BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Beckley West Virginia retail construction expert witness Beckley West Virginia Subterranean parking expert witness Beckley West Virginia condominium expert witness Beckley West Virginia structural steel construction expert witness Beckley West Virginia high-rise construction expert witness Beckley West Virginia production housing expert witness Beckley West Virginia casino resort expert witness Beckley West Virginia institutional building expert witness Beckley West Virginia concrete tilt-up expert witness Beckley West Virginia tract home expert witness Beckley West Virginia condominiums expert witness Beckley West Virginia parking structure expert witness Beckley West Virginia custom home expert witness Beckley West Virginia office building expert witness Beckley West Virginia low-income housing expert witness Beckley West Virginia housing expert witness Beckley West Virginia mid-rise construction expert witness Beckley West Virginia townhome construction expert witness Beckley West Virginia industrial building expert witness Beckley West Virginia multi family housing expert witness Beckley West Virginia hospital construction expert witness Beckley West Virginia
    Beckley West Virginia expert witness windowsBeckley West Virginia structural engineering expert witnessesBeckley West Virginia structural concrete expertBeckley West Virginia stucco expert witnessBeckley West Virginia testifying construction expert witnessBeckley West Virginia soil failure expert witnessBeckley West Virginia civil engineer expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Beckley, West Virginia

    West Virginia Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB440: Requires builders notify homeowners with Notice to consumer required; response to claim within 30 days and negotiations to conclude within 90 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Beckley West Virginia

    In 1991, the West Virginia Legislature adopted into law Chapter 21, Article 11 of the State Code. This law was established to set specific professional guidelines for contractors as well as to protect state businesses and consumers who utilize their services. The new law paved the way for creation of the Contractor Licensing Board which is made up of state businessmen, contractors and construction specialists.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Southern W Virginia
    Local # 5080
    PO Box 667
    Beckley, WV 25802
    Beckley West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Greenbrier Valley Home Builders Chapter
    Local # 5027
    PO Box 180
    Frankford, WV 24938
    Beckley West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Virginia (State)
    Local # 5000
    2220 Washington St. E Ste 1
    Charleston, WV 25311

    Beckley West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Charleston
    Local # 5018
    PO Box 8616
    South Charleston, WV 25303

    Beckley West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Tri State Home Builders Association
    Local # 5036
    PO Box 376
    Barboursville, WV 25504

    Beckley West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Midwestern Chapter Of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5040
    110 Pleasant Colony Dr
    Evans, WV 25241
    Beckley West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Potomac Highlands Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 5030
    PO Box 452
    Mathias, WV 26812
    Beckley West Virginia Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Beckley West Virginia

    Corporate Profile

    BECKLEY WEST VIRGINIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Beckley, West Virginia Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Beckley's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Beckley, West Virginia

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    The Leak Was Repaired. Why Is It Back? What California HOA Boards Should Document Next

    November 09, 2026 —
    A resident reports water staining near a window. The HOA arranges a repair, the area dries, and the complaint is closed. Months later, the stain returns. Then another resident reports a similar problem elsewhere in the building. At The Naumann Law Firm, we encourage HOA boards and property managers to pay attention to that sequence. A returning leak does not automatically mean the building has a construction defect. It does mean the board needs a clear record of what happened, what was repaired, and what changed afterward. Start With the History, Not Just the New Stain When a leak returns, the latest photograph tells only part of the story. Pull together the earlier maintenance request, inspection notes, photographs, repair proposal, invoice, and any messages from the resident or contractor. Then ask:
    • Was the leak reported in the same location before?
    • What did the contractor identify as the cause?
    • What work was completed, and when?
    • Did the repair address the source of the water or only the visible damage?
    • Have other units or common areas experienced similar symptoms?
    These details help a board understand whether it is dealing with a new problem, an unsuccessful repair, or a pattern that needs a broader investigation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Naumann Law Firm, PC

    Rogue AI — Is Your Company Prepared?

