BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania office building expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania housing expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Woodlyn Pennsylvania
    Woodlyn Pennsylvania structural concrete expertWoodlyn Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessWoodlyn Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessWoodlyn Pennsylvania consulting engineersWoodlyn Pennsylvania construction scheduling expert witnessWoodlyn Pennsylvania OSHA expert witness constructionWoodlyn Pennsylvania civil engineer expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Woodlyn, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Woodlyn Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Fayette County
    Local # 3961
    PO Box 1323
    Uniontown, PA 15401
    Woodlyn Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Adams County
    Local # 3920
    PO Box 3321
    Gettysburg, PA 17325
    Woodlyn Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530

    Woodlyn Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201

    Woodlyn Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    Woodlyn Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380

    Woodlyn Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    Woodlyn Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Woodlyn Pennsylvania


    No Coverage for Construction Defect Claim Only Impacting Insured's Work

    SFAA Commends U.S. House for Passage of Historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill

    Around the State

    Insured Fails to Provide Adequate Proof of Water Damage Through Roof

    Alexander Moore Promoted to Managing Partner of Kahana Feld’s Oakland Office

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof

    Cliff White Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    The Creation of San Fransokyo

    Champagne Wishes and Caviar Dreams. Unlicensed Contractor Takes the Cake

    Stop by BHA’s Booth at WCC and Support the Susan G. Komen Foundation

    Todd Seelman Recognized as Fellow of Wisconsin Law Foundation

    Why A Jury Found That Contractor 'Retaliated' Against Undocumented Craft Worker

    New NEPA Rule Restores Added Infrastructure Project Scrutiny

    School Board Settles Construction Defect Suit

    2022 Project of the Year: Linking Los Angeles

    Dispositive Motions in AAA Construction Arbitration: Why You Should Think Twice

    Define the Forum and Scope of Recovery in Contract Disputes

    Rental Assistance Program: Good News for Tenants and Possibly Landlords

    When Your “Private” Project Suddenly Turns into a “Public” Project. Hint: It Doesn’t Necessary Turn on Public Financing or Construction

    Standing When It Comes to Real Property Owned by a Trust

    Construction Defect Litigation in Nevada Called "Out of Control"

    Certifying Claim Under Contract Disputes Act

    Georgia Supreme Court Says Construction Defects Can Be an “Occurrence”

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    Reporting Requirements for Architects under California Business and Professions Code Section 5588

    Autovol’s Affordable Housing Project with Robotic Automation

    Contractor Sentenced to 7 Years for “Hail Damage” Fraud

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part I

    Montreal Bridge Builders Sue Canada Over New Restrictions

    Gaps in Insurance Created by Complex Risks

    Architect Responds to Defect Lawsuit over Defects at Texas Courthouse

    Environmental and Regulatory Law Update: New Federal and State Rulings

    Colorado Defective Construction is Not Considered "Property Damage"

    Traub Lieberman Partner Colleen Hastie and Associate Jeffrey George Successfully Oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Dismissal

    Best Practices for Installing Networks in New Buildings

    Mountain States Super Lawyers Recognizes 19 Nevada Snell & Wilmer Attorneys in 2025 Rankings

    “Details Matter” is the Foundation in a Texas Construction Defect Suit

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 43 White and Williams Lawyers

    What to Know Before Building a Guesthouse

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    Defective Panels Threatening Profit at China Solar Farms: Energy

    Contractual Warranty Agreements May Preclude Future Tort Recovery

    Tenth Circuit Reverses District Court's Ruling that Contractor Entitled to a Defense

    Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Don't Count On a Housing Slowdown to Improve Affordability

    Palo Alto Considers Fines for Stalled Construction Projects

    Attention Contractors: U.S. Department of Labor Issues Guidance on Avoiding Discrimination When Using AI in Hiring

    Indiana Federal Court Holds No Coverage for $50M Default Judgment for Lack of Timely Notice of Class Action

    Suspend the Work, but Don’t Get Fired

    Disputes Will Not Be Subject to Arbitration Provision If There Is No “Significant Relationship”
    Corporate Profile

    WOODLYN PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Woodlyn, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Woodlyn's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Woodlyn, Pennsylvania

    Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Five Partners 'Lawyers of the Year'

    September 08, 2026 —
    Best Lawyers has selected 207 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 45 offices for its 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized five Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Partner John R. Conley (Product Liability Litigation - Defendants); Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law; Tax Law; Trusts and Estates); Weirton Managing Partner Michelle L. Gorman (Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants); Portland Partner Megan Cook (Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants); and San Diego Partner Craig T. Mann (Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants). Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can also see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    The Construction Defect Litigation Podcast: Navigating Multi-Party Construction Defect Litigation

    September 08, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld Construction Defect Practice Group Chair Ivette Kincaid and attorney Thomas McCarrick recently joined the Construction Defect Litigation podcast to discuss the challenges—and strategies—behind complex construction defect matters involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on their experience, Ivette and Thomas explore practical approaches to:
    • Identifying key parties and understanding how claims and crossclaims develop
    • Working with experts to evaluate defects, causation and damages
    • Managing procedural challenges, including scheduling, document management and depositions
    • Applying thoughtful case management strategies to position complex matters for successful resolution
    Reprinted courtesy of Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld and Thomas McCarrick, Kahana Feld Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at tmccarrick@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    April 14, 2026 —
    The ownership and licensing of design documents in professional services agreements play a significant role in protecting the interests of the design professional and the project owner during and after project completion. The ownership or licensing of the drawings provision typically outlines who owns the drawings and specifications, who can use the documents, and how the documents can be used during and after the project. Project owners and developers should understand that payment for design services does not automatically transfer ownership or an exclusive right to use the professional design. Under U.S. copyright law, the default rule is that the design professional retains ownership of the instruments of service absent a contractual provision transferring ownership or a license. See 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act provides that copyright protection applies to “pictorial, graphic and sculptural works” and includes “architectural works.” 17 U.S.C. § 102. A design professional may only transfer copyright ownership in writing. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Abby Dvorkin, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Dvorkin may be contacted at advorkin@swlaw.com

    Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal

    June 08, 2026 —
    The mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer. Delay to Run the Statute of Limitations Following Hurricane Irma, a condominium association suffered roof and exterior envelope damage, reported an insurance claim, and submitted a sworn proof of loss to its property insurer in compliance with Florida Statute § 627.70132 (2020). The statute establishes a timeframe within which a policyholder must submit a claim for hurricane damage. Reprinted courtesy of Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Machaella Reisman, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Cary D. Steklof, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Ms. Reisman may be contacted at reismanm@hunton.com Mr. Steklof may be contacted at csteklof@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits

    July 27, 2026 —
    Levi W. Barrett, Co-Managing Partner of Peckar & Abramson’s New Jersey office, Co-Chair of the firm’s Construction Contracts & Risk Management team, and Executive Committee Member, was recently quoted in “New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits,” an article written by Engineering News-Record (ENR). The article examines New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s executive order temporarily halting state environmental permit reviews for certain large-scale data center projects while regulators develop a comprehensive framework to address the sector’s energy demands, water consumption, environmental impacts, and effects on local communities. It also explores the broader implications of the moratorium for developers, contractors, investors, and other stakeholders, as well as the ongoing debate between economic development, AI-driven infrastructure growth, and environmental and utility ratepayer concerns. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com