BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey low-income housing expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey high-rise construction expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey tract home expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey condominium expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey Medical building expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey multi family housing expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey Subterranean parking expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey retail construction expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey landscaping construction expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey office building expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey condominiums expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey parking structure expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey industrial building expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey custom home expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey custom homes expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey institutional building expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey production housing expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey casino resort expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey concrete tilt-up expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey townhome construction expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey mid-rise construction expert witness Maple Shade New Jersey
    Maple Shade New Jersey ada design expert witnessMaple Shade New Jersey engineering expert witnessMaple Shade New Jersey construction cost estimating expert witnessMaple Shade New Jersey expert witness structural engineerMaple Shade New Jersey structural concrete expertMaple Shade New Jersey construction expert witness consultantMaple Shade New Jersey soil failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Maple Shade, New Jersey

    New Jersey Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Title 46:3B-3 covers new home warranties, requiring "standards for construction and of quality for the structural elements and components of a new home with an indication, where appropriate, of what degree of noncompliance with such standards shall constitute a defect."; warranty periods and components are established; describes new home warranty security funds; limits builder liability to purchase price of home


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Maple Shade New Jersey

    No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing and electrical contractors. New homebuilders must register their business.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders League of S Jersey
    Local # 3124
    114 Haddontowne Court
    Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

    Maple Shade New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Shore Builders Association of Central New Jersey
    Local # 3164
    190 Oberlin Ave N
    Lakewood, NJ 08701

    Maple Shade New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New Jersey Builders Association
    Local # 3100
    200 American Metro Boulevard Ste 123
    Hamilton, NJ 08619

    Maple Shade New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders and Remodelers Assn of Northern NJ
    Local # 3172
    PO BOX 1236
    Maywood, NJ 07607

    Maple Shade New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Maple Shade New Jersey


    Las Vegas Sphere Lawsuits Roll On in Nevada Courtrooms

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    Learning a Lesson by Sweating the Small Stuff

    Common Construction Contract Provisions: Indemnity Provisions

    Roni Most, Esq., Reappointed as a City of Houston Associate Judge

    Court Rules that Collapse Coverage for Damage Caused “Only By” Specified Perils Violates Efficient Proximate Cause Rule and is Unenforceable

    The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter

    California Court Confirms Broad Coverage Under “Ongoing Operations” Endorsements

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    NY Project Produces America's First Utility Scale Wind Power

    Subsidence Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Landslide

    Analysis of the “owned property exclusion” under Panico v. State Farm

    Insureds' Experts Insufficient to Survive Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Planes, Trains and Prevailing Wages. Ok, No Planes, But Trains and Prevailing Wages Yes

    Battle Looms as Feds Order Washington State Coal Plant to Stay Open

    Supreme Court of Washington State Upholds SFAA Position on Spearin Doctrine

    Candlebrook Adds Dormitories With $230 Million Purchase

    Construction Spending Drops in March

    Grenfell Fire Probe Faults Construction Industry Practices

    Brown Paint Doesn’t Cover Up Construction Defects

    New York Court Holds Insurer Can Recover Before Insured Is Made Whole

    Judge Sentences Roofing Contractor Owner in Florida PPP Fraud Case

    Policy Sublimit Does Not Apply to Business Interruption Loss

    Lenders and Post-Foreclosure Purchasers Have Standing to Make Construction Defect Claims for After-Discovered Conditions

    It’s Called “Delegation” – Basic Risks and Considerations for Delegated Design on Projects

    Pensacola Bridge Repair Plan Grows as Inspectors Uncover More Damage

    The California Privacy Rights Act Passed – Now What?

    General Contractor Gets Fired [Upon] for Subcontractor’s Failure to Hire Apprentices

    General Partner Is Not Additional Insured For Construction Defect Claim

    Just Because You Allege There Was an Oral Contract Doesn’t Mean You’re Off the Hook for Attorneys’ Fees if you Lose

    Court or Arbitration? Why Contractors Can’t Afford to Get this Wrong

    Tension Over Municipal Gas Bans Creates Uncertainty for Real Estate Developers

    Insured's Failure to Prove Entire Collapse of Building Leads to Dismissal

    Anthony Luckie Speaks With Columbia University On Receiving Graduate Degree in Construction Administration Alongside His Father

    You're Doing Construction in Russia, Now What?

    Structural Failure of Precast-Concrete Span Sets Back Sydney Metro Job

    Anticipatory Repudiation of a Contract — The Prospective Breach

    CCPA Class Action Lawsuits Are Coming. Are You Ready?

