BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania office building expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania housing expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Centerport Pennsylvania
    Centerport Pennsylvania expert witness commercial buildingsCenterport Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessCenterport Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witnessCenterport Pennsylvania window expert witnessCenterport Pennsylvania civil engineering expert witnessCenterport Pennsylvania slope failure expert witnessCenterport Pennsylvania expert witness roofing
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Centerport, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Centerport Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Metro Pittsburgh
    Local # 3944
    2041 Blvd Of The Allies
    Pittsburgh, PA 15219

    Centerport Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Blair-Bedford Builders Association
    Local # 3908
    1410 Allegheny Street
    Hollidaysburg, PA 16648

    Centerport Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Huntingdon Co Builders Association
    Local # 3917
    PO Box 399
    Huntingdon, PA 16652

    Centerport Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mifflin-Juniata Chapter
    Local # 3926
    5 Oak Drive
    Thompsontown, PA 17094

    Centerport Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Schuylkill Builders Assn
    Local # 3954
    1036 Schylkill Mountain Rd
    Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972

    Centerport Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lehigh Valley Builders Association
    Local # 3904
    1524 W Linden St
    Allentown, PA 18102

    Centerport Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701

    Centerport Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Centerport Pennsylvania

    Corporate Profile

    CENTERPORT PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Centerport, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Centerport's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Centerport, Pennsylvania

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    The Leak Was Repaired. Why Is It Back? What California HOA Boards Should Document Next

    November 09, 2026 —
    A resident reports water staining near a window. The HOA arranges a repair, the area dries, and the complaint is closed. Months later, the stain returns. Then another resident reports a similar problem elsewhere in the building. At The Naumann Law Firm, we encourage HOA boards and property managers to pay attention to that sequence. A returning leak does not automatically mean the building has a construction defect. It does mean the board needs a clear record of what happened, what was repaired, and what changed afterward. Start With the History, Not Just the New Stain When a leak returns, the latest photograph tells only part of the story. Pull together the earlier maintenance request, inspection notes, photographs, repair proposal, invoice, and any messages from the resident or contractor. Then ask:
    • Was the leak reported in the same location before?
    • What did the contractor identify as the cause?
    • What work was completed, and when?
    • Did the repair address the source of the water or only the visible damage?
    • Have other units or common areas experienced similar symptoms?
    These details help a board understand whether it is dealing with a new problem, an unsuccessful repair, or a pattern that needs a broader investigation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Naumann Law Firm, PC

    Rogue AI — Is Your Company Prepared?

    September 28, 2026 —
    The recent wave of "rogue AI" incidents should be a wake-up call for every business leader and risk manager paying attention. Recent accounts document a sobering reality: AI systems from multiple leading AI developers have each escaped controlled testing environments and caused real-world harm—compromising outside infrastructure, exploiting third-party vulnerabilities, and even canceling another person's reservation to help a user jump a waitlist. These aren't hypotheticals from a sci-fi movie. They happened this summer. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    September 21, 2026 —
    The largest single-span steel plate girder bridge launch in the nation wasn’t about setting records. Alaska’s Juneau Creek Bridge design was a matter of necessity. The fully erected steel plate girder bridge, featuring a 440-ft main span hovering 285 ft above the Juneau Creek, was part of the larger Sterling Highway project. It offered a logistical challenge but was chosen among over a dozen bridge types due to the unique constraints brought by the mountainous site. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tim Newcomb, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    June 29, 2026 —
    The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and b
    Is Everybody Single? More Than Half the U.S. Now, Up From 37% in '76

    Trump Sues Casinos to Get Conditions Fixed or Name Off

    Haight Welcomes Elizabeth Lawley

    Fifth Circuit Decision on Number of Occurrences Underscores Need to Carefully Tailor Your Insurance Program<
    Industry Practices Questioned After Girder Fractures at Salesforce Transit Center

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    Corrective Action Protest Grounds for GSA Schedule Federal Construction Contractors

    Courts Will Not Rewrite Your Post-Loss Property Insurance Obligations

    U.S. Housing Starts Exceed Estimates After a Stronger December

    Court Says KBR Construction Costs in Iraq were Unreasonable

    GRSM Team Wins Summary Judgment in Million-Dollar HOA Dispute

    Kansas City Airport Terminal Project Faces Delays, Rising Costs

    Evacuations in Santa Barbara County as more Mudslides are Predicted

    Texas Approves Law Ensuring Fair and Open Competition

    GIS and BIM Integration Will Transform Infrastructure Design and Construction

    Beyond the Statute: How the Colorado Court Upheld Modified Accrual in Construction Contracts

    Congratulations 2024 DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Cybersecurity “Flash” Warning for Construction and Manufacturing Businesses

    U.S. State Adoption of the National Electrical Code

    Colorado Adopts Twombly-Iqbal “Plausibility” Standard

    In Supreme Court Showdown, California Appeals Courts Choose Sides Regarding Whether Right to Repair Act is Exclusive Remedy for Homeowners

    Boilerplate Contract Language on Permits could cause Problems for Contractors

    HHMR Joins Forces with HBF at 2025 Blitz Build: Building More Than Just Ramps

    Designer of World’s Tallest Building Wants to Turn Skyscrapers Into Batteries

    Congress Considers Pandemic Risk Insurance Act to Address COVID-19 Business Interruptions Losses

    The United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Finds Wrap-Up Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage of Additional Insureds

    South Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco Defects

    Building Supplier Sued for Late and Defective Building Materials

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    Are We Having Fun Yet? Construction In a Post-COVID World (Law Note)

    President Trump Nullifies “Volks Rule” Regarding Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Recordkeeping Requirements

    Federal Courts Keep Chipping Away at the CDC Eviction Moratorium

    As California Faces Mandatory Water Use Reductions How Will the Construction Industry be Impacted?

    Toll Brothers Climbs After Builder Reports Higher Sales

    Union THUGS Plead Guilty

    Traub Lieberman Partners Ryan Jones and Scot Samis Obtain Affirmation of Final Summary Judgment

    John O’Meara is Selected as America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators

    Miller Act Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling

    What is the True Value of Rooftop Solar Panels?

    The 411 on the New 415 Location of the Golden State Warriors

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    Uneven Code Enforcement Seen in Earthquake-Damaged Buildings in Turkey

    Anchorage Building Codes Credited for Limited Damage After Quakes

    Owners Bound by Arbitration Clause on Roofing Shingles Packaging

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tender Is the Fight”

    Gone Fishing: Tenant’s Insurer Casts A Line Seeking To Subrogate Against The Landlord

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Reminder: Pay if Paid Not All Encompassing (but Could it be?)

    Supply Chain Delay Recommendations

    Where There's Smoke...California's New Emergency Wildfire Smoke Protection Regulation And What Employers Are Required To Do

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    Amended Again?! Critical Changes to RPAPL § 881: What New York Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know

    China Allows Construction to Resume of High-Rise Stopped for Last Decade

    Building on New Risks: Construction in the Age of Greening