for $26M in Damages to Willis Tower

    The U.S. Flooded One of Houston’s Richest Neighborhoods to Save Everyone Else

    Statute of Limitations Bars Lender’s Subsequent Action to Quiet Title Against Junior Lienholder Mistakenly Omitted from Initial Judicial Foreclosure Action

    Eleventh Circuit Affirms Jury Verdict on Covered Property Loss

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One
    Corporate Profile

    PISGAH ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Pisgah, Alabama Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Pisgah's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pisgah, Alabama

    Appraisal Award Upheld Despite Insurer’s Contention that Causation was Considered

    February 23, 2026 —
    The federal district court in Tennessee granted the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding the appraisal award was properly determined despite the insurer’s argument that the appraisal panel considered causation of the loss. Nashville Communications, Inc. v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 223455 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 13, 2025) A windstorm struck and damaged the building owned and insured by Nashville Communications (NashComm). A claim was submitted to the insurer, Auto-Owners, for damage to the roof and interior water leakage. Auto-Owners acknowledged that there was some amount of wind damage to the building from the wind event. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy

    March 24, 2026 —
    Introduction On many construction projects, particularly large projects facing schedule pressure, owners may begin occupying or using portions of the project before the work reaches substantial completion. This is often due to operational needs, phased turnover, or market demands that drive owners to take possession of all or part of a project while construction activities are ongoing. While early occupancy may seem practical, it can blur the lines of responsibility between owner and contractor and can create significant legal and practical complications. These disputes are especially common on large, complex projects where punch list work, system commissioning, and closeout activities overlap with owner use. Without clear documentation and carefully drafted contract provisions, early occupancy can undermine an owner’s ability to enforce completion requirements while simultaneously exposing the contractor to claims of delay, inefficiency, or interference. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sydney Koby, Jones Walker
    Ms. Koby may be contacted at skoby@joneswalker.com

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    July 27, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted after the insured failed to file suit against the insurer within the policy’s two-year suit limitation provision. Interstate Investments, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98108 (S.D. N. Y. May 4, 2026). On or before June 27, 2023, a wind, hail and rainstorm damaged Interstate’s property in Oklahoma. Interstate filed a claim under its policy with Mt. Hawley. The policy provided that New York law applied and contained a two- year suit limitation provision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    Sheppard has been recognized by Chambers Global 2026 in the following practice areas:
    • Privacy & Data Security in the United States
    • Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional in the United States
    • Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy in the United States
    Additionally, the following Sheppard partners have been recognized by Chambers Global 2026:
    • Justin Boose (Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy – USA)
    • Will Chen (Intellectual Property: International Firms – South Korea)
    • David Chun (Intellectual Property – South Korea)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Arbitration Provision Must Be Incorporated into a Bond for Surety to Elect Arbitration

    March 03, 2026 —
    “Sureties cannot exercise unilateral election rights that are reserved for the principal of the underlying contract.” Anderson Service Corp. v. Old Republic Surety Company, 2026 WL 61436, *2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). This was the holding in a recent case dealing with arbitration. In this case, a subcontractor entered into a contract with a contractor that gave the contractor the right to elect arbitration in Pennsylvania. A dispute arose and the subcontractor recorded a construction lien. The contractor transferred the lien to a lien transfer bond under Florida law. (The contractor was the principal of the lien transfer bond.) The lien transfer bond surety then moved to compel the subcontractor to arbitration based on the underlying subcontract. The trial court agreed to compel arbitration but this was reversed on appeal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com