BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Joppa Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Joppa Alabama industrial building expert witness Joppa Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Joppa Alabama multi family housing expert witness Joppa Alabama custom homes expert witness Joppa Alabama custom home expert witness Joppa Alabama tract home expert witness Joppa Alabama condominium expert witness Joppa Alabama condominiums expert witness Joppa Alabama high-rise construction expert witness Joppa Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Joppa Alabama retail construction expert witness Joppa Alabama office building expert witness Joppa Alabama casino resort expert witness Joppa Alabama production housing expert witness Joppa Alabama parking structure expert witness Joppa Alabama townhome construction expert witness Joppa Alabama low-income housing expert witness Joppa Alabama housing expert witness Joppa Alabama hospital construction expert witness Joppa Alabama Medical building expert witness Joppa Alabama
    Joppa Alabama engineering consultantJoppa Alabama construction defect expert witnessJoppa Alabama construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessJoppa Alabama testifying construction expert witnessJoppa Alabama construction project management expert witnessesJoppa Alabama multi family design expert witnessJoppa Alabama roofing construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Joppa, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Joppa Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Marshall County
    Local # 0152
    428 E N Carlisle St
    Albertville, AL 35950

    Joppa Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dekalb Chapter
    Local # 0123
    213 Grand Ave SW
    Fort Payne, AL 35967
    Joppa Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cullman County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0121
    PO Box 1033
    Cullman, AL 35056

    Joppa Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Gadsden Home Builders Association
    Local # 0144
    524 Broad St Ste 1
    Gadsden, AL 35901

    Joppa Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    The Greater Morgan County Builders Association
    Local # 0124
    PO Box 2623
    Decatur, AL 35602

    Joppa Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Northwest Alabama
    Local # 0168
    PO Box 308
    Winfield, AL 35594
    Joppa Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Blount County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0104
    PO Box 571
    Oneonta, AL 35121
    Joppa Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Joppa Alabama


    Construction Wall Falls, Hurts Three

    Yet Another Reminder to ALWAYS Show Up for Court

    “A No-Lose Proposition?”

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    Connecticut Supreme Court Again Asked to Determine the Meaning of Collapse

    New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation

    Reversing Itself, West Virginia Supreme Court Holds Construction Defects Are Covered

    “For What It’s Worth”

    The Almost-Collapse of a Sarasota, Florida Condo Building

    No Coverage for Property Damage That is Limited to Work Completed by Subcontractor

    Nomos LLP Partners Recognized in Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Recording “Un-Neighborly” Documents

    City Council Authorizes Settlement of Basement Flooding Cases

    Payne & Fears Secures $1.9 Million in Defense Costs for Homebuilder Client in Summary Judgment Win Against Insurer

    Demolition Started for Boston’s $200M Professional Women’s Soccer Stadium Renovation Despite Looming Trial

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Returns as a Sponsor at the 30th Annual Construction Law Conference in San Antonio

    Landlords Beware: Subordination Agreements

    Jury Awards 20 Million Verdict Against Bishop Abbey Homes

    Legal Disputes Soar as Poor Information Management Impacts the AEC Industry

    Do Change Orders Need to be in Writing and Other Things That Might Surprise You

    The Texas Storm – Guidance for Contractors

    South African Building Industry in Line for More State Support

    Improvements to Confederate Monuments Lead to Lawsuits

    Limitation on Coverage for Payment of Damages Creates Ambiguity

    Dispute Resolution in Your Construction Contract

    Failing to Adopt a Comprehensive Cyber Plan Can Lead to Disaster

    Governor Signs Permit Extension Bill Extending Permit Deadlines to One Year

    Civil Engineers: Montana's Infrastructure Grade Declines to a 'C-'

    As Climate Changes, 'Underwater Mortgage' May Take on New Meaning

    Update Your California Release Provisions to Include Amended Section 1542 Language

    Federal District Court Addresses Material Misrepresentation in First Party Property Damage Claim

    When Employer’s Liability Coverage May Be Limited in New York

    Canada Home Resales Post First Fall in Eight Months

    The Regulations on the Trump Administration's Chopping Block

    Chinese Telecommunications Ban to Expand to Federally Funded Contracts Effective November 12, 2020

    Home Buyers will Pay More for Solar

    Taking Care of Infrastructure – Interview with Marilyn Grabowski

    Chicago Criticized for Not Maintaining Elevator Inspections

    Insured's Collapse Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    RDU Terminal 1: Going Green

    Sensors for Smarter Construction – Interview with Laura Kassovic of MbientLab

    Bar Against Forum Selection Clauses in Construction Contracts Extended to Design Professionals

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment Based Upon Vandalism Exclusion

    Sixth Circuit Finds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Under Kentucky Law

    California Appellate Court Rules That Mistakenly Grading the Wrong Land Is Not an Accident

    Flood Sublimits Do Not Apply to Loss Caused by Named Windstorm

    How To Spot a Bad Contractor Before It’s Too Late – Part 1

    Become Familiar With Your CGL Policy Exclusions to Ensure You Are Covered: Wardcraft v. EMC.

    Builder Waits too Long to Dispute Contract in Construction Defect Claim

    New York Court Holds Insurer Can Recover Before Insured Is Made Whole
    Corporate Profile

    JOPPA ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Joppa, Alabama Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Joppa's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Joppa, Alabama

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    AI Adoption in Construction: A UK Practitioner’s View

    April 20, 2026 —
    I recently talked with Chris Brady, an AI adoption consultant based in Birmingham, UK, who has spent 18 years working in construction. Two years ago, he began integrating AI into his work with contractors and SMEs, initially as an add-on service, and it has since become his main business. Chris now runs Metrix, an AI consultancy focused on UK construction companies, alongside two other ventures: Trade Upskill, an education platform for construction professionals, and ctrldash.ai, a compliance-automation SaaS for construction SMEs, both of which are soon to launch. What struck me most in our conversation was how grounded his approach is, built on years of direct industry experience rather than arriving from outside with a technology solution looking for a problem. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…

    August 24, 2026 —
    Florida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy: Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    We Won’t Permit That Excuse!

    June 23, 2026 —
    A Texas appellate court recently ruled that a building permit wasn’t a condition precedent for a construction project. That caught our attention. Can you build a commercial project without a permit? But as we read the case, we see the court’s reasoning. And it reminds us of an important legal principle that should inform our contract drafting and negotiation. The case was a civil suit brought by the project owner against its tenant improvement contractor for work on a medical spa. The owner claimed that the contractor didn’t perform the work properly and didn’t finish construction. The contractor argued that delays and problems were caused by the owner, alleging numerous failures, including the owner’s failure to secure a building permit. Reprinted courtesy of Curt Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Richard Eiszner, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Mr. Eiszner may be contacted at reiszner@pecklaw.com Read the full story...