BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Mesquite New Mexico office building expert witness Mesquite New Mexico mid-rise construction expert witness Mesquite New Mexico condominiums expert witness Mesquite New Mexico structural steel construction expert witness Mesquite New Mexico parking structure expert witness Mesquite New Mexico hospital construction expert witness Mesquite New Mexico retail construction expert witness Mesquite New Mexico Subterranean parking expert witness Mesquite New Mexico housing expert witness Mesquite New Mexico Medical building expert witness Mesquite New Mexico casino resort expert witness Mesquite New Mexico concrete tilt-up expert witness Mesquite New Mexico high-rise construction expert witness Mesquite New Mexico townhome construction expert witness Mesquite New Mexico institutional building expert witness Mesquite New Mexico production housing expert witness Mesquite New Mexico condominium expert witness Mesquite New Mexico custom homes expert witness Mesquite New Mexico landscaping construction expert witness Mesquite New Mexico industrial building expert witness Mesquite New Mexico low-income housing expert witness Mesquite New Mexico
    Mesquite New Mexico building code expert witnessMesquite New Mexico architectural expert witnessMesquite New Mexico concrete expert witnessMesquite New Mexico roofing and waterproofing expert witnessMesquite New Mexico reconstruction expert witnessMesquite New Mexico construction scheduling expert witnessMesquite New Mexico construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mesquite, New Mexico

    New Mexico Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mesquite New Mexico

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Southern New Mexico
    Local # 3254
    PO Box 2608
    Las Cruces, NM 88004

    Mesquite New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of Otero County
    Local # 3283
    PO Box 4382
    Alamogordo, NM 88310
    Mesquite New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SW New Mexico Home Builders Association
    Local # 3270
    PO Box 1962
    Silver City, NM 88062

    Mesquite New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3252
    PO Box 2769
    Ruidoso, NM 88355

    Mesquite New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Eastern NM Home Builders Association
    Local # 3240
    PO Box 1132
    Roswell, NM 88202
    Mesquite New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Eastern New Mexico
    Local # 3230
    PO Box 953
    Clovis, NM 88102
    Mesquite New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Mexico
    Local # 3200
    5931 Office Blvd NE Ste 1
    Albuquerque, NM 87109

    Mesquite New Mexico Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mesquite New Mexico

    Corporate Profile

    MESQUITE NEW MEXICO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Mesquite, New Mexico Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Mesquite's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mesquite, New Mexico

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Endorsement is Void Where Compliance is Impossible

    September 21, 2026 —
    The Sixth Circuit found that the insured’s loss of property due to fire was covered despite noncompliance with an endorsement requiring encompassing the property. 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mut Group, Inc., et al., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19156 (6th Cir. June 29, 2026). The insured, 3371 Reading, owned a building undergoing renovation. After the structure burned down, 3371 Reading made a claim under its policy with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. Ohio Casualty relied on an endorsement requiring fencing round the jobsite. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Colorado Legislature Considers Series of Bills Aimed at Boosting Affordable Housing Construction in Colorado — What Homebuilders Need to Know

    April 08, 2026 —
    On January 21, 2026, lawmakers introduced a series of bills with the goals of addressing affordable housing issues and incentivizing construction in Colorado. House Bill 26-1001 (known as the “Housing Opportunities Made Easier ‘HOME’ Act”) concerns the promotion for residential developments on “qualifying properties” that do not contain exempt parcels through the bypassing of often time-consuming local planning processes. Under HB26-1001, a “qualifying property is any real property that contains no more than five acres of land and is owned by: (i) a nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing; (ii) a nonprofit organization that provides public transit; (iii) a nonprofit organization that has entered into an agreement with another nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing, provided that the agreement requires the nonprofit organization with a demonstrated history of providing affordable housing to develop a residential development on the property; (iv) a school district; (v) a state college or university; (vi) a housing authority; or (vii) a local or regional transit district or a regional transportation authority serving one or more counties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Delay Matters: Florida’s Fourth DCA Reverses Hurricane Irma Dismissal

    June 08, 2026 —
    The mantra “delay, deny, defend” is frequently referenced in discussions of insurance claims handling, though insurers will invariably disavow these tactics. While it would be facially improper for an insurer to delay a coverage decision to gain a tactical advantage, empirical examples nonetheless exist. This very dynamic was addressed by Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals when it handed policyholders a win in Hypoluxo Mariner’s Cay Condo. Assoc’n, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 4D2024‑2250 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 1, 2026), reversing a trial court order dismissing a condominium association’s Hurricane Irma coverage lawsuit against its property insurer. Delay to Run the Statute of Limitations Following Hurricane Irma, a condominium association suffered roof and exterior envelope damage, reported an insurance claim, and submitted a sworn proof of loss to its property insurer in compliance with Florida Statute § 627.70132 (2020). The statute establishes a timeframe within which a policyholder must submit a claim for hurricane damage. Reprinted courtesy of CDJ’s #4 Topic of the Year: KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County

    That Boilerplate Language May Just Land You in Hot Water

    Blackstone to Buy Chicago’s Willis Tower for $1.3 Billion

    U.S. Home Prices Rose More Than Estimated in February

    Getting U.S to Zero Carbon Will Take a $2.5 Trillion Investment by 2030

    Colorado’s Need for Condos May Spark Construction Defect Law Reform

    Mobile Home Owners Not a Class in Drainage Lawsuit

    New Safety Requirements added for Keystone Pipeline

    Hold on Just One Second: Texas Clarifies Starting Point for Negligence Statute of Limitations

    “Don’t Coblentz - You Might Miss It!”

