BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Seaford New York industrial building expert witness Seaford New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Seaford New York multi family housing expert witness Seaford New York low-income housing expert witness Seaford New York townhome construction expert witness Seaford New York custom homes expert witness Seaford New York casino resort expert witness Seaford New York landscaping construction expert witness Seaford New York housing expert witness Seaford New York Subterranean parking expert witness Seaford New York institutional building expert witness Seaford New York Medical building expert witness Seaford New York condominium expert witness Seaford New York condominiums expert witness Seaford New York high-rise construction expert witness Seaford New York tract home expert witness Seaford New York structural steel construction expert witness Seaford New York custom home expert witness Seaford New York hospital construction expert witness Seaford New York production housing expert witness Seaford New York office building expert witness Seaford New York
    Seaford New York expert witness structural engineerSeaford New York multi family design expert witnessSeaford New York architect expert witnessSeaford New York consulting general contractorSeaford New York construction defect expert witnessSeaford New York construction safety expertSeaford New York roofing construction expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Seaford, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seaford New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Associated Builders & Owners
    Local # 3392
    80 Maiden Lane Ste 1503
    New York, NY 10038

    Seaford New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New York City Builders Association
    Local # 3354
    3225 Victory Blvd
    Staten Island, NY 10314

    Seaford New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Queens & Bronx Building Association
    Local # 3365
    16-66 Bell Blvd #745
    Bayside, NY 11360

    Seaford New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Long Island Builders Institute
    Local # 3324
    1757-8 Veterans Memorial Highway
    Islandia, NY 11749

    Seaford New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Rockland County Bldrs & Remodelers
    Local # 3342
    8 College Ave
    Nanuet, NY 10954

    Seaford New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of the Hudson Valley
    Local # 3348
    1161 Little Britain Rd
    New Windsor, NY 12553

    Seaford New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Tier Home Builders & Rem Assoc
    Local # 3330
    2807 North St
    Endwell, NY 13760

    Seaford New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Seaford New York


    Waiver of Subrogation and Lack of Contractual Privity Bars Commercial Tenants’ Claims

    Ex-San Francisco DPW Director Sentenced to Seven Years in Corruption Case

    Ireland Said to Plan Home Loans Limits to Prevent Bubble

    Improper Means Exception and Tortious Interference Claims

    Payment Bond Claim Notice Requires More than Mailing

    Traub Lieberman Team Obtains Summary Judgment in Favor of Client Under Florida’s Newly Implemented Summary Judgment Standard

    Quick Note: COVID-19 Claim – Proving Causation

    EPA Rejects Most of N.Y.’s $511 Million Tappan Zee Loan

    Colorado Homebuyers Must be in Privity of Contract with Developer to Assert Breach of Implied Warranty of Suitability

    eRent: Construction Efficiency Using Principles of the Sharing Economy

    Leaky Wells Spur Call for Stricter Rules on Gas Drilling

    LA Fire Victims Can Pursue City Utility Claims, Judge Rules

    Settlement Reached in California Animal Shelter Construction Defect Case

    Update: New VOSH Maximum Penalties as of July 1

    Required Contract Provisions for Construction Contracts in California

    Connecticut Federal District Court Follows Majority Rule on Insurance Policy Anti-Assignment Clauses

    Big League Dreams a Nightmare for Town

    Construction Litigation Group Listed in U.S. News Top Tier

    US Moves to Come Clean on PFAS in Drinking Water

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Considerations for Optimizing Dispute Resolution Clauses

    Illinois Law Bars Coverage for Construction Defects in Insured's Work

    …More on Delay Claims and the Burden of Proof Substantiating Delay

    LA Metro To Pay Kiewit $297.8M Settlement on Freeway Job

    After 60 Years, I-95 Is Complete

    Overruling Henkel, California Supreme Court Validates Assignment of Policies

    No Duty to Defend Under Renter's Policy

    Public Contract Code Section 1104 Does Not Apply to Claims of Implied Breach of Warranty of Correctness of Plans and Specifications

    PSA: Virginia DOLI Amends COVID Workplace Standard

    Part I: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts

    Houston Bond Issue Jump-Starts 237 Flood Control Projects

    Anti-Fracking Win in N.Y. Court May Deal Blow to Industry

    Will Millennial’s Desire for Efficient Spaces Kill the McMansion?

    Joint Venture Dispute Over Profits

    Patent or Latent: An Important Question in Construction Defects

    House Bill Clarifies Start Point for Florida’s Statute of Repose

    PSA: Pay If Paid Ban Goes into Effect on January 1, 2023

    Second Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures

    Amazon HQ2 Puts Concrete on an Embodied Carbon Diet

    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    Settlement Agreement? It Ain’t Over ‘Til it’s . . . Final, in Writing, Fully Executed, and Admissible

    Does a Broker Forfeit His or Her Commission for Technical Non-Compliance with Department of Real Estate Statutory Requirements?

    Hotel Owner Makes Construction Defect Claim

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    6 Ways to Reduce Fire Safety Hazards in BESS

    One Word Makes All The Difference – The Distinction Between “Pay If Paid” and “Pay When Paid” Clauses

    Want to Make Your Jobsite Safer? Look to the Skies.

    HOA Foreclosure Excess Sale Proceeds Go to Owner

    Improperly Installed Flanges Are Impaired Property

    Spreading Cracks On FIU Bridge Failed to Alarm Project Team

    Four Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars
    Corporate Profile

    SEAFORD NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Seaford, New York Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Seaford's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Seaford, New York

    Wilke Fleury is proud to congratulate attorneys recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America.

    September 15, 2026 —
    The Best Lawyers in America®: Dan Egan, Daniel Foster, David Frenznick, and George Guthrie. Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America: Islam M. Ahmad, Kathryne Baldwin, Melissa Eaton, Jason Eldred, and Mustafa Karim. Congratulations to this outstanding group! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    June 15, 2026 —
    Most, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees. But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    The Drawing Changed. Did You Catch It? A Hard Lesson for Contractors About Revised Plans

    November 09, 2026 —
    Every contractor has seen it. A revised drawing hits your inbox. You open the sheet, look for the clouds, figure out what changed, and move on. But what if something changed outside the cloud? That seemingly simple question became a very expensive problem in Young Contracting/SE, Inc. v. Pitt Excavating, LLC, (Oct. 30, 2026), a recent Tennessee Court of Appeals decision involving a general contractor and its excavation subcontractor. The subcontract required Pitt to perform its work in accordance with the project drawings and specifications, “as amended from time to time.” During the project, Young sent Pitt a revised drawing. Pitt’s owner testified that his practice was to look at the clouded areas because he understood those areas to identify what had changed. He explained that he presumed the rest of the drawing remained the same. Guess what? That assumption did not work out well. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matthew J. Devries, Buchalter
    Mr. Devries may be contacted at mdevries@buchalter.com

    New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits

    July 27, 2026 —
    Levi W. Barrett, Co-Managing Partner of Peckar & Abramson’s New Jersey office, Co-Chair of the firm’s Construction Contracts & Risk Management team, and Executive Committee Member, was recently quoted in “New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits,” an article written by Engineering News-Record (ENR). The article examines New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s executive order temporarily halting state environmental permit reviews for certain large-scale data center projects while regulators develop a comprehensive framework to address the sector’s energy demands, water consumption, environmental impacts, and effects on local communities. It also explores the broader implications of the moratorium for developers, contractors, investors, and other stakeholders, as well as the ongoing debate between economic development, AI-driven infrastructure growth, and environmental and utility ratepayer concerns. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com

    Texas Prepares to Restart Data Center Construction, with Around 300 Projects Under Review And 6,608 MW Awaiting Energization Approval, Driving Demand for Rapid-Response Lifting Operations

    October 20, 2026 —
    Texas is experiencing an unprecedented increase in power demand. The ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) power grid reached a record peak demand of 91.1 GW in summer 2026, 6% above the previous record, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). This is compounded by interconnection requests totaling around 474 GW, more than five times the record peak, with approximately 90% of these requests related to data centers, according to the Office of the Governor of Texas. Within this context, authorities have launched a comprehensive review process. In August , the Governor directed the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and ERCOT to audit all data centers progressing toward grid connection, covering around 300 projects. ERCOT has also suspended approvals to energize data centers of 75 MW or more and has set December 10 as the date for the publication of its reports. For the industry, this pause creates a valuable planning window. Goldman Sachs notes that it takes 18 to 24 months to build a data center once permits have been secured, while only 50% to 60% of planned capacity is delivered on schedule. Supply chain constraints and labor shortages are among the most common causes of delays. In this context, construction agility is becoming increasingly critical. A one-month delay at a typical 60 MW U.S. data center is estimated to cost up to $14.2 million in lost revenue, additional costs and penalties, according to STL Partners data. Against this backdrop, Sarens, which has operated in the U.S. since 2009 and is headquartered in Houston, with offices also in Odessa and Beaumont, positions as a logistics partner for developers and contractors preparing for the execution phase. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sarens

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    Additional Insureds Obligated to Meet Self-Insured Retention

    October 20, 2026 —
    The federal district court found that the additional insureds had to meet the policy’s self-insured retention before a duty to defend was triggered. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Premier Design & Build Group, LLC, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXXIS 170741 (N.D. Ill. July 31, 2026). Amerisure issued CGL and umbrella policies to Premier Design & Build Group, LLC. Amerisure had the right and duty to defend in certain suits for property damage under both policies. Premier contracted with MG East, LLC (MGE) to build three buildings. After the buildings were constructed, MG filed suit against Premier in state court, seeking recovery for allegedly defective installation of the roof, flashing, and gutters on each of the buildings. Premier had subcontracted with Tecta American Sough Florida, Inc. to install the flashing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com