BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Arkport New York office building expert witness Arkport New York Medical building expert witness Arkport New York townhome construction expert witness Arkport New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Arkport New York tract home expert witness Arkport New York casino resort expert witness Arkport New York custom homes expert witness Arkport New York low-income housing expert witness Arkport New York institutional building expert witness Arkport New York hospital construction expert witness Arkport New York mid-rise construction expert witness Arkport New York custom home expert witness Arkport New York retail construction expert witness Arkport New York production housing expert witness Arkport New York industrial building expert witness Arkport New York multi family housing expert witness Arkport New York condominium expert witness Arkport New York Subterranean parking expert witness Arkport New York condominiums expert witness Arkport New York structural steel construction expert witness Arkport New York housing expert witness Arkport New York
    Arkport New York construction project management expert witnessArkport New York expert witness commercial buildingsArkport New York construction claims expert witnessArkport New York construction defect expert witnessArkport New York civil engineering expert witnessArkport New York construction expert witnessArkport New York building code expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Arkport, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Arkport New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tompkins/Cortland Bldrs&Remo
    Local # 3382
    PO Box 202
    Cortland, NY 13045

    Arkport New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New York State Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3300
    1 Commerce Plz Ste 704
    Albany, NY 12210

    Arkport New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Finger Lakes Home Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 3312
    PO Box 421
    Big Flats, NY 14814

    Arkport New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Tier Home Builders & Rem Assoc
    Local # 3330
    2807 North St
    Endwell, NY 13760

    Arkport New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Capital Region B & R Assoc
    Local # 3305
    1202 Troy-Schenectady Road Ste 7
    Latham, NY 12110

    Arkport New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Buffalo Niagara Builders Association
    Local # 3306
    90 Sylvan Pkwy
    West Amherst, NY 14228

    Arkport New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Central New York Inc
    Local # 3386
    3675 James St
    Syracuse, NY 13206

    Arkport New York Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Arkport New York


    Fort Lauderdale Team Secures Appellate Win Affirming Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in High-Stakes Negligence Case

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    STV and Tutor Perini/Parsons Arbitrate Unusual Dispute Over Seven $1M Deductibles

    New OSHA Regulations on Confined Spaces in Construction

    CEB’s Mechanics Liens and Related Remedies – 2014 Update

    Texas Supreme Court to Review Eight-Corners Duty-to-Defend Rule

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Apparently, It’s Not Always Who You Know”

    Contractor Haunted by “Demonized” Flooring

    2014 WCC Panel: Working Smarter with Technology

    Additional Insured Prevails on Summary Judgment For Duty to Defend, Indemnify

    Anti-Fracking Win in N.Y. Court May Deal Blow to Industry

    New Orleans Is Auctioning Off Vacant Lots Online

    Quick Note: Third-Party Can Bring Common Law Bad Faith Claim

    Mendocino Hospital Nearing Completion

    Drafting or Negotiating A Subcontract–Questions To Consider

    Two Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Selected as 2026 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Commercial Construction Heating Up

    Commercial Real Estate in 2023: A Snapshot

    FEMA Offers to Review Hurricane Sandy Claims

    Claim Against Broker Survives Motion to Dismiss

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    Payment Bond Surety Entitled to Award of Attorneys’ Fees Although Defended by Principal

    Chambers USA 2022 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Construction Insurance Costs for New York Schools is Going Up

    Window Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple Occurrences

    Your Excess Policy May Not “Follow Form” to Your Primary Policy’s Aggregate Limits: How to Avoid a Multi-Million Dollar Mistake

    “Over? Did you say ‘over’?”

    Leveraging the 50-State Initiative, Connecticut and Maine Team Secure Full Dismissal of Coverage Claim for Catastrophic Property Loss

    Extrinsic Evidence, or Eight Corners? Texas Court Sheds Light on Determining the Duty to Defend

    Nine Haight Attorneys Selected for Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch 2021

    Virginia Families Hope to Sue over Chinese Drywall

    Evaluating Construction Trends From 2023 and Forecasting For 2024

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    Damage Caused Not by Superstorm Sandy, But by Faulty Workmanship, Not Covered

    Regional US Airports Are Back After Years of Decay

    Governor Brown Signs Legislation Aimed at Curbing ADA Accessibility Abuses in California

    Fire Damages Unfinished Hospital Tower at NYU Langone Medical Center

    At the Border of Contract and Torts in Construction Disputes

    Three-Year Delay Not “Prompt Notice,” But Insurer Not “Appreciably Prejudiced” Either, New Jersey Court Holds

    Homebuilders Go Green in Response to Homebuyer Demand

    The Five-Step Protocol to Reopening a Business

    Blackstone to Buy Chicago’s Willis Tower for $1.3 Billion

    Is Drone Aerial Photography Really Best for Your Construction Projects?

