BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania housing expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania office building expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Smithton Pennsylvania
    Smithton Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessSmithton Pennsylvania expert witness roofingSmithton Pennsylvania structural concrete expertSmithton Pennsylvania construction expert testimonySmithton Pennsylvania defective construction expertSmithton Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessSmithton Pennsylvania construction expert witness public projects
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Smithton, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Smithton Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Washington Co Builders Association
    Local # 3964
    30 E Beau St Room #321
    Washington, PA 15301

    Smithton Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Bucks & Montgomery Counties
    Local # 3945
    721 Dresher Road Suite 1200
    Horsham, PA 19044

    Smithton Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Lancaster
    Local # 3936
    204 Butler Ave Ste 200
    Lancaster, PA 17601

    Smithton Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pennsylvania Builders Association
    Local # 3900
    600 N 12th St
    Lemoyne, PA 17043

    Smithton Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lebanon County Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3938
    39 Klein Avenue
    Lebanon, PA 17042

    Smithton Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404

    Smithton Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of the Alleghenies
    Local # 3928
    1397 Eisenhower Blvd Suite 201
    Johnstown, PA 15904

    Smithton Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Smithton Pennsylvania

    Corporate Profile

    SMITHTON PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Smithton, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Smithton's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Smithton, Pennsylvania

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    August 24, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 11, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce the opening of a new office in Sacramento, CA. This will be the firm’s 19th office across the United States. Partner Melvin F. Marcia has joined Kahana Feld and will lead the opening of the Sacramento office. He is joined by attorneys Matthew Brenner and Britney Lucchesi as well as paralegal Michelle Welcker. “We’re excited to welcome Melvin to the Kahana Feld team and expand our footprint in Northern California,” said Amir Kahana, Firmwide Managing Partner of Kahana Feld. “His addition strengthens Kahana Feld’s capabilities and will allow us to work more closely with our general liability, construction defect, and labor and employment clients in the Sacramento area while continuing to provide the level of service and experience they have come to expect from our firm.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Preventing Common and Costly Water Intrusion Events in Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Water leaking into a building is a leading cause of damage and loss in the construction industry. On one jobsite, heavy rains flooded a sub-basement, damaging a new electrical transformer—all because a roof drain was not property connected. On another jobsite, a drinking-fountain supply line broke in a multistory building that was undergoing renovation, causing water to run—undetected—for an entire weekend, resulting in water damage to all lower floors, where construction had been finished. Those loss scenarios could have been prevented with a comprehensive and effective water damage prevention plan (WDPP). This includes routine site inspections to identify uncontrolled water damage exposures and basic maintenance to make sure drains are clean of debris and divert them to a catch basin or low point away from the building. An effective WDPP plan also incorporates technology such as backflow preventers on sewer connections and water sensing technology to monitor the most vulnerable exposures. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Swift, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    June 08, 2026 —
    The Los Angeles Times has ranked Lewis Brisbois the third largest firm in LA County by attorney headcount, and first for number of litigation attorneys. Lewis Brisbois, whose Los Angeles office is led by Co-Managing Partners Jana I. Lubert and Kathleen Walker, has 273 attorneys working in LA County, including 167 partners. The firm ranked No. 1 for Litigation in the county, with 206 attorneys under the leadership of Partner Craig Holden. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alici
    Did New York Zero Tolerance Campaign Improve Jobsite Safety?

    Reconstructing the Francis Scott Key Bridge Utilizing the Progressive Design-Build Method

    Construction is the Fastest Growing Industry in California

    Can I Record a Lis Pendens in Arizona if the Lawsuit is filed Another Jurisdiction?

    No Expert Testimony for You: Maryland Federal Court Deems Expert Testimony Inadmissible

    Data Center Construction: Contractors Must Step Up

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Listed in the Best Lawyers in America© 2017

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    When a Construction Lender Steps into the Shoes of the Developer, the Door is Open for Claims by the General Contractor

    PSA: Virginia Repeals Its Permanent COVID-19 Safety Standard

    Builder Waits too Long to Dispute Contract in Construction Defect Claim

    Illinois Court of Appeals Addresses What It Means to “Reside” in Property for Purposes of Coverage

    An Architect Uses AI to Explore Surreal Black Worlds


    Insurer Not Bound by Decision in Underlying Case Where No Collateral Estoppel

    Bank Window Lawsuit Settles Quietly

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    Fact of Settlement Communications in Underlying Lawsuits is Not Ground for Anti-SLAPP Motion in Subsequent Bad Faith Lawsuit

    A Primer on Insurance for Construction Projects

    New Jersey Rules that Forensic Lab Analysts Can’t be Forced to Testify

    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    U.S. Home Prices Climbed 0.1% in July as Gains Slowed

    Committeewoman Requests Refund on Attorney Fees after Failed Legal Efforts

    Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction Spending

    Issues of Fact Prevent Insurer's Summary Judgment Motion in Collapse Case

    Brooklyn Atlantic Yards Yields Dueling Suits on Tower

    Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea

    Flood Insurance Claim Filed in State Court Properly Dismissed

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC recognized by Construction Executive in The Top 50 Construction Law Firms™ of 2025

    The Future for Tall Buildings Could Be Greener

    Brazil's Success at Hosting World Cup Bodes Well for Olympics

    The Most Expensive Apartment Listings in New York That Are Not in Manhattan

    Hurricane Laura: Implications for Insurers in Louisiana

    New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation

    California to Build ‘Total Disaster City’ for Training

    ASCE Statement on Hurricane Milton and Environmental Threats

    They Say Nothing Lasts Forever, but What If Decommissioning Does?

    White House’s New Draft Guidance Limiting NEPA Review of Greenhouse Gas Impacts Is Not So New or Limiting

    Acord Certificates of Liability Insurance: What They Don’t Tell You Can Hurt You

    Hawaii Federal Court Grants Insured's Motion for Remand

    Hurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane Season

    House of the Week: Spanish Dream Home on California's Riviera

    The DOL Claims Most Independent Contractors Are Employees

    ASCE Statement on Senate Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    No Ink, No Problem: When Employees and Agents Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements

    Collapse Claim Dismissed

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    Injured Subcontractor Employee Asserts Premise Liability Claim Against General Contractor

    Delaware Supreme Court Won’t Halt Building

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Apparently, It’s Not Always Who You Know”

    Private Statutory Cause of Action Under Florida’s Underground Facility Damage Prevention and Safety Act

    Insureds Survive Motion to Dismiss Civil Authority Claim

    Janus v. AFSCME

    Ambiguity Kills in Construction Contracting

    Coping With The New Cap And Trade Law

    Sacramento’s Commercial Construction Market Heats Up

    Feds Move To Indict NY Contractor Execs, Developer, Ex-Cuomo Aide

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    New York Establishes a Registration Requirement for Contractors and Subcontractors Performing Public Works and Covered Private Projects

    Extrinsic Evidence, or Eight Corners? Texas Court Sheds Light on Determining the Duty to Defend

    Construction Safety Technologies – Videos

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    AIA Waivers Under Fire: Why Post-Completion Losses May Still Be Actionable

    Trends: “Nearshoring” Opportunities for the Construction Industry