BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Ruso North Dakota townhome construction expert witness Ruso North Dakota housing expert witness Ruso North Dakota condominiums expert witness Ruso North Dakota industrial building expert witness Ruso North Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Ruso North Dakota hospital construction expert witness Ruso North Dakota retail construction expert witness Ruso North Dakota institutional building expert witness Ruso North Dakota tract home expert witness Ruso North Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Ruso North Dakota production housing expert witness Ruso North Dakota casino resort expert witness Ruso North Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Ruso North Dakota custom home expert witness Ruso North Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Ruso North Dakota Medical building expert witness Ruso North Dakota office building expert witness Ruso North Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Ruso North Dakota multi family housing expert witness Ruso North Dakota low-income housing expert witness Ruso North Dakota parking structure expert witness Ruso North Dakota
    Ruso North Dakota building code expert witnessRuso North Dakota construction code expert witnessRuso North Dakota architectural engineering expert witnessRuso North Dakota construction scheduling expert witnessRuso North Dakota roofing and waterproofing expert witnessRuso North Dakota soil failure expert witnessRuso North Dakota consulting general contractor
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ruso, North Dakota

    North Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1437) Notice required six months prior to undertaking any repair other than emergency repair, or instituting action for breach of warranty of one or two-family dwelling; response time 30 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ruso North Dakota

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $2,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Forx Builders Association
    Local # 3515
    519 DeMers Ave
    Grand Forks, ND 58201

    Ruso North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Williston Area Builders Association
    Local # 3520
    PO Box 1825
    Williston, ND 58802
    Ruso North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Minot Association of Bldrs
    Local # 3565
    PO Box 1851
    Minot, ND 58702

    Ruso North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Dakota AB
    Local # 3500
    1720 Burnt Boat Dr Ste 207
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Ruso North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bismarck-Mandan Home Builders Association
    Local # 3510
    2600 Gateway Ave Ste 1
    Bismarck, ND 58503

    Ruso North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dickinson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3512
    PO Box 1697
    Dickinson, ND 58602
    Ruso North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Fargo-Moorhead
    Local # 3545
    1802 32nd Ave S
    Fargo, ND 58103

    Ruso North Dakota Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ruso North Dakota


    Dusseldorf Evacuates About 4,000 as World War II Bomb Defused

    It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It

    Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ Job

    Skilled Labor Shortage Implications for Construction Companies

    Construction Contractor “Mean Tweets” Edition

    Did the Building Boom Lead to a Boom in Construction Defects?

    Woodbridge II and the Nuanced Meaning of “Adverse Use” in Hostile Property Rights Cases in Colorado

    First-Time Homebuyers Make Biggest Share of Deals in 17 Years

    “The Myth of Sisyphus”

    Whether Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is an Occurrence Creates Ambiguity

    …More on Delay Claims and the Burden of Proof Substantiating Delay

    2023 Construction Law Update

    Ninth Circuit Holds that 1993 Budget Appropriations Language Does Not Compel the Corps of Engineers to use 1987 Wetlands Guidance Indefinitely

    Sept. 11 Victims Rejected by U.S. High Court on Lawsuit

    California Supreme Court Raises the Bar on Dangerous Conditions on Public Property Claims

    Late Notice Bars Insured's Claim for Loss Caused by Hurricane

    Employee Screening and Testing in the Covid-19 Era: Getting Back to Work

    Appellate Court reverses district court’s finding of alter ego in Sedgwick Properties Development Corporation v. Christopher Hinds (2019WL2865935)

    Insurers May Not Be Required to Defend Contractors In a Florida §558 Proceeding

    Message from the Chair: Kelsey Funes (Volume I)

    Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

    New Jersey Condominium Owners Sue FEMA

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 3: Standard Form Policy Exclusions

    Look Out! Texas Building Shedding Marble Panels

    FERC’s New Order on Data Center Co-Location: What Utilities Need to Know

    Hail Damage Requires Replacement of Even Undamaged Siding

    San Francisco Airport’s Terminal 1 Aims Sky High

    New York’s Highest Court Gives Insurers “an Incentive to Defend”

    CSLB’s Military Application Assistance Program

    Black & Veatch Appeals After Judge Upholds Jury's Surprise $1 Damage Award From Boldt

    Preliminary Notice Is More Important Than Ever During COVID-19

    2019 Legislative Session

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    OSHA Releases COVID-19 Guidance

    Arbitration Provisions Are Challenging To Circumvent

    Federal Judge Rips Shady Procurement Practices at DRPA

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Certain Private Projects Now Fall Under Prevailing Wage Laws. Is Yours One of Them?

