BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Hopkins South Carolina production housing expert witness Hopkins South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Hopkins South Carolina custom home expert witness Hopkins South Carolina retail construction expert witness Hopkins South Carolina condominiums expert witness Hopkins South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Hopkins South Carolina casino resort expert witness Hopkins South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Hopkins South Carolina housing expert witness Hopkins South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Hopkins South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Hopkins South Carolina institutional building expert witness Hopkins South Carolina office building expert witness Hopkins South Carolina condominium expert witness Hopkins South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Hopkins South Carolina tract home expert witness Hopkins South Carolina parking structure expert witness Hopkins South Carolina townhome construction expert witness Hopkins South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Hopkins South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Hopkins South Carolina Medical building expert witness Hopkins South Carolina
    Hopkins South Carolina hospital construction expert witnessHopkins South Carolina civil engineer expert witnessHopkins South Carolina structural engineering expert witnessesHopkins South Carolina defective construction expertHopkins South Carolina construction scheduling expert witnessHopkins South Carolina soil failure expert witnessHopkins South Carolina construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hopkins, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hopkins South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Horry-Georgetown Home Builders Association
    Local # 4252
    728 Highway 501 East
    Conway, SC 29526

    Hopkins South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Sumter-Clarendon
    Local # 4276
    PO Box 1215
    Sumter, SC 29151
    Hopkins South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of South Carolina
    Local # 4200
    1419 Pendleton St
    Columbia, SC 29201

    Hopkins South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Columbia
    Local # 4224
    625 Taylor Street
    Columbia, SC 29202

    Hopkins South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Gr Pee Dee SC
    Local # 4232
    PO Box 13494
    Florence, SC 29504

    Hopkins South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lakelands Home Builders Association
    Local # 4242
    PO Box 3194
    Greenwood, SC 29648

    Hopkins South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Aiken County
    Local # 4208
    P O Box 2251
    Aiken, SC 29802

    Hopkins South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hopkins South Carolina


    Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co.

    Court Rejects Insurer's Argument That Two Triggers Required

    Florida Appellate Court Holds Four-Year Statute of Limitations Applicable Irrespective of Contractor Licensure

    Two-Part Series on Condominium Construction Defect Issues

    Consumer Fraud Claim against Insured is Not an "Occurrence"

    NYC Airports Get $500,000 Makeover Contest From Cuomo

    Eight Ways to Protect a Construction Company Before a Claim Is Filed

    Record Home Sales in Sydney Add to Bubble Fear

    Feds, County Seek Delay in Houston $7B Road Widening Over Community Impact

    Construction Calamity: Risk Transfer Tips for Contractors After a Catastrophic Loss

    Does the Russia Ukraine War Lead to a Consideration in Your Construction Contracts?

    No Coverage for Alleged Misrepresentation Claim

    Not All Work is Covered Under the Federal Miller Act

    After Pittsburgh Bridge Collapse, Fast-Rising Replacement Emerges

    North Carolina Supreme Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage,” Allocation and Exhaustion-Related Issues Arising Out of Benzene-Related Claims

    Builder’s Be Wary of Insurance Policies that Provide No Coverage for Building: Mt. Hawley Ins. Co v. Creek Side at Parker HOA

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    Insured’s Breach of Contract Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss, but Bad Faith Claim Does Not

    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is Proud to Announce Jeannette Garcia Has Been Elected as Secretary of the Hispanic Bar Association of Orange County!

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    Forensic Team Finds Fault with Concrete Slabs in Oroville Dam Failure

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/30/23) – AI Predicts Home Prices, Construction’s Effect on the Economy, and Could Streamline Communications for Developers

    The Economic Loss Rule: From Where Does the Duty Arise?

    Blog Completes Sixteenth Year

    Lewis Brisbois Listed as Top 10 Firm of 2022 on Leopard Solutions Law Firm Index

    Condemnation Actions: How Valuable Is Your Evidence of Property Value?

    What is a Civil Dispute?

    In Kansas City, a First-Ever Stadium Designed for Women’s Sports Takes the Field

    New World Cup Stadiums Failed at their First Trial

    Angelo Mozilo Speaks: No Regrets at Countrywide

    Athletic Trainers Help Workers Get Back to the Jobsite and Stay Healthy After Injury

    Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions Into Waterlogged Miami?

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Yet ANOTHER Reminder to Always Respond

    Do You Have the Receipt? Pennsylvania Court Finds Insufficient Evidence That Defendant Sold the Product

    Repairs to Hurricane-damaged Sanibel Causeway Completed in 105 Days

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael K. Kiernan and Associate Brandon Christian Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice in Favor of Defendant

    Agree to Use your “Professional Best"? You may Lose Insurance Coverage! (Law Note)

    U.S. Homeowners Are Lingering Longer, and the Wait Is Paying Off

    Different AI Uses Present Similar Benefits for Large and Small Construction Firms

    Work to Solve the Mental Health Crisis in Construction

    Federal Regulatory Recap: A Summary of Recent Rulemaking Actions Taken or Proposed Affecting the Energy Industry

    A Court-Side Seat: NWP 12 and the Dakota Access Pipeline Easement Get Forced Vacations, while a Potential Violation of the Eighth Amendment Isn’t Going Anywhere

    Sixth Circuit Finds No Coverage for Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Digitalizing Cross-Laminated Timber Construction

    Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’s

    Nuclear Fusion Pushes to Reach Commercial Power Plant Stage

    Predicting Our Future with Andrew Weinreich
    Corporate Profile

    HOPKINS SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Hopkins, South Carolina Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hopkins, South Carolina

    Construction Seyt Named a Top Construction Blog by FeedSpot

    March 31, 2026 —
    Since 2019, we have strived to bring our readers practical, useful insights on recent trends shaping our industry. Whether you are a contractor, designer, developer, attorney, or industry professional, our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to navigate your business with that much more confidence. We are honored that “The Construction Seyt” has been named by FeedSpot as a “Best Construction Blog” to follow for 2026. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Credibility Matters…Even in Delay Claims

    September 29, 2026 —
    Credibility matters. Here’s another example involving a delay claim on public private partnership delivery method. The project agreement required claims to be tried by a hearing examiner. The public private partnership developer (for lack of a better term) submitted delay claims that it contended were caused by Miami-Dade County. The hearing examiner awarded the developer delay time and compensation. On appeal, the County argued that the delays awarded by the hearing examiner were concurrent critical path delays with other delays caused by the developer’s team (the developer’s contractor). This was demonstrated by the fact that in an attempt to mitigate the County delay, the contractor’s incorporated a schedule fragnet into its schedule to mitigate delay that showed the critical path was driven by events deemed caused by the contractor. This was also reported in the contractor’s monthly updates. The developer argued that its mitigation plan did not work and, thus, the schedules showed a hypothetical delay caused by the contractor when, in actuality, it was the County-caused delay that drove the critical path. The hearing officer agreed with the contractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Tracy Cowan Honored as “Icon” in Missouri Lawyers Media’s First-Ever “Illinois Legal Leaders” Awards

    September 15, 2026 —
    St. Louis Managing Partner Tracy Cowan has been named an “Icon” by Missouri Lawyers Media in its inaugural “Illinois Legal Leaders” awards program. Mr. Cowan was among 14 people who earned “Icon” status in the awards program. This category honors “senior leaders with 30 years or more of legal practice” and is one of three groups recognized. The other two include “Up & Coming Lawyers,” for attorneys with 10 or fewer years in legal practice, and “Leaders in the Law,” which recognizes members of the bar who have significantly contributed to the practice of law in the state, the local legal community, and the broader community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Actual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess Insurers

    August 24, 2026 —
    California courts were previously split on the issue of whether an insured may bring declaratory relief claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance. Some California courts held that the actual exhaustion of underlying insurance was necessary, whereas other courts allowed for these types of claims to proceed.[1] Recently, the California Supreme Court addressed this split of authority and, in doing so, handed down a significant win for policyholders. In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., the Court held that insureds may proceed with bringing forth viable declaratory relief and bad faith claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance.[2] A summary of the Court’s opinion is provided below. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at KRudolph@sdvlaw.com

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

    The ROI of Estimating Accuracy in Preconstruction

    September 15, 2026 —
    Precision is the foundation of profitability in construction. Even minor quantity or pricing mistakes can swing bids anywhere from 5-15%, leading to project delays, unprofitable jobs or margin erosion through change orders. And worse, these losses can damage client trust and jeopardize long-term relationships that drive repeat business and future bids. Consistently estimating accurately builds confidence, speeds up bidding and positions your company to win more profitable projects. Estimating accuracy is where profit is either protected or lost. In construction, you make your biggest financial decisions before a project ever starts. Once a bid is won, most of the project’s cost structure is locked in. If the estimate is wrong, no amount of execution can fully fix those mistakes. That makes estimating accuracy a business issue, not just an operations issue. Reprinted courtesy of Aaron Kivett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...