BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Marshall County West Virginia custom homes expert witness Marshall County West Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Marshall County West Virginia custom home expert witness Marshall County West Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Marshall County West Virginia casino resort expert witness Marshall County West Virginia housing expert witness Marshall County West Virginia Medical building expert witness Marshall County West Virginia condominium expert witness Marshall County West Virginia townhome construction expert witness Marshall County West Virginia hospital construction expert witness Marshall County West Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Marshall County West Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Marshall County West Virginia landscaping construction expert witness Marshall County West Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Marshall County West Virginia industrial building expert witness Marshall County West Virginia condominiums expert witness Marshall County West Virginia parking structure expert witness Marshall County West Virginia retail construction expert witness Marshall County West Virginia tract home expert witness Marshall County West Virginia multi family housing expert witness Marshall County West Virginia office building expert witness Marshall County West Virginia
    Marshall County West Virginia stucco expert witnessMarshall County West Virginia testifying construction expert witnessMarshall County West Virginia building code compliance expert witnessMarshall County West Virginia construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessMarshall County West Virginia delay claim expert witnessMarshall County West Virginia structural engineering expert witnessesMarshall County West Virginia construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Marshall County, West Virginia

    West Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB440: Requires builders notify homeowners with Notice to consumer required; response to claim within 30 days and negotiations to conclude within 90 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Marshall County West Virginia

    In 1991, the West Virginia Legislature adopted into law Chapter 21, Article 11 of the State Code. This law was established to set specific professional guidelines for contractors as well as to protect state businesses and consumers who utilize their services. The new law paved the way for creation of the Contractor Licensing Board which is made up of state businessmen, contractors and construction specialists.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern Panhandle Chapter
    Local # 5046
    112 19th St
    Wheeling, WV 26003
    Marshall County West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of No Central WV
    Local # 5054
    4 Riddle Court
    Morgantown, WV 26505

    Marshall County West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eastern Panhandle Home Builders Association
    Local # 5023
    430 Randoph St Ste C
    Martinsburg, WV 25401

    Marshall County West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mid Ohio Valley
    Local # 5072
    PO Box 556
    Parkersburg, WV 26102

    Marshall County West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Highlands Chapter
    Local # 5021
    PO Box 1847
    Elkins, WV 26241
    Marshall County West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Potomac Highlands Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5030
    PO Box 452
    Mathias, WV 26812
    Marshall County West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Midwestern Chapter Of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5040
    110 Pleasant Colony Dr
    Evans, WV 25241
    Marshall County West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Marshall County West Virginia


    Houston Office Secures Favorable Verdict in Trespass and Nuisance Case Involving Subcontractor’s Accidental Installation of Storm Sewer Pipe on Plaintiff’s Property

    The Ghosts of Projects Past

    Quick Note: Eichleay Damages (Unabsorbed Home Office Overhead)

    Flint Water Crisis and America’s Clean Water Access Failings

    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    New York State Legislature Reintroduces Bills to Extend Mortgage Recording Tax to Mezzanine Debt and Preferred Equity

    Modified Plan Unveiled for Chicago's Sixth-Tallest Tower

    Insured Survives Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse Case

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized as Super Lawyers

    Who Will Pay for San Francisco's $750 Million Tilting Tower?

    Significant Issues Test Applies to Fraudulent Claims to Determine Attorney’s Fees

    New York Appellate Court Applies Broad Duty to Defend to Property Damage Case

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    Quick Note: Submitting Civil Remedy Notice

    Georgia Passes Solar CUVA Bill

    Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants

    Europe’s Satellites Could Help Catch the Next Climate Disaster

    Contractors Must Register with the L&I Prior to Offering or Performing Work, or Risk Having their Breach of Contract Case Dismissed

    Backpacks, Broadway, and Building Restrictions: A Legal Reminder

    Appeals Court Affirms Carrier’s Duty to Pay Costs Taxed Against Insured in Construction Defect Suit

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    New Window Insulation Introduced to U.S. Market

    University of Tennessee Commits to $1.9B Capital Plan

    Property Insurance Exclusion for Constant or Repeated Leakage of Water

    S&P Suspended and Fined $80 Million in SEC, State Mortgage Bond Cases

    In Supreme Court Showdown, California Appeals Courts Choose Sides Regarding Whether Right to Repair Act is Exclusive Remedy for Homeowners

    Deescalating Hyper Escalation

    U.K. Developer Pledges Building Safety in Wake of Grenfell

    Celebrating Dave McLain’s Recognition in the Best Lawyers in America® 2025

    Structuring Water Resilience for Data Center Development: Water Rights, Reuse Incentives, and Emerging Disclosure Risk

    McCarthy Workers Test Fall-Protection Harnesses Designed to Better Fit Women

    ‘The Ground Just Gave Out’: How a Storm’s Fury Ravaged Asheville

    TOLLING AGREEMENTS: Construction Defect Lawyers use them to preserve Association Warranty Claims during Construction Defect Negotiations with Developers

    Hunton Insurance Practice Again Scores “Tier 1” National Ranking in US News Best Law Firm Rankings

    A Court-Side Seat: An End-of-Year Environmental Update

    The Hidden Dangers of Construction Defect Litigation

    Colorado Supreme Court Finds Economic Loss Rule Applies to Allegations of Willful and Wanton Conduct

    Under Privette Doctrine, A Landowner Delegates All Responsibility For Workplace Safety to its Independent Contractor, and therefore Owes No Duty to Remedy or Adopt Measures to Protect Against Known Hazards

    Business Risk Exclusions (j) 5 and (j) 6 Found Ambiguous

    COVID-19 Information and Resources

    As the Term Winds Down, Several Important Regulatory Cases Await the U.S. Supreme Court

    Washington High Court Holds Insurers Bound by Representations in Agent’s Certificates of Insurance

    Recovery Crews Swing Into Action as Hurricane Michael Departs

    Risky Business: Contractual Versus Equitable Rights of Subrogation

    Job Growth Seen as Good News for North Carolina Housing Market

    Restrictions On Out-Of-State Real Estate Brokers Being Challenged In Nevada

    Circuit Court Supports Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protections in Connection with Internal Investigations

    Construction Warranties and the Statute of Repose – Southern States Chemical, Inc v. Tampa Tank & Welding Inc.

    Navigating the Construction Burrito: OCIP Policies in California’s Construction Defect Cases
    Corporate Profile

    MARSHALL COUNTY WEST VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Marshall County, West Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Marshall County's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Marshall County, West Virginia

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight named one of the Top 50 Construction Law Firms

    August 11, 2026 —
    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is pleased to announce its fifth consecutive year of recognition by Construction Executive as one of The Top 50 Construction Law Firms. Since its first publication in 2003, Construction Executive magazine has served as the leading source for news, market developments, and business issues impacting the construction industry. Construction Executive established the rankings by asking over 600 U.S. construction law firms to complete a survey. Constructive Executive’s data collection includes: 2025 revenues from the firm’s construction practice; the number of attorneys in the firm’s construction practice; the percentage of the firm’s total revenues derived from its construction practice; the number of states in which the firm is licensed to practice; the year in which the construction practice was established; and the number of construction industry clients served during the fiscal year 2025. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress

    March 31, 2026 —
    Several homebuilding groups say they support most of the massive housing reform bill making its way through Congress but want to see certain provisions including those related to build-to-rent and manufactured homes changed before it advances any further. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Esther D'Amico, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Kahana Feld Announces Key Partner Additions Coast to Coast

    June 22, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – June 10, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce Yvette Davis, Evan Kalooky, Beth Obra-White, Sean Paden, Michael Parme, Jeffrey Schmid, and Julieanne Yanez have joined the firm as partners. Four of these partners are joining the San Diego office, which further strengthens the firm’s General Liability and Construction Litigation practices and enhances Kahana Feld’s ability to serve clients across a broad range of complex matters in the region. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Congratulations to Gianna Liddy on Her Promotion to Partner

    September 21, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Gianna Liddy has been promoted to partner. Gianna’s dedication, leadership, and exceptional contributions to the firm have earned her this well-deserved recognition. Please join us in congratulating her on this exciting achievement! Meet Gianna Liddy! Gianna has been with BWB&O since 2019 and has been practicing law since 2017. Her practice focuses on complex civil defense litigation, including high-exposure personal injury, premises liability, transportation, construction defect, habitability, and general liability matters. As a Supervising Attorney in the firm’s Encinitas office, she oversees a team of attorneys, collaborates closely with clients and insurance professionals, and develops litigation strategy in complex matters. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    August 03, 2026 —
    For nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026. As discussed previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

    June 29, 2026 —
    Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com