BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania office building expert witness Mehoopany Pennsylvania
    Mehoopany Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessMehoopany Pennsylvania construction safety expertMehoopany Pennsylvania civil engineer expert witnessMehoopany Pennsylvania construction expert witness consultantMehoopany Pennsylvania ada design expert witnessMehoopany Pennsylvania structural concrete expertMehoopany Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mehoopany, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mehoopany Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tri-County Builders Association
    Local # 3962
    5183 Georgetown Rd
    Franklin, PA 16323
    Mehoopany Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Wayne County Builders Assoc
    Local # 3965
    PO Box 378
    Hawley, PA 18428

    Mehoopany Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lackawanna Home Builders Association
    Local # 3902
    116 N. Washington Ave.
    Scranton, PA 18503

    Mehoopany Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Pike County Builders Association
    Local # 3953
    209 E Harford St
    Milford, PA 18337

    Mehoopany Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3942
    PO Box 488
    Fredonia, PA 16124
    Mehoopany Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bradford County Chapter
    Local # 3930
    PO Box 213
    Monroeton, PA 18832
    Mehoopany Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Northeastern PA
    Local # 3932
    411 Main St
    Kingston, PA 18704

    Mehoopany Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mehoopany Pennsylvania


    U.K. Construction Growth Unexpectedly Accelerated in January

    What You Should Know About Liquidated Damages and Liability Caps for Delay and Performance Liquidated Damages

    Why and When Construction Robotics Makes Sense

    Businesspeople to Nevada: Revoke the Construction Defect Laws

    The Choice Is Yours – Or Is It? Anti-Choice-of-Laws Statutes Applicable to Construction Contracts

    California Contractors – You Should Know That Section 7141.5 May Be Your Golden Ticket

    U.K. Puts Tax on Developers to Fund Safer Apartment Blocks

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/08/23) – Buy and Sell With AI, Urban Real Estate Demand and Increasing Energy Costs

    A Few Construction Related Bills to Keep an Eye On in 2023 (UPDATED)

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    Texas Legislative Update

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Sobering Facts for Construction Safety Day

    Unlicensed Contractors Caught in a Sting Operation

    Segal McCambridge Expands West Coast Presence with the Addition of 36 Attorneys from Chapman Glucksman to Los Angeles Office

    No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Causing Property Damage to Insured's Product Only

    Duty to Defend Sorted Between Two Insurers Based Upon Lease and Policies

    Will a Notice of Non-Responsibility Prevent Enforcement of a California Mechanics Lien?

    No Additional Insured Coverage for Subcontractor's Work Outside Policy Period

    Singer Akon’s Multibillion-Dollar Futuristic City in Africa Gets Final Notice

    Miller Act Payment Bond Surety Bound to Arbitration Award

    Fifth Circuit Certifies Questions to Texas Supreme Court on Concurrent Causation Doctrine

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 28 Years of Service!

    Hawaii Supreme Court Says Aloha to Insurers Trying to Recoup Defense Costs From Policyholders

    Best Practices for ESI Collection in Construction Litigation

    Scott Saylin Expands Employment Litigation and Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 5: Valuation of Loss, Sublimits, and Amount of Potential Recovery

    Cyber Thieves Phish Away a $735K Payment to a Minnesota Contractor

    Employee Screening and Testing in the Covid-19 Era: Getting Back to Work

    Buy America/Buy American, a Primer For Contractors

    Forget Backyard Pools, Build a Swimming Pond Instead

    Tenn. Court of Appeals Finally Clarifies Contractor Licensing Laws, Holding An “Underlicensed” Contractor Is Violation of Tennessee’s Consumer Protection Act

    Congratulations 2020 DE, MA, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    PSA: Performing Construction Work in Virginia Requires a Contractor’s License

    The Importance of the Subcontractor Exception to the “Your Work” Exclusion

    Design Professionals Owe a Duty of Care to Homeowners

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 3: Standard Form Policy Exclusions

    Colorado’s Abbreviated Legislative Session Offers Builders a Reprieve

    No Hiring Surge by Homebuilders Says Industry Group

    Buy a House or Pay Off College? $1.2 Trillion Student Debt Heats Up in Capital

    2017 Construction Outlook: Slow, Mature Growth, but No Decline, Expected

    Fifth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment Award to Insurer on Hurricane Damage Claim

    Saudi Prince’s Megacity Shows Signs of Life

    Colorado Legislature Considering Making it Easier to Prevail on CCPA Claims

    AB 1701 Has Passed – Developers and General Contractors Are Now Required to Double Pay for Labor Due to Their Subcontractors’ Failure to Pay

    Your Bad Faith Jury Instruction Against an Insurer is Important

    These Are the 13 Cities Where Millennials Can't Afford a Home

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/24/24) – Long-Term Housing Issues in Hawaii, Underperforming REITs, and Growth in a Subset of the Hotel Sector

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denies Review of Pro-Policy Decision

    Court Addresses Insurers' Dispute Over Which is Primary, Which is Excess
    Corporate Profile

    MEHOOPANY PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Mehoopany, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Mehoopany's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mehoopany, Pennsylvania

    The GKN Aerospace Chemical Release and the Laws Designed to Address It

    July 06, 2026 —
    On May 21, 2026, a 34,000-gallon storage tank at the GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California began leaking methyl methacrylate (MMA), a volatile and highly flammable industrial chemical used to manufacture high-strength acrylic plastics. GKN Aerospace makes advanced military and commercial transparencies, such as aircraft canopies, windshields, cabin windows, bullet-resistant glass, and spacecraft windows. In polymer chemistry lingo, MMA is known as a monomer. Monomers are like individual links to a chain. Under the right conditions they link up (react) with each other to form long-chained polymers, or plastics. MMA is an unstable monomer that requires controlled storage conditions to avoid setting off a polymerization (chain) reaction. According to early reports, the MMA tank at GKN Aerospace overheated. The cause of the overheating is not yet clear, but the overheating may have created conditions enabling the MMA to initiate polymerization, which in turn generated heat, which in turn generated pressure, activating the tank’s pressure-relief system and releasing MMA vapor into the atmosphere. Concerns about a runaway reaction, massive release, and explosion led the Orange County Fire Authority to order evacuation of approximately 40,000 residents and closure of thirteen schools. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com

    Your AI Tool Could Be Your Next Breach of Contract

    October 20, 2026 —
    Like many industries, the construction industry is rapidly adopting artificial intelligence. AI-powered tools now help construction teams estimate costs, transcribe meetings, summarize RFIs, model schedules, and manage project documents faster than ever before. But amid this rush toward efficiency, a serious risk hides in plain sight: every time project documents are uploaded into a third-party AI tool, contractual confidentiality obligations may be implicated — or outright breached — exposing companies to potentially substantial and uncapped liability. General contractors often face strict confidentiality and nondisclosure obligations, whether under the prime construction contract or a separate NDA. This is especially true for complex projects or those involving proprietary technology — such as data centers, medical or scientific facilities, and energy generation and storage facilities. These confidentiality clauses typically define “confidential information” broadly to encompass all non-public information provided for the project, including plans, specifications, pricing, schedules, RFPs, and even the contract terms themselves. These confidentiality obligations almost always flow down to subcontractors. Reprinted courtesy of Laurie Choi, Snell & Wilmer and Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Choi may be contacted at lchoi@swlaw.com Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    June 22, 2026 —
    The court granted the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment because the insured failed to present evidence that the insurer failed to conduct a reasonable investigation. PSY Burger, LLC v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66991(C.D. Cal. March 20, 2026). The insured’s commercial property suffered heavy damage from tropical storm Hilary. State Farm denied coverage to repair the damage. The insured sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and bad faith due to an inadequate investigation. Apparently, the insured did not retain an expert to opine on claims handling. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars Lists

    August 16, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 3, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, and Sharon Oh-Kubisch were selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers list, and attorney Hannah Ellenhorn Bloom was selected to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars list. Jason Feld was recognized in the area of Construction Litigation. He is a founding partner of Kahana Feld and focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Properly Taking Judicial Notice of Florida’s Building Code

    October 12, 2026 —
    Many construction defects cases involve Florida’s Building Code. A recent non-construction case, BSREP II PBG Resort, LLC v Ginsburg, 2026 WL 265226 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), discussed a court taking judicial notice of a provision in the Florida Building Code. This case was a premise liability case where the plaintiff tripped in an asphalt parking lot. The plaintiff, without complying with proper procedural notice protocol, asked the court to take judicial notice of a section of Florida’s Building Code, i.e., admitting this section as relevant evidence in the case. The trial court granted the request for judicial notice and the plaintiff used this as the basis of her cross-examination, the jury instructions, and closing argument that the violation of this section of Florida’s Building Code was evidence of negligence. This was in error. First, Florida’s Building Code is NOT a statute but an administrative rule. Ginsburg, supra. As an administrative rule, a court “may” but is not obligated to take judicial notice of the rule – it is a permissive judicial notice request per Florida Statute s. 90.203 and 90.202(9). This is important because the trial court viewed Florida’s Building Code as a statute it mandatorily had to take judicial notice of per Florida Statute s. 90.201, which was in error. Because it was permissive, the plaintiff needed to comply with statutory procedural notice protocols, which the plaintiff failed to do. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com