BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Merrill Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Merrill Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Merrill Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Merrill Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Merrill Wisconsin housing expert witness Merrill Wisconsin office building expert witness Merrill Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Merrill Wisconsin multi family housing expert witness Merrill Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Merrill Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Merrill Wisconsin condominiums expert witness Merrill Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Merrill Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Merrill Wisconsin condominium expert witness Merrill Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Merrill Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Merrill Wisconsin tract home expert witness Merrill Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Merrill Wisconsin production housing expert witness Merrill Wisconsin custom home expert witness Merrill Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Merrill Wisconsin
    Merrill Wisconsin testifying construction expert witnessMerrill Wisconsin engineering expert witnessMerrill Wisconsin engineering consultantMerrill Wisconsin construction defect expert witnessMerrill Wisconsin construction expert witness public projectsMerrill Wisconsin forensic architectMerrill Wisconsin structural concrete expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Merrill, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Merrill Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Merrill Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868

    Merrill Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Merrill Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Merrill Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703

    Merrill Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wolf River Builders Association
    Local # 5193
    PO Box 595
    Shawano, WI 54166
    Merrill Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 5196
    PO Box 1074
    Minocqua, WI 54548

    Merrill Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Merrill Wisconsin


    Navigating Construction Defect Claims and Statutes of Limitation: Key Lessons from Stoecklein v. Fayette Farms

    Amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – Expert Testimony

    Power & Energy - Emerging Insurance Coverage Cases of Interest

    Pillsbury Insights – Navigating the Real Estate Market During COVID-19

    A Few Construction Related Bills to Keep an Eye On in 2023 (UPDATED)

    Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision

    Chicago Debt Document Says $8.5B O'Hare Revamp May Be Delayed

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    Need to Cover Yourself for “Crisis” Changes on a Job Site? Try These Tips (guest post)

    Illinois Non-Profit Sues over Defective Roof

    Congratulations to Associate Madeline Arcellana on Her Selection as a Top Rank Attorney in Southern Nevada!

    NY Court Holds Excess Liability Coverage Could Never be Triggered Where Employers’ Liability Policy Provided Unlimited Insurance Coverage

    The “Unavailability Exception” is Unavailable to Policyholders, According to New York Court of Appeals

    Appellate Court Reinforces When the Attorney-Client Relationship Ends for Purposes of “Continuous Representation” Tolling Provision of Legal Malpractice Statute of Limitations

    No Bad Faith in Insurer's Denial of Collapse Claim

    The Who/What/How of Sealing Plans for Architects and Engineers (Law Note)

    Sources of Insurance Recovery for Emerging PFAS Claims

    60-Mile-Long Drone Inspection Flight Points to the Future

    Update to Washington State Covid-19 Guidance

    Miller Act Claim for Unsigned Change Orders

    Pennsylvania Federal Court Confirms: Construction Defect Claims Not Covered by CGL Policies

    Texas Court Construes Breach of Contract Exclusion Narrowly in Duty-to-Defend Case

    Coverage Found for Faulty Workmanship Damaging Other Property

    Haight’s San Diego Office is Growing with the Addition of New Attorneys

    Looking for a Way Out

    Expert Excluded After Never Viewing Damaged Property

    Lack of Credibility Can Destroy a Claim

    Rebuilding in Fire-Damaged Los Angeles One Year Later

    Time Is Money on Construction Projects and Categories of Delay

    Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Claims under Fair Claims Settlement Act Survives Summary Judgment

    Predicting Our Future with Andrew Weinreich

    California Mechanics’ Lien Case Treads Both Old and New Ground

    Unlicensed Contractor Shoots for the Stars . . . Sputters on Takeoff

    Lucky No. 7: Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Issues Pro-Policyholder Decision Regarding Additional Insured Coverage for Upstream Parties

    Skipping Depositions does not Constitute Failure to Cooperate in New York

    Unlocking the Potential of AI and Chat GBT in Construction Management

    Texas Supreme Court Holds Anadarko’s $100M Deepwater Horizon Defense Costs Are Not Subject To Joint Venture Liability Limits

    Rachel Reynolds Selected as Prime Member of ADTA

    You’re Only as Good as Those with Whom You Contract

    Union THUGS Plead Guilty

    Gloria Gaynor Sues Contractor over Defective Deck Construction

    Construction Defect Leads to Death, Jury Awards $39 Million

    Changes to Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act in New York Introduced

    Quick Note: Attorney’s Fees on Attorney’s Fees

    Substitute Materials — What Are Your Duties? What Are Your Risks? (Law Note)

    Circumstances In Which Design Professional Has Construction Lien Rights

    From Ashes to Action: LA Fire Recovery Enters New Phase

    Wendel Rosen Attorneys Named as Fellows of the Construction Lawyers Society of America

    Builders Arrested after Building Collapses in India

    Evergrande’s Condemned Towers on China’s Hawaii Show Threat
    >

    What California’s COVID-19 Reopening Means for the Construction Industry

    Insurance Client Alert: Denial of Summary Judgment Does Not Automatically Establish Duty to Defend

    What is the Implied Warranty of Habitability?

