BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin office building expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin high-rise construction expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin structural steel construction expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin concrete tilt-up expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin landscaping construction expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin townhome construction expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin condominium expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin retail construction expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin hospital construction expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin housing expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin tract home expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin parking structure expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin low-income housing expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin casino resort expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin industrial building expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin institutional building expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin production housing expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin Medical building expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin custom homes expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin mid-rise construction expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin custom home expert witness Dunbar Wisconsin
    Dunbar Wisconsin construction project management expert witnessesDunbar Wisconsin expert witness windowsDunbar Wisconsin expert witness roofingDunbar Wisconsin construction expert testimonyDunbar Wisconsin fenestration expert witnessDunbar Wisconsin construction expert witness consultantDunbar Wisconsin building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Dunbar, Wisconsin

    Wisconsin Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB448 specifies 90 day notice with details and evidence prior to commencing legal action. It provides for a 15 day written response from contractor or 25 days if cross-claims against subcontractors; The law states “The claimant and contractor or supplier are bound by any contractor or supplier warranty terms pertaining to products or services supplied for the dwelling.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Dunbar Wisconsin

    Contractors are required to have the correct credentials for their trade. Not all classifications require credentialing. For a list of credentials, see the website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Heart of the North Builders Association
    Local # 5137
    PO Box 6
    Rice Lake, WI 54868

    Dunbar Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Headwaters Builders Association
    Local # 5196
    PO Box 1074
    Minocqua, WI 54548

    Dunbar Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northland Area Builders Association
    Local # 5135
    29148 Mail Rd
    Danbury, WI 54830

    Dunbar Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wausau Area Builders Association
    Local # 5172
    141 W Thomas St
    Wausau, WI 54401

    Dunbar Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    St Croix Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5182
    1632 ROLLING HILLS LN
    River Falls, WI 54022

    Dunbar Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Door County Home Builders Association
    Local # 5103
    PO Box 112 4087
    Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235

    Dunbar Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Chippewa Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 5104
    4319 Jeffers Rd Ste 200
    Eau Claire, WI 54703

    Dunbar Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Dunbar Wisconsin


    Lis Pendens – Recordation and Dissolution

    Let’s Give ‘Em Sutton to Talk About: Tennessee Court Enforces Sutton Doctrine

    Turnover Traps for Community Associations: Investigate First, Release Claims Later

    Mondaq’s 2023 Construction Comparative Guide

    Housing Starts in U.S. Beat 1 Million Pace for Second Month

    Is the Event You Are Claiming as Unforeseeable Delay Really Unforeseeable?

    Thanks to All for the 2024 Super Lawyers Nod!

    Netflix Plans $900M Facility At Former New Jersey Army Base

    Home Builders and Developers Beware: SC Supreme Court Beats Up Hybrid Arbitration Clauses Mercilessly

    “But it’s 2021!” Service of Motion to Vacate Via Email Found Insufficient by the Eleventh Circuit

    What California’s COVID-19 Reopening Means for the Construction Industry

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    Green Construction Trends Contractors Can Expect in 2019

    Designed to Expose: Beware Lender Certificates

    GRSM Now 11th Largest Law Firm in United States

    Federal Contractors Should Request Debriefings As A Matter Of Course

    The Importance of Providing Notice to a Surety

    The National Labor Relations Board Joint Employer Standard is Vacated by the Eastern District of Texas

    “Genuine” Issue of “Material” Fact and Summary Judgments

    The Business of Engineering: An Interview with Matthew Loos

    Insurer's Attempt to Challenge Appraisal Award Rejected

    Insurers Need only Prove that Other Coverage Exists for Construction Defect Claims

    Anti-Concurrent, Anti-Sequential Causation Clause Precludes Coverage

    A New Digital Twin for an Existing Bridge

    Connecticut Federal District Court Again Finds "Collapse" Provisions Ambiguous

    Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co.

    Avoiding Lender Liability for Credit-Related Actions in California

    Flood Policy Does Not Cover Debris Removal from Property

    Flint Water Crisis and America’s Clean Water Access Failings

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2017

    Developers Celebrate Arizona’s Opportunity Zones

    Nevada Construction Defect Lawyers Dead in Possible Suicides

    Two Worthy Insurance Topics: (1) Bad Faith, And (2) Settling Without Insurer’s Consent

    Shimmick Gets Nod for Second Pilot Pile at Settling Millennium Tower

    Apartment Boom in Denver a Shortcut Around Condo Construction Defect Suits?

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers®

    DRCOG’s Findings on the Impact of Construction Defect Litigation Have Been Released (And the Results Should Not Surprise You)

    Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Renovation Contractors: Be Careful How You Disclose Your Projects

    Party Cannot Skirt Out of the Very Fraud It Perpetrates

    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    Maybe California Actually Does Have Enough Water

    Court Finds Duty To Defend Environmental Claim, But Defense Limited to $100,000

    Consider Manner In Which Loan Agreement (Promissory Note) Is Drafted

    Green Cement? You Bet!

    University of Tennessee’s New Humanities Building Construction Set to Begin

    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    Co-Housing Startups Fly in the Face of Old-School NYC Housing Law

    California Trial Court Clarifies Application of SB800 Roofing Standards and Expert’s Opinions
    Corporate Profile

    DUNBAR WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Dunbar, Wisconsin Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Dunbar, Wisconsin

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    May 05, 2026 —
    The court denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding genuine issues of fact regarding implication of the policy’s ensuing loss provision. Stella Prop. Dev.. & Event Productions, LLC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15854 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2026). Stella owned a cultural center that was insured under a commercial property all-risk policy issued by Auto-Owners. A windstorm with gusts of 65 miles per hour struck the Center causing damage. The Center’s inspector found extensive wind damage on nearly all facets of the roof. Further, the inspector found the existing organic shingles were in “very poor condition” and were “defective, discontinued, and no longer available.” The estimated cost of repairs to the roof was $108,010.52. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    June 29, 2026 —
    Daily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties. The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com

    Fraud Allegations Stymie Additional Insured’s Request for a Defense

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Federal District Court granted the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s complaint seeking a defense of the underlying case alleging fraud. Renovation Realty, Inc. v. Colony Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21409 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2026). Mara Fortin sued Renovation Realty and others (“Fortin litigation”) from the fraudulent sale of a residence. The underlying complaint alleged Renovation “deliberately misrepresented of the residence as ‘completely remodeled’ and ‘meticulously maintained’.” The defendants, however, including Renovation, “knew from sources including a pre-renovation termite report documenting fungus and dry rot . . . that the Property harbored pre-existing material defects.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Ayushi Neogi Published in ADC Defense Comment on Arbitration in Evolving Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape

    May 12, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel Ayushi Neogi has authored an article in the Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada’s Defense Comment magazine examining the shifting landscape of arbitration following the Ending Forced Arbitration Act. Titled “Compelling Arbitration in a Post-Ending Forced Arbitration Act, Plaintiff-Friendly Landscape,” the article analyzes how recent legislative changes are reshaping arbitration strategy, particularly as employees gain greater ability to bypass arbitration in certain claims. Neogi provides practical insight into how courts are responding and what this means for defense counsel navigating increasingly complex and plaintiff-friendly environments. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    May 26, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – May 14, 2026 - Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion has been ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 guide and recognized as a leading firm in Litigation: General Commercial for Orange County. Newmeyer Dillion was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise and caliber of talent where the firm stood out for its exceptional work and is recognized in Litigation: General Commercial. Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff expressed the firm's gratitude: “It is an honor for our firm to be recognized by Chambers and Partners in their Spotlight California 2026 guide. This acknowledgment reflects our commitment to providing high quality legal services tailored to the unique needs of our clients.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress

    March 31, 2026 —
    Several homebuilding groups say they support most of the massive housing reform bill making its way through Congress but want to see certain provisions including those related to build-to-rent and manufactured homes changed before it advances any further. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Esther D'Amico, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com