BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Dalhart Texas high-rise construction expert witness Dalhart Texas custom homes expert witness Dalhart Texas condominiums expert witness Dalhart Texas multi family housing expert witness Dalhart Texas Medical building expert witness Dalhart Texas structural steel construction expert witness Dalhart Texas office building expert witness Dalhart Texas production housing expert witness Dalhart Texas custom home expert witness Dalhart Texas industrial building expert witness Dalhart Texas hospital construction expert witness Dalhart Texas casino resort expert witness Dalhart Texas housing expert witness Dalhart Texas retail construction expert witness Dalhart Texas tract home expert witness Dalhart Texas mid-rise construction expert witness Dalhart Texas low-income housing expert witness Dalhart Texas Subterranean parking expert witness Dalhart Texas townhome construction expert witness Dalhart Texas landscaping construction expert witness Dalhart Texas concrete tilt-up expert witness Dalhart Texas
    Dalhart Texas OSHA expert witness constructionDalhart Texas construction claims expert witnessDalhart Texas expert witness structural engineerDalhart Texas soil failure expert witnessDalhart Texas ada design expert witnessDalhart Texas expert witness concrete failureDalhart Texas construction expert testimony
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Dalhart, Texas

    Texas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 730 amended the Texas Property Code by adding Title 16 and amending chapter 27. Overseen by the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC) the code asserts that a contractor is not liable for any percentage of damages caused by failure to take reasonable action to mitigate damages or take reasonable action to maintain the residence. It also limits damages, requires written notification and response for right of repair and defines warranty periods. Additionally, SB 754 states“(5-10 Sec. 27.107) a contractor may assert as an affirmative defense to an allegation of a defect made in a complaint filed under this subchapter that the defect is the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the home.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Dalhart Texas

    No state license is required, however, general contractors must get permits at the local level. Separate boards license HVAC, and plumbing trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Texas Panhandle Builders Association
    Local # 4509
    5601 Enterprise Cir
    Amarillo, TX 79106

    Dalhart Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Texas Home Builders Association
    Local # 4578
    4410 Fairway Blvd
    Wichita Falls, TX 76308

    Dalhart Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Grayson - Fannin and Cooke Counties
    Local # 4563
    PO Box 1421
    Sherman, TX 75091

    Dalhart Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Texas
    Local # 4545
    4223 85th St
    Lubbock, TX 79423

    Dalhart Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Texarkana
    Local # 4566
    PO Box 7048
    Texarkana, TX 75505

    Dalhart Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Dallas
    Local # 4524
    5816 West Plano Pkwy
    Plano, TX 75093

    Dalhart Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Fort Worth
    Local # 4530
    70001 Blvd 26 Ste 323
    Fort Worth, TX 76180

    Dalhart Texas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Dalhart Texas


    Washington School District Sues Construction Company Over Water Pipe Damage

    Collapse Claim Dismissed

    Curtain Wall Suppliers Claim Rival Duplicated Unique System

    What is Bad Faith?

    Repair of Fractured Girders Complete at Shuttered Salesforce Transit Center

    The 411 on the New 415 Location of the Golden State Warriors

    Boston Contractor Faces More OSHA Penalties

    1st District Joins 2nd District Court of Appeals and Holds that One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement Claims

    Designing a Fair Standard of Care in Design Agreements

    Insured's Expert Qualified, Judgment for Coverage Affirmed

    Preparing the Next Generation of Skilled Construction Workers: AGC Workforce Development Plan

    It’s a Jolly Time of the Year: 5 Tips for Dealing with Construction Labor Issues During the Holidays

    Consulting Firm Indicted and Charged with Falsifying Concrete Reports

    Trial Victory in San Mateo County!

    Monumental Museum Makeover Comes In For Landing

    Designer of World’s Tallest Building Wants to Turn Skyscrapers Into Batteries

    New York Court Narrowly Interprets “Expected or Intended Injury” Exclusion in Win for Policyholder

    Homeowners Sued for Failing to Disclose Defects

    Commercial Development Nearly Quadruples in Jacksonville Area

    Client Alert: Release of Liability Agreement Extinguishes Duty of Ordinary Care

    Prison Time and Restitution for Construction Fraud

    Apple to Open Steve Jobs-Inspired Ring-Shaped Campus in April

    Unbilled Costs Remain in Tutor Perini's Finances

    Contractor Sues Yelp Reviewer for Defamation

    E I, E I, - OH! What’s in a Name?

    Reconciling Prompt Payments and Withholding of Retention Payments

    Third Circuit Affirms Use of Eminent Domain by Natural Gas Pipeline

    Kiewit Seeks Millions in Added Connecticut Pier Renovation Costs

    Courts Will Not Second-Guess Public Entities When it Comes to Design Immunity

    Social Distancing and the Impact on Service of Process Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Significant Issues Test Applies to Fraudulent Claims to Determine Attorney’s Fees

    Insured Cannot Sue to Challenge Binding Appraisal Decision

    Former NYC Condo Empire Executive Arrested for Larceny, Tax Fraud

    Seventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying Injuries

    More Fun with Indemnity and Construction Contracts!

    El Paso Increases Surety Bond Requirement on Contractors

    Napa Quake, Flooding Cost $4 Billion in U.S. in August

    Insurer Must Indemnify Additional Insured After Settlement

    Emergency Paid Sick Leave and FMLA Leave Updates in Response to COVID-19

    Waste Not: NJ Digester Plant Transforms Food Waste to Fuel

    Earthquake Hits Mid-Atlantic Region; No Immediate Damage Reports

    Congratulations to Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, Peter Brown, Karen Baytosh, and Associate Matthew Cox for Their Inclusion in 2022 Best Lawyers!

    Mixed Reality for Construction: Applicability and Reality

    Hawaii Supreme Court Tackles "Other Insurance" Issues

    Governor Brown Signs Legislation Aimed at Curbing ADA Accessibility Abuses in California

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    Weslaco, Texas Investigating Possible Fraudulent Contractor Invoices

    “Details Matter” is the Foundation in a Texas Construction Defect Suit

    Why Biden’s Infrastructure Plan Is a Green Jobs Plan

    New England Construction Defect Law Groups to Combine
    Corporate Profile

    DALHART TEXAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Dalhart, Texas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Dalhart's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Dalhart, Texas

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand

    May 14, 2026 —
    Seattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates. For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence. While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Glosser may be contacted at larry.glosser@acslawyers.com

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    September 01, 2026 —
    New York City has expanded its investigation into the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters tower in Midtown Manhattan as the Dept. of Investigation confirmed a parallel inquiry and the Dept. of Buildings directed the property owner to retain third-party engineering oversight. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Tracy Cowan Honored as “Icon” in Missouri Lawyers Media’s First-Ever “Illinois Legal Leaders” Awards

    September 15, 2026 —
    St. Louis Managing Partner Tracy Cowan has been named an “Icon” by Missouri Lawyers Media in its inaugural “Illinois Legal Leaders” awards program. Mr. Cowan was among 14 people who earned “Icon” status in the awards program. This category honors “senior leaders with 30 years or more of legal practice” and is one of three groups recognized. The other two include “Up & Coming Lawyers,” for attorneys with 10 or fewer years in legal practice, and “Leaders in the Law,” which recognizes members of the bar who have significantly contributed to the practice of law in the state, the local legal community, and the broader community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Chambers USA Recognizes GRSM as 2026 Industry Leader

    June 29, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has once again been recognized by Chambers USA, a prestigious directory of the country’s top law firms. In addition to the firm’s practice recognitions, eight partners, David Capell, Nancy Erfle, Matthew Foy, Ashlee Grant, Craig Heryford, Andrew Port, Todd Regan, and Angela Richie, were recognized among the nation’s top lawyers in their respective fields. Chambers USA recognized the firm in the following eight categories: USA – Nationwide – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer, Band 4 The firm is widely sought after by national insurance sector clients facing a wide array of coverage disputes as well as bad faith claims. The firm has additional capabilities in class actions and appellate litigation. Its broad base of experience includes professional liability, construction, and bankruptcy-related issues. This is the third year the firm has received this recognition. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision

    March 24, 2026 —
    A powerful group representing the nation’s home builders is coming out against the most significant housing legislation in more than a decade over a provision negotiated by the White House that would restrict institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. The builders’ objection could imperil the bill’s chances of becoming law, even as leaders of both parties are desperate to show they are doing something to alleviate voters’ cost-of-living concerns. The Senate voted 90-8 to clear a procedural hurdle for the bill on Wednesday, with a vote on final passage expected early next week. The inclusion of the investor ban in a broader housing bill was key to getting the White House on board, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina, told reporters Tuesday. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katy O'Donnell, Bloomberg

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com