BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Lisman Alabama landscaping construction expert witness Lisman Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Lisman Alabama parking structure expert witness Lisman Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Lisman Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Lisman Alabama industrial building expert witness Lisman Alabama hospital construction expert witness Lisman Alabama institutional building expert witness Lisman Alabama tract home expert witness Lisman Alabama townhome construction expert witness Lisman Alabama low-income housing expert witness Lisman Alabama concrete tilt-up expert witness Lisman Alabama condominium expert witness Lisman Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Lisman Alabama production housing expert witness Lisman Alabama multi family housing expert witness Lisman Alabama custom homes expert witness Lisman Alabama custom home expert witness Lisman Alabama Medical building expert witness Lisman Alabama housing expert witness Lisman Alabama casino resort expert witness Lisman Alabama
    Lisman Alabama construction expertsLisman Alabama architectural expert witnessLisman Alabama expert witness roofingLisman Alabama engineering consultantLisman Alabama stucco expert witnessLisman Alabama expert witness commercial buildingsLisman Alabama roofing construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lisman, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lisman Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Alabama
    Local # 0100
    PO Box 241305
    Montgomery, AL 36124

    Lisman Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117

    Lisman Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Phenix City
    Local # 0172
    1808 Opelika Road
    Phenix City, AL 36867
    Lisman Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lee Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0136
    528 Lafayette Pl
    Auburn, AL 36830
    Lisman Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Alabama Home Builders Association
    Local # 0102
    PO Box 190
    Greenville, AL 36037
    Lisman Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tallapoosa Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 0186
    714 Commerce Drive
    Alexander City, AL 35010
    Lisman Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Enterprise Home Builders Association
    Local # 0133
    PO Box 310861
    Enterprise, AL 36331
    Lisman Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lisman Alabama


    Who's Who Legal Recognizes Two White and Williams Lawyers as Thought/Global Leaders in Insurance and Reinsurance

    Condo Collapse Spurs Hometown House Member to Demand U.S. Rules

    Under Colorado House Bill 17-1279, HOA Boards Now Must Get Members’ Informed Consent Before Bringing A Construction Defect Action

    New Safety Requirements added for Keystone Pipeline

    Subcontractors Aren’t Helpless

    Wait, You Want An HOA?! Restricting Implied Common-Interest Communities

    California Appellate Court Holds “Minimal Causal Connection” Satisfies Causation Requirement in All Risk Policies

    It’s (Not) Discretionary

    Jobsite Safety Should Be Every Contractors' Priority

    A Trivial Case

    City of Aspen v. Burlingame Ranch II Condominium Owners Association: Clarifying the Application of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act

    GRSM Now 11th Largest Law Firm in United States

    Agency Principles Matter (Including When It Comes to Arbitration Provisions)

    New OSHA Rule Creates Electronic Reporting Requirement

    Supreme Court of Washington State Upholds SFAA Position on Spearin Doctrine

    You Cannot Arbitrate Claims Not Covered By The Arbitration Agreement

    Canada's Ex-Attorney General Set to Testify About SNC-Lavalin Scandal

    CGL Policies and the Professional Liabilities Exclusion

    Duty To Defend Construction Defect Case Affirmed, Duty to Indemnify Reversed In Part

    White House Hopefuls Make Pitches to Construction Unions

    Overruling Henkel, California Supreme Court Validates Assignment of Policies

    Tenn. Court of Appeals Finally Clarifies Contractor Licensing Laws, Holding An “Underlicensed” Contractor Is Violation of Tennessee’s Consumer Protection Act

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 3: Standard Form Policy Exclusions

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected for the 2024 Edition of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch

    Insurance Agent Sued for Lapse in Coverage after House Collapses

    Insurer Incorrectly Relies Upon "Your Work" Exclusion to Deny Coverage

    Water Seepage, Ensuing Mold Damage Covered by Homeowner's Policy

    Who Will Pay for San Francisco's $750 Million Tilting Tower?

    Some Insurers Dismissed, Others Are Not in Claims for Faulty Workmanship

    Court of Appeal: Privette Doctrine Does Not Apply to Landlord-Tenant Relationships

    Exclusion for Construction of Condominiums Includes Faulty Construction of Retaining Wall

    Rent Increases During the Coronavirus Emergency Part II: Avoiding Violations Under California’s Anti-Price Gouging Statute

    Dusseldorf Evacuates About 4,000 as World War II Bomb Defused

    Bad Faith Jury Verdict Upheld After Insurer's Failure to Settle Within Policy Limits

    Design Firm Settles over Construction Defect Claim

    Think Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or Occurrence

    Caltrans Hiring of Inexperienced Chinese Builder for Bay Bridge Expansion Questioned

    Condominium's Agent Owes No Duty to Injured Apartment Owner

    Virginia Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C" Grade

    Recovery Crews Swing Into Action as Hurricane Michael Departs

    New York Office Secures Appellate Win in Labor Law 240(1) Fall in Basement Accident Case

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim

    Gene Witkin Joins Ross Hart’s Mediation Team at AMCC

    In Real Life the Bad Guy Sometimes Gets Away: Adding Judgment Debtors to a Judgment

    Cincinnati Team Secures Summary Judgment for Paving Company in Trip-and-Fall Case

    Tax Increase Pumps $52 Billion Into California Construction

    Does Stricter Decertification Mean More “Leedigation?”

