BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Early Branch South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Early Branch South Carolina institutional building expert witness Early Branch South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Early Branch South Carolina tract home expert witness Early Branch South Carolina Medical building expert witness Early Branch South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Early Branch South Carolina industrial building expert witness Early Branch South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Early Branch South Carolina retail construction expert witness Early Branch South Carolina office building expert witness Early Branch South Carolina casino resort expert witness Early Branch South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Early Branch South Carolina condominium expert witness Early Branch South Carolina parking structure expert witness Early Branch South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Early Branch South Carolina custom home expert witness Early Branch South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Early Branch South Carolina condominiums expert witness Early Branch South Carolina housing expert witness Early Branch South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Early Branch South Carolina custom homes expert witness Early Branch South Carolina
    Early Branch South Carolina consulting general contractorEarly Branch South Carolina engineering expert witnessEarly Branch South Carolina concrete expert witnessEarly Branch South Carolina construction safety expertEarly Branch South Carolina expert witness commercial buildingsEarly Branch South Carolina testifying construction expert witnessEarly Branch South Carolina consulting engineers
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Early Branch, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Early Branch South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Charleston Trident Home Builders Association
    Local # 4216
    2120 Noisette Blvd Ste 108A
    North Charleston, SC 29405

    Early Branch South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of the Lowcountry
    Local # 4213
    PO BOX 716
    Beaufort, SC 29901

    Early Branch South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Hilton Head Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 4248
    PO Box 22360
    Hilton Head Island, SC 29925

    Early Branch South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Orangebg.-Bamberg
    Local # 4260
    PO Box 870
    Orangeburg, SC 29116
    Early Branch South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Aiken County
    Local # 4208
    P O Box 2251
    Aiken, SC 29802

    Early Branch South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Horry-Georgetown Home Builders Association
    Local # 4252
    728 Highway 501 East
    Conway, SC 29526

    Early Branch South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Sumter-Clarendon
    Local # 4276
    PO Box 1215
    Sumter, SC 29151
    Early Branch South Carolina Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Early Branch South Carolina

    Corporate Profile

    EARLY BRANCH SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Early Branch, South Carolina Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Early Branch's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Early Branch, South Carolina

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Texas Prepares to Restart Data Center Construction, with Around 300 Projects Under Review And 6,608 MW Awaiting Energization Approval, Driving Demand for Rapid-Response Lifting Operations

    October 20, 2026 —
    Texas is experiencing an unprecedented increase in power demand. The ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) power grid reached a record peak demand of 91.1 GW in summer 2026, 6% above the previous record, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). This is compounded by interconnection requests totaling around 474 GW, more than five times the record peak, with approximately 90% of these requests related to data centers, according to the Office of the Governor of Texas. Within this context, authorities have launched a comprehensive review process. In August , the Governor directed the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and ERCOT to audit all data centers progressing toward grid connection, covering around 300 projects. ERCOT has also suspended approvals to energize data centers of 75 MW or more and has set December 10 as the date for the publication of its reports. For the industry, this pause creates a valuable planning window. Goldman Sachs notes that it takes 18 to 24 months to build a data center once permits have been secured, while only 50% to 60% of planned capacity is delivered on schedule. Supply chain constraints and labor shortages are among the most common causes of delays. In this context, construction agility is becoming increasingly critical. A one-month delay at a typical 60 MW U.S. data center is estimated to cost up to $14.2 million in lost revenue, additional costs and penalties, according to STL Partners data. Against this backdrop, Sarens, which has operated in the U.S. since 2009 and is headquartered in Houston, with offices also in Odessa and Beaumont, positions as a logistics partner for developers and contractors preparing for the execution phase. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sarens

    Unable To Afford an Appellate Bond? You May Be “Indigent” And Qualify for a Discretionary Waiver or Reduction of the Bond Amount.

