BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Adams Oregon low-income housing expert witness Adams Oregon multi family housing expert witness Adams Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Adams Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Adams Oregon custom homes expert witness Adams Oregon townhome construction expert witness Adams Oregon casino resort expert witness Adams Oregon tract home expert witness Adams Oregon institutional building expert witness Adams Oregon office building expert witness Adams Oregon condominiums expert witness Adams Oregon housing expert witness Adams Oregon condominium expert witness Adams Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Adams Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Adams Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Adams Oregon parking structure expert witness Adams Oregon retail construction expert witness Adams Oregon Medical building expert witness Adams Oregon industrial building expert witness Adams Oregon production housing expert witness Adams Oregon
    Adams Oregon construction project management expert witnessesAdams Oregon expert witness structural engineerAdams Oregon building consultant expertAdams Oregon building envelope expert witnessAdams Oregon construction defect expert witnessAdams Oregon architectural engineering expert witnessAdams Oregon architect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Adams, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Adams Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838
    Adams Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138

    Adams Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035

    Adams Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Adams Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301

    Adams Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814
    Adams Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389

    Adams Oregon Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Adams Oregon


    Insured Versus Insured Clause Does Not Bar Coverage

    Updated Covid-19 Standards In The Workplace

    Washington Supreme Court Expands Contractor Notice Obligations

    A Bill for an Act Concerning Workers’ Compensation – 2014 Edition

    Work to Solve the Mental Health Crisis in Construction

    Keeping KeyArena's Landmark Lid Overhead at Climate Pledge Arena Redevelopment Is A 22,000-Ton Balancing Act

    California to Require Disclosure of Construction Defect Claims

    Housing Starts in U.S. Little Changed From Stronger January

    Nine Haight Attorneys Selected for Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch 2021

    Appeals Court Affirms Carrier’s Duty to Pay Costs Taxed Against Insured in Construction Defect Suit

    Terms of Your Teaming Agreement Matter

    New EPA Regulation for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments

    Colorado Adopts Twombly-Iqbal “Plausibility” Standard

    Collapse Claim Fails Due To Defectively Designed Roof and Deck

    Depreciating Labor Costs May be Factor in Actual Cash Value

    Only Two Weeks Until BHA’s Texas MCLE Seminar in San Antonio

    More Broad-Based Expansion for Construction Industry Expected in 2015

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Indeed, You Just Design ‘Em”

    Four Common Construction Contracts

    Survey Finds Tough Labor Market Top-of-mind for Busy Georgia Contractors

    More Charges Anticipated in Las Vegas HOA Scam

    Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail”

    Foundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over Cracks

    Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Expands into Georgia

    From Dark Data to Building Intelligence

    Preparing the Next Generation of Skilled Construction Workers: AGC Workforce Development Plan

    Sixth Circuit Rejects Claim for Reverse Bad Faith

    Sometimes You Get Away with Unwritten Contracts. . .

    'Time to Be Human': Paul Doherty Talks Tech and Architecture

    Federal Court Enforces “Limits” and “Most We Will Pay” Clauses in Additional Insured Endorsement

    Meet D1's Neutrals Series: KENNETH FLOREY

    Ex-Detroit Demolition Official Sentenced for Taking Bribes

    Pennsylvania Modernizes State Building Code

    Breach Of Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Packaged With Contract Disputes Act Claim

    Settlement between IOSHA and Mid-America Reached after Stage Collapse Fatalities

    Federal Subcontractor Who Failed to Follow FAR Regulations Finds That “Fair” and “Just” are Not Synonymous

    Morrison Bridge Allegedly Crumbling

    Evaluating Construction Trends From 2023 and Forecasting For 2024

    Judge Dismisses Suit to Block Construction of Obama Center

    Smart Contracts Poised to Impact the Future of Construction

    July Sees Big Drop in Home Sales

    Overview of New Mexico Construction Law

    Hurricane Harvey: Understanding the Insurance Aspects, Immediate Actions for Risk Managers

    Congratulations to Newport Beach Lawyers Rick Peterson and Lindsey Wells on an Outstanding Trial Victory in a Habitability Case!

    Defects in Texas High School Stadium Angers Residents

    Impasse Over Corruption Charges Costs SNC $3.7 Billion, CEO Says

    Wait! Don’t Sign Yet: Reviewing Contract Protections During the COVID Pandemic

    Kahana Feld Secures Voluntary Discontinuance With Prejudice in High-Exposure Trip-and-Fall Case

    Breaking the Impasse by Understanding Blame

    Blackstone to Buy Cosmopolitan Resort for $1.73 Billion
    Corporate Profile

    ADAMS OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Adams, Oregon Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Adams, Oregon

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/11/25) – An AI Inflection Point for Hotels, Investor Pivot in Build-to-Rent and Looming Legislation for Single-Family Investors

    March 24, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, lodging demand for World Cup brings growth, commercial property management firms use of AI becomes firmer, construction industry shows slow start to the year, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Four Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    March 17, 2026 —
    We congratulate our four Payne & Fears attorneys who have been named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. This recognition highlights the next generation of legal talent, honoring attorneys who have made a strong impact in their practice areas early in their careers. Employment & Labor Taylor Brown Bree Oswald Employment Litigation: Defense Tyler Runge Business Litigation Brian Shaw Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!

    September 08, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, John Toohey, and Tyler Offenhauser have been named to the 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers list. Notably, Nicole Whyte was also selected to the Top 50 Orange County Super Lawyers list, an honor reflecting her outstanding work, leadership, and impact in the legal community. Associates Kevin Moore, Sukayna Jaidi, and Andrew Mathews are also being recognized as 2027 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. Our team is being honored for their distinguished service and dedication in Family Law, Civil, Business, Construction, and Personal Injury Litigation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP

    Contractor Dispute Resolution Framework and Prevention

    July 06, 2026 —
    WHAT DEFINES A CONTRACTOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK A contractor dispute resolution framework is a structured system of contractual terms, governance processes and escalation pathways designed to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts between contracting parties with minimal disruption to cost, schedule and performance. The framework operates as both a preventive control and a corrective mechanism. Preventive elements establish clarity in scope, expectations and accountability before work begins. Corrective elements define how disagreements are identified, documented, escalated and resolved once they arise. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros Secure a $0.00 Settlement on a Multimillion-Dollar Construction Defect Case!

    April 14, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros’ client was a construction supervisor on a palatial mansion. The homeowners claimed millions of dollars in damages and asserted the client was a general contractor (GC) and so responsible for the alleged defects. Jeff and Ryan took more than 15 depositions, reinforcing their trial strategy theme: that the client was not a GC, but Plaintiffs were. They secured significant concessions from Plaintiffs, pressed Plaintiffs’ own negligent construction choices, and made the risk of trying the case intolerable. On the eve of trial, Plaintiffs backed down, settling out Jeff and Ryan’s client for $0.00. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    WSHB Managing Partner Chad Dunigan Named Finalist for Jerrold S. Oliver "Ollie" Award of Excellence

    May 12, 2026 —
    Chad Dunigan, Managing Partner of Wood Smith Henning & Berman's Orlando, Florida, office, has been selected as one of just four finalists for the prestigious Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence, affectionately known in the construction defect community as the "Ollie" Award. This distinguished honor recognizes individuals who have made exceptional contributions and demonstrated unwavering dedication to advancing the field of construction defect law. Named in honor of the late Judge Jerrold S. Oliver, a revered founder of alternative dispute resolution in construction defect claims and litigation, the Ollie award symbolizes loyalty, commitment, and trust within the industry. Judge Oliver's legacy as a staunch believer in the resolution process continues to inspire professionals who strive for excellence in the construction defect community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wood Smith Henning Berman