BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Fall Creek Oregon casino resort expert witness Fall Creek Oregon low-income housing expert witness Fall Creek Oregon condominiums expert witness Fall Creek Oregon custom home expert witness Fall Creek Oregon parking structure expert witness Fall Creek Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Fall Creek Oregon office building expert witness Fall Creek Oregon townhome construction expert witness Fall Creek Oregon institutional building expert witness Fall Creek Oregon production housing expert witness Fall Creek Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Fall Creek Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Fall Creek Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Fall Creek Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Fall Creek Oregon custom homes expert witness Fall Creek Oregon tract home expert witness Fall Creek Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Fall Creek Oregon housing expert witness Fall Creek Oregon retail construction expert witness Fall Creek Oregon industrial building expert witness Fall Creek Oregon hospital construction expert witness Fall Creek Oregon
    Fall Creek Oregon reconstruction expert witnessFall Creek Oregon construction forensic expert witnessFall Creek Oregon construction claims expert witnessFall Creek Oregon defective construction expertFall Creek Oregon architect expert witnessFall Creek Oregon roofing and waterproofing expert witnessFall Creek Oregon fenestration expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fall Creek, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fall Creek Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702

    Fall Creek Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Lane County
    Local # 3824
    1065 River Rd
    Eugene, OR 97404

    Fall Creek Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420

    Fall Creek Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Fall Creek Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Willamette Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3805
    PO Box 440 32054 Old Hwy 34
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Fall Creek Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471

    Fall Creek Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814
    Fall Creek Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fall Creek Oregon


    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    BP Is Not an Additional Insured Under Transocean's Policy

    Insurance Tips for Contractors

    New Mandatory Bond Notice Forms in Florida

    Single-Family Home Starts Seen Catching Up to Surging U.S. Sales

    The 411 on the New 415 Location of the Golden State Warriors

    The “Up” House is “Up” for Sale

    Subcontractors Found Liable to Reimburse Insurer Defense Costs in Equitable Subrogation Action

    Florida Issues Emergency Fraud Prevention Rule to Protect Policyholders in Wake of Catastrophic Storms

    Pandemic Magnifies Financial Risk in Construction: What Executives Can Do to Speed up Customer Payments

    Another Case Highlighting the Difference Between CGL Policies and Performance Bonds

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Nevada for Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Summary Judgment for Insurer on Construction Defect Claim Reversed

    Quick Note: Subcontractor Payment Bond = Common Law Payment Bond

    Additional Insured Secures Defense Under Subcontractor's Policy

    Study May Come Too Late for Construction Defect Bill

    The Enforceability of “Pay-If-Paid” Provisions Affirmed in New Jersey

    Eleventh Circuit Finds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Green Home Predictions That Are Best Poised to Come True in 2014 and Beyond (guest post)

    Top 10 Take-Aways: the ABA Forum's 2024 Mid-Winter Meeting

    Seattle Independent Contractor Ordinance – Pitfalls for Unwary Construction Professionals

    Housing Buoyed by 20-Year High for Vet’s Loans: Mortgages

    Key Amendments to Insurance Claims-Handling Regulations in Puerto Rico

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    Appellate Court Endorses Discretionary Test for Vicarious Disqualification of Law Firms Due To New Attorney’s Conflict

    West Coast Casualty’s Quarter Century of Service

    Enforceability of Contract Provisions Extending Liquidated Damages Beyond Substantial Completion

    As Evidence Grows, Regions Prepare for Sea Level Rise

    Presidential Executive Order 14008: The Climate Crisis Order

    Texas Enacts Landmark Restrictions on Foreign Land Ownership Under SB 17

    10 Answers to Those Nagging Mechanics Lien Questions Keeping You Up at Night. Kind of

    White House Proposal Returns to 1978 NEPA Review Procedures

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    New York Bridge to Be Largest Infrastructure Project in North America

    Building Supplier Sued for Late and Defective Building Materials

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    Contract Terms Can Impact the Accrual Date For Florida’s Statute of Repose

    The Power of Planning: Four Key Themes for Mitigating Risk in Construction

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (4/17/24) – Travel & Tourism Reach All-Time High, President Biden Emphasizes Housing in SOTU Address, and State Transportation Projects Under Scrutiny

    New 2021 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards Effective February 23, 2021

    Disrupt a Broken Industry—The Industrial Construction Sandbox

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    Project Delivery Methods: A Bird’s-Eye View

    Illinois Supreme Court Holds that Constructions Defects May Constitute “Property Damage” Caused By An “Occurrence” Under Standard CGL Policy, Overruling Prior Appellate Court Precedent

    Trial Date Discussed for Las Vegas HOA Takeover Case

    Builder’s Risk Coverage—Construction Defects

    Risky Business: Contractual Protections in the 'New Normal'

    No Coverage for Faulty Installation of Windows

    Insurer's Attempt to Strike Experts in Collapse Case Fails
    Corporate Profile

    FALL CREEK OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Fall Creek, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fall Creek, Oregon

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Safeguarding Your Privileged Construction Information With a Clawback Agreement

    June 08, 2026 —
    For contractors and construction executives, a dispute that escalates to litigation brings risks that go well beyond the jobsite. When a dispute escalates to litigation, the attorney-client privilege is a critical protection to safeguard your interests. Disclosing privileged material can undermine your litigation position and, in some cases, negatively impact your business. In the construction context, this often includes sensitive communications about project delays, defect investigations, safety incidents or payment disputes—materials that can significantly impact both liability and reputation. During litigation, the discovery process requires the exchange of documents and data with your adversary. If privileged materials are disclosed to your adversary during discovery you risk the waiver of your privilege, which in plain terms means you lose the protection of the privilege and make the privileged information, and in some cases all other information related to the same subject matter, available to your adversary. It is critical that your attorney take steps to protect against the unintentional disclosure of privileged materials during discovery to avoid a waiver. Reprinted courtesy of Laura Fraher, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Ms. Fraher may be contacted at lfraher@barclaydamon.com

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    July 20, 2026 —
    A settlement agreement does not need to be executed for it to be enforceable as long as there was a MEETING OF THE MINDS. The same rings true for any contract regardless of whether the contract is signed – THERE NEEDS TO BE A MEETING OF THE MINDS. In a recent case dealing with the settlement agreement on a construction lien, the essential settlement terms (money and mutual release) were memorialized in an e-mail exchange between the parties (owner and subcontractor). The settlement required the owner to pay the principal amount plus some attorney’s fees and then a mutual general release would be prepared. In response to the confirmatory email, the owner sent a check, which the subcontractor deposited, but the owner refused to sign the release signed and sent by the subcontractor. The owner further claimed it doesn’t need to pay the attorney’s fees because the lien amount was paid in full. The subcontractor sued arguing the owner breached the terms of the settlement. The appellate court agreed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Best Lawyers in America

    September 08, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP partner Garret Murai has been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the area of Construction Law. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States are recognized by Best Lawyers in America®. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.