BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina casino resort expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina custom home expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina custom homes expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina Medical building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina industrial building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina townhome construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina production housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina parking structure expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina office building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina retail construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina institutional building expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Van Wyck South Carolina
    Van Wyck South Carolina architecture expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina ada design expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina expert witness roofingVan Wyck South Carolina construction project management expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina construction expert witnessesVan Wyck South Carolina construction claims expert witnessVan Wyck South Carolina construction expert testimony
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Van Wyck, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Van Wyck South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Spartanburg
    Local # 4272
    PO Box 2592 341 E Kennedy S
    Spartanburg, SC 29304

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of York County Inc
    Local # 4264
    PO Box 2881
    Rock Hill, SC 29732

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greenville
    Local # 4240
    5 Creekside Park Ct Suite A
    Greenville, SC 29615

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Cherokee County
    Local # 4220
    PO Box 218
    Gaffney, SC 29342
    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association Lancaster Cty SC
    Local # 4230
    305 W Dunlap St C
    Lancaster, SC 29720
    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679

    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379
    Van Wyck South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Van Wyck South Carolina


    NTSB Pittsburgh Bridge Probe Update Sheds Light on Collapse Sequence

    Read Before You Sign: Claim Waivers in Project Documents

    Beth Cook Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    Substitute Materials — What Are Your Duties? What Are Your Risks? (Law Note)

    No Third-Quarter Gain for Construction

    Judge Dismisses Suit to Block Construction of Obama Center

    Overruling Henkel, California Supreme Court Validates Assignment of Policies

    Brief Overview of Rights of Unlicensed Contractors in California

    Construction Warranties and the Statute of Repose – Southern States Chemical, Inc v. Tampa Tank & Welding Inc.

    Always Keep Your Time Limits in Mind—to Know When You Can Sue, and When You Can No Longer Be Sued (Law Note)

    Coverage for Construction Defects Barred By Exclusion j (5)

    Vacation during a Project? Time for your Construction Documents to Shine!

    Court Rules Planned Development of Banning Ranch May Proceed

    Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Holds that Nearly All Project Labor Agreements are Illegal

    Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co.

    California Bid Protests: Responsiveness and Materiality

    The Ups and Downs of Elevator Maintenance Contractor's Policy Limits

    Washington State Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision on Spearin Doctrine

    It’s Too Late, Lloyd’s: New York Federal Court Finds Insurer Waived Late Notice Defense

    Sureties and Bond Producers May Be Liable For a Contractor’s False Claims Action Violation

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces New Partners

    Workers at Two NFL Stadiums Test Positive for COVID-19, But Construction Continues

    Toddler Crashes through Window, Falls to his Death

    Housing Starts in U.S. Climb to an Almost Eight-Year High

    You Can Take This Job and Shove It!

    Lewis Brisbois Moves to Top 15 in Law360 2022 Diversity Snapshot

    Make Sure You Comply with Florida’s Pre-Suit Notice Requirements for Construction Defects

    Manhattan Developer Wants Claims Dismissed in Breach of Contract Suit

    Louis "Dutch" Schotemeyer Returns to Newmeyer Dillion as Partner in Newport Beach Office

    Why Hurricane Preparedness Isn’t About the Property

    Is it the End of the Story for Redevelopment in California?

    Duty to Defend Triggered by Damage to Other Non-Defective Property

    Nuclear Fusion Pushes to Reach Commercial Power Plant Stage

    NY Appeals Court Ruled Builders not Responsible in Terrorism Cases

    Anchoring Abuse: Evolution & Eradication

    Review your Additional Insured Endorsement

    CFTC Establishes Climate-Risk Unit, Echoing Other Biden Administration Agency Themes

    What Counts as Adequate Opportunity to Cure?

    CDJ’s #4 Topic of the Year: KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County

    Sacramento Water Works Recognized as a Historic Civil Engineering Landmark

    AFL-CIO Joins in $10 Billion Infrastructure Plan

    Arizona Rooftop Safety: Is it Adequate or Substandard?

    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Liability Policy’s Arbitration Endorsement Applies to Third Party Beneficiaries, Including Additional Insureds

    Winning Attorney Fees in Litigation as a California Construction Contractor or Subcontractor

    ACEC Statement on Negotiated Bipartisan Debt Limit Compromise

    Not All Design-Build Projects are Created Equal

    Homebuilding Still on the Rise

    U.K. High Court COVID-19 Victory for Policyholders May Set a Trend in the U.S.

    Groundbreaking on New Boulder Neighborhood
    Corporate Profile

    VAN WYCK SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Van Wyck, South Carolina Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Van Wyck's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Van Wyck, South Carolina

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Actual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess Insurers

    August 24, 2026 —
    California courts were previously split on the issue of whether an insured may bring declaratory relief claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance. Some California courts held that the actual exhaustion of underlying insurance was necessary, whereas other courts allowed for these types of claims to proceed.[1] Recently, the California Supreme Court addressed this split of authority and, in doing so, handed down a significant win for policyholders. In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., the Court held that insureds may proceed with bringing forth viable declaratory relief and bad faith claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance.[2] A summary of the Court’s opinion is provided below. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    July 27, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted after the insured failed to file suit against the insurer within the policy’s two-year suit limitation provision. Interstate Investments, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98108 (S.D. N. Y. May 4, 2026). On or before June 27, 2023, a wind, hail and rainstorm damaged Interstate’s property in Oklahoma. Interstate filed a claim under its policy with Mt. Hawley. The policy provided that New York law applied and contained a two- year suit limitation provision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    June 29, 2026 —
    The Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    Leading Boutiques Combine to Form SDV Fenchurch, A Global Law Firm for Insurance Policyholders

    September 15, 2026 —
    TRUMBULL, Conn., and LONDON, Sept. 1, 2026 — Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), Fenchurch Law, Wesolowski Abogados, and CLIR & Fenchurch and their partner members in Asia, Europe and North America combined today to launch SDV Fenchurch, a global law firm built exclusively to represent policyholders and the brokers who advise them. Structured as a Swiss verein, SDV Fenchurch unites dedicated insurance-recovery practices across eight jurisdictions in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Turkey, and Singapore. With over 90 lawyers devoted to insurance coverage matters, the firm is among the largest policyholder-side practices in the world and, by number of jurisdictions with full-time policyholder counsel capabilities, the most geographically extensive. The founders are brought together by a single shared mission: to act solely for policyholders, never the insurers, in insurance disputes. This is in stark contrast to most international firms with insurance practices, which mostly represent insurers only. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of SDV Fenchurch