BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania housing expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania office building expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Georgetown Pennsylvania
    Georgetown Pennsylvania construction safety expertGeorgetown Pennsylvania OSHA expert witness constructionGeorgetown Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessGeorgetown Pennsylvania construction expert testimonyGeorgetown Pennsylvania architectural expert witnessGeorgetown Pennsylvania construction claims expert witnessGeorgetown Pennsylvania building code expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Georgetown, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Georgetown Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Huntingdon Co Builders Association
    Local # 3917
    PO Box 399
    Huntingdon, PA 16652

    Georgetown Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mifflin-Juniata Chapter
    Local # 3926
    5 Oak Drive
    Thompsontown, PA 17094

    Georgetown Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Schuylkill Builders Assn
    Local # 3954
    1036 Schylkill Mountain Rd
    Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972

    Georgetown Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lehigh Valley Builders Association
    Local # 3904
    1524 W Linden St
    Allentown, PA 18102

    Georgetown Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701

    Georgetown Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Metro Pittsburgh
    Local # 3944
    2041 Blvd Of The Allies
    Pittsburgh, PA 15219

    Georgetown Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Blair-Bedford Builders Association
    Local # 3908
    1410 Allegheny Street
    Hollidaysburg, PA 16648

    Georgetown Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Georgetown Pennsylvania


    Rachel Reynolds Selected as Prime Member of ADTA

    Tips for Drafting Construction Contracts

    Comply with your Insurance Policy's Conditions Precedent (Post-Loss Obligations)

    No Duty To Defend Additional Insured When Bodily Injury Not Caused by Insured

    The Louvre Abu Dhabi’s Mega-Structure Domed Roof Completed

    MetLife Takes Majority Stake in New San Francisco Office Tower

    Powering Goal Congruence in Construction Through Smart Contracts

    Musk Says ‘Chicago Express’ Tunnel Project Could Start Work in Months

    Microwave Transmission of Space-Based Solar Power: The Focus of New Attention

    The Importance of Providing Notice to a Surety

    Difficulty in Defending Rental Supplier’s Claim Under Credit Application

    Tetra Tech-U.S. Cleanup Dispute in San Francisco Grows

    Fraud and Construction Contracts- Like Oil and Water?

    BIM Meets Reality on the Construction Site

    Negligence Claim Not Barred by Gist of the Action Doctrine

    New WA Law Caps Retainage on Private Projects at 5%

    Motion to Strike Insurer's Expert Opinion Granted

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 2: Coverage for Smoke-Related Damages

    New York’s Lawsky Proposes Changes to Reduce Home Foreclosures

    Winning Attorney Fees in Litigation as a California Construction Contractor or Subcontractor

    The Unpost, Post: Dynamex and the Construction Indianapolis

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    Payne & Fears Secures $1.9 Million in Defense Costs for Homebuilder Client in Summary Judgment Win Against Insurer

    Executive Insights 2024: Leaders in Construction Law

    Insurer Wrongfully Denies Coverage When Household Member Fails to Submit to EUO

    Beam Fracture on Closed Mississippi River Bridge Is at Least Two Years Old

    Builders Support Most of Bipartisan Housing Reform Bill in Congress

    L.A. Makes $4.5 Billion Bet on Olympics After Boston Backs Out

    Fifth Circuit Finds Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case

    Anti-Assignment Provision Unenforceable in Kentucky

    Sean Shecter to Join American University Environmental and Energy Law Alumni Advisory Council

    Builder Waits too Long to Dispute Contract in Construction Defect Claim

    Speeding up Infrastructure Projects with the Cloud

    Thomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)

    Construction Firms Complain of Missed Payments on Redevelopment Project

    Liquidated Damages: Too High and It’s a Penalty. Too Low and You’re Out of Luck.

    Former UN General Assembly President Charged in Bribe Scheme

    New York Appellate Court Affirms 1966 Insurance Policy Continues to Cover WTC Asbestos Claims

    Reminder: Just Being Incorporated Isn’t Enough

    Three Steps to a Safer Jobsite

    The Biggest Trials Coming to Courts Around the World in 2021

    Yet ANOTHER Reminder to Always Respond

    COVID-19 Business Interruption Claims Four Years Later: What Have We Learned?