    Exception to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not Apply

    Settling with Some, But Not All, of the Defendants in a Construction Defect Case

    Where-Forum Art Thou? Is the Chosen Forum Akin to No Forum at All?

    ICYMI: Highlights From ABC Convention 2024

    Negligence Per Se Claim Based Upon Failure to Pay Benefits Fails

    Wendel Rosen Construction Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Los Angeles Could Be Devastated by the Next Big Earthquake
    Corporate Profile

    ARKPORT NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Arkport, New York Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Arkport's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Arkport, New York

    California’s Retention Reform on Private Construction Projects

    February 17, 2026 —
    Retention has long been a contentious issue in California construction. Traditionally, owners withheld retention of 10% from each progress payment until completion, arguing it was necessary to ensure performance, quality and timely delivery. Contractors and subcontractors, however, often struggled with cash flow, payroll, and material costs while waiting months—sometimes even years—for withheld retention. Recognizing the financial challenges contractors and subcontractors face, the California legislature passed Senate Bill 61 (“SB 61”), now codified under California Civil Code Section 8811 and effective January 1, 2026, limiting retention to 5% on private works of improvement, aligning with the public works standard in place since 2012. The law’s intent is clear—ease financial strain on contractors and subcontractors while still providing owners with security (albeit reduced) with respect to project completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael McKeeman, Seyfarth
    Mr. McKeeman may be contacted at

    AIA Waivers Under Fire: Why Post-Completion Losses May Still Be Actionable

    January 26, 2026 —
    On its face, the power of a waiver of subrogation clause in a construction contract is profound. It bars otherwise actionable – and sometimes egregious – losses resulting from contractor carelessness before they can ever get started. One question courts have long battled with is the limits to the lasting effects of such a waiver. Whether the waiver power can be transferred amongst parties, applied to third parties or used with policies taken out after construction completion are among the few grey areas that have kept subrogation practitioners and the courts busy. Recently, a federal court in Idaho clarified its position on the power to waive subrogation. In Seneca Ins. Co. v. McAlvain Constr., Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00340-BLW, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 251777 (D. Idaho), the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (District Court) addressed whether a subrogation waiver in an AIA construction contract, signed between an owner and the general contractor, applied to the subsequent owner of a building. In doing so, the court looked at the limiting language of the waiver as well as the contractual posture of the subsequent owner. Ultimately, the court found the waiver inapplicable, denying the motion for summary judgment of Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff McAlvain Construction, Inc. (McAlvain). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lian Skaf, White and Williams
    Mr. Skaf may be contacted at skafl@whiteandwilliams.com

    How Mobile Tools Are Capturing Safety Data on Jobsites

    April 08, 2026 —
    Traditionally, construction safety management is “reactive compliance”—reporting on an incident, filling out a form on paper or electronically, taking a picture and filing it away for compliance purposes. Safety management is shifting from reactive to proactive. Forward-thinking companies are using data and leading indicators to identify risks before incidents happen, not just document injuries after the fact. Mobile tools have completely changed the way safety operations work on construction sites, enabling that transition to proactive safety management. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bruns, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Reminder: You Can’t Make Others Indemnify You for Your Own Actions

    January 13, 2026 —
    I have spoken about Virginia Code 11-4.1 and the prohibition on forcing others to indemnify for the actions of the indemnitees on a few occasions here at Construction Law Musings (See Uniwest Posts). The Western District of Virginia gave its take on indemnification clauses and why they need to be carefully drafted in a December 2024 case, Sauer Construction, LLC v. MC3 Solutions, LLC et al. In Sauer, the Court looked at, among other things, an indemnification provision between MC3, a subcontractor to Sauer, and MC3s sub-subcontractor, Bonitz Flooring Group. This was the relatively typical construction dispute where a general contractor sues a subcontractor and then that subcontractor sues its supplier and sub-subcontractors for indemnity pursuant to its contract. When faced with the indemnification claim, Bonitz argued that the indemnification provision violated the Va. Code 11-4.1 because it required Bonitz to indemnify MC3 for MC3’s actions. The provision follows the break. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    Snell & Wilmer Partner Jonathan Frank Named Winner of 2025 Connect CRE’s Lawyers in Real Estate Award

    January 13, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY — Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that Orange County Partner Jonathan Frank has received the 2025 Connect CRE’s Lawyers in Real Estate Award, a distinction honoring attorneys who demonstrate excellence in commercial real estate law while making meaningful contributions to the industry and their communities. The award recognizes legal leaders whose expertise, vision, and dedication set them apart, reflecting a career marked by both professional achievement and civic impact. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer