BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania office building expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Grantville Pennsylvania
    Grantville Pennsylvania roofing and waterproofing expert witnessGrantville Pennsylvania engineering consultantGrantville Pennsylvania OSHA expert witness constructionGrantville Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessGrantville Pennsylvania fenestration expert witnessGrantville Pennsylvania construction expert witnessGrantville Pennsylvania construction forensic expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Grantville, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Grantville Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Blair-Bedford Builders Association
    Local # 3908
    1410 Allegheny Street
    Hollidaysburg, PA 16648

    Grantville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Metro Pittsburgh
    Local # 3944
    2041 Blvd Of The Allies
    Pittsburgh, PA 15219

    Grantville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Berks County
    Local # 3948
    25 Stevens Ave
    West Lawn, PA 19609

    Grantville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Harrisburg
    Local # 3924
    2416 Park Drive
    Harrisburg, PA 17110

    Grantville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of the Alleghenies
    Local # 3928
    1397 Eisenhower Blvd Suite 201
    Johnstown, PA 15904

    Grantville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lebanon County Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3938
    39 Klein Avenue
    Lebanon, PA 17042

    Grantville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Huntingdon Co Builders Association
    Local # 3917
    PO Box 399
    Huntingdon, PA 16652

    Grantville Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Grantville Pennsylvania


    ASCE and Accelerator for America Release Map to Showcase Projects from Bipartisan Infrastructure Law

    Travelers Injury Impact Report Highlights Longer Recovery Times Amid Declining Injury Rates

    Housing Bill Threatened by Rift on Help for Disadvantaged

    Professional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage Where Ordinary Negligence is Inseparably Intertwined With Professional Service

    Colorado Governor Polis’s Executive Order D 2020 101: Keeping Up with Colorado’s Shifting Eviction Landscape during COVID-19

    Buffett’s $11 Million Beach House Is Still on the Market

    'Taylor Swift Is an Economic Phenomenon': CE's Q1 2024 Economic Update and Forecast

    You Have Choices (Litigation Versus Mediation)

    To Ask or Not to Ask (Arbitrator Inquiries and the Obligation to Remain Neutral)

    AAA Revises Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit with Additional Million

    BWB&O Partner Jack Briscoe and Associate Anoushe Marandjian Win Summary Judgment Motion on Behalf of Homeowner Client!

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/23/25) – Builders Look for Startups, AI Transforms Real Estate and Interest Rates Stall Construction Momentum

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (11/8/23) – New Handling of Homelessness, Decline in Investments into ESG Funds, and Shrinking of a Homebuyer’s Dollar

    At Least 32 Dead in Massive US Storm, Extreme Risks Remain

    NARI Addresses Construction Defect Claim Issues for Remodeling Contractors

    Can an Architect, Hired by an Owner, Be Sued by the General Contractor?

    Don’t Do this When it Comes to Construction Liens

    Commercial Construction in the Golden State is Looking Pretty Golden

    NIST Florida Condo Collapse Probe Develops Dozens of Hypotheses

    Unpunished Racist Taunts: A Pennsylvania Harassment Case With No True 'Winner'

    Traub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull Obtains Favorable Arbitration Award In Year-Long High-Stakes Construction Defect Case

    Turkey to Start Building 200,000 Homes in March, Erdogan Says

    Preparing For and Avoiding Residential Construction Disputes: For Homeowners and Contractors

    Rescission of Policy for Misrepresentation in Application Reversed

    Minnesota Senate Office Building Called Unconstitutional

    Signed, Sealed and (Almost) Delivered: EU Council Authorizes Signing of U.S. – EU Bilateral Insurance Agreement

    Insurance Policies and Indemnity Provisions Are Not the Same

    BWB&O Partner Tyler Offenhauser and Associate Lizbeth Lopez Won Their Motion for Summary Judgment Based on the Privette Doctrine

    Colorado Court of Appeals Defines “Substantial Completion” for Subcontractors’ Work so as to Shorten the Period of Time in Which They Can Be Sued

    Los Angeles Considering Census of Seismically Unstable Buildings

    Key Ways Construction Companies Can Stay in Compliance with E-Verify

    Security on Large Construction Projects. The Payment Remedy You Probably Never Heard of

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Secured by Lewis Brisbois in Coverage Dispute Involving San Francisco 49ers’ Levi Stadium

    Bankrupt Canada Contractor Execs Ordered to Repay $26 Million

    City Drops Impact Fees to Encourage Commercial Development

    Sometimes You Get Away with Unwritten Contracts. . .

    Three Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Last Parcel of Rancho del Oro Masterplan Purchased by Cornerstone Communties

    A New Statute of Limitations on Construction Claims by VA State Agencies?

    David A. Frenznick Awarded Multiple Accolades in the 2020 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America

    Are Proprietary Specifications Illegal?

