BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Perry Michigan structural steel construction expert witness Perry Michigan industrial building expert witness Perry Michigan retail construction expert witness Perry Michigan concrete tilt-up expert witness Perry Michigan hospital construction expert witness Perry Michigan casino resort expert witness Perry Michigan custom home expert witness Perry Michigan institutional building expert witness Perry Michigan tract home expert witness Perry Michigan Medical building expert witness Perry Michigan low-income housing expert witness Perry Michigan Subterranean parking expert witness Perry Michigan landscaping construction expert witness Perry Michigan high-rise construction expert witness Perry Michigan condominium expert witness Perry Michigan mid-rise construction expert witness Perry Michigan office building expert witness Perry Michigan production housing expert witness Perry Michigan custom homes expert witness Perry Michigan townhome construction expert witness Perry Michigan parking structure expert witness Perry Michigan
    Perry Michigan expert witness windowsPerry Michigan multi family design expert witnessPerry Michigan soil failure expert witnessPerry Michigan consulting general contractorPerry Michigan stucco expert witnessPerry Michigan construction expert witnessesPerry Michigan structural engineering expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Perry, Michigan

    Michigan Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Article 24 of the Occupational Code dictates that a complaint against a builder must be filed with the Department of Consumer and Industry Service within 18 months of the completion, occupancy or purchase of a residence. If building official determines complaint has merit, "Notice to Respondent: sent to provide builder with opportunity to repair; additional administrative procedures follow to conclusion; Individual townships have local rules regarding properties; Example: Bloomfield has mandated that structures must meet ongoing minimum maintenance standards.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Perry Michigan

    Residential contractors need to be licensed. License required for plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of the Holland Area
    Local # 2340
    211 Lincoln Ave
    Holland, MI 49423

    Perry Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS
    Local # 2300
    6427 Centurion Dr #150B
    Lansing, MI 48917

    Perry Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home & Builders Association of Gtr Grd Rapids
    Local # 2336
    3196 Kraft Ave SE Ste 300
    Grand Rapids, MI 49512

    Perry Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Lansing Home Builders & Remodelers Assoc
    Local # 2352
    2937 Atrium Dr Ste 201
    Okemos, MI 48864

    Perry Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Barry County
    Local # 2310
    2700 S Broadway
    Hastings, MI 49058

    Perry Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metro Flint Inc
    Local # 2332
    4262 Somers Dr
    Burton, MI 48529

    Perry Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Shiawassee County
    Local # 2380
    221 E Exchange St
    Owosso, MI 48867

    Perry Michigan Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Perry Michigan


    White and Williams Ranked in Top Tiers of "Best Law Firms"

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    Construction Defect Specialist Joins Kansas City Firm

    Florida Condos Bet on Americans Making 50% Down Payments

    BHA Has a Nice Swing

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    Mediating is Eye Opening

    Insurer Could Not Rely on Extrinsic Evidence to Circumvent Its Duty to Defend

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Manhattan Home Prices Top Pre-Crisis Record on Luxury Deals

    Trump Soho May Abandon Condos to Operate Mainly as Hotel

    Alleged Defective Water Pump Leads to 900K in Damages

    Mortar Insufficient to Insure Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case

    Poor Pleading Leads to Loss of Claim for Trespass Due to Relation-Back Doctrine, Statute of Limitations

    Defenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage Denial

    Recent Developments Involving Cedell v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington

    Flood Coverage Denied Based on Failure to Submit Proof of Loss

    Professional Liability Insurance Considerations When Design Professionals are Involved

    Contractor Pleads Guilty to Disadvantaged-Business Fraud

    Fort Lauderdale Partner Secures Defense Verdict for Engineering Firm in High-Stakes Negligence Case

    Reminder: FOLLOW Your Well Drafted Contract Provisions

    9th Circuit Plumbs Through the Federal and State False Claims Acts

    Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the San Diego Business Journal

    Steps to Defending against Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Is it the End of the Story for Redevelopment in California?

    Wildfire Is Efficient Proximate Cause of Moisture Reaching Expansive Soils Under Residence

    Client Alert: Catch Me If You Can – Giorgio Is No Gingerbread Man

    New OSHA Rule Creates Electronic Reporting Requirement

    Lack of Credibility Can Destroy a Claim

    House of Digital Twins

    Arizona Court of Appeals Awards Attorneys’ Fees in Quiet-Title Action

    Record-Setting Construction in Fargo

    Mandatory Arbitration Provision Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Thank You for 14 Consecutive Years of Legal Elite Elections

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Give a Little Extra …”

    The Risks and Rewards of Sustainable Building Design

    Court of Appeal Opens Pandora’s Box on Definition of “Contractor” for Forum Selection Clauses

    Virginia Allows Condominium Association’s Insurer to Subrogate Against a Condominium Tenant

    Rio Olympics Work Was a Mess and Then Something Curious Happened

    Providing Notice of Claims Under Your Construction Contract

    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    Feds to Repair Damage From Halted Border Wall Work in Texas, California

    Addressing Safety on the Construction Site

    What Counts as Adequate Opportunity to Cure?

