Don’t Spoil Me: Oklahoma District Court Rules Against Spoliation Sanctions
January 08, 2024 —
Kyle Rice - The Subrogation StrategistIn Okla. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Omega Flex, Inc., No. CIV-22-18-D, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197755, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (the District Court) determined spoliation sanctions were not warranted after a home was demolished for repair following a joint scene examination.
The insurer, Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Insurer) provided a policy of insurance to Michael and Sondra Diel (the Diels). On July 11, 2020, the Diels’ home was struck by lightning and their attic caught fire. Following the loss, Insurer retained both counsel and fire origin and cause experts to inspect the Diels’ property. Insurer’s counsel informed in-house counsel for Omega Flex, Inc. (Omega Flex) via a letter dated July 14, 2020, that a preliminary investigation indicated the fire may have been caused by an Omega Flex product—specifically, TracPipe Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing (CSST). Insurer’s counsel invited Omega Flex to inspect the property, noting: “It is anticipated that the loss will exceed $300,000” and stating that any inspection “must be completed during the next two weeks.
At that time, the homeowner will proceed with demolition to rebuild.” (Emphasis added).
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kyle Rice, White and WilliamsMr. Rice may be contacted at
ricek@whiteandwilliams.com
Insurer’s Broad Duty to Defend in Oregon, and the Recent Ruling in State of Oregon v. Pacific Indemnity Company
January 02, 2024 —
Keith Sparks - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCOregon law mandates a broad duty to defend, requiring insurers to provide legal representation to their policyholders whenever there is a potential for coverage under the policy. The significance of this broad interpretation means that an insurer has a duty to defend an insured even in situations where the alleged facts only imply a covered claim, and even in situations where the underlying claim is ultimately not covered by the policy. The insurer’s duty to defend is triggered if the allegations of the complaint, reasonably interpreted, could result in the insured being held liable for damages covered by the policy. This is referred to as the “four-corners” rule; it is also sometimes referred to as the eight-corners rule (for the four corners of the complaint plus the four corners of the policy). Oregon’s adoption of a broad interpretation of the duty to defend affirmatively places the onus on insurers to err on the side of coverage.
This broad duty to defend is based on the principle that an insured should not have to bear the expense of defending a lawsuit that the insurer may ultimately have to pay for. The duty to defend is also important because it helps ensure that insureds have access to legal representation when faced with a lawsuit.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Keith Sparks, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCMr. Sparks may be contacted at
keith.sparks@acslawyers.com
Former NYC Condo Empire Executive Arrested for Larceny, Tax Fraud
March 11, 2024 —
Ava Benny-Morrison - BloombergA former New York executive facing lawsuits over the collapse of real estate empire HFZ Capital Group has been arrested in Miami, charged with grand larceny and tax fraud.
Nir Meir, 48, was arrested Monday, a spokesperson for the Miami-Dade Police Department confirmed. Meir was detained on an out-of-state warrant, suggesting his arrest may be the result of an investigation by law enforcement in New York.
A spokesperson for the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. Meir’s attorney also didn’t immediately respond to an email.
Meir, the former managing principal of HFZ Capital Group, has been battling multiple lawsuits in New York over his involvement in the once-prominent real estate firm. He’s denied wrongdoing.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ava Benny-Morrison, Bloomberg
Hawaii Supreme Court Bars Insurers from Billing Policyholders for Uncovered Defense Costs
April 23, 2024 —
Amanda C. Stefanatos - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Across the country, there is a split in authority as to whether an insurance company should be allowed to recoup defense costs where it is ultimately determined that the carrier has no duty to defend under the policy and the policy is silent as to such reimbursement. The Hawaii Supreme Court is the latest to enter the fray to address this very question, ruling in favor of policyholders in the recent case of
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Bodell Construction Company.
Facts of the Case and Procedural History
The Bodell case arose in response to a pair of certified questions from the US District Court for Hawaii to the Hawaii Supreme Court. The case involved a group of primary and excess insurers that sold liability policies to Bodell Construction and sought reimbursement of defense costs that the insurers had paid to defend a construction defect claim against Bodell. In the Underlying Action, the District Court ultimately ruled that the claims against Bodell Construction were not covered under the policies. Because the claims were not covered, the insurers demanded reimbursement of the defense fees from Bodell . Having determined there was no Hawaii state law on this issue, and in light of conflicting decisions in the district courts, the US District Court for Hawaii requested guidance from the Hawaii Supreme Court.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Amanda C. Stefanatos, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Ms. Stefanatos may be contacted at
AStefanatos@sdvlaw.com
Graham & Who May Trigger The Need To Protest
December 23, 2023 —
Hugo Fraga - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCOn May 30, 2023, the Washington Court of Appeals, Division I, issued a decision that appears to expand a contractor’s obligation with respect to WSDOT notice and claim procedures. In
Graham Contracting, Ltd. v. City of Federal Way, No. 83494-1-I, 2023 WL 3721171 (Wash. Ct. App. May 30, 2023) (Unpublished), the Court held that under the 2016 WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (“Standard Specifications”), a Contractor must protest the actions of not only the “Engineer” but also the actions of any person or organization acting on behalf of the Owner.
This case arises out of a public construction contract in which Graham Contracting Ltd (“Graham”) built a multi-million dollar roadway improvement for the City of Federal Way along a stretch of Pacific Highway. The appeal was from the trial court’s granting of the City’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss claims by Graham for extra time and money due to delays and impacts to Graham’s construction of the Project.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Hugo Fraga, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCMr. Fraga may be contacted at
hugo.fraga@acslawyers.com
Insurance Litigation Roundup: “Post No Bills!”
April 02, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyA company which is in the business of posting “advertising signs on temporary construction sites on behalf of clients” was “sued for trespass, conversion, and other torts” when it entered a site to remove posters. The company sought to have its insurance carrier cover the cost of its defense but was refused. A federal court lawsuit in California against the insurer ensued. The insurer prevailed on a Rule 12 motion to dismiss, and the insured appealed.
At issue: had an “occurrence” under the CGL policy taken place – that is, an “accident,” an “unexpected, unforeseen, or undesigned happening or consequence from either a known or unknown cause?” The appellate court noted that the company’s contractor “intended” to enter the work site and remove posters, which gave rise to the trespass claim. For its part, the company urged that the contractor’s actions “were based on erroneous information… [a] mistaken belief that it had the right or duty to enter the site and remove the posters….”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Recognized in 2024 Best Law Firm® Rankings
November 16, 2023 —
David M. McLain – Colorado Construction Litigation BlogWe are thrilled to announce that Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC (“HHMR”) has been recognized in the 2024 Best Law Firm® rankings. Our firm has been placed in Metro Tier 2 in Colorado for Construction Law, a testament to our unwavering commitment to providing top-tier legal services.
At HHMR, we pride ourselves on our expertise in construction law and the litigation of construction-related claims. Our team of dedicated attorneys is well-versed and experienced in tort, contract, property, and general casualty litigation. This recognition by Best Lawyers affirms our dedication to serving our clients selflessly and to the best of our ability.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & RoswellMr. McLain may be contacted at
mclain@hhmrlaw.com
Homebuilders Are Fighting Green Building. Homeowners Will Pay.
April 22, 2024 —
Mark Gongloff - BloombergBack in the 1990s, political guru James Carville said he wanted to be reincarnated as the bond market because it could “intimidate everybody.” Here in the 2020s, you might prefer to come back as a homebuilder. The industry has the political muscle to protect its profits at the expense of both homeowne
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/24/24) – Long-Term Housing Issues in Hawaii, Underperforming REITs, and Growth in a Subset of the Hotel SectorIgnoring Employee ADA Accommodation Requests Can Be Costly – A Cautionary TaleIllinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation ClaimEx-Turner Exec Gets 46 Months for Bloomberg Construction BribesAnti-Concurrent Causation Clause Eliminates Loss from HurricaneFifth Circuit Finds Duty to Defend Construction Defect CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Strikes a Deathblow to Substantial Factor Causation in Most Cases; Is Asbestos Litigation Next?CDJ’s Year-End Re
Creating a Custom Home Feature in the Great Outdoors
Effective October 1, 2019, Florida General Contractors Have a Statutory Right to Recovery of Attorney Fees Against a Defaulted Subcontractor’s Surety
Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction
New Standard Addresses Wind Turbine Construction Safety Requirements and Identifies Hazards
Firm Pays $8.4M to Settle Hurricane Restoration Contract Case
Brief Overview of Rights of Unlicensed Contractors in California
Lennar Profit Tops Estimates as Home Prices Increase
Tejon Ranch Co. Announces Settlement of Litigation Related to the Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement
Arizona Supreme Court Confirms a Prevailing Homeowner Can Recover Fees on Implied Warranty Claims
There's No Such Thing as a Free House
Tennessee Looks to Define Improvements to Real Property
Texas Supreme Court: Breach of Contract Not Required to Prevail on Statutory Bad Faith Claim
Never, Ever, Ever Assume! (Or, How a Stuck Shoe is Like a Construction Project Assumption)
Contractors and Force Majeure: Contractual Protection from Hurricanes and Severe Weather
BHA Has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports NCHV and Final Salute at 2017 WCC Seminar
Architectural Firm, Fired by School District, Launches Lawsuit
Construction Industry Survey Says Optimism Hits All-Time High
When Do Hard-Nosed Negotiations Become Coercion? Or, When Should You Feel Unlucky?
Owner’s Obligation Giving Notice to Cure to Contractor and Analyzing Repair Protocol
Breach of Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect Claim
Travelers Insurance Sues Chicago for $26M in Damages to Willis Tower
What You Don’t Know About Construction Law Can Hurt Your Engineering Firm (Law Note)
Challenging Enforceability of Liquidated Damages (In Federal Construction Context)
That’s not the way we’ve always done it! (Why you should update your office practices)
Construction Law- Where Pragmatism and Law Collide
Zombie Foreclosures Plaguing Various Cities in the U.S.
Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part I
Court Rejects Anti-SLAPP Motion in Construction Defect Suit
Hunton Insurance Practice Again Scores “Tier 1” National Ranking in US News Best Law Firm Rankings
What You Need to Know About the Recently Enacted Infrastructure Bill
7 Ways Technology is Changing Construction (guest post)
A DC Office Building Offers a Lesson in Glass and Sculpture
Nevada Supreme Court Declares Subcontractor Not Required to Provide Pre-Litigation Notice to Supplier
Contrasting Expert Opinions Result in Denial of Cross Motions for Summary Judgment
The Multigenerational Housing Trend
Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding
New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation
Bridge Disaster - Italy’s Moment of Truth
Mitigating FCRA Risk Through Insurance
Distinguishing Hawaii Law, New Jersey Finds Anti-Assignment Clause Ineffective
Montana Court Finds Duty to Defend over Construction Defect Allegation
The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver
EPA Announces Decision to Retain Current Position on RCRA Regulation of Oil and Gas Production Wastes
Federal Court Reiterates Broad Duty to Defend in Additional Insured Cases
AB5 Construction Exemption - A Checklist to Avoid Application of AB5's Three-Part Test
California Clarifies Its Inverse Condemnation Standard
What The U.S. Can Learn from China to Bring Its Buildings to New Heights
Wells Fargo Shuns Peers’ Settlement in U.S in Mortgage
Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (08/10/22)
Shifting Fees and Costs in Nevada Construction Defect Cases
