BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Fort Payne Alabama Subterranean parking expert witness Fort Payne Alabama condominiums expert witness Fort Payne Alabama casino resort expert witness Fort Payne Alabama townhome construction expert witness Fort Payne Alabama parking structure expert witness Fort Payne Alabama custom homes expert witness Fort Payne Alabama housing expert witness Fort Payne Alabama institutional building expert witness Fort Payne Alabama production housing expert witness Fort Payne Alabama condominium expert witness Fort Payne Alabama tract home expert witness Fort Payne Alabama retail construction expert witness Fort Payne Alabama industrial building expert witness Fort Payne Alabama low-income housing expert witness Fort Payne Alabama mid-rise construction expert witness Fort Payne Alabama hospital construction expert witness Fort Payne Alabama multi family housing expert witness Fort Payne Alabama concrete tilt-up expert witness Fort Payne Alabama structural steel construction expert witness Fort Payne Alabama Medical building expert witness Fort Payne Alabama office building expert witness Fort Payne Alabama
    Fort Payne Alabama expert witnesses fenestrationFort Payne Alabama construction expert witness public projectsFort Payne Alabama delay claim expert witnessFort Payne Alabama fenestration expert witnessFort Payne Alabama testifying construction expert witnessFort Payne Alabama forensic architectFort Payne Alabama building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fort Payne, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fort Payne Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Dekalb Chapter
    Local # 0123
    213 Grand Ave SW
    Fort Payne, AL 35967
    Fort Payne Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Marshall County
    Local # 0152
    428 E N Carlisle St
    Albertville, AL 35950

    Fort Payne Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    The Greater Morgan County Builders Association
    Local # 0124
    PO Box 2623
    Decatur, AL 35602

    Fort Payne Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cullman County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0121
    PO Box 1033
    Cullman, AL 35056

    Fort Payne Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Huntsville/Madison County Builders Association
    Local # 0148
    2804 Bob Wallace Ave SW
    Huntsville, AL 35805

    Fort Payne Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Gadsden Home Builders Association
    Local # 0144
    524 Broad St Ste 1
    Gadsden, AL 35901

    Fort Payne Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Jackson County Chapter
    Local # 0150
    PO Box 130
    Scottsboro, AL 35768
    Fort Payne Alabama Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fort Payne Alabama

    Corporate Profile

    FORT PAYNE ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Fort Payne, Alabama Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Fort Payne's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fort Payne, Alabama

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    April 14, 2026 —
    Written change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law requires these provisions in residential construction contracts. Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    May 14, 2026 —
    SAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that two attorneys in the San Diego office have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars publication. Rising Stars is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. To be eligible for inclusion, a candidate must be either 40 years old or younger or in practice for 10 years or less. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research and peer nominations, with no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state named to the Rising Stars list. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Trump Replaces Architect to Lead $300 Million Ballroom Design

    December 30, 2025 —
    President Donald Trump has tapped a new architect to help plan his $300 million White House ballroom wing, assigning the former lead designer to a consultant role in the high-profile and controversial project. Shalom Baranes Associates, a Washington-based architecture firm, will design the ballroom that will be built in place of the demolished East Wing, according to a White House official. James McCrery, who was previously named to lead the project, will remain in a consulting role. “Shalom is an accomplished architect whose work has shaped the architectural identity of our nation’s capital for decades and his experience will be a great asset to the completion of this project,” White House spokesman Davis Ingle said. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Skylar Woodhouse, Bloomberg

    Florida’s Proposed HB 255: A Quiet Shift That Could Reshape Condo Defect Liability

    January 21, 2026 —
    In Florida, developers and contractors work under strict clocks. Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes, sets two firm deadlines for construction claims: a four-year statute of limitations and a seven-year statute of repose. Those timelines govern when an owner or condominium association may pursue claims for alleged defects. Once the repose period ends, the claim is barred regardless of when the problem surfaced. Condominium law complicates that scheme. Section 718.124 delays the start of the limitation and repose periods on association claims until control of the board shifts from the developer to the unit owners. The logic is simple: a developer-controlled board cannot be expected to sue the developer. The practical effect is more sweeping. If turnover occurs late in the life of a project, the repose period may remain tolled for years, extending exposure far beyond the seven years that apply everywhere else. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matt Maranges, Jones Walker
    Mr. Maranges may be contacted at mmaranges@joneswalker.com

