BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness De Soto Iowa custom homes expert witness De Soto Iowa institutional building expert witness De Soto Iowa landscaping construction expert witness De Soto Iowa hospital construction expert witness De Soto Iowa townhome construction expert witness De Soto Iowa structural steel construction expert witness De Soto Iowa office building expert witness De Soto Iowa parking structure expert witness De Soto Iowa retail construction expert witness De Soto Iowa condominium expert witness De Soto Iowa high-rise construction expert witness De Soto Iowa casino resort expert witness De Soto Iowa housing expert witness De Soto Iowa Medical building expert witness De Soto Iowa concrete tilt-up expert witness De Soto Iowa tract home expert witness De Soto Iowa low-income housing expert witness De Soto Iowa industrial building expert witness De Soto Iowa condominiums expert witness De Soto Iowa custom home expert witness De Soto Iowa multi family housing expert witness De Soto Iowa
    De Soto Iowa construction defect expert witnessDe Soto Iowa architecture expert witnessDe Soto Iowa consulting architect expert witnessDe Soto Iowa construction safety expertDe Soto Iowa construction expert witness consultantDe Soto Iowa roofing construction expertDe Soto Iowa slope failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    De Soto, Iowa

    Iowa Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines De Soto Iowa

    Licensing for plumbers and electricians is done at the local level. No state license for general contracting, however, all businesses must register with the state.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Quad Cities
    Local # 1635
    3528 Jersey Ridge Rd
    Davenport, IA 52807

    De Soto Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Iowa
    Local # 1600
    3072 104th Street
    Urbandale, IA 50322

    De Soto Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Iowa City
    Local # 1663
    PO Box 3396
    Iowa City, IA 52244

    De Soto Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Gr Des Moines
    Local # 1649
    6751 Corporate Drive
    Johnston, IA 50131

    De Soto Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Ames
    Local # 1607
    PO Box 864
    Ames, IA 50010

    De Soto Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Gr Cedar Rapids Area
    Local # 1621
    350 Miller Rd Ste1
    Hiawatha, IA 52233

    De Soto Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    South Central Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1687
    721 N 1st St
    Centerville, IA 52544
    De Soto Iowa Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For De Soto Iowa


    Nine Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Recognized as Southern California Super Lawyers

    Keep an Eye Out on What Your Insurance Policy and Contract Says

    New Jersey Supreme Court Hears Insurers’ Bid to Overturn a $400M Decision

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/23/25) – Builders Look for Startups, AI Transforms Real Estate and Interest Rates Stall Construction Momentum

    Coverage Denied for Ensuing Loss After Foundation Damage

    Property Owner Entitled to Rely on Zoning Administrator Advice

    Rulemaking to Modernize, Expand DOI’s “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment Rules Expected Fall 2023

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: J. PAUL ALLEN

    Constructing a New American Dream

    Strict Rules for Home Remodel Contracts in California

    Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses

    Fed Inflation Goal Is Elusive as U.S. Rents Stabilize: Economy

    Do We Really Want Courts Deciding if Our Construction Contracts are Fair?

    Avoid the Headache – Submit the Sworn Proof of Loss to Property Insurer

    ConsensusDOCS Updates its Forms

    Bay Area Counties Issue Less Restrictive “Shelter in Place” Orders, Including for Construction

    A Lawyer's Perspective on Current Issues Dominating the Construction Industry

    The Trend in the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation

    Enforceability of Contract Provisions Extending Liquidated Damages Beyond Substantial Completion

    An Additional Insured’s Reasonable Expectations may be Different from the Named Insured’s and Must be Considered to Determine whether the Additional Insured is Entitled to Defense from the Insurer of a Commercial Excess & Umbrella Liability Policy

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Sudden Death”

    I’m Sorry, So Sorry: Legal Implications of Apologies and Admissions of Fault for Delaware Healthcare Professionals

    2026 Top Business Risks for Construction and Engineering Companies

    Sinking S.F. Tower Prompts More Lawsuits

    How to Remove a Mechanics Lien from Your Property

    Insured's Challenge to Use of Xactimate Software to Determine Repair Costs for Damage Fails

    Insurer's Late Notice Defense Fails on Summary Judgment

    Wisconsin Court of Appeals Holds Economic Loss Doctrine Applies to Damage to Other Property If It Was a Foreseeable Result of Disappointed Contractual Expectations

    Next Steps for Policyholders in the Aftermath of the California Wildfires

    9 Basic Strategies for Pursuing Coverage for Construction Accident Claims

    Recommendations and Drafting Considerations for Construction Contingency Clauses Part III

    Appeals Court Rules that CGL Policy Doesn’t Cover Subcontractors’ Faulty Work

    The Top 10 Changes to the AIA A201: What You Need to Know

    Personal Guarantor Cannot Escape a Personal Guarantee By…

    Green Cement? You Bet!

    Arizona Court Cites California Courts to Determine Construction Defect Coverage is Time Barred

    Anti-Assignment Provision Unenforceable in Kentucky

    Are Millennials Finally Moving Out On Their Own?

    U.S., Canada, Mexico Set New Joint Clean-Energy Goal

    Mediation in the Zero Sum World of Construction

    Arbitration: For Whom the Statute of Limitations Does Not Toll in Pennsylvania

    Construction Defect Bill a Long Shot in Nevada

    Used French Fry Oil Fuels London Offices as Buildings Go Green

    South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

    "My Bad, I Thought It Was in Good Faith" is Not Good Enough - Contractor Ordered to Pay Prompt Payment Penalties

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2024 New York – Metro Super Lawyers®

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss "Redundant Claims" Denied

    Colorado “occurrence”

    Not a Waiver for All: Maryland Declines to Apply Subrogation Waiver to Subcontractors

    CDJ’s #4 Topic of the Year: KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County
    Corporate Profile

    DE SOTO IOWA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The De Soto, Iowa Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to De Soto's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    De Soto, Iowa

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    May 26, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – May 14, 2026 - Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion has been ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 guide and recognized as a leading firm in Litigation: General Commercial for Orange County. Newmeyer Dillion was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise and caliber of talent where the firm stood out for its exceptional work and is recognized in Litigation: General Commercial. Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff expressed the firm's gratitude: “It is an honor for our firm to be recognized by Chambers and Partners in their Spotlight California 2026 guide. This acknowledgment reflects our commitment to providing high quality legal services tailored to the unique needs of our clients.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    August 03, 2026 —
    It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    The Construction Defect Litigation Podcast: Navigating Multi-Party Construction Defect Litigation

    September 08, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld Construction Defect Practice Group Chair Ivette Kincaid and attorney Thomas McCarrick recently joined the Construction Defect Litigation podcast to discuss the challenges—and strategies—behind complex construction defect matters involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on their experience, Ivette and Thomas explore practical approaches to:
    • Identifying key parties and understanding how claims and crossclaims develop
    • Working with experts to evaluate defects, causation and damages
    • Managing procedural challenges, including scheduling, document management and depositions
    • Applying thoughtful case management strategies to position complex matters for successful resolution
    Reprinted courtesy of Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld and Thomas McCarrick, Kahana Feld Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at tmccarrick@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses

    May 12, 2026 —
    The recent Kona Low storms that hit all islands were devastating, causing significant property damage. Homeowners and businesses will be seeking coverage under their insurance policies to recover for their losses. Here is a brief look at what may be covered and which exclusions may be troublesome in homeowners’ and commercial property policies. Typically, both a homeowners’ policy and a commercial property policy include a grant of coverage for “direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property.” Covered perils are listed, including such events as fire, lightning, or windstorm. Covered Property includes dwellings, other structures on the property and personal property. Additional coverages are usually provided. This includes debris removal after a peril insured against or collapse of a structure. In a homeowners’ policy, additional living expenses are likely covered when the damaged home is not fit to live in. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Insurer’s Federal Suit Dismissed in Favor of Insured’s State Suit

    April 14, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insured’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s federal suit for declaratory judgment because the insured filed a more complete action in state court. Church Mut. Ins. Co. v. Elmwood Baptist Church, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 259762 (S.D. W.V. Dec. 16, 2025). Elmwood purchased a property policy from Church Mutual Insurance Company. After the roof of Elmwood’s property collapsed, the parties disputed the amount Church Mutual owed to Elmwood. Church Mutual filed suit in federal district court asking for a declaration that the policy was “void ab initio,’ or, alternatively, that Church had fully compensated Elmwood for its loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Turning Expert Services into Products

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Finnish engineering, architecture, and project consulting company, AINS Group, recently opened an online store to purchase fixed-price services. The store presents specialist work in a product-like format, with fixed service names, defined scopes, and visible prices, such as a building history report, a zoning plan cost analysis, and a technical preliminary survey for a property transaction. Is this productization a smart move or a sign that expert services are being commoditized? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Five Snell & Wilmer Partners Named to Utah Business’ 2026 Legal Elite

    September 29, 2026 —
    SALT LAKE CITY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that five partners have been named to Utah Business’ 2026 “Legal Elite.” The annual recognition honors leading Utah attorneys who are making a meaningful impact in their respective areas of practice. Honorees are peer-nominated and selected by a panel of experienced legal and law enforcement professionals based on their legal knowledge, commitment to ethical standards, and professional achievements. Wade R. Budge is a land use and real estate lawyer with significant experience advising developers and owners in all aspects of real estate development. He has negotiated entitlements for master planned communities, industrials projects, retail centers, office buildings, subdivisions, and mountain resorts throughout Utah. He also regularly represents clients in the use, acquisition, and disposition of real estate projects throughout the Western United States. Budge has advised developers in obtaining public incentives and using public finance tools, including tax increment financing, to facilitate new and redevelopment projects, and regularly advises clients with government relations matters involving state and local governments. Budge has negotiated public-private partnerships with dozens of local governments and with every one of the state’s development agencies, including the Point of the Mountain State Land Authority, the Military Installation Development Authority, and the Utah Fairpark Area Investment and Restoration District. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer