BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Blount County Tennessee structural steel construction expert witness Blount County Tennessee institutional building expert witness Blount County Tennessee landscaping construction expert witness Blount County Tennessee retail construction expert witness Blount County Tennessee low-income housing expert witness Blount County Tennessee production housing expert witness Blount County Tennessee housing expert witness Blount County Tennessee condominium expert witness Blount County Tennessee concrete tilt-up expert witness Blount County Tennessee Subterranean parking expert witness Blount County Tennessee custom home expert witness Blount County Tennessee casino resort expert witness Blount County Tennessee Medical building expert witness Blount County Tennessee condominiums expert witness Blount County Tennessee parking structure expert witness Blount County Tennessee custom homes expert witness Blount County Tennessee industrial building expert witness Blount County Tennessee townhome construction expert witness Blount County Tennessee high-rise construction expert witness Blount County Tennessee hospital construction expert witness Blount County Tennessee multi family housing expert witness Blount County Tennessee
    Blount County Tennessee construction expert witness public projectsBlount County Tennessee construction project management expert witnessesBlount County Tennessee roofing and waterproofing expert witnessBlount County Tennessee expert witness windowsBlount County Tennessee forensic architectBlount County Tennessee construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessBlount County Tennessee structural concrete expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Blount County, Tennessee

    Tennessee Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2787/SB2931 & HB 2771/SB 2201; Title 66, Chptr 36) Homeowners must serve written notice of a defect 15 days after its discovery; Contractors, upon receipt of the notice, have 10 business days to inspect the residence and inform any subcontractors it believes are reasonably responsible on the defect. Within 10 business days after notice of the claim, the subcontractor must serve a written response to contractor. Within 30 days after receipt of notice of a defect, the contractor must provide written notice of intention (repair, replace, monetarily compensate or reject) to the homeowner.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Blount County Tennessee

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Sevier Co
    Local # 4486
    PO Box 4653
    Sevierville, TN 37864

    Blount County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Maryville Alcoa Home Builders Association
    Local # 4453
    1719 Kings Cir
    Maryville, TN 37801

    Blount County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Rutherford Cty
    Local # 4490
    730-A Middle Tennessee Blvd Suite 5
    Murfreesboro, TN 37129

    Blount County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Warren County Chapter
    Local # 4495
    PO Box 608
    McMinnville, TN 37111
    Blount County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Cumberland Co
    Local # 4410
    PO Box 507
    Crossville, TN 38557

    Blount County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Knoxville
    Local # 4455
    221 Clark St
    Knoxville, TN 37921

    Blount County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Jackson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4430
    206 E Main St Ste 204
    Jackson, TN 38302

    Blount County Tennessee Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Blount County Tennessee


    City Council Authorizes Settlement of Basement Flooding Cases

    CDJ’s #8 Topic of the Year: California’s Board of Equalization Tower

    Integration Can Inoculate in Utah

    Homebuyers Aren't Sweating the Fed

    Manufacturer of Asbestos-Free Product May Still Be Liable for Asbestos Related Injuries

    N.J. Voters Approve $116 Million in School Construction

    Steven Cvitanovic Recognized in JD Supra's 2017 Readers' Choice Awards

    The EPA’s Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule: Are Contractors Aware of It?

    Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Matching of Materials Decided by Appraisers

    There’s Still No Amazon for Housing, But Fintech’s Working on It

    Insurer Must Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Housing Woes Worse in L.A. Than New York, San Francisco

    Benefit of the Coblentz Agreement and Consent Judgment

    When OSHA Cites You

    Washington Court of Appeals Narrows Arbitrator Authority in Construction Dispute

    NY Appeals Court Ruled Builders not Responsible in Terrorism Cases

    Insurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” Case

    Required Contract Provisions for Construction Contracts in California

    Circuit Court Supports Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protections in Connection with Internal Investigations

    Factual Issues Prevent Summary Judgment Determination on Coverage for Additional Insured

    Contractors Should be Aware of Homeowner Duties When Invited to Perform Residential Work

    Does the Implied Warranty of Habitability Extend to Subsequent Purchasers? Depends on the State

    Houston Bond Issue Jump-Starts 237 Flood Control Projects

    Navigating Federal Government Contracts Under Newly Imposed Tariffs

    Were Condos a Bad Idea?

    Homeowner’s Claims Defeated Because “Gravamen” of Complaint was Fraud, not Breach of Contract

    Personal Injury Claims – The Basics

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2024 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!!

    Louisiana District Court Declines to Apply Total Pollution Exclusion

    Assignment of Insured's Policy Ineffective

    Caterpillar Said to Be Focus of Senate Overseas Tax Probe

    Court Holds That Insurance Producer Cannot Be Liable for Denial of COVID-19 Business Interruption Claim

    New EPA Regulation for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments

    Nine Gibbs Giden Partners Listed in Southern California Super Lawyers 2022

    Can an Architect, Hired by an Owner, Be Sued by the General Contractor?

    August Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Appreciate at Faster Pace

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Strikes a Deathblow to Substantial Factor Causation in Most Cases; Is Asbestos Litigation Next?

    Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants

    Impairing Your Insurer’s Subrogation Rights

    Fracking Fears Grow as Oklahoma Hit by More Earthquakes Than California

    Bertha – The Tunnel is Finished, but Her Legacy Continues

    2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar – Recap

    Tension Over Municipal Gas Bans Creates Uncertainty for Real Estate Developers

    Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage

    Emergency Paid Sick Leave and FMLA Leave Updates in Response to COVID-19

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2025 Fall Forum Meeting in Louisville

    French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

    Drones, Googleplexes and Hyperloops

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Affordable Harlem Housing Allegedly Riddled with Construction Defects
    Corporate Profile

    BLOUNT COUNTY TENNESSEE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Blount County, Tennessee Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Blount County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Blount County, Tennessee

    It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It

    July 27, 2026 —
    When you win a bid, you might be singing that everything is going your way. Then something goes wrong. The owner hands you defective plans, sits on RFI responses or other critical information, or otherwise upends the work. The costs pile up through no fault of your own. You feel wronged, and you want to be made whole. But a feeling that you got burned is not enough. To recover, that feeling has to become something the law recognizes as damages. So, what are damages, and how do you prove them? At bottom, contract damages are the money that puts the non-breaching party (i.e., the party that doesn’t breach the contract) in the position it would have occupied had the contract been performed. Reprinted courtesy of Bradley E. Sands, Jones Walker LLP and Katie McCracken, Summer Associate, University of Georgia School of Law Read the full story...
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    Humanoid Robots in Construction: The Reality Right Now

    October 12, 2026 —
    Humanoid robots are getting a lot of media attention. Videos of robots doing backflips and kung fu moves suggest that a general-purpose machine worker is just around the corner. A recent visit by the Finnish technology magazine Tekniikka&Talous to crane manufacturer Konecranes offers a more sober picture. I think it is a useful reality check for anyone in the AEC industry wondering what humanoids can actually do today. What a Humanoid Can Do in a Controlled Environment Konecranes bought a Unitree G1 EDU humanoid in autumn 2025, likely as the first Finnish industrial company to do so. With separately purchased five-finger hands and other extras, the price came close to €100,000. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    August 16, 2026 —
    A recent decision out of the Federal Claims Court explains the post-award bid protest standard of review. In Massman Construction Co. v. U.S., 2026 WL 1971985 (Fed.Cl. 2026), a protestor brought a post-award bid protest after the Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to another contractor. The protestor argued that the Army Corps (government) acted irrational in its evaluation through disparate treatment. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and remanded for the Army Corps to “either justify this disparity or explain why [awardee’s] lower-priced, but technically inferior proposal provides the best value to the government.” Massman Construction, supra at *1. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court

    June 15, 2026 —
    The Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment on a collapse claim for the insured, rejecting the insurer’s arguments that were not presented to the trial court. Homeowner’s Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins, Co. v. Oakes, 2026 Fl. App. LEXIS 2086 (Fl. Ct. App. March 18, 2026). The insured’s ceiling collapsed in the secondary home on the insured’s property. The claim was reported to the insurer, but coverage was denied after its investigation. The insured sued the insurer for breach of contract. Under the Additional Coverage provisions of the policy, collapse was covered if it was “abrupt.” An abrupt collapse was not covered, however, if exclusions for “Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot” and “faulty, inadequate or defective design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, materials or maintenance” applied. The collapse provisions contained no language stating that the coverage granted in the provision was also subject to all the other exclusions in the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com

    11 Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    August 24, 2026 —
    Congratulations to the 11 Payne & Fears attorneys included in the 2027 Edition of “Lawyer of the Year” and The Best Lawyers In America®. Attorneys have been recognized in the following practice areas: “Lawyer of the Year” (2027 Edition) Orange County
    • Benjamin A. Nix
      • Trade Secrets Law
    The Best Lawyers in America® (2027 Edition) Irvine, CA
    • Jeffrey K. Brown
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel F. Fears
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel M. Livingston
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Litigation – Real Estate
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears