BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Eastchester New York industrial building expert witness Eastchester New York high-rise construction expert witness Eastchester New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Eastchester New York institutional building expert witness Eastchester New York casino resort expert witness Eastchester New York structural steel construction expert witness Eastchester New York custom home expert witness Eastchester New York multi family housing expert witness Eastchester New York housing expert witness Eastchester New York production housing expert witness Eastchester New York mid-rise construction expert witness Eastchester New York hospital construction expert witness Eastchester New York office building expert witness Eastchester New York retail construction expert witness Eastchester New York Medical building expert witness Eastchester New York condominiums expert witness Eastchester New York townhome construction expert witness Eastchester New York low-income housing expert witness Eastchester New York condominium expert witness Eastchester New York tract home expert witness Eastchester New York Subterranean parking expert witness Eastchester New York
    Eastchester New York construction cost estimating expert witnessEastchester New York construction scheduling expert witnessEastchester New York expert witness commercial buildingsEastchester New York testifying construction expert witnessEastchester New York hospital construction expert witnessEastchester New York expert witness concrete failureEastchester New York construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Eastchester, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Eastchester New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Rockland County Bldrs & Remodelers
    Local # 3342
    8 College Ave
    Nanuet, NY 10954

    Eastchester New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Long Island Builders Institute
    Local # 3324
    1757-8 Veterans Memorial Highway
    Islandia, NY 11749

    Eastchester New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Queens & Bronx Building Association
    Local # 3365
    16-66 Bell Blvd #745
    Bayside, NY 11360

    Eastchester New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Associated Builders & Owners
    Local # 3392
    80 Maiden Lane Ste 1503
    New York, NY 10038

    Eastchester New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New York City Builders Association
    Local # 3354
    3225 Victory Blvd
    Staten Island, NY 10314

    Eastchester New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of the Hudson Valley
    Local # 3348
    1161 Little Britain Rd
    New Windsor, NY 12553

    Eastchester New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Tier Home Builders & Rem Assoc
    Local # 3330
    2807 North St
    Endwell, NY 13760

    Eastchester New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Eastchester New York


    Texas Supreme Court Holds Anadarko’s $100M Deepwater Horizon Defense Costs Are Not Subject To Joint Venture Liability Limits

    How SmartThings Wants to Automate Your Home

    A Contractual Liability Exclusion Doesn't Preclude Insurer's Duty to Indemnify

    South Carolina Clarifies the Accrual Date for Its Statute of Repose

    Toddler Crashes through Window, Falls to his Death

    Lien Attaches To Landlord’s Interest When Landlord Is Party To Tenant Improvement Construction Contract

    Las Vegas’ McCarran Tower Construction Issues Delays Opening

    California Clarifies Basis for Inverse Condemnation Claims

    Brown Paint Doesn’t Cover Up Construction Defects

    U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Maritime Charters and the Specter of a New Permitting Regime

    Texas Federal Court Finds Total Pollution Exclusion Does Not Foreclose a Duty to Defend Waterway Degradation Lawsuit

    Ivanhoe Cambridge Plans Toronto Office Towers, Terminal

    Is The Enforceability Of A No-Damage-For-Delay Provision Inappropriate For Summary Judgment

    Eighth Circuit Considers Judicial Estoppel in Hazardous Substance Release-Related Personal Injury Case

    Ohio Condo Development Case Filed in 2011 is Scheduled for Trial

    Federal Regulatory Recap: A Summary of Recent Rulemaking Actions Taken or Proposed Affecting the Energy Industry

    Construction Reaches Half-Way Point on San Diego's $2.1 Billion Mid-Coast Trolley

    Colorado Court of Appeals to Rule on Arbitrability of an HOA's Construction Defect Claims

    Federal District Court Finds Coverage Barred Because of Lack of Allegations of Damage During the Policy Period and Because of Late Notice

    Administration Seeks To Build New FBI HQ on Current D.C. Site

    School District Client Advisory: Civility is not an Option, It is a Duty

    Nevada Business Magazine Ranks Madeline Arcellana and Reema Hassanieh as 2025 Top Attorneys in Nevada!

    General Contractors: Consider Importance of "Primary Noncontributory" Language

    Improper Classification Under Davis Bacon Can Be Costly

    Building Amid the COVID Challenge

    Safety Versus a False Sense of Security: Challenges to the Use of Construction Cranes

    Sales of Existing U.S. Homes Unexpectedly Fell in January

    Virginia Joins California and Nevada in Passing its Consumer Privacy Act

    2025 Construction Law Update

    Keep it Simple with Nunn-Agreements in Colorado

    Address 'Your Work' Exposure Within CPrL Policies With Faulty Workmanship Coverage

    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Appraisal Appropriate Despite Pending Coverage Issues

    Be Careful with “Green” Construction

    Hurricane Milton Barrels Toward Florida With 180 MPH Winds

    LA’s Backyard-Home Boom Offers Wildfire-Hit Residents New Option

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    25 Days After Explosion, Another Utility Shuts Off Gas in Boston Area

    Know What You’ve Built: An Interview with Timo Makkonen of Congrid

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (05/11/22)

    Partner Vik Nagpal is Recognized as a Top Lawyer of 2020

    Building Materials Price Increase Clause for Contractors and Subcontractors – Three Options

    Billionaires and CEOs Gather for Milken in a Reeling LA

    Building Down in November, Even While Home Sales Rise

    The Arbitration Club… Is Not So Exclusive

    The Families First Coronavirus Response Act: What Every Employer Should Know

    Lump Sum Subcontract? Perhaps Not.

    New York’s Highest Court Gives Insurers “an Incentive to Defend”

    Miller Act and “Public Work of the Federal Government”

    DC Circuit Upholds EPA’s Latest RCRA Recycling Rule
    Corporate Profile

    EASTCHESTER NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Eastchester, New York Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Eastchester's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Eastchester, New York

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    June 15, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision allowing oil and gas companies to move Louisiana coastal erosion lawsuits from state court to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. While the ruling is procedural, it carries significant implications for environmental- and energy-related risks. The case, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, Slip Op. 24-813 (April 17, 2026), addressed a threshold jurisdictional question but has broader significance for environmental and climate related litigation. State courts are often viewed as more favorable forums for plaintiffs asserting environmental damage claims, particularly those brought by governmental entities. The opinion issued on April 17, 2026 is the latest development in long-running Louisiana coastal litigation that began more than a decade ago. Starting in 2013, Louisiana parishes filed 42 lawsuits against oil and gas companies alleging environmental damage related to historic oil field operations. The parishes alleged that oil and gas companies violated state coastal management laws by failing to properly restore impacted areas. Chevron sought to remove the cases from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), known as federal officer removal, which provides federal jurisdiction over “any person acting under [an] officer” of the United States "for or relating to any act under color of such office." The Fifth Circuit rejected the argument and remanded the case, and others like it, to state court. Trial began in March 2025 in Point à la Hache, Louisiana. On April 4, 2025, the jury awarded a total of $745 million to compensate for land loss, contamination and abandoned equipment. On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the question of whether a federal contractor can remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Kretschmann, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Kretschmann may be contacted at Jennifer.Kretschmann@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    May 26, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – May 14, 2026 - Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion has been ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 guide and recognized as a leading firm in Litigation: General Commercial for Orange County. Newmeyer Dillion was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise and caliber of talent where the firm stood out for its exceptional work and is recognized in Litigation: General Commercial. Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff expressed the firm's gratitude: “It is an honor for our firm to be recognized by Chambers and Partners in their Spotlight California 2026 guide. This acknowledgment reflects our commitment to providing high quality legal services tailored to the unique needs of our clients.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Additional Insureds Obligated to Meet Self-Insured Retention

    October 20, 2026 —
    The federal district court found that the additional insureds had to meet the policy’s self-insured retention before a duty to defend was triggered. Amerisure Ins. Co. v. Premier Design & Build Group, LLC, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXXIS 170741 (N.D. Ill. July 31, 2026). Amerisure issued CGL and umbrella policies to Premier Design & Build Group, LLC. Amerisure had the right and duty to defend in certain suits for property damage under both policies. Premier contracted with MG East, LLC (MGE) to build three buildings. After the buildings were constructed, MG filed suit against Premier in state court, seeking recovery for allegedly defective installation of the roof, flashing, and gutters on each of the buildings. Premier had subcontracted with Tecta American Sough Florida, Inc. to install the flashing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Bid Today, Pay a Different Rate Tomorrow? California AB 1198 Changes Prevailing Wage Rules for Large Public Works Projects

    November 09, 2026 —
    Contractors and subcontractors bidding on California’s largest public works projects will soon face a new labor-cost risk: the wage rates they are required to pay may change after they submit their bids. California’s prevailing wage rules generally set the minimum pay for workers on public works projects based on the type of work and the project’s location. Under Assembly Bill 1198 (“AB 1198”), updated prevailing wage rates may apply during construction to public works contracts awarded or advertised for bid after July 1, 2027 if the awarded value of the prime contract is $35 million or more. On those projects, the wage rates that applied when the project was first advertised may not remain the same throughout the work. For contractors pursuing infrastructure projects that take several years to complete, this is not just a payroll issue. A change in required wage rates can affect the cost of work already priced in a bid. Contractors will need to consider that possibility when estimating labor costs, setting aside funds for unexpected costs, obtaining subcontractor prices, and negotiating contract terms that address price increases or changes to the work. Those terms can determine whether the contractor or the public agency awarding the contract bears the additional cost. Contractors will also need processes in place to track wage changes and their effect on project costs. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth and Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    373 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    October 06, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 373 of the firm’s attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® including the prestigious “Lawyer of the Year” honors, and “Ones to Watch” list. Attorneys listed as Ones to Watch typically have been in practice for five to nine years. “Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. The following Snell & Wilmer attorneys were named 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” award recipients: Cortland P. Andrews, Troy J. Aramburu, Brian L. Blaylock, M. Lawrence Brown, Brian D. Cunningham, Michael M. Donahey, Jason Ebe, Matthew P. Fischer, Brett W. Johnson, Nathan G. Kanute, William A. Kastin, Timothy J. Kay, James D. Kilroy, Joseph A. Kroeger, Matthew L. Lalli, John F. Lomax, Anne M. Meyer, Robin L. Miskell, Patrick J. Paul, Amit D. Ranade, and M. Roxanne Veliz. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Trend Continues Where Unlicensed Contractors Have No Recourse

    July 13, 2026 —
    There’s been a recent trend in Florida case law that has figuratively “killed” unlicensed contractors. Here’s another one. The moral to this trend and case is simple: make sure you have the proper licenses prior to serving as a contractor under Florida law. Trying to be cute, as seemed to be the situation in this case with a creative argument, is not an argument that will carry the day and your resources will be devoted to being creative versus the ultimate merits of the dispute. In Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, 2026 WL 1649571 (S.D.Fla. 2026) an owner of real property hired a company to design and construct a spec home on the property. The company and its owner were NOT licensed contractors. The contract stated the company was serving as a “spec developer” and referred to it as the contractor throughout the contract. Other than this, the contract was set up as a cost plus a fee. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com