    Cybersecurity "Flash" Warning for Construction and Manufacturing Businesses

    New Jersey Courts Sign "Death Knell" for 1979 Weedo Decision

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap - The New Science of Jury Trial Advocacy

    Schools Remain Top Priority in Carolinas as Cleanup From Storms Continues

    Duty to Defend For Accident Exists, But Not Duty to Indeminfy

    Wharf Holdings to Sell Entire Sino-Ocean Stake for $284 Million

    Boston’s Tunnel Project Plagued by Water
    Corporate Profile

    GEORGETOWN PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Georgetown, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Georgetown's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Georgetown, Pennsylvania

    Court Rules Insurer AIG Can't Claw Back $50M Storm Payout From Turner

    October 20, 2026 —
    A Delaware court judge ruled earlier this month that insurer AIG cannot claw back $50 million from Turner Construction for two insurance claim payouts it has made to New York University's Langone Medical Center. The dispute relates to the 2012 flooding of the university's Manhattan hospital center during Superstorm Sandy in October 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Sausage-Making Often Relies on the Good Sense of the Chef Rather than the Recipe

    June 23, 2026 —
    Even for lawyers, the rules governing litigation can get complex and convoluted. Does something need to be filed? What needs to be filed? When is the deadline for filing? Simple questions with not always with straightforward answers. This was the case in R & J Sheet Metal, Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Construction Co. of California, 111 Cal.App.5th 878 (2025), which involved sheet metal panels lost when they fell into the Port of Long Beach harbor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Michael C. Zisa and Phillip Boldt Co-Author D.C. Chapter of “50-State Guide to Electronic Execution of the General Agreement of Indemnity”

    October 06, 2026 —
    Michael C. Zisa, Co-Managing Partner of P&A’s Washington, D.C. office, Chair of the Surety and Construction Related Insurance Defense practice, and Co-Chair of the Crisis Management team, and Phillip Boldt, an Associate in P&A’s Washington, D.C. office, have co-authored the District of Columbia chapter of the American Bar Association (ABA) Fidelity and Surety Law Committee and The Surety & Fidelity Association of America’s (SFAA), “50-State Guide to Electronic Execution of the General Agreement of Indemnity.” Reprinted courtesy of Michael C. Zisa, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Zisa may be contacted at mzisa@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    September 21, 2026 —
    The largest single-span steel plate girder bridge launch in the nation wasn’t about setting records. Alaska’s Juneau Creek Bridge design was a matter of necessity. The fully erected steel plate girder bridge, featuring a 440-ft main span hovering 285 ft above the Juneau Creek, was part of the larger Sterling Highway project. It offered a logistical challenge but was chosen among over a dozen bridge types due to the unique constraints brought by the mountainous site. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tim Newcomb, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Pay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted Line

    August 03, 2026 —
    Buried deep in the fine print of a subcontract, a pay-if-paid clause may be looming. If you are a subcontractor or supplier, misreading these clauses can put your cash flow at risk. If you are an owner or general contractor, drafting them incorrectly can leave you with obligations you never intended — or unenforceable protections you were counting on. It is more important than ever to understand when pay-if-paid clauses hold up and when they do not, as well as recent litigation and drafting trends. Whether you are negotiating a new agreement, reviewing your standard form contracts, or staring down a payment dispute, understanding how Arizona law treats pay-if-paid clauses is essential. In this article, we break down key considerations, walk through the legal standards Arizona courts apply, and offer practical tips to consider to help you protect your payment rights on the next project. Reprinted courtesy of Christian Fernandez, Snell & Wilmer and Matthew Racioppo, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Fernandez may be contacted at cfernandez@swlaw.com Mr. Racioppo may be contacted at mracioppo@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Rogue AI — Is Your Company Prepared?

    September 28, 2026 —
    The recent wave of "rogue AI" incidents should be a wake-up call for every business leader and risk manager paying attention. Recent accounts document a sobering reality: AI systems from multiple leading AI developers have each escaped controlled testing environments and caused real-world harm—compromising outside infrastructure, exploiting third-party vulnerabilities, and even canceling another person's reservation to help a user jump a waitlist. These aren't hypotheticals from a sci-fi movie. They happened this summer. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    May 26, 2026 —
    The insurer successfully moved for summary judgment, eliminating the insured’s claim for roof damage due to windstorm. Mulas v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20537 (Jan. 30, 2026). The insureds’ commercial property sustained windstorm damage during Hurricane Ian. Westchester denied the claim. The insureds believed Westchester wrongfully denied coverage for roof damage and various interior damage to property. The insureds also argued that Westchester’s actual cash value (ACV) payment did not reflect the fully insured loss. The insureds sued and Westchester moved for summary judgment. Westchester argued the roof damage was not covered because Hurricane Ian did not cause the damage. Westchester hired an engineer who determined the roof damage was not caused by wind from Hurricane Ian. Westchester pointed out that the insureds’ expert also found no wind damage on the roof. The insureds offered no other evidence suggesting the hurricane caused roof damage. Therefore, the insureds could not show that Westchester breached the policy by denying coverage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com