BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts parking structure expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts hospital construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts Subterranean parking expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts mid-rise construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts condominium expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts institutional building expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts landscaping construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts housing expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts multi family housing expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts tract home expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts condominiums expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts casino resort expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts office building expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts Medical building expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts production housing expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts custom home expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts townhome construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts low-income housing expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts concrete tilt-up expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts structural steel construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts custom homes expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts
    Cambridge Massachusetts construction project management expert witnessesCambridge Massachusetts construction code expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts construction expertsCambridge Massachusetts construction expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts architectural expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts roofing and waterproofing expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts expert witness roofing
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Massachusetts Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cambridge Massachusetts

    No state license required for general contracting. Licensure required for plumbing and electrical trades. Companies selling home repair services must be registered with the state.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central Massachusetts Inc
    Local # 2280
    51 Pullman Street
    Worcester, MA 01606

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Massachusetts Home Builders Association
    Local # 2200
    700 Congress St Suite 200
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Boston
    Local # 2220
    700 Congress St. Suite 202
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North East Builders Assn of MA
    Local # 2255
    170 Main St Suite 205
    Tewksbury, MA 01876

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Western Mass
    Local # 2270
    240 Cadwell Dr
    Springfield, MA 01104

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bristol-Norfolk Home Builders Association
    Local # 2211
    65 Neponset Ave Ste 3
    Foxboro, MA 02035

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Association of Cape Cod
    Local # 2230
    9 New Venture Dr #7
    South Dennis, MA 02660

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cambridge Massachusetts


    Manhattan Townhouse Sells for a Record $79.5 Million

    Defective Sprinklers Not Cause of Library Flooding

    Court Upholds Denial of Collapse Coverage Where Building Still Stands

    The Best Laid Plans: Contingency in a Construction Contract

    Arizona Supreme Court Holds a Credit Bid at a Trustee’s Sale Should Not be Credited to a Title Insurer Under a Standard Lender’s Title Policy To the Extent the Bid Exceeds the Collateral’s Fair Market Value

    Contractor Allegedly Injured after Slipping on Black Ice Files Suit

    The Fourth Circuit Applies a Consequential Damages Exclusionary Clause and the Economic Loss Doctrine to Bar Claims by a Subrogating Insurer Seeking to Recover Over $19 Million in Damages

    Claims for Bad Faith and Punitive Damages Survive Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Negligent Misrepresentation Claim Does Not Allege Property Damage, Barring Coverage

    A Few Construction Related Bills to Keep an Eye On in 2023 (UPDATED)

    Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Carbon Monoxide Injuries Caused by One Occurrence

    Breaking Down Homeowners Association Laws In California

    Revisiting the CMO; Are We Overusing the Mediation Privilege?

    How California’s Construction Industry has dealt with the New Indemnity Law

    Should CGL Insurer have Duty to Defend Insured During Chapter 558 Notice of Construction Defects Process???

    Submitting Claims on Government Projects Can Be Tricky

    The Final Nail: Ongoing Repairs Do Not Toll the Statute of Repose

    Insurer's Quote on Coverage for Theft by Hacker Creates Issue of Fact

    Pre-Suit Settlement Offers and Construction Lien Actions

    Ordinary Use of Term In Insurance Policy Prevailed

    Arbitration is Waivable (Even If You Don’t Mean To)

    Guidance for Construction Leaders: How Is the Americans With Disabilities Act Applied During the Pandemic?

    The Right to Repair Act Means What it Says and Says What it Means

    Near-Zero Carbon Cement Powers Sustainable 3D-Printed Homes

    One Word Makes All The Difference – The Distinction Between “Pay If Paid” and “Pay When Paid” Clauses

    California Fears El Nino's Dark Side Will Bring More Trouble

    CA Supreme Court Permits Insurers to Bring Direct Actions Seeking Reimbursement of Excessive Fees Against Cumis Counsel Under Limited Circumstances

    Road to Record $199 Million Award Began With Hunch on Guardrails

    Safe Commercial Asbestos-Removal Practices

    Couple Claims Poor Installation of Home Caused Defects

    A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business

    MSJ Granted Equates to a Huge Victory for BWB&O & City of Murrieta Fire Department!

