BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Petersburg Ohio custom home expert witness Petersburg Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness Petersburg Ohio townhome construction expert witness Petersburg Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Petersburg Ohio structural steel construction expert witness Petersburg Ohio institutional building expert witness Petersburg Ohio condominium expert witness Petersburg Ohio parking structure expert witness Petersburg Ohio custom homes expert witness Petersburg Ohio retail construction expert witness Petersburg Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Petersburg Ohio condominiums expert witness Petersburg Ohio tract home expert witness Petersburg Ohio landscaping construction expert witness Petersburg Ohio industrial building expert witness Petersburg Ohio low-income housing expert witness Petersburg Ohio production housing expert witness Petersburg Ohio Medical building expert witness Petersburg Ohio casino resort expert witness Petersburg Ohio multi family housing expert witness Petersburg Ohio housing expert witness Petersburg Ohio
    Petersburg Ohio construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessPetersburg Ohio engineering consultantPetersburg Ohio contractor expert witnessPetersburg Ohio construction expert witness public projectsPetersburg Ohio expert witness roofingPetersburg Ohio architect expert witnessPetersburg Ohio testifying construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Petersburg, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Petersburg Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Stark County
    Local # 3615
    4344 Metro Cir NW
    North Canton, OH 44720

    Petersburg Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hancock County
    Local # 3639
    9811 Smokies Way
    Findlay, OH 45840

    Petersburg Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Wayne and Holmes Cos
    Local # 3690
    4973 Cleveland Rd Suite A
    Wooster, OH 44691

    Petersburg Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Portage & Summit Counties
    Local # 3603
    799 White Pond Drive
    Akron, OH 44320

    Petersburg Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Mahoning Valley
    Local # 3689
    5121 Mahoning Ave
    Youngstown, OH 44515

    Petersburg Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Central Buckeye Builders Association
    Local # 3648
    1520 Allentown Rd
    Lima, OH 45805

    Petersburg Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of North Central OH
    Local # 3651
    1183 Lexington Avenue
    Mansfield, OH 44907

    Petersburg Ohio Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Petersburg Ohio


    Construction Safety Technologies – Videos

    3 Common Cash Flow Issues That Plague The Construction Industry

    Negligent Misrepresentation in Sale of Building Altered without Permits

    Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Honors Construction Attorney

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    A Special CDJ Thanksgiving Edition

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    Hake Law Attorneys Join National Law Firm Wilson Elser

    Subsequent Purchaser Can Assert Claims for Construction Defects

    Potential Coverage Issues Implicated by the Champlain Towers Collapse

    Five Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2025 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    Judge Rejects Extrapolation, Harmon Tower to Remain Standing

    Commercial Construction Heating Up

    New Legislation Requires Changes to your California Home Improvement Contract for 2026

    L.A. Mixes Grit With Glitz in Downtown Revamp: Cities

    Sewage Flowing in London’s River Thames Draws Green Bond Demand

    Attorney's Erroneous Conclusion that Limitations Period Had Not Expired Was Not Grounds For Relief Under C.C.P. § 473(b)

    My Construction Law Wish List

    9204 Meet 8850. Public Works Claims Processes Now Apply to Private Works, With Some Differences

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    Federal Contract Termination For Convenience

    Firm Sued for Stopping Construction in Indiana Wants Case Tried in Germany

    Title II under ADA Applicable to Public Rights-of-Way, Parks and Other Recreation Areas

    No Coverage for Additional Insured

    N.J. Appellate Court Confirms that AIA Construction Contract Bars Insurer's Subrogation Claim

    How To Fix Oroville Dam

    Deadlines. . . They’re Important. Project Owner Risks Losing Claim By Failing to Timely Identify “Doe” Defendant

    Congratulations to Haight’s 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers

    Arbitration is Waivable (Even If You Don’t Mean To)

    Property Damage, Occurrences, Delays, Offsets and Fees. California Decision is a Smorgasbord of Construction Insurance Issues

    Largest US Dam Removal Stirs Debate Over Coveted West Water

    Home Building on the Upswing in Bakersfield

    GSA Releases Updated Standards to Accelerate Federal Buildings Toward Zero Emissions

    Court Affirms Summary Adjudication of Bad Faith Claim Where Expert Opinions Raised a Genuine Dispute

    Meet the Forum's Neutrals: MATTHEW W. ARGUE

    Harmon Tower Demolition on Hold Due to Insurer

    California Supreme Court Adopts “Vertical Exhaustion” in the Long-Storied Montrose Environmental Coverage Litigation

    Housing in U.S. Cools as Rate Rise Hits Sales: Mortgages

    What You Need to Know About “Ipso Facto” Clauses and Their Impact on Termination of a Contractor or Subcontractor in a Bankruptcy

    Canadian Developer Faces Charges After Massive Fire on Construction Site

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    Reasonableness of Liquidated Damages Determined at Time of Contract (or, You Can’t Look Back Again)

    Ensuing Loss Provision Salvages Coverage for Water Damage Claim

    APROPLAN and GenieBelt Merge, Creating “LetsBuild” – the Build Phase End-to-End Digital Platform

    Senate Bill 15-091 Passes Out of the Senate State, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee

    How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.

    Roots of Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Reach Back a Decade

    North Dakota Supreme Court Clarifies Breadth of Contractual Liability Coverage

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms TM of 2024 by Construction Executive

    Plehat Brings Natural Environments into Design Tools
    Corporate Profile

    PETERSBURG OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Petersburg, Ohio Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Petersburg's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Petersburg, Ohio

    Your Construction Contract Won’t Always Save You From a Bad Project Record

    November 02, 2026 —
    Construction contracts are full of protections. No-damage-for-delay clauses. Consequential damage waivers. Rights to supplement a subcontractor’s work. Broad scheduling provisions. But a recent Tennessee construction case provides an important reminder: the best contract in the world may not save you from bad project facts. In Commercial Painting Company, Inc. v. The Weitz Company, LLC (TN Ct. App. Oct. 28, 2026), the dispute involved a general contractor and its drywall subcontractor on a multi-building retirement community. The subcontract was originally worth more than $3.2 million, and the parties eventually disagreed about delays, scheduling, supplemental work, backcharges, and unpaid applications for payment. What began as a fairly typical construction dispute became anything but typical. A jury ultimately found that the general contractor had intentionally misrepresented material facts and awarded the subcontractor $3.9 million in punitive damages. (The case has a lengthy procedural history involving multiple appeals, but this post focuses only on the practical lessons from the most recent decision.) Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matthew J. Devries, Buchalter
    Mr. Devries may be contacted at mdevries@buchalter.com

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case

    August 25, 2026 —
    Former Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    At the Frontier of Change: How—or Where—to Rebuild as Alaska's Permafrost Disappears

    September 28, 2026 —
    In some areas of the tiny subsistence coastal village of Kwigillingok along the Bering Sea in western Alaska, pockets of ground feel squishy, almost gelatinous, rather than solid. It’s an odd sensation, as if there is only a thin layer of muddy soil preventing people from falling into the water beneath their feet. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com