    CARB Issues Proposed Climate Disclosure Regulations

    January 13, 2026 —
    On December 9, 2025, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) issued proposed regulations and a staff report for California’s comprehensive climate disclosure laws, the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261). These proposed regulations come less than a month after the Ninth Circuit issued an injunction temporarily halting enforcement of SB 261, at least until a January 9, 2026, hearing on the plaintiffs’ requested longer-term injunction through the remainder of the First Amendment challenge to the laws. The draft regulations would adopt some, but not all, of the provisions proposed by CARB in its public workshops on the laws to date, and notably would scale back applicability to those companies above a threshold level of sales in the state. The proposed regulations also define key terms, establish the program fee structures, explain fee enforcement and set initial reporting timelines. The written comment period begins on December 26, 2025, and ends on February 9, 2026. CARB will hold a public hearing on the proposed regulations on February 26, 2026 at 9 a.m. PST. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. McDonough, Pillsbury, Ashleigh Myers, Pillsbury and Karen Eskander, Pillsbury Mr. McDonough may be contacted at michael.mcdonough@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Eskander may be contacted at karen.eskander@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Conditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    December 30, 2025 —
    This is the third article in a series of four articles discussing how to properly fill out the four California construction releases described in California Civil Code 8132 – 8138. Let me start by noting that in addition to practicing construction law for more than 35 years, I chaired the committee of California construction attorneys who revised those sections of the California Civil Code dealing with this release form and many other construction forms as part of Senate Bill 189 in 2010. I also wrote the first version of this release form and made it free to the public well before the new law took effect in 2012. With this background, let me note a few things about the Conditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment form to help you avoid mistakes that might prevent you from achieving the intended effect of the form or releasing claim rights to a greater extent than you intend. At the end of this article is a copy of the form itself which includes numbers coinciding with the instructions I will give below. A live electronically fillable version of the form is available on our firm’s website (www.porterlaw.com) under the “Forms” section. It is free and you can fill it out on your screen before printing it out and signing it. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    Tampa Team Obtains Highly Favorable Verdict for Property Owner Client in Lawsuit over Traffic Accident

    March 24, 2026 —
    Tampa Managing Partner John Rine and Partner Nick Dareneau obtained a very favorable verdict for their property owner client in a Sarasota County trial in a lawsuit arising from a traffic accident. At the end of closing arguments, plaintiff’s counsel requested appropriately $18 million from the jury. The jury returned a net verdict of just over a thousand dollars. The plaintiff was on a scooter and was involved in an accident with an SUV in a parking lot intersection. Our firm represented the property owner. The plaintiffs argued that the landscape vegetation was too tall and violated the sight lines of the two drivers, and that the height of the shrubbery violated the owner’s landscaping contract and a local sight line ordinance. They also argued that the intersection lacked a stop sign in contrast to the other six parking lot entrances, which had stop signs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Fixed Price, Fluid Quantities: The Hidden Risks in Lump Sum Agreements with Variable Units

    November 21, 2025 —
    Lump sum construction agreements are the most basic of the different design-bid-build options: the contractor agrees to complete the entire scope of work for a fixed price, and assumes most of the quantity and cost risks. If the contractor’s actual costs exceed its estimates, the contractor absorbs the loss. Adding a clause into the construction agreement that allows unit quantities to increase or decrease based on actual job quantities creates a mechanism that can reduce the risk of estimating, but it is a clause that should be carefully drafted and closely guarded. There are times when it makes sense for parties to deviate from their lump sum agreement and allow for greater flexibility: when there are uncertainties in site conditions or scope, and/or to reduce disputes over changed conditions. The parties can introduce elements of unit-price contracts into the lump sum framework, either choosing to shift the risk entirely to one party or the other, or sharing the risk, e.g., by including an equitable adjustment clause that allows for a price adjustment if the variation exceeds a certain threshold. Even with that balance, incorporating opportunities for adjustments can favor more than just the contractor: it creates a disincentive for the contractor to inflate unit prices to hedge against quantity risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of
    Massachusetts SJC Clarifies “Strict Compliance” Standard in Construction Contracts

    NYPD Investigating Two White Flags on
    Microsoft Said to Weigh Multibillion-Dollar Headquarters Revamp

    3 Common Cash Flow Issues That Plague The Construction Industry

    Illinois Court Assesses Factual Nature of Term “Reside” in Determining Duty to Defend

    Cause Still Unclear in March Retaining Wall Collapse on $900M NJ Interchange

    Prospective Additional Insureds May Be Obligated to Arbitrate Coverage Disputes

    Defining a Property Management Agreement

    Homeowner's Mold Claim Denied Due to Spoilation

    Novation Agreements Under Federal Contracts

    Loss Ensuing from Faulty Workmanship Covered

    Hiring the Right Expert For Your Construction Dispute

    The Failure to Pursue a Construction Lien Does Not Create a “Gotcha” Argument

    London's Walkie Talkie Tower Voted Britain's Worst New Building

    Late Notice Kills Insured's Claim for Damage Due to Hurricane

    National Infrastructure Leaders Visit Dallas' Able Pump Station to Tout Benefits of Water Infrastructure Investment

    NY Estimating Consultant Settles $3.1M Government Project Fraud Case

    There’s an Unusual Thing Happening in the Housing Market

    Saudi Arabia Awards Contracts for Megacity Neom’s Worker Housing

    Merger to Create Massive Los Angeles Construction Firm

    Not If, But When: Newly Enacted Virginia Legislation Bans “Pay-If-Paid” Clauses In Construction Contracts

    Another Reason to Love Construction Mediation (Read: Why Mediation Works)

    Firm Sued for Stopping Construction in Indiana Wants Case Tried in Germany

    Neither Designated Work Exclusion nor Pre-Existing Damage Exclusion Defeat Duty to Defend

    Miller Act and “Public Work of the Federal Government”

    Fourth Circuit Clarifies What Qualifies As “Labor” Under The Miller Act

    California Court of Appeal Clarifies Intent of Faulty Workmanship Exclusions

    Effective Strategies for Reinforcing Safety Into Evolving Design Standards

    Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: Known Loss Doctrine & Interpretation of “Occurrence”

    Consider Manner In Which Loan Agreement (Promissory Note) Is Drafted

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2020

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    #4 CDJ Topic: Vita Planning and Landscape Architecture, Inc. v. HKS Architects, Inc.

    New Case Alert: Oregon Supreme Court Prohibits Insurer’s Attempt to Relitigate Insured’s Liability

    UPDATE: Trade Secrets Pact Allows Resumed Work on $2.6B Ga. Battery Plant

    More Regulations for Federal Contractors

    Connecticut Federal District Court Follows Majority Rule on Insurance Policy Anti-Assignment Clauses

    KB Home Names New President of its D.C. Metro Division

    Know When Your Claim “Accrues” or Risk Losing It

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Hold the Pickles, Hold the Lettuce?”

    Court Makes an Unsettling Inference to Find that the Statute of Limitations Bars Claims Arising from a 1997 Northridge Earthquake Settlement

    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    Insurer Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Under Unjust Enrichment Theory

    Quick Note: Procure Worker’s Compensation in the Name of Your Company If You Are a General Contractor

    Court Holds That Insurance Producer Cannot Be Liable for Denial of COVID-19 Business Interruption Claim

    Heat Exposure Safety and Risk Factors

    Renters Trading Size for Frills Fuel U.S. Apartment Boom

    Reversing Itself, West Virginia Supreme Court Holds Construction Defects Are Covered

    GRSM Named Among 2026 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers®

    California Clarifies Its Inverse Condemnation Standard

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home

    Attorneys' Fees Awarded as Part of "Damages Because of Property Damage"