    September 28, 2026 —
    The recent wave of "rogue AI" incidents should be a wake-up call for every business leader and risk manager paying attention. Recent accounts document a sobering reality: AI systems from multiple leading AI developers have each escaped controlled testing environments and caused real-world harm—compromising outside infrastructure, exploiting third-party vulnerabilities, and even canceling another person's reservation to help a user jump a waitlist. These aren't hypotheticals from a sci-fi movie. They happened this summer. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    September 21, 2026 —
    The largest single-span steel plate girder bridge launch in the nation wasn’t about setting records. Alaska’s Juneau Creek Bridge design was a matter of necessity. The fully erected steel plate girder bridge, featuring a 440-ft main span hovering 285 ft above the Juneau Creek, was part of the larger Sterling Highway project. It offered a logistical challenge but was chosen among over a dozen bridge types due to the unique constraints brought by the mountainous site. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tim Newcomb, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    June 29, 2026 —
    The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and b
    Is Everybody Single? More Than Half the U.S. Now, Up From 37% in '76

    Trump Sues Casinos to Get Conditions Fixed or Name Off

    Haight Welcomes Elizabeth Lawley

    Fifth Circuit Decision on Number of Occurrences Underscores Need to Carefully Tailor Your Insurance Program<
    Industry Practices Questioned After Girder Fractures at Salesforce Transit Center

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    Corrective Action Protest Grounds for GSA Schedule Federal Construction Contractors

    Courts Will Not Rewrite Your Post-Loss Property Insurance Obligations

    U.S. Housing Starts Exceed Estimates After a Stronger December

    Court Says KBR Construction Costs in Iraq were Unreasonable

    GRSM Team Wins Summary Judgment in Million-Dollar HOA Dispute

    Kansas City Airport Terminal Project Faces Delays, Rising Costs

    Evacuations in Santa Barbara County as more Mudslides are Predicted

    Texas Approves Law Ensuring Fair and Open Competition

    GIS and BIM Integration Will Transform Infrastructure Design and Construction

    Beyond the Statute: How the Colorado Court Upheld Modified Accrual in Construction Contracts

    Congratulations 2024 DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Cybersecurity “Flash” Warning for Construction and Manufacturing Businesses

    U.S. State Adoption of the National Electrical Code

    Colorado Adopts Twombly-Iqbal “Plausibility” Standard

    In Supreme Court Showdown, California Appeals Courts Choose Sides Regarding Whether Right to Repair Act is Exclusive Remedy for Homeowners

    Boilerplate Contract Language on Permits could cause Problems for Contractors

    HHMR Joins Forces with HBF at 2025 Blitz Build: Building More Than Just Ramps

    Designer of World’s Tallest Building Wants to Turn Skyscrapers Into Batteries

    Congress Considers Pandemic Risk Insurance Act to Address COVID-19 Business Interruptions Losses

    The United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Finds Wrap-Up Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage of Additional Insureds

    South Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco Defects

    Building Supplier Sued for Late and Defective Building Materials

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    Are We Having Fun Yet? Construction In a Post-COVID World (Law Note)

    President Trump Nullifies “Volks Rule” Regarding Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Recordkeeping Requirements

    Federal Courts Keep Chipping Away at the CDC Eviction Moratorium

    As California Faces Mandatory Water Use Reductions How Will the Construction Industry be Impacted?

    Toll Brothers Climbs After Builder Reports Higher Sales

    Union THUGS Plead Guilty

    Traub Lieberman Partners Ryan Jones and Scot Samis Obtain Affirmation of Final Summary Judgment

    John O’Meara is Selected as America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators

    Miller Act Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling

    What is the True Value of Rooftop Solar Panels?

    The 411 on the New 415 Location of the Golden State Warriors

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    Uneven Code Enforcement Seen in Earthquake-Damaged Buildings in Turkey

    Anchorage Building Codes Credited for Limited Damage After Quakes

    Owners Bound by Arbitration Clause on Roofing Shingles Packaging

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tender Is the Fight”

    Gone Fishing: Tenant’s Insurer Casts A Line Seeking To Subrogate Against The Landlord

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Reminder: Pay if Paid Not All Encompassing (but Could it be?)

    Supply Chain Delay Recommendations

    Where There's Smoke...California's New Emergency Wildfire Smoke Protection Regulation And What Employers Are Required To Do

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    Amended Again?! Critical Changes to RPAPL § 881: What New York Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know

    China Allows Construction to Resume of High-Rise Stopped for Last Decade

    Building on New Risks: Construction in the Age of Greening