    SIG Earnings Advance 21% as U.K. Construction Strengthens

    Uniformity in Florida’s Construction Bond Laws Brings About Fairness for the Industry

    Washington Supreme Court Finds Agent’s Representations in Certificate of Insurance Bind Insurance Company to Additional Insured Coverage

    CDJ’s #2 Topic of the Year: Ewing Constr. Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 2014 Tex. LEXIS 39 (Tex. Jan.17, 2014)

    New York Team Secures Appellate Win on Behalf of National Home Improvement Chain

    A Court-Side Seat: May Brings Federal Appellate Courts Rulings and Executive Orders

    Partner Patrick Au Achieves a Major Arbitration Result on a Redevelopment Project in Downtown Los Angeles!

    New York Appellate Division Reverses Denial of Landlord’s Additional Insured Tender

    U.K. Developer Pledges Building Safety in Wake of Grenfell

    SB 721 – California Multi-Family Buildings New Require Inspections of “EEEs”

    Unjust Enrichment and Express Contract Don’t Mix

    Payne & Fears Recognized by Best Lawyers in 2026 Best Law Firms®
    Corporate Profile

    MAPLE SHADE NEW JERSEY CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Maple Shade, New Jersey Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Maple Shade's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Maple Shade, New Jersey

    Leaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed

    March 31, 2026 —
    As a mediator helping to settle construction disputes and as an arbitrator deciding outcomes of these disputes, I found certain lessons to be especially helpful after graduating last summer from the Executive Education program at Harvard Kennedy School (HKS). The exceptional HKS curriculum included courses focused on negotiation strategies for multiparty disputes, decisive leadership during crisis, and human behavior affecting dispute resolution. In particular, our HKS class debated the impact of cognitive bias in dispute resolution, and we studied a central theme that decision-making is universally scientific. That is, parties making decisions in dispute resolution exhibit and rely upon empirical factors that good mediators and decision makers should appreciate and understand. Bias, for example, can cause key players to discount persuasive witnesses, admissible evidence, and reliable expert opinions that influence the outcome of a construction dispute. Biased decision makers may also choose to withhold key information from the mediator, as though doing so will help rather than hurt what is supposed to be an objective and diplomatic process. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Rick G. Erickson, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Erickson may be contacted at rerickson@swlaw.com

    Lienor Dealing With “Show Cause” Summons by Condominium Unit Owner

    September 01, 2026 —
    One of the statutory vehicles to shorten a construction lienor’s statute of limitations to foreclose on a construction lien is through a “show cause” summons that essentially requires the lienor to foreclose on the lien within 20 days from receipt of the “show cause” summons. This is a statutory procedure under Florida’s Lien Law in Fla. Stat. s. 713.21(4). If a lienor receives a “show cause” summons and lawsuit, the lienor should, without delay, counterclaim or file a separate lien foreclosure lawsuit within the 20-day period without exception. This is provided the lienor wants to move forward with its lien. If a lienor does not, the lien will be discharged of record. If you are a lienor and receive a “show cause” summons, please immediately consult with construction counsel that can best advise you and perfect your lien rights. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Andrea DeField Among Nation’s Top Young Litigators

    September 08, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage team is proud to celebrate the recognition of Andrea DeField on Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 40 & Under List, an annual ranking that highlights the nation’s leading litigators age 40 and under. Andrea was one of only six Hunton lawyers selected and was recognized in the South region. Benchmark Litigation’s 40 & Under List honors attorneys who have distinguished themselves through significant case work, client feedback, and peer review. This honor reflects Andrea’s reputation as one of the country’s leading policyholder-side insurance recovery litigators and her standing as a trusted advisor to companies facing some of today’s most complex insurance and risk management challenges. As head of Hunton’s cyber insurance practice, Andrea has built her career helping companies manage risk and maximize insurance recovery. Her practice spans the full spectrum of insurance-related issues, from advising clients on contractual risk transfer and insurance program design to representing policyholders in high-stakes coverage and bad faith disputes. She has guided clients through some of the most complex and widely publicized losses in recent years and helps companies recover under a broad range of insurance products, including D&O, professional liability, crime, property, cyber, and general liability policies. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    This post was co-authored by Labor + Employment group lawyer Christopher Costain, Hayden Eckblom (Summer Intern), and Pasqualina Fox-Mina (Summer Associate). Hayden and Pasqualina are not admitted to practice law. On May 11, 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed into law Public Act 26-12, a wide-ranging bill centered around employee rights. Our colleagues in Robinson+Cole’s Labor, Employment, Benefits + Immigration group recently published a legal update summarizing the key components of Public Act 26-12. Here, we focus on the Wage Theft and Prevailing Wage concepts in the bill that directly relate to the construction industry. Wage Theft With exceptions for public works and small residential projects, general contractors will be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid wages owed to an employee of a subcontractor of any tier on private construction projects, beginning with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2027. As we know, there is a separate regime for public works projects involving payment bonds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anand Gupta, Robinson & Cole LLP
    Mr. Gupta may be contacted at agupta@rc.com

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com