    California’s Right to Repair Act not an Exclusive Remedy

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tender Is the Fight”

    Trucks looking for Defects Create Social Media Frenzy

    Colorado SB 15-177 UPDATE: Senate Business, Labor, & Technology Committee Refers Construction Defect Reform Bill to Full Senate

    New Jersey Construction Company Owner and Employees Arrested for Fraud

    Toll Brothers Surges on May Gain in Deposits for New Homes

    Cooperation and Collaboration With Government May Be on the Horizon

    New England Construction Defect Law Groups to Combine

    Gordon & Rees Ranks #5 in Top 50 Construction Law Firms in the Nation

    ASCE Statement on Congress Passage of National Debt Limit Suspension

    Ruling Dealing with Constructive Changes, Constructive Suspension, and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

    Ambiguity in Insurance Policy will be Interpreted in Favor of Insurance Coverage

    Travelers’ 3rd Circ. Win Curbs Insurers’ Asbestos Exposure

    Homeowner’s Claims Defeated Because “Gravamen” of Complaint was Fraud, not Breach of Contract

    Emerging Trends in Shortened Statutes of Limitations and Statutes of Repose

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part II
    Corporate Profile

    CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Cambridge, Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Cambridge's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Corporate Transparency Act’s Impact on Real Estate: Reporting Companies, Exemptions and Beneficial Ownership Reporting (webinar)

    December 04, 2023 —
    On October 23, 2023, colleague Andrew Weiner and Kevin Gaunt, counsel at Hunton Andrews Kurth, examined the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), effective Jan. 1, 2024, and its impact on real estate entities and transactions, including who is considered a reporting company subject to new beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirements and whether an exemption applies. The panel also discussed certain state laws that impose similar reporting requirements as the CTA and described best practices for real estate counsel to assist their clients with preparing for the CTA’s implementation and ongoing compliance. The panel also reviewed other important considerations, including:
    1. Which real estate entities will likely be most affected by the CTA’s implementation and why?
    2. What exemptions may apply?
    3. How will the CTA’s reporting requirements affect real estate transactions for lenders and investors/buyers?
      1. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

        Cincinnati Team Secures Summary Judgment for Paving Company in Trip-and-Fall Case

        February 05, 2024 —
        Cincinnati, Ohio (January 25, 2024) - In a recent decision by the Oldham County Circuit Court, Lewis Brisbois Partner Andrew Weber and Associate Jason Paskan obtained summary judgment for a paving company client after successfully arguing that their client did not owe the plaintiff a duty at the time leading up to her trip and fall. Although the court concluded that there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether a parking space wheel stop actually caused her fall, the court noted that whether the wheel stop “constituted an unreasonably dangerous condition necessitating a duty to eliminate them or warn of them is an entirely different matter.” Rebecca Reynolds v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc., et al., Oldham Circuit Court Case No. 21-CI-00236, *6 (Dec. 21, 2023). The plaintiff in Reynolds drove to the hospital with her sister-in-law for medical testing. Id. at * 2. While both had been to the hospital before, due to COVID and construction in the emergency department, they had to take a different entrance into the hospital. Id. In the plaintiff’s attempt to navigate the parking lot, she allegedly tripped over a black wheel stop that was covered by a shadow. Id. The plaintiff sued the hospital as the landowner and the paving company working in the hospital’s parking lot, among others, under the theory that the failure to stripe the wheel stop, closing off spaces with the black wheel stops, or posting warnings about the condition of the parking lot would have prevented her fall. Id. at *2-3. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

        Traub Lieberman Attorneys Lisa M. Rolle, Eric D. Suben, and Justyn Verzillo Secure Dismissal of All Claims in a Premises Liability Case

        November 16, 2023 —
        On an appeal of an order denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in a slip-and-fall action commenced in Kings County Supreme Court, Traub Lieberman attorneys Lisa M. Rolle, Eric D. Suben, and Justyn Verzillo successfully secured dismissal of all claims by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on behalf of Traub Lieberman’s client. The lawsuit sought to recover damages arising out of injuries the Plaintiff allegedly sustained when she slipped and fell in the shower of a rental property owned by the Defendant, a limited liability company. Plaintiff alleged that the subject shower was defective, and the Defendant negligent, based on the absence of non-slip surfacing and grab bars in the shower. Aside from premises liability (negligence), Plaintiffs asserted eight other causes of action, including gross negligence, breach of warranty of habitability, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, alter-ego liability, loss of consortium, and for declaratory judgment. The judge in Supreme Court denied Traub Lieberman’s motion to dismiss on behalf of Defendant, citing as the sole reason that the affidavits submitted with the motion were unsigned, and ignoring Traub Lieberman’s arguments pointing out the glaring facial deficiencies of Plaintiff’s pleading and that the signed affidavits were in fact submitted before the return date. Reprinted courtesy of Lisa M. Rolle, Traub Lieberman, Eric D. Suben, Traub Lieberman and Justyn Verzillo, Traub Lieberman Ms. Rolle may be contacted at lrolle@tlsslaw.com Mr. Suben may be contacted at esuben@tlsslaw.com Mr. Verzillo may be contacted at jverzillo@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

        Carbon Sequestration Can Combat Global Warming, Sometimes in Unexpected Ways

        April 02, 2024 —
        Whether by land, by sea or through human innovation, carbon sequestration is likely coming to (or already happening in) a destination near you. As our planet, overdosed on greenhouse gases, battles climate disasters, a logical solution is to simply stop pumping carbon dioxide into the air. Legislation worldwide is aimed at that target, but reducing output alone may not be enough. There are still billions of tons of extra CO2 already in the atmosphere—this crossroads is where sequestration comes into play. Carbon sequestration is exactly what it sounds like—the storage of CO2. Once carbon is sucked out of the air, or in some cases pulled directly from industrial smokestacks, sequestration can be undertaken in a lot of different ways. Carbon storage happens naturally, when forests and oceans absorb and convert CO2 into organic matter, but carbon dioxide can also be artificially injected into deep underground rock formations (or wells), or in some cases technological approaches repurpose carbon into a resource like concrete, or as a catalyst in a closed-loop industrial system. However it’s accomplished, the point of sequestration is to stabilize carbon and ensure it doesn’t creep back into our atmosphere. Researchers, like those at the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, now say that CO2 removal is vital to keeping global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (past that threshold, climate change could reach catastrophic levels). A 2023 University of Oxford study estimated that, currently, about two billion metric tons of carbon dioxide are being removed each year, primarily through land management (i.e., planting trees), and suggested that we need to double that amount to avoid dangerous global warming levels. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. McDonough, Pillsbury, Robert A. James, Pillsbury and Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury Mr. McDonough may be contacted at michael.mcdonough@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

        Michael Baker Intl. Settles Federal Pay Bias Allegations

        February 26, 2024 —
        Michael Baker International Inc. agreed to pay $122,299 in back wages as part of an agreement with the U.S. Dept. of Labor to resolve allegations that the engineer-consultant paid women in four job titles less than their male counterparts. Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com Read the full story...

        No Damages for Delay May Not Be Enforceable in Virginia

        January 08, 2024 —
        Anyone who reads Construction Law Musings with any regularity (thank you by the way) knows that the contract is king in most instances here in Virginia. Any commercial construction subcontractor in Virginia is likely also very familiar with so-called “no damages for delay” clauses in construction contracts. These clauses essentially state that a subcontractor’s only remedy for a delay caused by any factor beyond its control (including the fault of the general contractor), after proper notice to the general contractor, is an extension of time to complete the work. However, in 2015 the Virginia General Assembly passed a change in the law that precluded the diminishment of any right to claims for demonstrated additional costs prior to payment. This left open the question as to which types of “diminishment” would be barred by the statute. The recent case out of the Eastern District of Virginia federal court, Strata Solar LLC v. Fall Line Construction LLC, added a bit of clarity. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
        Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

        Gaps in Insurance Created by Complex Risks

        January 22, 2024 —
        From slips, trips and falls to extreme weather and cyberattacks, businesses are regularly confronted with risks to operations and profitability. In 2023, elevated building costs, increased flooding, and growing ransomware attacks made it compelling for business owners to make sure they had adequate insurance to stay ahead of property and liability exposures. However, if left unchecked, these trends can lead to gaps in coverage. As 2024 approaches, now is the time to assess your risk and collaborate with the right resources to fill any potential voids in insurance. Economic inflation for example has changed property valuations, which can result in coverage gaps if policyholders have not examined their replacement costs recently. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of The Hartford Staff, The Hartford Insights

        Federal Magistrate Judge Recommends Rescission of Policies

        February 12, 2024 —
        In the recent case of Union Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. 142 Driggs LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220393, Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York recommended granting the insurer's default judgment and holding that of three policies issued to 142 Driggs LLC ("Driggs") be rescinded ab initio. Driggs had represented on its insurance applications that it did not provide parking to anyone other than itself, tenants, and its guests at the subject insured premises. However, Union Mutual learned that Driggs had been renting out three garages to non-tenants. Second, Driggs represented that the mercantile square footage was around 1,000 square feet, when in actuality, it was larger than allowed under the policies. Union Mutual provided underwriting guidelines in connection with its default motion, which state that "parking provided for anyone other than the insured, tenants and their guests," presents an "unacceptable risk." The guidelines also state that answering yes to any "preliminary application questions (which presumably included those regarding mercantile square footage and parking) is an "unacceptable risk." The court held that these guidelines supported a finding that Driggs made material misrepresentation and that Union Mutual relied on these misrepresentations in issuing the policies. The court, as such, recommended that the policies at issue be rescinded from inception. Read the full story...
        Reprinted courtesy of Craig Rokuson, Traub Lieberman
        Mr. Rokuson may be contacted at crokuson@tlsslaw.com