BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Oakland Nebraska industrial building expert witness Oakland Nebraska custom homes expert witness Oakland Nebraska concrete tilt-up expert witness Oakland Nebraska custom home expert witness Oakland Nebraska condominiums expert witness Oakland Nebraska Subterranean parking expert witness Oakland Nebraska low-income housing expert witness Oakland Nebraska housing expert witness Oakland Nebraska condominium expert witness Oakland Nebraska structural steel construction expert witness Oakland Nebraska casino resort expert witness Oakland Nebraska retail construction expert witness Oakland Nebraska parking structure expert witness Oakland Nebraska Medical building expert witness Oakland Nebraska institutional building expert witness Oakland Nebraska townhome construction expert witness Oakland Nebraska landscaping construction expert witness Oakland Nebraska tract home expert witness Oakland Nebraska multi family housing expert witness Oakland Nebraska office building expert witness Oakland Nebraska production housing expert witness Oakland Nebraska
    Oakland Nebraska expert witness concrete failureOakland Nebraska building consultant expertOakland Nebraska slope failure expert witnessOakland Nebraska testifying construction expert witnessOakland Nebraska civil engineering expert witnessOakland Nebraska structural engineering expert witnessesOakland Nebraska roofing and waterproofing expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Oakland, Nebraska

    Nebraska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Actions alleging a breach of warranty and construction defect are governed by a four-year statute of limitations (which may be extended by two years if the cause of action is not or could not reasonably have been discovered within the four-year period) and a ten-year statute of repose for latent defects.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Oakland Nebraska

    Businesses must register with the Secretary of State. No state license is required for general contracting, however, local licensure is needed in counties with populations over 100,000. Licensure is required for the electrical trade.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of the Norfolk Area
    Local # 2890
    PO Box 425
    Tilden, NE 68781
    Oakland Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Columbus Home Builders Association
    Local # 2805
    3121 39th St
    Columbus, NE 68601
    Oakland Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Metro Omaha Builders Assn
    Local # 2872
    4141 N 156th Street Ste 100
    Omaha, NE 68116

    Oakland Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North Platte Chapter
    Local # 2854
    PO Box 146
    North Platte, NE 69103
    Oakland Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2818
    131 North Grace
    Grand Island, NE 68803
    Oakland Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Nebraska State Home Builders Association
    Local # 2800
    PO Box 22375
    Lincoln, NE 68542

    Oakland Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    West Central Nebraska Home Builders Association
    Local # 2897
    5817 Ave O Place
    Kearney, NE 68847
    Oakland Nebraska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Oakland Nebraska


    Winners Announced in Seattle’s Office-to-Residential Call for Ideas Contest

    Excess Must Defend After Primary Improperly Refuses to Do So

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Negligence and Private Nuisance

    Mechanic’s Liens- Big Exception

    Haight’s San Diego Office is Growing with the Addition of New Attorneys

    Engineering Report Finds More Investigation Needed of Balconies at New Jersey Condo

    Insured’s Motion to Compel Production of Underwriting Materials Granted

    Georgia Update: Automatic Renewals in Consumer Service Contracts

    That Boilerplate Language May Just Land You in Hot Water

    3D Printing Innovations Enhance Building Safety

    Ivanhoe Cambridge Plans Toronto Office Towers, Terminal

    Los Angeles Construction Sites May Be on Fault Lines

    Client Alert: Restaurant Owed Duty of Care to Driver Killed by Third-Party on Street Adjacent to Restaurant Parking Lot

    Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency Under Scrutiny

    Work without Permits may lead to Problems Later

    Quick Tip: Don’t Indemnify for Breach of Contract

    Jury Trials: A COVID Update

    Pipeline Safety Violations Cause of Explosion that Killed 8

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers!

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/18/23) – Zillow’s New Pilot Program, Production Begins at Solar Panel Plant in Georgia, and More Diversity on Contracts for Buffalo Bills Stadium

    Client Alert: Absence of a Court Reporter at a Civil Motion Hearing May Preclude Appellate Review

    DRCOG’s Findings on the Impact of Construction Defect Litigation Have Been Released (And the Results Should Not Surprise You)

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Earth Movement Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    Digital Twins – Interview with Cristina Savian

    Fifth Circuit Affirms District Court's Grant of Summary Judgment to Insurer on Property Loss Claim

    No Coverage for Additional Insured for Construction Defect Claim

    Colorado “occurrence”

    Top 10 Take-Aways: the ABA Forum's 2024 Mid-Winter Meeting

    Toolbox Talk Series: International Arbitration for the "Domestic" Construction Lawyer

    2021 Executive Insights: Leaders in Construction Law

    Contract Change # 10: Differing Site Conditions (law note)

    America’s Factories Weren’t Built to Endure This Many Hurricanes

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    The Black Woman Architect Who Hopes to Change the Face of Design in America

    South African Building Industry in Line for More State Support

    The Advantages of Virtual Reality in Construction

    Delaware Supreme Court Allows Shareholders Access to Corporation’s Attorney-Client Privileged Documents

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    U.K. Broadens Crackdown on Archaic Property Leasehold System

    Prefabrication Contract Considerations

    Two-Part Series on Condominium Construction Defect Issues

    California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

    “Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

    Court of Appeal Holds Only “Named Insureds” May Sue for Bad Faith Under California FAIR Plan Policy

    Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plans for Contractors: Lessons From the Past

    CDJ’s #3 Topic of the Year: Burch v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 223 Cal.App.4th 1411 (2014)

    Fraud Claims and Breach Of Warranty Claims Against Manufacturer

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict
    Corporate Profile

    OAKLAND NEBRASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Oakland, Nebraska Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Oakland's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Oakland, Nebraska

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com