BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Atco New Jersey concrete tilt-up expert witness Atco New Jersey tract home expert witness Atco New Jersey industrial building expert witness Atco New Jersey retail construction expert witness Atco New Jersey condominiums expert witness Atco New Jersey townhome construction expert witness Atco New Jersey landscaping construction expert witness Atco New Jersey hospital construction expert witness Atco New Jersey Medical building expert witness Atco New Jersey mid-rise construction expert witness Atco New Jersey casino resort expert witness Atco New Jersey structural steel construction expert witness Atco New Jersey Subterranean parking expert witness Atco New Jersey multi family housing expert witness Atco New Jersey condominium expert witness Atco New Jersey custom homes expert witness Atco New Jersey low-income housing expert witness Atco New Jersey custom home expert witness Atco New Jersey office building expert witness Atco New Jersey housing expert witness Atco New Jersey parking structure expert witness Atco New Jersey
    Atco New Jersey defective construction expertAtco New Jersey structural engineering expert witnessesAtco New Jersey construction expert witness consultantAtco New Jersey construction defect expert witnessAtco New Jersey expert witness roofingAtco New Jersey architectural engineering expert witnessAtco New Jersey slope failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Atco, New Jersey

    New Jersey Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Title 46:3B-3 covers new home warranties, requiring "standards for construction and of quality for the structural elements and components of a new home with an indication, where appropriate, of what degree of noncompliance with such standards shall constitute a defect."; warranty periods and components are established; describes new home warranty security funds; limits builder liability to purchase price of home


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Atco New Jersey

    No state license is required for general contracting. Licensure is required for plumbing and electrical contractors. New homebuilders must register their business.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders and Remodelers Assn of Northern NJ
    Local # 3172
    PO BOX 1236
    Maywood, NJ 07607

    Atco New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    New Jersey Builders Association
    Local # 3100
    200 American Metro Boulevard Ste 123
    Hamilton, NJ 08619

    Atco New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Shore Builders Association of Central New Jersey
    Local # 3164
    190 Oberlin Ave N
    Lakewood, NJ 08701

    Atco New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders League of S Jersey
    Local # 3124
    114 Haddontowne Court
    Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

    Atco New Jersey Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Atco New Jersey


    Type I and Type II Differing Site Conditions Claims

    Certified Question Asks Washington Supreme Court Whether Insurer is Bound by Contradictory Certificate of Insurance

    Alleged Defective Water Pump Leads to 900K in Damages

    Vacation during a Project? Time for your Construction Documents to Shine!

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    Wilke Fleury is proud to congratulate attorneys recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America.

    Uniformity in Florida’s Construction Bond Laws Brings About Fairness for the Industry

    ASCE Statement on Senate Passage Of Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    Suing A Payment Bond Surety in Different Venue Than Set Forth in The Subcontract

    COVID-19 Win for Policyholders! Court Approves "Direct Physical Loss" Argument

    Seabold Construction Ties Demise to Dispute with Real Estate Developer

    Pennsylvania Reconstruction Project Beset by Problems

    Ornate Las Vegas Palace Rented by Michael Jackson for Sale

    EEOC Builds on Best Practice Guidance Regarding Harassment Within the Construction Industry

    South Carolina Court of Appeals Diverges from Damico Opinion, Sending Recent Construction Defects Cases to Arbitration

    Resolving Subcontractor Disputes with Pass-Through Claims and Liquidation Agreements

    How to Document Changes and Preserve Claims Without Starting a Fight

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2025 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    New Jersey Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Coverage Gap Dispute

    Wall Street Is Buying Starter Homes to Quietly Become America’s Landlord

    Insurer Must Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    Fifth Circuit Confirms: Insurer Must Defend Despite Your Work/Your Product Exclusion

    Practical Pointers for Change Orders on Commercial Construction Contracts

    City of Aspen v. Burlingame Ranch II Condominium Owners Association: Clarifying the Application of the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act

    Are “Green” Building Designations and Certifications Truly Necessary?

    Wall Failure Due to Construction Defect Says Insurer

    The Future of Airport Infrastructure in a Post-Pandemic World

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denies Review of Pro-Policy Decision

    Contractor Definition Central to Coverage Dispute

    Construction Resumes after Defects

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Holds that Subrogation Waiver Does Not Violate Statute Prohibiting Limitation on Tort Liability in Construction Contracts

    Is It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    Colorado Legislative Update: HB 20-1155, HB 20-1290, and HB 20-1348

    Absent Separate Covered Peril, Ensuing Loss is Not Applicable

    2018 Update to EPA’s “Superfund Task Force Report”

    Understanding the Limits of Privilege When Applied to Witness Prep Sessions

    Court Denies Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Collapse Claim

    California Pipeline Disaster Brings More Scandal for PG&E

    NY Is Set To Sue US EPA Over ‘Completion’ of PCB Removal

    Preserving Lien Rights on Private Projects in Washington: Three Common Mistakes to Avoid

    Be Aware of Two New Statutes that Became Effective May 1, 2021

    Specific Performance of an Option Contract to Purchase Real Property is Barred Absent Agreement on All Material Terms

    Caution to GCs! An Exception to Privette Can Leave You Open to Liability

    10 Haight Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers in America© 2022 and The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2022

    Notice of Claim Sufficient to Invoke Coverage

    Avoid Delay or Get Ready to Pay: The Risks of “Time-Is-of-The-Essence” Clauses

    Best Lawyers Honors 48 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Recognizes Four Partners as 'Lawyers of the Year'
    Corporate Profile

    ATCO NEW JERSEY CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Atco, New Jersey Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Atco's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Atco, New Jersey

    Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage

    July 06, 2026 —
    The general contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment successfully established that damage to footings in place before the policy period was covered after the collapse of a building. Big D Builders, Inc. v. Am Zurich Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72012 (D. Idaho March 31, 2026). Big D was the general contractor for building a new airplane hangar by erecting a 38,000 square foot structure. Before Big D began construction, the site of the hangar did not contain any pre-existing structures or buildings. Before completion of the hangar, it collapsed and caused extensive property damage. The builder’s risk policy issued by Zurich covered certain aspects of the construction project for the policy period December 28, 2023, to December 28, 2024. Zurich accepted coverage for most of the damage but not for damage to footings and columns installed prior to the start date of the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    $10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight

    September 15, 2026 —
    A $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

    May 12, 2026 —
    Congratulations to Partner Mike D’Andrea and Associates Ruth Rasiah and Kaylah Abdullah in the Los Angeles office for obtaining a complete dismissal of their clients in a significant claim involving California’s Public Utilities regulations. After lengthy litigation, BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted against Claimant, Spectrum (Charter Communications), which resulted in a complete dismissal of the action against BWB&O’s clients. At issue was whether California’s Public Utilities Code shifted the common law duty to maintain certain utility equipment in residential areas within Southern California. After significant briefing, the Superior Court found that BWB&O correctly argued that the Public Utilities Code required utility companies, like Spectrum, to fully maintain utility equipment, and that private residents are not responsible for utility maintenance (even if the physical equipment is located on private property). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage

    August 11, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026). Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Urban Digital Twins: How Virtual Cities Could Help Build Smarter Cities

    August 11, 2026 —
    Traffic congestion, endless construction, flooded streets and power outages. For city leaders and residents alike, these disruptions are simply part of daily urban life. But an emerging tool, known as the urban digital twin, could help cities anticipate problems before they occur by allowing planners to simulate responses, stress-test infrastructure, and evaluate decisions before implementing them in the real world. What Is an Urban Digital Twin? An urban digital twin is a dynamic, data-driven virtual model of a real city. It uses AI analytics and combines 3D modeling with real-time data and information from sources such as IoT sensors, traffic cameras, satellite feeds, infrastructure databases, utility networks, and environmental data including weather systems and heat maps to create a continuously updated digital representation of the urban environment that mirrors infrastructure, movement and systems in real time. In other words, it is a living digital replica of a city. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury

    Anomaly in Adding a Third-Party Claimant to a Liability Insurance Coverage Dispute

    May 05, 2026 —
    In an insurance coverage lawsuit seeking declaratory relief, an insurer sued the third-party claimant. The insurer was seeking a declaration that there was no coverage, which naturally would impact the third-party claimant. The insured did not respond to the lawsuit and the insurer moved for a default judgment which was objected to by the third-party claimant. The trial court granted a final judgment in favor of the insurer, which prompted an appeal from the third-party claimant because the final judgment impacts its rights to coverage if it obtains a judgment against the insured. The appellate court reversed but please take a look at this Court’s discussion on the issue of an insurer adding a third-party claimant to a coverage lawsuit when then the third-party cannot pursue a direct claim against the insurer until it obtains a settlement or judgment against the insured. It presents an interesting argument and counter-point for a third-party claimant that is added to the coverage lawsuit which has implications if it obtains a judgment against the insured: This case involves an apparent anomaly in Florida law. It is well-established that third-party claimants injured by an insured’s negligence have a right as third-party beneficiaries to payment from the insured’s insurance proceeds. It is equally well-established that the third-party claimants’ rights in this regard do not accrue unless and until they obtain a verdict or settlement against the insured. A quick review of this law is helpful at this point. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New Law Prompts ABC Minnesota/North Dakota to Design New Telecommunications Safety Training Program

    June 29, 2026 —
    On the first day of the year, a Minnesota law requiring installers of underground telecommunication infrastructure broadband, fiber or phone lines (when projects utilize directional drilling, and/or work is being conducted within 10 feet of existing utilities) to undergo a 40-hour certification went into effect. Originally passed in mid-2024 and proposed to go into effect in July 2025, the law’s requirements were postponed until January 2026, giving ABC Minnesota/North Dakota—in partnership with NCCER and the Minnesota Cable Communications Association—time to roll out their Safety Qualified Underground Telecommunications Installer training program, which would ensure the workforce of their contractor members were certified. Reprinted courtesy of Grace Calengor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...