Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements
June 29, 2026 —
Jill Casson Owen, Benjamin J. Hawkins & Stephen Wright - Snell & WilmerA Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026)
OVERVIEW
The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law).
KEY HOLDINGS
1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings
The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session.
Reprinted courtesy of
Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer,
Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and
Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer
Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com
Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com
Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com
Read the full story...
Segal McCambridge Shareholders and Associates Recognized in 2027 Best Lawyers in America®
September 01, 2026 —
Segal McCambridgeSegal McCambridge is pleased to announce that 24 firm shareholders and associates have been recognized in the 2027 editions of the Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through a trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For more than four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion.
"This Best Lawyers recognition is especially meaningful because it reflects the caliber of advocacy our attorneys bring to clients every day, across a wide range of practice areas," said Jason P. Eckerly, Segal McCambridge Managing Shareholder. "We are proud to see so many of our colleagues honored for their legal skills, dedication, and professionalism. This continued recognition underscores the strength of our national platform and the depth of talent across our firm."
Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers in America® include:
Jason P. Eckerly; Chicago, IL; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Scott R. Emery; New York, NY; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants
Jay Evans; Pittsburgh, PA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Richard H. Glucksman; Los Angeles, CA; Construction Law
Nathan R. Horne; Austin, TX; Construction Law; Litigation - Construction
Alice Sacks Johnston; Pittsburgh, PA; Commercial Litigation; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Patrick M. Kemp; Austin, TX; Litigation - Insurance
Mitchell P. Morinec; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation
Anthony J. Sbarra, Jr.; Milton, MA; Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Alan J. Taylor; Southfield, MI; Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law
Kenneth P. Williams; Southfield, MI; Insurance Law; Litigation - Insurance; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
David J. Yates; Southfield, MI; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Segal McCambridge's attorneys named in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America® include:
Masood Syed Ali; Chicago, IL; Labor and Employment Law - Management
Mari Bryn Dowdy; Austin, TX; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Chaniece M. Hill; Chicago, IL; Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants
Mandy Kolodkin; Indianapolis, IN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Jeffrey M. Marchese; New York, NY; Litigation - Construction
Courtney C. McLaren; Memphis, TN; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Benjamin J. Nellans; Chicago, IL; Commercial Litigation
Christopher P. Norton; Los Angeles, CA; Commercial Litigation
Nelson T. Rainey; Memphis, TN; Family Law; Health Care Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Nicholas E. Richardson; Tampa, FL; Insurance Law
Jordan B. Rosenberg; Philadelphia, PA; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Ian M. Sadler; Austin, TX; Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law
About Best Lawyers®
Best Lawyers® is an elite global network of legal professionals recognized through trusted, peer-reviewed distinction. For over four decades, its Purely Peer Review® methodology has upheld the principle that recognition should be earned through the opinions of fellow attorneys, not marketing influence or paid listings. Each year, millions of confidential evaluations are collected worldwide, contributing to one of the legal industry's most rigorous and trusted vetting processes. Only about 5% of lawyers in the United States and 3% globally are recognized, reflecting the selectivity and credibility of the results. No fees are accepted for consideration or inclusion, maintaining the integrity and independence of all recognitions. For more information, visit: www.bestlawyers.com.
About Segal McCambridge
Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.
Construction Seyt Named a Top Construction Blog by FeedSpot
March 31, 2026 —
Seyfarth Shaw LLP - The Construction SeytSince 2019, we have strived to bring our readers practical, useful insights on recent trends shaping our industry. Whether you are a contractor, designer, developer, attorney, or industry professional, our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to navigate your business with that much more confidence. We are honored that “The Construction Seyt” has been named by FeedSpot as a “Best Construction Blog” to follow for 2026.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Actual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess Insurers
August 24, 2026 —
Kyle A. Rudolph - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.California courts were previously split on the issue of whether an insured may bring declaratory relief claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance. Some California courts held that the actual exhaustion of underlying insurance was necessary, whereas other courts allowed for these types of claims to proceed.[
1]
Recently, the California Supreme Court addressed this split of authority and, in doing so, handed down a significant win for policyholders. In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., the Court held that insureds may proceed with bringing forth viable declaratory relief and bad faith claims against excess insurers prior to the exhaustion of underlying insurance.[
2] A summary of the Court’s opinion is provided below.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kyle A. Rudolph, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Mr. Rudolph may be contacted at
KRudolph@sdvlaw.com
Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation
April 20, 2026 —
Benton Wheatley & Anna Spicer - Construction ExecutiveEvery major construction project comes with risk, whether it’s a
warehouse build, a
multifamily development or a major renovation. Parties tend to be aligned when things are proceeding as planned. But when something goes wrong—cracked concrete, water intrusion, systems that don’t perform as expected—those interests can quickly diverge.
Property owners are often caught in the middle when construction defects surface. T
Avoid the Headache – Submit the Sworn Proof of Loss to Property Insurer"Occurrence" May Include Intentional Acts In MontanaAndrea DeField Recognized In 2024 List of Influential Business Women By South Florida Business JournalMassachusetts Pulls Phased Trigger On Its Statute of ReposeNorth Carolina Soil & Groundwater Case to be Heard by U.S. Supreme CourtWill Colorado Pass a Construction Defect Reform Bill in 2016?Business Insurance Names Rachel Hudgins Among 2024 Break Out Award WinnersConstruction Attorneys Get an AI Assist in Document CrunchCalifornia’s Fair Payment Act: What Every Owner, Developer, and Contractor Should Know About SB 440Traub Lieberman Partner Jonathan Harwood Wins Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of InsurerNew Mexico Architect Is Tuned Into His StatePennsylvania Civil Engineers Give the State's Infrastructure a "C-" GradeIn Contracts, One Word Makes All the DifferenceBanks Loosening U.S. Mortgage Standards: Chart of the DaySometimes You Get Away with Default (but don’t count on it)New York Considering Legislation That Would Create Statute of Repose For ConstructionMass. Gas Leak Follows NTSB Final Report, Call for ReformsCalifornia Statutes Authorizing Public-Private Partnership ContractingCertifying Claim Under Contract Disputes ActThomson Reuters Construction Law (Virginia Practice Series)Housing Starts in U.S. Climb to an Almost Eight-Year HighLabor Intensive2018 Construction Outlook: Mature Expansion, Deceleration in Some Sectors, Continued Growth in OthersBrenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction DelaysAppeal of an Attorney Disqualification Order Results in Partial Automatic Stay of Trial Court ProceedingsChambers USA Recognizes GRSM as 2026 Industry LeaderNo Collapse Coverage Where Policy's Collapse Provisions DeletedInsurers Reacting to Massachusetts TornadoesThe Importance of Indemnification Clauses in Managing Post-Completion Project RiskJudicial Economy Disfavors Enforcement of Mandatory Forum Selection ClauseWhen “Substantially Similar” Means “Fundamentally Identical”: Delaware Court Enforces Related Claim Provision to Deny D&O Coverage for Securities Class ActionHousing Starts Rebound in U.S. as Inflation Eases: EconomyTidal Lagoon Plans Marine Project to Power Every Home in WalesConstruction Spending Had Strongest Increase in Four YearsWave Breaker: How a Living Shoreline Will Protect a Florida Highway and Oyster BedNinth Circuit Rules Supreme Court’s Two-Part Test of Implied Certification under the False Claims Act MandatoryActual Controversy Without Actual Exhaustion: California Supreme Court Allows Declaratory Relief and Bad Faith Claims Against Excess InsurersSecurity on Large Construction Projects. The Payment Remedy You Probably Never Heard ofLeading Boutiques Combine to Form SDV Fenchurch, A Global Law Firm for Insurance PolicyholdersInsurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Reject Collapse Coverage DeniedRestoring the USS Alabama: Surety Lessons From an 80-Year-Old BattleshipWhat You Need to Know About “Ipso Facto” Clauses and Their Impact on Termination of a Contractor or Subcontractor in a BankruptcyHurricane Damage Not Covered for Home Owner Not Named in PolicyPennsylvania Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Attorney Fee Award Under the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment ActMixed Reality for Construction: Applicability and RealityInsurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by WindstormCSLB Releases New Forms and Announces New Fees! Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction SpendingNo Coverage for Home Damaged by Falling BouldersTraub Lieberman Recognized in the 2025 Edition of Chambers USAAre Modern Buildings Silently Killing Us?Lien Law Change in IdahoBoots on the Ground- A Great Way to Learn and Help Construction ClientsWhat to Do Before OSHA Comes KnockingProject-Specific Commercial General Liability InsuranceIntentionally Set Atlanta Interstate Fire Closes Artery Until JuneIllinois Supreme Court Limits Reach of Implied Warranty Claims Against ContractorsKiewit Selected for Rebuild of Collapsed Baltimore BridgeTerminating Contracts for Convenience — “Just Because”BOO! Running From Chainsaw Wielding Actor then Falling is an Inherent Risk of a Haunted AttractionSummary Judgment in Construction Defect Case Cannot Be Overturned While Facts Are Still in Contention in Related CasesFinding an "Occurrence," Appellate Court Rules Insurer Must DefendWhat to do about California’s Defect-Ridden Board of Equalization BuildingICYMI: Highlights From ABC Convention 2024The Looming Housing Crisis and Limited Government Relief—An Examination of the CDC Eviction Moratorium Two Months In Federal Judge Vacates CDC Eviction Moratorium NationwideNLRB Finalizes Rule for Construction Industry Unions to Obtain Majority Support Representational StatusCourt Affirms Duty to Defend Additional Insured ContractorEmployee Exclusion Bars Coverage for Wrongful Death of Subcontractor's EmployeeThe 2017 ASCDC and CDCMA Construction Defect Seminar and Holiday ReceptionDispute Over Amount Insured Owes Public Adjuster ResolvedFollow the Dispute Resolution Provision(s) in Your ContractTraub Lieberman Partner Jessica Kull Obtains Favorable Arbitration Award In Year-Long High-Stakes Construction Defect CaseBailout for an Improperly Drafted Indemnification ProvisionAttorney Writing Series on Misconceptions over Construction DefectsQuick Note: Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment BondASCE and Accelerator for America Release Map to Showcase Projects from Bipartisan Infrastructure LawSuppliers of Inherently Dangerous Raw Materials Remain Excluded from the Protections of the Component Parts DoctrineExcess Must Defend After Primary Improperly Refuses to Do SoSubcontrator’s Insurer Must Reimburse for Defense of ContractorAnother Las Vegas Tower at the Center of Construction Defect ClaimsGeneral Contractor’s Ability to Supplement Subcontractor Per SubcontractHow Slow and Steady Can Lose the Race - Pacing and Delay ClaimsQuick Note: Remember to Timely Foreclose Lien Against Lien Transfer Bond 