    City Drops Impact Fees to Encourage Commercial Development

    Blog: Congress Strikes a Blow to President Obama’s “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces” Executive Order 13673

    EPA Rejects Most of N.Y.’s $511 Million Tappan Zee Loan

    New York Appellate Court Affirms 1966 Insurance Policy Continues to Cover WTC Asbestos Claims

    EPA Coal Ash Cleanup Rule Changes Send Utilities, Agencies Back to Drawing Board

    Updates to the CEQA Guidelines Have Been Finalized
    Corporate Profile

    PERRY MICHIGAN CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Perry, Michigan Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Perry's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Perry, Michigan

    A Permitting Base Checklist for Data Centers and Power Plants

    June 02, 2026 —
    There is a lot of talk these days about “license to operate” for data centers, meaning management of the relationships with stakeholders and broader communities concerning both the benefits and adverse consequences of locating a facility in a particular locale. Here, we are speaking of “license to operate” more literally—namely, the legal and regulatory permitting and approval requirements for a privately owned data center whether by itself or colocated with a power generating plant. Our Base Checklist includes generally and potentially applicable permitting requirements for development and operation, using California as an example. (Taking legal authority Frank Sinatra out of context, “If you can make it there, you can make it anywhere.”) The actual requirements for a given facility would depend, in part, on local law, including planning and zoning laws and plans, and the environment of the site. Just as examples, additional permitting and mitigation requirements might apply if sensitive receptors are located nearby (e.g., noise mitigation for residential dwellings), if sensitive and protected biological resources (e.g., jurisdictional waters and/or protected species) would be impacted, or if the present or former land uses require additional measures (e.g., hazardous materials remediation, mitigation for conversion of prime farmland, or protection of cultural resources). The scope of permit requirements would ultimately be determined by the applicable regulatory agencies and by the lead and responsible agencies under the applicable state environmental land use regime—in our reference case here, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. McDonough, Pillsbury, Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury and Stacey C. Wright, Pillsbury Mr. McDonough may be contacted at michael.mcdonough@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Wright may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    June 15, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision allowing oil and gas companies to move Louisiana coastal erosion lawsuits from state court to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. While the ruling is procedural, it carries significant implications for environmental- and energy-related risks. The case, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, Slip Op. 24-813 (April 17, 2026), addressed a threshold jurisdictional question but has broader significance for environmental and climate related litigation. State courts are often viewed as more favorable forums for plaintiffs asserting environmental damage claims, particularly those brought by governmental entities. The opinion issued on April 17, 2026 is the latest development in long-running Louisiana coastal litigation that began more than a decade ago. Starting in 2013, Louisiana parishes filed 42 lawsuits against oil and gas companies alleging environmental damage related to historic oil field operations. The parishes alleged that oil and gas companies violated state coastal management laws by failing to properly restore impacted areas. Chevron sought to remove the cases from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), known as federal officer removal, which provides federal jurisdiction over “any person acting under [an] officer” of the United States "for or relating to any act under color of such office." The Fifth Circuit rejected the argument and remanded the case, and others like it, to state court. Trial began in March 2025 in Point à la Hache, Louisiana. On April 4, 2025, the jury awarded a total of $745 million to compensate for land loss, contamination and abandoned equipment. On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the question of whether a federal contractor can remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Kretschmann, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Kretschmann may be contacted at Jennifer.Kretschmann@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    June 29, 2026 —
    The Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Data Center Construction and the AEC Partner of the Future

    April 14, 2026 —
    During my involvement in designing mobile phone production facilities, the speed of design and construction was critical. Any delay could directly translate into lost revenue. That same logic now applies to data centers, though the stakes are much higher. Instead of optimizing physical production lines, we are constructing infrastructure for digital production. The global data center capacity is expected to nearly double by 2030, and with this level of demand, the traditional project-by-project delivery model begins to show its limitations. Data centers are no longer isolated projects in the traditional sense. They are evolving into repeatable, scalable production systems, making them ideal environments for AEC process and business model innovation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    WSHB Managing Partner Chad Dunigan Named Finalist for Jerrold S. Oliver "Ollie" Award of Excellence

    May 12, 2026 —
    Chad Dunigan, Managing Partner of Wood Smith Henning & Berman's Orlando, Florida, office, has been selected as one of just four finalists for the prestigious Jerrold S. Oliver Award of Excellence, affectionately known in the construction defect community as the "Ollie" Award. This distinguished honor recognizes individuals who have made exceptional contributions and demonstrated unwavering dedication to advancing the field of construction defect law. Named in honor of the late Judge Jerrold S. Oliver, a revered founder of alternative dispute resolution in construction defect claims and litigation, the Ollie award symbolizes loyalty, commitment, and trust within the industry. Judge Oliver's legacy as a staunch believer in the resolution process continues to inspire professionals who strive for excellence in the construction defect community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wood Smith Henning Berman

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized With Top Honor in Ranking Arizona: Top Law Firms for 2026

    June 22, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that the firm has been voted as the top law firm in Arizona for the 17th consecutive year in the 2026 edition of AZ Big Media’s Ranking Arizona: The Best of Arizona Business. The firm was again recognized in the category of “Top 10 large law firms in Arizona” which looked at firms with 39 attorneys or more. “We are honored to receive this award recognizing our team’s ongoing commitment to excellence in service of our clients, our community, and each other,” said Firm Chair Barbara J. Dawson. “We are proud to play a meaningful role in supporting the strength and growth of Arizona’s vibrant business environment amid a rapidly changing global economy.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer