BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Bedford Wyoming condominium expert witness Bedford Wyoming custom homes expert witness Bedford Wyoming production housing expert witness Bedford Wyoming hospital construction expert witness Bedford Wyoming industrial building expert witness Bedford Wyoming multi family housing expert witness Bedford Wyoming institutional building expert witness Bedford Wyoming casino resort expert witness Bedford Wyoming Subterranean parking expert witness Bedford Wyoming condominiums expert witness Bedford Wyoming retail construction expert witness Bedford Wyoming parking structure expert witness Bedford Wyoming concrete tilt-up expert witness Bedford Wyoming tract home expert witness Bedford Wyoming Medical building expert witness Bedford Wyoming structural steel construction expert witness Bedford Wyoming mid-rise construction expert witness Bedford Wyoming office building expert witness Bedford Wyoming low-income housing expert witness Bedford Wyoming townhome construction expert witness Bedford Wyoming housing expert witness Bedford Wyoming
    Bedford Wyoming ada design expert witnessBedford Wyoming reconstruction expert witnessBedford Wyoming civil engineer expert witnessBedford Wyoming engineering expert witnessBedford Wyoming structural engineering expert witnessesBedford Wyoming structural concrete expertBedford Wyoming multi family design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Bedford, Wyoming

    Wyoming Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Bedford Wyoming

    State license is required for electrical trades only. All other licensing is done at the local level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Converse Co Chapter
    Local # 5230
    PO Box 714 739 East Antelope Road
    Douglas, WY 82633
    Bedford Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southeast Wyoming Builders Association
    Local # 5210
    1819 Warren Avenue
    Cheyenne, WY 82001

    Bedford Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wyoming Home Builders Association
    Local # 5200
    PO Box 646
    Sheridan, WY 82801
    Bedford Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Big Horn Home Builders Association
    Local # 5250
    23 North Scott Ste 14
    Sheridan, WY 82801

    Bedford Wyoming Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Bedford Wyoming


    Construction Defects Lead to “A Pretty Shocking Sight”

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    Hawaii Supreme Court Bars Insurers from Billing Policyholders for Uncovered Defense Costs

    Preliminary Notices: Common Avoidable But Fatal Mistakes

    Flood Sublimits Do Not Apply to Loss Caused by Named Windstorm

    American Roads Are Paved With Inefficiency

    State Farm to Build Multi-Use Complex in Dallas Area

    Construction Law Alert: Builder’s Alternative Pre-litigation Procedures Upheld Over Strong Opposition

    Vincent Alexander Named to Florida Trend’s Legal Elite

    OSHA Reinforces COVID Guidelines for the Workplace

    Kiewit and Two Ex-Managers Face Canada Jobsite Fatality Criminal Trial

    Nondelegable Duties

    HHMR and Every One of its Partners Recognized by Legal 500 in Denver Elite – Real Estate

    Genuine Dispute Over Cause of Damage and Insureds’ Demolition Before Inspection Negate Bad Faith and Elder Abuse Claims

    New York Philharmonic Will Open Geffen Hall Two Years Ahead of Schedule

    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    The Right to Repair Act Means What it Says and Says What it Means

    Where There's Smoke...California's New Emergency Wildfire Smoke Protection Regulation And What Employers Are Required To Do

    Can an Owner Preemptively Avoid a Mechanics Lien?

    Almost Nothing Is Impossible

    Sanctions Award Against Pro Se Plaintiff Upheld

    Legal Matters Escalate in Aspen Condo Case

    Carroll Brock of Larchmont Homes Dies at Age 88

    Bill Introduced to give Colorado Shortest Statute of Repose in U.S.

    White And Williams Celebrates Chambers USA Guide 2025 Rankings

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2021 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!

    California Department of Corrections Gets Hit With the Prison Bid Protest Blues

    Construction Expert and Judge Living in the Same Hood Is Not Grounds For Recusal

    Construction Contract Provisions that Should Pique Your Interest

    Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment in Leaky Condo Conversion

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (11/02/22) – Flexible Workspaces, Sustainable Infrastructure, & Construction Tech

    The Best Lawyers in America© Peer Review Names Eight Newmeyer & Dillion Partners in Multiple Categories and Two Partners as Orange County’s Lawyers of the Year in Construction and Insurance Law

    Florida's Third DCA Reasserts the Teeth of Chapter 558 and the Future of Construction Defect Litigation

    Measure Of Damages for Breach of Construction Contract

    Three White and Williams Lawyers Named Top Lawyers by Delaware Today

    FirstEnergy Fined $3.9M in Scandal Involving Nuke Plants

    Land a Cause of Home Building Shortage?

    Almost Half of Homes in New York and D.C. Are Now Losing Value

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Insurer Must Defend Oil Company Against Entire Lawsuit

    Windstorm Exclusion Found Ambiguous

    California Supreme Court Holds that Requirement of Prejudice for Late Notice Defense is a Fundamental Public Policy of the State for Choice of Law Analysis

    So, You Have a Judgment Against a California Contractor or Subcontractor. What Next? How Can I Enforce Payment?

    Homebuilding in Las Vegas Slows but Doesn’t Fall

    Biden Administration Issues Buy America Guidance for Federal Infrastructure Funds

    Hawaii Federal District Court Rejects Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Construction Defect Claims

    Just Because You Allege There Was an Oral Contract Doesn’t Mean You’re Off the Hook for Attorneys’ Fees if you Lose

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 38 White and Williams Lawyers

    Recent Environmental Cases: Something in the Water, in the Air and in the Woods

    Snell & Wilmer Partner Jonathan Frank Named Winner of 2025 Connect CRE’s Lawyers in Real Estate Award

    Gibbs Giden is Pleased to Announce Four New Partners and Two New Associates
    Corporate Profile

    BEDFORD WYOMING CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Bedford, Wyoming Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Bedford, Wyoming

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    June 15, 2026 —
    Most, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees. But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”

    October 06, 2026 —
    A recent federal district court opinion, Sauer Construction, LLC v. United Structures of Georgia, LLC, 2026 WL 2522849 (M.D.Fla. 2026), addressed two worthy considerations when it comes to a Miller Act payment bond claim. And, when I am talking about considerations, I am really talking about “no-nos.” These are things you don’t do. First, don’t file an untimely Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. Make sure, as a claimant, you file that lawsuit within one year from your final furnishing. In this case, the subcontractor claimant did not and tried to argue around the statute of limitations with an equitable tolling argument, i.e., that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled to accommodate the late filing of the lawsuit. Guess what? The subcontractor was not successful. You are fighting an uphill (losing) battle when arguing equitable tolling because “traditional equitable tolling principles require that the claimant demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, such as fraud, misinformation, or deliberate concealment.” Sauer Construction, supra. This means you need ultra-persuasive evidence to support such equitable tolling principles. Actually, having this evidence is doubtful. Thus, timely file the Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. There is no legitimate reason not to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

    June 29, 2026 —
    Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    The ROI of Estimating Accuracy in Preconstruction

    September 15, 2026 —
    Precision is the foundation of profitability in construction. Even minor quantity or pricing mistakes can swing bids anywhere from 5-15%, leading to project delays, unprofitable jobs or margin erosion through change orders. And worse, these losses can damage client trust and jeopardize long-term relationships that drive repeat business and future bids. Consistently estimating accurately builds confidence, speeds up bidding and positions your company to win more profitable projects. Estimating accuracy is where profit is either protected or lost. In construction, you make your biggest financial decisions before a project ever starts. Once a bid is won, most of the project’s cost structure is locked in. If the estimate is wrong, no amount of execution can fully fix those mistakes. That makes estimating accuracy a business issue, not just an operations issue. Reprinted courtesy of Aaron Kivett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Special Counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters Appointed Chair of the ABA’s Commission on Women in the Profession

    October 06, 2026 —
    Special counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters was recently appointed as the chair of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Women in the Profession. Established in 1987, the Commission was created to assess the status of women in the legal sector and remove barriers to their professional advancement. As chair, Lorie will lead a 12-member roster of commissioners, and a panel of special advisers, dedicated to ensuring equal participation and systemic equity for women lawyers across the justice system and pursuing various studies to identify issues uniquely facing women in the profession, including disparate treatment, training and recruitment, parenting, and other issues. Most recently, the Commission in late July 2026 issued a groundbreaking study about issues affecting the mental health and well-being of women lawyers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com