    ASCE Statement on Calls to Suspend the Federal Gas Tax

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (10/06/21)

    Colorado’s New Mechanics’ Lien Protections: What S.B. 26-074 Means for Your Next Project

    Alaska Supreme Court Dismisses Claims of Uncooperative Pro Se Litigant in Defect Case

    What I Love and Hate About Updating My Contracts From an Owners’ Perspective

    The Sensible Resurgence of the Multigenerational Home

    Private Real Estate Listings Ignite Fight Over How US Homes Are Sold

    Design-Assist, an Ambiguous Term Causing Conflict in the Construction Industry[1]
    Corporate Profile

    GRANTVILLE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Grantville, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Grantville, Pennsylvania

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    May 14, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partner Jonathan Federman, Partner Thomas Cronin, and Senior Counsel Garrett Lee recently secured a victory in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, on behalf of the firm’s client, an architectural firm, in a liability dispute. The case arose following an entity’s purchase of a 111-unit building for use as an investment or rental property. The plaintiff made claims against the architect of the building, alleging that there were design defects that breached an implied warranty, as well as a negligence claim. GRSM argued that an architect could not be liable for implied warranties, particularly for an implied warranty which no Illinois court has ever recognized. GRSM further argued that Illinois law bars an architect from liability for negligence arising from a duty pursuant to contract under the economic loss doctrine. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Best Lawyers Recognizes 33 White and Williams LLP Lawyers

    August 24, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is pleased to congratulate our attorneys recognized among the 2027 Best Lawyers in America® rankings. Best Lawyers® has recognized Michael W. Horner, Chair of the Healthcare Group and Managing Partner of the Cherry Hill, NJ Office, as a 2027 "Lawyer of the Year” in the area of Litigation - Insurance for Cherry Hill. Michael Horner’s has extensive experience litigating, mediating and arbitrating complex catastrophic cases throughout multiple jurisdictions in the Northeast, with litigation and counseling experience that spans several decades in the areas of healthcare, catastrophic loss and employment matters in multiple state and federal jurisdictions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Predict Risk, Not Incidents: A New Analytics Framework for Your Construction Safety Data

    August 03, 2026 —
    Behind every “zero-incidents” company report, hidden hazards may already be accumulating—risks that could become serious injuries tomorrow. The question every executive should be asking is not, “Did anything go wrong last month?” It is: “Where is risk building on my projects right now?” Most construction organizations cannot answer that question. Not because the data does not exist—it does. Every active project generates daily inspection findings, labor records, near-miss reports and audit results. The problem is that standard safety systems collect this data and then report it in ways that make it operationally useless for prevention. They describe the past. They predict nothing. The predictive safety analytics framework (PSAF) is a practical, deployable system developed from years of applying data science to large-scale construction portfolio operations that takes the safety data construction organizations already collect and transforms it into a forward-looking risk signal. The result? A single weekly score that tells executives where risk is concentrating across their portfolio before anyone gets hurt. Reprinted courtesy of Tabrez Zahoor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    New York Construction Employers Face New Reporting and Cancellation Pay Requirements Beginning December 8, 2026

    October 26, 2026 —
    Effective December 8, 2026, pursuant to the New York Construction Reporting Pay Act, employers in the New York State construction industry will be subjected to new reporting requirements and will be required to pay both union and non-union workers for certain last-minute schedule changes, even when the disruption is caused by weather, failed inspections, material shortages, site-access restrictions, or delays attributable to owners, general contractors, or other trades. For many contractors, routine decisions that have historically been considered part of construction scheduling risk may now create mandatory wage obligations, prevailing wage compliance concerns, and potential wage-and-hour litigation exposure. Reprinted courtesy of Bradley J. Bartolomeo, Lewis Brisbois and Clare M. Cunningham, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Bartolomeo may be contacted at Bradley.Bartolomeo@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Cunningham may be contacted at Clare.Cunningham@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Utah’s Emerging Framework for Responsible Data Center Development

    September 08, 2026 —
    Utah is establishing itself as one of the nation’s most attractive jurisdictions for large-scale data center development, with a structured, defensible regulatory pathway that gives developers and investors the clarity needed to deploy capital at scale. The cornerstone is Executive Order 2026-03, “Establishing a Higher Bar for Data Center Development in Utah,” signed by Governor Spencer J. Cox on May 29, 2026. The Executive Order creates an actionable compliance framework letting developers demonstrate stewardship across water, air quality, energy, wildlife, and community engagement – reducing regulatory and reputational risk. Recent enactments on energy self-supply and water rights operationalize these principles, while a few counties have adopted short-term local moratoria to update zoning; understanding how these interact with the state framework matters for site selection. Reprinted courtesy of Denise A. Dragoo, Snell & Wilmer and Josh Miller, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Dragoo may be contacted at ddragoo@swlaw.com Mr. Miller may be contacted at jmiller@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/19/26) – Single-Family Housing Investors Worry, Confidence in Multifamily REITs and Construction Backlog Falls

    September 08, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. Chamber of Commerce creates Housing Advisory Council, a legal battle develops over new federal rules related to mortgage escrow accounts, hospitality dealmakers pursue ‘bigger, higher-conviction’ M&A, and more!
    • In the wake of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becoming law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has created a Housing Advisory Council with the goal of advancing market-driven policies that help increase housing supply and promote affordability. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    • Investors in the single-family housing market are increasingly concerned about interest rates, rising insurance and home costs, and the ongoing war with Iran. (Diana Olick, CNBC)
    • A legal battle is brewing over new federal rules related to accounts that hold money to pay homeowners’ property taxes and insurance payments. (Sarah Agostino, CNBC)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com