    Construction Defect Disputes: Know Your Measure of Damages!!!!!

    2020s Most Read Construction Law Articles

    Five Steps Employers Should Take In the Second Year Of the COVID-19 Pandemic

    County Sovereign Immunity Invokes Change-Order Ordinance

    Floating Crane on Job in NYC's East River Has a Storied Past of Cold War Intrigue

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Courthouse Reporter Series: Nebraska Court of Appeals Vacates Arbitration Award for Misconduct

    Manhattan Condos at Half Price Reshape New York’s Harlem

    Nevada Senate Rejects Construction Defect Bill

    South Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco Defects

    Yet Another Reason That Your Contract Matters

    After 15 Years, Settlement Arrested at San Francisco's Millennium Tower
    Corporate Profile

    RUSO NORTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Ruso, North Dakota Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Ruso's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ruso, North Dakota

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    4th Department Narrowly Interprets Professional Services

    August 11, 2026 —
    In the recent case of Cty. of Erie v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2026 NY Slip Op 04092 (App. Div. 4th Dept.), New York’s Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that a general liability carrier for a construction manager owed additional insured coverage to the County of Erie, notwithstanding an exclusion in the construction manager’s policy for injuries arising out of professional services. The underlying case involved injuries sustained when the underlying plaintiff fell off of her bicycle at a park owned by the County when she transitioned from the pavement edge to grass. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Craig Rokuson, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Rokuson may be contacted at crokuson@tlsslaw.com

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    May 05, 2026 —
    The court denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding genuine issues of fact regarding implication of the policy’s ensuing loss provision. Stella Prop. Dev.. & Event Productions, LLC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15854 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2026). Stella owned a cultural center that was insured under a commercial property all-risk policy issued by Auto-Owners. A windstorm with gusts of 65 miles per hour struck the Center causing damage. The Center’s inspector found extensive wind damage on nearly all facets of the roof. Further, the inspector found the existing organic shingles were in “very poor condition” and were “defective, discontinued, and no longer available.” The estimated cost of repairs to the roof was $108,010.52. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Settlement Agreements and Contracts Require a Meeting of the Minds

    July 20, 2026 —
    A settlement agreement does not need to be executed for it to be enforceable as long as there was a MEETING OF THE MINDS. The same rings true for any contract regardless of whether the contract is signed – THERE NEEDS TO BE A MEETING OF THE MINDS. In a recent case dealing with the settlement agreement on a construction lien, the essential settlement terms (money and mutual release) were memorialized in an e-mail exchange between the parties (owner and subcontractor). The settlement required the owner to pay the principal amount plus some attorney’s fees and then a mutual general release would be prepared. In response to the confirmatory email, the owner sent a check, which the subcontractor deposited, but the owner refused to sign the release signed and sent by the subcontractor. The owner further claimed it doesn’t need to pay the attorney’s fees because the lien amount was paid in full. The subcontractor sued arguing the owner breached the terms of the settlement. The appellate court agreed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Underlying Complaint Alleges Possibility of Coverage, Triggering Duty to Defend

    September 15, 2026 —
    In a dispute among insurers for various defendants in the underlying case regarding the providing of a defense, the Second Circuit vacated, in part, the district court’s judgment and remanded the case. New Your Marine and Gen. Ins. Co. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 18087 (2nd Cir. June 23, 2026). Mary Guzman, who worked for a cleaning company, PBM, LLC, alleged that she was injured when a glass panel in a revolving door fell onto her as she cleaned the door. She filed suit in state court against the owners of the building as well as the lessee of the fifteenth floor where the accident occurred, Bank of New York Mellon (Bank). She alleged the owners and the Bank were negligent in creating the dangerous condition that caused her injury. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com