    Out of Eastern Europe, a Window Into the Post-Pandemic Office

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    A Recession Is Coming, But the Housing Market Won't Trigger It
    Corporate Profile

    LISMAN ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Lisman, Alabama Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Lisman's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lisman, Alabama

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Report Outlines Roadmap for Construction Jobsites to Cut Carbon Emissions by 2040

    April 20, 2026 —
    Denver, Colo., April 16, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A new industry report outlines five practical steps that, when implemented together, could reduce construction jobsite emissions by up to 75% without compromising cost, schedule or performance. Grounded in real operational data from 617 construction projects across the U.S. and Canada, Growing and Greening Canadian Construction represents the most comprehensive sector-wide analysis of jobsite emissions conducted to date. The report was developed through a collaboration among leading general contractors, including PCL Construction, in partnership with the Transition Accelerator, an organization that drives projects, partnerships, and strategies to promote economic competitiveness in a carbon‑neutral world. The report focuses specifically on emissions from construction jobsite activities and reflects a shared commitment to advancing practical, scalable solutions for the industry. About PCL Construction PCL is a group of independent construction companies that operates throughout the United States, Canada, the Caribbean and Australia. As one of the largest contracting organizations in North America, PCL completes more than $9.9 billion USD in work annually, building projects that shape communities. The company’s 100% employee ownership model fuels a culture of commitment for clients in the buildings, civil infrastructure, heavy industrial and solar markets. With a strategic presence in more than 30 major centers, PCL’s leadership teams consistently drive innovation and set new benchmarks for excellence, bringing unparalleled skill to every project. Watch us build at PCL.com. About the Transition Accelerator The Transition Accelerator works with 300+ partner organizations across Canada to build out pathways to a prosperous low-carbon economy and avoid costly dead-ends along the way. We help governments and industry harness the global shift towards clean growth to secure permanent jobs, abundant energy, and strong regional economies across the country. By connecting systems-level thinking with real-world analysis, we’re enabling a more affordable, competitive, and resilient future. Read the full story...

    The Deadline to File Suit on a Public Works Payment Payment Bond is Triggered by a Claimant’s Work on a Project Not by a Claimant’s Work Under a Contract

    June 02, 2026 —
    California law requires that prime contractors furnish a payment bond – providing for payment to lower-tiered subcontractors and suppliers – on state and local public works projects with a value in excess of $25,000. There are three conditions that must be satisfied when a claimant makes a claim against a payment bond on a public works project in California:
    1. First, generally, the claimant must have served a preliminary notice, unless the claimant is a first-tier subcontractor or supplier;
    2. The claimant must have “ceased to provide work” on the project; and
    3. The claimant must file suit against the payment bond no later than six (6) months after the period in which a stop payment notice must be given or, in other words, the earlier of 270 days after completion of the public works project or 210 days after a notice of completion or cessation was recorded on a public works project.
    In Tarlton & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company, 111 Cal.App.5th 376 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeal examined whether a subcontractor timely filed a claim against a payment bond when a prime contractor was terminated and replaced by another prime contractor who the subcontractor continued to perform work for. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening

    July 27, 2026 —
    On July 15, Lewis Brisbois hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new Garden City office, which opened in April to serve the Long Island community and beyond. The event was attended by more than 100 people, including Lewis Brisbois attorneys and staff as well as clients, local business and government leaders, Nassau County Supreme Court judges, and members of the press. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman delivered remarks and cut the ribbon for the office. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    March 17, 2026 —
    In a case that I’m frankly surprised I don’t see more of, the 2nd District Court of Appeal of California examined an indemnity claim by a subcontractor against a general contractor and public entity who mistakenly believed that a construction project did not require the payment of prevailing wages. The Nabors Case In Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. City of Long Beach, 108 Cal.App 540 (2025), subcontractor Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. sued general contractor Tidelands Oil Production Company and the City of Long Beach after it was found liable in a class action lawsuit for failing to pay prevailing wages to its employees. Nabors’ contract with Tidelands did not require the payment of prevailing wages and neither Tidelands nor the City believed that the project, which involved “oil well plug and abandonment” work, required the payment of prevailing wages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com