    October 26, 2026 —
    One of the most frequent questions asked when a client is considering taking an appeal from an adverse judgment or order is whether that judgment or order is stayed pending appeal. The answer, not surprisingly, is “it depends.” While the general rule is that perfecting an appeal stays proceedings in the trial court, including enforcement of the judgment or order, there are many, many, exceptions to that rule. One such exception is a judgment or order for “money or the payment of money.” (CCP § 917.1) In such cases, a bond or undertaking is typically required to stay enforcement. The costs of such security can be significant. If you are using an admitted surety insurer, the amount of security required is 1 1/2 times the amount of the judgment. Obtaining a bond through an admitted surety will require that you have sufficient collateral to secure the bond, and sufficient funds to pay the associated premiums, which generally run between 1% and 3% of the total bond amount, per year. So, if you are appealing from a $1 million judgment, you will likely need $1.5 million in assets as collateral, and up to $30,000 per year for the premium. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Suzanne M. Nicholson, Wilke Fleury
    Ms. Nicholson may be contacted at snicholson@wilkefleury.com

    Segal McCambridge Shareholders and Associates Recognized in 2027 Best Lawyers in America®

    September 01, 2026 —
    Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that 24 firm shareholders and associates have been recognized in the 2027 editions of the Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through a trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For more than four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion.    "This Best Lawyers recognition is especially meaningful because it reflects the caliber of advocacy our attorneys bring to clients every day, across a wide range of practice areas," said Jason P. Eckerly, Segal McCambridge Managing Shareholder. "We are proud to see so many of our colleagues honored for their legal skills, dedication, and professionalism. This continued recognition underscores the strength of our national platform and the depth of talent across our firm." Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers in America® include: Jason P. Eckerly; Chicago, IL; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Scott R. Emery; New York, NY; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Jay Evans; Pittsburgh, PA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Richard H. Glucksman; Los Angeles, CA; Construction Law Nathan R. Horne; Austin, TX; Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Alice Sacks Johnston; Pittsburgh, PA; Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Patrick M. Kemp; Austin, TX; Litigation - Insurance Mitchell P. Morinec; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation Anthony J. Sbarra, Jr.; Milton, MA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Alan J. Taylor; Southfield, MI; Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law Kenneth P. Williams; Southfield, MI; Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants David J. Yates; Southfield, MI; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America® include: Masood Syed Ali; Chicago, IL; Labor and Employment Law - Management Mari Bryn Dowdy; Austin, TX; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Chaniece M. Hill; Chicago, IL; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Mandy Kolodkin; Indianapolis, IN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Jeffrey M. Marchese; New York, NY; Litigation - Construction Courtney C. McLaren; Memphis, TN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Benjamin J. Nellans; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation Christopher P. Norton; Los Angeles, CA; Commercial Litigation Nelson T. Rainey; Memphis, TN; Family Law; Health Care Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Nicholas E. Richardson; Tampa, FL; Insurance Law Jordan B. Rosenberg; Philadelphia, PA; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Ian M. Sadler; Austin, TX; Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law About Best Lawyers® Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For over four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. Each year, millions of confidential evaluations are collected worldwide, contributing to one of the legal industry's most rigorous and trusted vetting processes. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States and 3% globally are recognized, reflecting the selectivity and credibility of the results. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion, maintaining the integrity and independence of all recognitions. For more information, visit: www.bestlawyers.com. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Voluntary Dismissal of an Indemnity Claim Does Not Make the Subcontractor a “Prevailing Party,” Washington Court of Appeals Holds

    September 21, 2026 —
    In King County v. Walsh Construction Company II, LLC, No. 86503-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2025), an unpublished decision from Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals, the Court affirmed the denial of a subcontractor’s request for prevailing-party attorney fees under an indemnity clause after the general contractor voluntarily dismissed its indemnity claims. Because the indemnity claim was no longer live and no determination of fault had occurred, the Court held that the trial court did not err in denying the request. ACS represented Walsh, the general contractor, in securing the denial of the fee request at the trial court that the Court of Appeals affirmed.
    Walking the Tightrope of SB 35

    Contractors Can No Longer Make Roof Repairs Following Their Own Inspections

    Sinking Floor Does Not Meet Strict Definition of Collapse

    New York’s Highest Court Weighs in on N.Y. Labor Law

    Will Maryland Beltway Developer's Exit Doom $7.6B P3 Project?

    NYC Building Explosion Kills Two After Neighbor Reports Gas Leak

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part II

    Extreme Weather Events Show Why the Construction Supply Chain Needs a Risk-Management Transformation

    The Buck Stops Over There: Have Indemnitors Become the Insurers of First and Last Resort?

    One Stat About Bathrooms Explains Why You Can’t Find a House

    No Coverage for Contractor's Faulty Workmanship

    New Opportunities for “Small” Construction Contractors as SBA Adjusts Its Size Standards Again Due to Unprecedented Inflation

    Record Keeping—the Devil’s in the Details

    Fannie Overseer Moves to Rescue Housing With Lower Risk to Lenders

    Fifth Circuit Requires Causal Distinction for Ensuing Loss Exception to Faulty Work Exclusion

    Bronx Public Housing Tower Partially Collapses

    Event-Cancellation Insurance Issues During a Pandemic

    Stephen Henning Receives “Legend of an Era” Award

    New York Developers Facing Construction Defect Lawsuit

    SCOTUS, Having Received Views of Solicitor General, Will Decide Whether CWA Regulates Indirect Discharge of Pollutants Into Navigable Water Via Groundwater

    Hunton Insurance Partner Among Top 250 Women in Litigation

    Spearin Doctrine as an Affirmative Defense

    “Time Is Money!” In Construction and This Is Why There Is a Liquidated Damages Provision

    Zetlin & De Chiara Ranked in the Top Tier for Construction Law by Legal 500 USADifferent AI Uses Present Similar Benefits for Large and Small Construction Firms

    Montrose III: Vertical Exhaustion Applies in Upper Layers of Excess Coverage

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    New York High Court: “Issued or Delivered” Includes Policies Insuring Risks in New York

    Putting 3D First, a Model Bridge Rises in Norway

    4 Steps to Take When a Worker Is Injured on Your Construction Site

    Sixth Circuit Finds No Coverage for Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    A Relatively Small Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t Mix

    Construction Termination Issues Part 6: This is the End (Tips for The Design Professional)

    Congratulations Devin Brunson on His Promotion to Partner!

    New York Revises Retainage Requirements for Private Construction Contracts: Overview of the “5% Retainage Law”

    Florida’s Citizens Property Insurance May Be Immune From Bad Faith, But Is Not Immune From Consequential Damages

    Don’t Put All Your Eggs in the Silent-Cyber Basket

    Home Numbers Remain Small While Homes Get Bigger

    Buffett Says ‘No-Brainer’ to Get a Mortgage to Short Rates

    California Court of Appeal Finds Lingering Smoke From Wildfire is not Direct Physical Loss

    The Legal Landscape

    California Supreme Court Holds Insured Entitled to Coverage Under CGL Policy for Negligent Hiring

    Court of Appeal Holds Only “Named Insureds” May Sue for Bad Faith Under California FAIR Plan Policy

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Honors Four Partners as ‘Lawyers of the Year’

    How to Document Changes and Preserve Claims Without Starting a Fight

    Claim for Punitive Damages Based on Insurers' Alleged Bad Faith Business Practices Fails

    “Time Is Money!” In Construction and This Is Why There Is a Liquidated Damages Provision

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    South Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco Defects

    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    Construction Defect Settlement in Seattle

    Power of Workers Compensation Immunity on Construction Project

    Don’t Let Construction Problems Become Construction Disputes (guest post)

    Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    PSA: Pay If Paid Ban Goes into Effect on January 1, 2023

    What is a Personal Injury?

    Bond Principal Necessary on a Mechanic’s Lien Claim

    Illinois Appellate Court Holds Causation Can be Addressed in Appraisal Process

    Outcry Over Peru’s Vast Graft Probe Prompts Top Lawyer to Quit

    2016 Updates to CEB’s Mechanics Liens and Retail Leasing Practice Books Now Available

    The OFCCP’s November 2019 Updated Technical Assistance Guide: What Every Federal Construction Contractor Should Know

    Details Matter: The Importance of Strictly Following Public Bid Statutes

    Shoring of Ceiling Does Not Constitute Collapse Under Policy's Definition

    Housing Buoyed by 20-Year High for Vet’s Loans: Mortgages

    Not Remotely Law as Usual: Don’t Settle for Delays – Settle at Remote Mediation

    Conn. Appellate Court Overturns Jury Verdict, Holding Plaintiff’s Sole Remedy for Injuries Arising From Open Manhole Was State’s Highway Defect Statute

    Mediation v. Arbitration, Both Private Dispute Resolution but Very Different Sorts

    Factor the Factor in Factoring

    New York Court of Appeals Finds a Proximate Cause Standard in Additional Insured Endorsements

    Parking Reform Takes Off on the West Coast

    Time to Reform Construction Defect Law in Nevada

    Newmeyer Dillion Partner Louis "Dutch" Schotemeyer Named One of Orange County's 500 Most Influential by Orange County Business Journal

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Do Not Trigger Right to Independent Counsel

    Some Work Cannot be Included in a Miller Act Claim