    New York City Construction: Boom Times Again?

    Deferred Maintenance?

    Hotel Claims Construction Defect Could Have Caused Collapse

    NIST Florida Condo Collapse Probe Develops Dozens of Hypotheses

    Congratulations to Haight’s 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers

    Forget Palm Springs—Santa Fe Is the New Mecca for Modern Architecture

    Transition Study a Condo Board’s First Defense against Construction Defects

    Canada Cooler Housing Market Boosts Poloz’s Soft Landing

    Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Expands into Georgia

    NYC Shuts 9 Pre-Kindergartens for Health, Safety Issues

    Lower Manhattan Condos Rival Midtown’s Luxury Skyscrapers

    Insurers Can Sue One Another for Defense Costs on Equitable Indemnity and Equitable Contribution Basis

    Claim for Collapse After Demolition of Building Fails

    The Legal 500 U.S. 2024 Guide Names Peckar & Abramson a Top Tier Firm in Construction Law and Recognizes Nine Attorneys

    Wisconsin High Court Rejects Insurer’s Misuse of “Other Insurance” Provision
    Corporate Profile

    MERRILL WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Merrill, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Merrill's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Merrill, Wisconsin

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage

    July 06, 2026 —
    The general contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment successfully established that damage to footings in place before the policy period was covered after the collapse of a building. Big D Builders, Inc. v. Am Zurich Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72012 (D. Idaho March 31, 2026). Big D was the general contractor for building a new airplane hangar by erecting a 38,000 square foot structure. Before Big D began construction, the site of the hangar did not contain any pre-existing structures or buildings. Before completion of the hangar, it collapsed and caused extensive property damage. The builder’s risk policy issued by Zurich covered certain aspects of the construction project for the policy period December 28, 2023, to December 28, 2024. Zurich accepted coverage for most of the damage but not for damage to footings and columns installed prior to the start date of the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Five Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers

    March 10, 2026 —
    Five Payne & Fears attorneys have been named to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers list in recognition of their work across a range of practice areas. This honor reflects their dedication to their clients, depth of experience, and the high standard of service they bring to every matter. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    April 14, 2026 —
    The ownership and licensing of design documents in professional services agreements play a significant role in protecting the interests of the design professional and the project owner during and after project completion. The ownership or licensing of the drawings provision typically outlines who owns the drawings and specifications, who can use the documents, and how the documents can be used during and after the project. Project owners and developers should understand that payment for design services does not automatically transfer ownership or an exclusive right to use the professional design. Under U.S. copyright law, the default rule is that the design professional retains ownership of the instruments of service absent a contractual provision transferring ownership or a license. See 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act provides that copyright protection applies to “pictorial, graphic and sculptural works” and includes “architectural works.” 17 U.S.C. § 102. A design professional may only transfer copyright ownership in writing. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Abby Dvorkin, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Dvorkin may be contacted at advorkin@swlaw.com

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    April 20, 2026 —
    For 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve. What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results. This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insufficient Notice of Commencement and Construction Lien Rights

    August 03, 2026 —
    When a party is preserving their construction lien rights, the party will look to the recorded Notice of Commencement. This is the recorded document that provides the lienor with the information for purposes of preserving construction lien rights. A Notice to Owner company will typically rely on the Notice of Commencement to serve Notices to Owners from lower tiers not in contract with the owner. However, when it comes to preparing the lien, a lienor should look beyond just the Notice of Commencement and also look to the property appraiser’s website as a backstop. In a recent case, a window company had the homeowner sign the Notice of Commencement and then filled in the information. The company naturally did this for the convenience of the homeowner that probably was unfamiliar with the Notice of Commencement process. Regardless, information in the Notice of Commencement was inaccurate. It failed to include all the real property owners. Thus, when a payment dispute arose and a construction lien was prepared, it did not identify all of the real property owners. All of the real property owners were added later during the pendency of a lien foreclosure lawsuit. The trial court denied the lien because of the defective / insufficient Notice of Commencement — the lienor assumed the risk of error by filling out the information in the Notice of Commencement. The trial court further denied the lien holding that because the work did not commence within 90 days of the Notice of Commencement, the Notice of Commencement is void. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Law Prompts ABC Minnesota/North Dakota to Design New Telecommunications Safety Training Program

    June 29, 2026 —
    On the first day of the year, a Minnesota law requiring installers of underground telecommunication infrastructure broadband, fiber or phone lines (when projects utilize directional drilling, and/or work is being conducted within 10 feet of existing utilities) to undergo a 40-hour certification went into effect. Originally passed in mid-2024 and proposed to go into effect in July 2025, the law’s requirements were postponed until January 2026, giving ABC Minnesota/North Dakota—in partnership with NCCER and the Minnesota Cable Communications Association—time to roll out their Safety Qualified Underground Telecommunications Installer training program, which would ensure the workforce of their contractor members were certified. Reprinted courtesy of Grace Calengor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...