BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin Subterranean parking expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin housing expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin condominium expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin production housing expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin custom home expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Ogdensburg Wisconsin
    Ogdensburg Wisconsin building consultant expertOgdensburg Wisconsin expert witnesses fenestrationOgdensburg Wisconsin construction cost estimating expert witnessOgdensburg Wisconsin construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessOgdensburg Wisconsin structural concrete expertOgdensburg Wisconsin OSHA expert witness constructionOgdensburg Wisconsin contractor expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ogdensburg, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ogdensburg Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Brown County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5124
    PO Box 13194 811 Packerland Drive
    Green Bay, WI 54307

    Ogdensburg Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Golden Sands Home Builders Association
    Local # 5118
    1001 Theater Dr
    Plover, WI 54467

    Ogdensburg Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Wisc Home Builders Association
    Local # 5180
    2135 8th Street S
    Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494

    Ogdensburg Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5168
    920 W Association Dr
    Appleton, WI 54914

    Ogdensburg Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wolf River Builders Association
    Local # 5193
    PO Box 595
    Shawano, WI 54166
    Ogdensburg Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703

    Ogdensburg Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Ogdensburg Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ogdensburg Wisconsin


    Construction Warranties: Have You Seen Me Lately?

    Significant Increase in Colorado Tort Damages Caps Now in Effect Under Recent Legislation

    Insurer Fails to Establish Prejudice Due to Late Notice

    Wyoming Supreme Court Picks a Side After Reviewing the Sutton Rule

    John Aho: Engineer Pushed for Seismic Safety in Alaska Ahead of 2018 Earthquake

    Is Performance Bond Liable for Delay Damages?

    KY Mining Accident Not a Covered Occurrence Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    Back to Basics – Differing Site Conditions

    Federal Court Opinion Has Huge Impact on the Construction Industry

    BLOK, a Wired UK Hottest 100 Housing Market Startup, Gets Funding from a Renowned Group of Investors

    Navigating Construction Defect Claims and Statutes of Limitation: Key Lessons from Stoecklein v. Fayette Farms

    The Air in There: Offices, and Issues, That Seem to Make Us Stupid

    GAO Sustains Unsupported Past Performance Evaluation and Unequal Discussion Bid Protest

    Pulte’s Kitchen Innovation Throw Down

    Insurance Client Alert: Mere Mailing of Policy and Renewals Into California is Not Sufficient Basis for Jurisdiction Over Bad Faith Lawsuit

    California Bullet Train Clears Federal Environmental Approval

    White House’s New Draft Guidance Limiting NEPA Review of Greenhouse Gas Impacts Is Not So New or Limiting

    Structural Problems May Cause Year-Long Delay Opening New Orleans School

    Seattle Condos, Close to Waterfront, Construction Defects Included

    Updated 3/13/20: Coronavirus is Here: What Does That Mean for Your Project and Your Business?

    The California Legislature Passes SB 496 Limiting Design Professional Defense and Indemnity Obligations

    CISA Clarifies – Construction is Part of Critical Infrastructure Activities

    Making the Construction Industry a Safer place for Women

    Contractors Prepare for a Strong 2021 Despite Unpredictability

    You Cannot Always Contract Your Way Out of a Problem (The Case for Dispute Resolution in Mega and Large Complex Construction Projects)

    Significant Issues Test Applies to Fraudulent Claims to Determine Attorney’s Fees

    Following Mishaps, D.C. Metro Presses on With Repairs

    California Fears El Nino's Dark Side Will Bring More Trouble

    President Trump Implements Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

    Federal Government Partial Shutdown – Picking Up the Pieces

    New York Appellate Court Applies Broad Duty to Defend to Property Damage Case

    Excess Carrier's Declaratory Judgment Action Stayed While Underlying Case Still Pending

    Newmeyer Dillion Named 2023 Best Law Firm in Multiple Practice Areas By U.S. News-Best Lawyers

    The “Your Work” Exclusion—Is there a Trend against Coverage?

    Ireland Said to Plan Home Loans Limits to Prevent Bubble

    Second Circuit Court Differentiates the Standard for Determining Evident Partiality for a Neutral Arbitrator and a Party-Appointed Arbitrator

    Couple Claims Poor Installation of Home Caused Defects

    State Farm to Build Multi-Use Complex in Dallas Area

    Using Lien and Bond Claims to Secure Project Payments

    Goldberg Segalla Welcomes William L. Nimick

    How You Plead Allegations to Trigger Liability Insurer’s Duties Is Critical

    Todd Ehrenreich Inducted as Fellow of International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    WSDOT Seeks Retraction of Waiver Excluding Non-Minority Woman-Owned Businesses from Participation Goals

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Selected to Best Lawyers in America© Orange County and as Attorneys of the Year 2018

    Breach Of Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Packaged With Contract Disputes Act Claim

    DE Confirms Robust D&O Protection Despite Company Demise

    Court of Appeal Holds That Higher-Tiered Party on Construction Project Can be Held Liable for Intentional Interference with Contract

    Three Key Takeaways from Recent Hotel Website ADA Litigation

    Expert Can be Questioned on a Construction Standard, Even if Not Relied Upon

    Homebuilding Design Goes 3D
    itemprop="name">Court Upholds Plan to Eliminate Vehicles from Balboa Park Complex

    Carillion Fallout Affects Major Hospital Project in Liverpool

    This New Indicator Shows There's No Bubble Forming in U.S. Housing

    The Oregon Tort Claims Act (“OTCA”) Applies When a Duty Arises from Statute or Common Law and is Independent from The Terms of a Specific Contract. (OR)
    Corporate Profile

    OGDENSBURG WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Ogdensburg, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Ogdensburg's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ogdensburg, Wisconsin

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    July 20, 2026 —
    The Utah Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed, in the construction context, Utah’s strict approach to enforcing integration clauses to preclude parol evidence and other legal theories that would vary the written terms of a contract. In Reid v. All Surface LC, 2025 UT App 134, decided last September, the court affirmed in all respects the trial court’s grant of summary judgment based on the strength of an integration clause against a homeowner who sued a contractor for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, civil conspiracy, negligence, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. More recently, however, the same court rejected those same arguments in Tidwell v. Jensen, 2026 UT App 13 as to tort claims arising from a used car sale. The facts in Reid were sympathetic to the plaintiff. After being told she had a mold issue near a defective basement shower, the plaintiff solicited bids. A remediation contractor advised that while it could address the mold, the shower replacement should be handled by someone else. The plaintiff contacted All Surface LC, a shower replacement contractor. During an interview, the sales representative stated that All Surface could “do full mold remediation, tear everything out, and reframe the shower.” The plaintiff ultimately retained All Surface, expecting it would both resolve the mold issues and replace the shower. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark O. Morris, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Morris may be contacted at mmorris@swlaw.com

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

    April 20, 2026 —
    The court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026). Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds. Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    BWB&O is proud to announce that Reno Partner Karen Baytosh received a significant victory on behalf of the firm’s Developer Client in a high-exposure personal injury matter. Plaintiff, a teenager, was struck by an intoxicated driver while walking her dog at night, sustaining catastrophic injuries requiring 24-hour critical care for the remainder of her life. Plaintiff’s Guardian brought suit against the drunk driver and her husband, the City, and BWB&O’s Developer Clients, alleging that the City and Developers failed to improve street lighting and install a sidewalk that would have prevented the accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    August 03, 2026 —
    When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Damage from Frozen Pipes Excluded from Coverage

    March 31, 2026 —
    Applying Texas law, the federal district court found there was no coverage for damage to the insured’s commercial building due to the bursting of frozen pipes. Barona v. State Farm Lloyds, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 257379 (S.D. Texas Dec. 12, 2025). Freezing weather froze Barona’s plumbing fixtures, causing significant water damage to the commercial property when the plumbing eventually expanded and burst. State Farm sent an inspector. During the inspection, Barona stated that he turned off the heat to his building but did not shut off the water supply or drain the pipes. State Farm denied covered based on the policy’s exclusion for frozen plumbing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com