    Safe and Safer

    David M. McLain to Speak at the CLM Claims College - School of Construction - Scholarships Available

    New Jersey Supreme Court Holding Impacts Allocation of Damages in Cases Involving Successive Tortfeasors

    Insurance Law Client Alert: California Appeals Court Refuses to Apply Professional Services Exclusion to Products-Completed Operations Loss

    New Tariffs Could Shorten Construction Expansion Cycle

    Client Alert: Restaurant Owed Duty of Care to Driver Killed by Third-Party on Street Adjacent to Restaurant Parking Lot

    Avoid L&I Violations by Following Appropriate Safety Procedures

    Fifth Circuit Requires Causal Distinction for Ensuing Loss Exception to Faulty Work Exclusion

    English v. RKK. . . The Saga Continues

    Insurer Unable to Declare its Coverage Excess In Construction Defect Case

    Developer Transition - Maryland Condominiums

    AGC’s 2024 Construction Outlook. Infrastructure is Bright but Office-Geddon is Not

    Scaffolding Purchase Suggests No New Building for Board of Equalization

    “Bee” Careful: Unique Considerations When Negotiating a Bee Storage Lease Agreement

    Reminder: A Little Pain Now Can Save a Lot of Pain Later

    More Musings From the Mediation Trenches

    Jury Awards 20 Million Verdict Against Bishop Abbey Homes

    Non-compliance With Endorsement Means No Indemnity Coverage

    Impasse Over Corruption Charges Costs SNC $3.7 Billion, CEO Says

    July Sees Big D
    Top 10 Cases of 2019

    Washington Trial Court Narrows Definition of First Party Claimant, Clarifies Available Causes of Action in Commercial Property Loss Context

    Schools Remain Top Priority in Carolinas as Cleanup From Storms Continues

    24th Annual West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar A Success

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    Property Owner Entitled to Rely on Zoning Administrator Advice

    How to Determine the Deadline for Recording a California Mechanics Lien

    Senate’s Fannie Mae Wind-Down Plan Faces High Hurdles

    Performance Bond Surety Takeover – Using Terminated Contractor To Complete The Work

    Proposition 65: OEHHA to Consider Adding and Delisting Certain Chemicals of Concern

    Employee Screening and Testing in the Covid-19 Era: Getting Back to Work

    Harmon Tower Construction Defects Update: Who’s To Blame?

    Federal Court Upholds Uninsured Contractor Endorsement; Finds Duty to Defend Anyway

    Australians Back U.S. Renewables While Opportunities at Home Ebb

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: SONYA SEEDER

    Boston’s Tunnel Project Plagued by Water

    Florida Project Could Help Address Runoff, Algae Blooms

    The GKN Aerospace Chemical Release and the Laws Designed to Address It

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/21/24) – REITs Show Their Strength, Energy Prices Increase Construction Costs and CRE Struggles to Keep Pace

    Legislative Update on Bills of Note (Updated Post-Adjournment)

    ZLien Startup has Discovered a Billion in Payments for Clients

    Yellowstone Park Aims for Quick Reopening After Floods

    Supreme Court Finds Insurance Coverage for Intentional (and Despicable) Act of Contractor’s Employee

    Exceptions to Privette Doctrine Do Not Apply Where There is No Evidence a General Contractor Affirmatively Contributed to the Injuries of an Independent Contractor's Employee

    Melissa Dewey Brumback Invited Into Claims & Litigation Management Alliance Membership

    St. Mary & St. John Coptic Orthodox Church v. SBS Insurance Services, Inc.

    Filing Motion to Increase Lien Transfer Bond (Before Trial Court Loses Jurisdiction Over Final Judgment)

    Insurer Must Cover Portions of Arbitration Award

    Texas Supreme Court Defines ‘Plaintiff’ in 3rd-Party Claims Against Design Professionals

    Couple Sues for Construction Defects in Manufactured Home

    Government’s Termination of Contractor for Default for Failure-To-Make Progress

    How AI Can Become a Design Adviser

    Florida’s Citizens Property Insurance May Be Immune From Bad Faith, But Is Not Immune From Consequential Damages

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    Recycling Our Cities, One Building at a Time

    Following Mishaps, D.C. Metro Presses on With Repairs

    Not So Unambiguous: California Court of Appeal Finds Coverage for Additional Insured

    Pending Sales of Existing Homes in U.S. Decline for Eighth Month

    Insured Versus Insured Clause Does Not Bar Coverage

    Presenting a “Total Time” Delay Claim Is Not Sufficient

    How Will Today’s Pandemic Impact Tomorrow’s Construction Contracts?

    Colorado Homebuyers Must be in Privity of Contract with Developer to Assert Breach of Implied Warranty of Suitability

    Newmeyer & Dillion Ranked Fourth Among Medium Sized Companies in 2016 OCBJ Best Places to Work List

    Seattle’s Tallest Tower Said Readying to Go On the Market

    Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions Into Waterlogged Miami?

    Irvine Partner Cinnamon J. Carr and Associate Brittney H. Aquino Prevail on Summary Judgment

    Construction Laborers Sue Contractors Over Wage Theft

    Trump’s Infrastructure Weak

    eRent: Construction Efficiency Using Principles of the Sharing Economy

    If Passed, New Bill AB 2320 Will Mandate Cyber Insurance For State Government Contractors