BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Richland Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Richland Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Richland Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Richland Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Richland Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Richland Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Richland Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Richland Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Richland Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Richland Pennsylvania housing expert witness Richland Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Richland Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Richland Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Richland Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Richland Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Richland Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Richland Pennsylvania office building expert witness Richland Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Richland Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Richland Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Richland Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Richland Pennsylvania
    Richland Pennsylvania contractor expert witnessRichland Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witnessRichland Pennsylvania stucco expert witnessRichland Pennsylvania building code compliance expert witnessRichland Pennsylvania window expert witnessRichland Pennsylvania expert witnesses fenestrationRichland Pennsylvania construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Richland, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Richland Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Blair-Bedford Builders Association
    Local # 3908
    1410 Allegheny Street
    Hollidaysburg, PA 16648

    Richland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Metro Pittsburgh
    Local # 3944
    2041 Blvd Of The Allies
    Pittsburgh, PA 15219

    Richland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Berks County
    Local # 3948
    25 Stevens Ave
    West Lawn, PA 19609

    Richland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Harrisburg
    Local # 3924
    2416 Park Drive
    Harrisburg, PA 17110

    Richland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of the Alleghenies
    Local # 3928
    1397 Eisenhower Blvd Suite 201
    Johnstown, PA 15904

    Richland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lebanon County Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3938
    39 Klein Avenue
    Lebanon, PA 17042

    Richland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pennsylvania Builders Association
    Local # 3900
    600 N 12th St
    Lemoyne, PA 17043

    Richland Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Richland Pennsylvania


    Carroll Brock of Larchmont Homes Dies at Age 88

    Subcontractor Sued for Alleged Defective Work

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Slower Pace in May

    Handshake Deals Gone Wrong

    Cable-Free Elevators Will Soar to New Heights, and Move Sideways

    Dusseldorf Evacuates About 4,000 as World War II Bomb Defused

    The Sky is Falling! – Or is it? Impacting Lives through Addressing the Fear of Environmental Liabilities

    Structural Failure of Precast-Concrete Span Sets Back Sydney Metro Job

    New Orleans Reviews System After Storm Swamps Pumps

    Prejudice to Insurer After Late Notice of Hurricane Damage Raises Issue of Fact

    Colorado Passes Compromise Bill on Construction Defects

    Bad Faith Jury Verdict Upheld After Insurer's Failure to Settle Within Policy Limits

    New Jersey’s Independent Contractor Rule

    US Secretary of Labor Withdraws Guidance Regarding Independent Contractors

    California’s SB 61: New Limits on Retention Payments in Private Construction Contracts

    DC Circuit Issues Two Important Clean Air Act and Administrative Law Decisions

    Concrete Worker Wins Lawsuit and Settles with Other Defendant

    Traub Lieberman Chair Emeritus Awarded the 2022 Vince Donohue Award by the International Association of Claim Professionals

    Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting Operation

    Design Professionals Owe a Duty of Care to Homeowners

    ICC/ASHRAE/USGBC/IES Green Model Code Integrates Existing Standards

    Justice Didn’t Ensure Mortgage Fraud Was Priority, IG Says

    Thanks to All for My 9th Straight Super Lawyers Election

    Spain Risks €10.6 Billion Flood Damage Bill, Sanchez Says

    U.S., Canada, Mexico Set New Joint Clean-Energy Goal

    Remodels Replace Construction in Redding

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 28 Years of Service!

    ADA Lawsuits Spur Renovation Work in Fresno Area

    New York Construction Practice Team Obtains Summary Judgment, Dismissal of Labor Law §240(1) Claim Against Municipal Entities

    Understanding Entitlement to Delays and Proper Support

    These Are the 13 Cities Where Millennials Can't Afford a Home

    Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues

    U.S. Home Prices Climbed 0.1% in July as Gains Slowed

    Mediation Fails In Federal Lawsuit Seeking Damages From Sureties for Alleged Contract Fraud

    Henderson Engineers Tests AI for Building Systems Design with Torch.AI

    Engineer TRC Fends Off Lawsuits After Merger

    Washington State Updates the Contractor Registration Statute

    OPINION: Stop Requiring Exhibit Lists!

    Resolve to Say “No” This Year

    Insured's Testimony On Expectation of Coverage Deemed Harmless

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Structural Engineer Found Liable for Defects that Rendered a Condominium Dangerously Unsafe

    Building Bold and Sustainable: A Talk with James O’Callaghan

    Additional Elements a Plaintiff Must Plead and Prove to Enforce Restrictive Covenant

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    First Suit Filed for Losses Caused by COVID-19

    The “Right to Repair” Construction Defects in the Rocky Mountain and Plains Region

    COVID-19 Response: California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board Implements Sweeping New Regulations to Prevent COVID-19 in the Workplace

    What is an Alternative Dispute Resolution?

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth
    Corporate Profile

    RICHLAND PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Richland, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Richland, Pennsylvania

    Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court

    June 15, 2026 —
    The Florida Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment on a collapse claim for the insured, rejecting the insurer’s arguments that were not presented to the trial court. Homeowner’s Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins, Co. v. Oakes, 2026 Fl. App. LEXIS 2086 (Fl. Ct. App. March 18, 2026). The insured’s ceiling collapsed in the secondary home on the insured’s property. The claim was reported to the insurer, but coverage was denied after its investigation. The insured sued the insurer for breach of contract. Under the Additional Coverage provisions of the policy, collapse was covered if it was “abrupt.” An abrupt collapse was not covered, however, if exclusions for “Fungi, Wet or Dry Rot” and “faulty, inadequate or defective design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, materials or maintenance” applied. The collapse provisions contained no language stating that the coverage granted in the provision was also subject to all the other exclusions in the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    The Best Lawyers in America® - Ball Janik Attorneys Earn Multiple Recognitions

    September 01, 2026 —
    Orlando, FL, August 20, 2026 – Ball Janik LLP is pleased to announce that 24 of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. The 33rd Best Lawyers edition recognitions are based on peer review and highlight attorneys across a range of practice areas. This recognition underscores the broad experience Ball Janik's attorneys bring to the firm's construction defect practice. "We're proud to be recognized by Best Lawyers again this year," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "These honors reflect the expertise and depth of our team, our continued growth across Florida, and our commitment to providing strong counsel to clients in complex construction, insurance recovery, and litigation matters." Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® include: Keegan A. Berry — Construction Law Brian T. Crevasse — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Todd Demetriades — Litigation - Construction Joseph R. Fitos — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Megan A. Picataggio — Construction Law Jon E. Lemole — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Salvatore G. Scro — Construction Law Nicholas B. Vargo — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Kelly M. Corcoran — Construction Law Gabriel Z. Coelho — Construction Law Evan J. Small — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Franchesco Soto — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Phillip E. Joseph — Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law James C. Prichard — Construction Law Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America include: Nicholas Passantino — Litigation - Construction Amanda L. Gonzalez — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Morgan N. Lester — Litigation - Construction Chris S. Tribbey — Construction Law Kyle Bugden — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Brian Tannenbaum — Construction Law Kayla Mosquera — Insurance Law Natasha L. Biela — Commercial Litigation Elijah C. Waring, Jr. — Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Greg K. Demers — Construction Law About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.

    From Dark Data to Building Intelligence

    July 13, 2026 —
    In this episode, I talk with Mark Sorsa-Leslie, founder and CEO of Auttaa AI, whose team just won first place in Luotea’s inaugural hackathon in Helsinki for turning property maintenance from reactive firefighting into proactive forecasting with AI. Mark is a chartered surveyor with 30 years of real estate data experience, previously the founder of the UK sensor company Beringar. We discuss why so much building data stays dark and siloed, from outdated networking technology to the shortage of people who understand both engineering and property. Mark explains how Auttaa bridges real-time building data with large language models, using what he calls an “influence graph” to surface correlations and causation across previously disconnected systems, such as linking occupancy patterns to CO2 readings to diagnose ventilation problems in minutes rather than days. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    May 05, 2026 —
    The court denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding genuine issues of fact regarding implication of the policy’s ensuing loss provision. Stella Prop. Dev.. & Event Productions, LLC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15854 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2026). Stella owned a cultural center that was insured under a commercial property all-risk policy issued by Auto-Owners. A windstorm with gusts of 65 miles per hour struck the Center causing damage. The Center’s inspector found extensive wind damage on nearly all facets of the roof. Further, the inspector found the existing organic shingles were in “very poor condition” and were “defective, discontinued, and no longer available.” The estimated cost of repairs to the roof was $108,010.52. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    May 26, 2026 —
    Brenda Radmacher, a partner in Seyfarth’s Construction Law practice and a mediator and arbitrator serving on the American Arbitration Association’s panels, is among the contributing authors to the American Bar Association’s forthcoming guide on construction disputes: Time – The Legal Implications of Project Delay in Construction. Drawing on three decades of experience, Radmacher authors Chapter 8, Contractor Delay Damages, offering practical insight into one of the most contested issues in construction litigation and arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...