BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Little York Indiana custom homes expert witness Little York Indiana institutional building expert witness Little York Indiana hospital construction expert witness Little York Indiana landscaping construction expert witness Little York Indiana production housing expert witness Little York Indiana casino resort expert witness Little York Indiana Medical building expert witness Little York Indiana condominium expert witness Little York Indiana housing expert witness Little York Indiana Subterranean parking expert witness Little York Indiana mid-rise construction expert witness Little York Indiana parking structure expert witness Little York Indiana multi family housing expert witness Little York Indiana condominiums expert witness Little York Indiana office building expert witness Little York Indiana industrial building expert witness Little York Indiana low-income housing expert witness Little York Indiana retail construction expert witness Little York Indiana tract home expert witness Little York Indiana high-rise construction expert witness Little York Indiana custom home expert witness Little York Indiana
    Little York Indiana construction defect expert witnessLittle York Indiana roofing construction expertLittle York Indiana building envelope expert witnessLittle York Indiana construction code expert witnessLittle York Indiana fenestration expert witnessLittle York Indiana expert witnesses fenestrationLittle York Indiana construction cost estimating expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Little York, Indiana

    Indiana Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to SB45160, §IC 32-27-3-1&2 a claimant must provide written notice 60 days before filing an action. Within 21 days after service of the notice, the construction professional must serve a written response. Claimant must file list of known construction defects, description, and the construction professional responsible for each alleged defect (to the extent known).


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Little York Indiana

    License required for plumbing. All other licensing is done at the local county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    River Valley Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1576
    PO Box 365
    Hanover, IN 47243
    Little York Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Vincennes Area Chapter
    Local # 1563
    PO Box 531
    Vincennes, IN 47591
    Little York Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Lawrence County Chapter
    Local # 1535
    201 Main Street c/o Hoosier Door
    Oolitic, IN 47451
    Little York Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Dubois County
    Local # 1511
    1813 S A St
    Jasper, IN 47546

    Little York Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Gibson Co Chapter
    Local # 1530
    PO Box 386
    Princeton, IN 47670
    Little York Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Dearborn Co Home Builders Association
    Local # 1522
    PO Box 21
    Aurora, IN 47001
    Little York Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Monroe County Building Association
    Local # 1508
    3901 E Hagan St Ste H
    Bloomington, IN 47401

    Little York Indiana Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Little York Indiana


    Winners Announced in Seattle’s Office-to-Residential Call for Ideas Contest

    Excess Must Defend After Primary Improperly Refuses to Do So

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Negligence and Private Nuisance

    Mechanic’s Liens- Big Exception

    Haight’s San Diego Office is Growing with the Addition of New Attorneys

    Engineering Report Finds More Investigation Needed of Balconies at New Jersey Condo

    Insured’s Motion to Compel Production of Underwriting Materials Granted

    Georgia Update: Automatic Renewals in Consumer Service Contracts

    That Boilerplate Language May Just Land You in Hot Water

    3D Printing Innovations Enhance Building Safety

    Ivanhoe Cambridge Plans Toronto Office Towers, Terminal

    Los Angeles Construction Sites May Be on Fault Lines

    Client Alert: Restaurant Owed Duty of Care to Driver Killed by Third-Party on Street Adjacent to Restaurant Parking Lot

    Texas Windstorm Insurance Agency Under Scrutiny

    Work without Permits may lead to Problems Later

    Quick Tip: Don’t Indemnify for Breach of Contract

    Jury Trials: A COVID Update

    Pipeline Safety Violations Cause of Explosion that Killed 8

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers!

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/18/23) – Zillow’s New Pilot Program, Production Begins at Solar Panel Plant in Georgia, and More Diversity on Contracts for Buffalo Bills Stadium

    Client Alert: Absence of a Court Reporter at a Civil Motion Hearing May Preclude Appellate Review

    DRCOG’s Findings on the Impact of Construction Defect Litigation Have Been Released (And the Results Should Not Surprise You)

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    Earth Movement Exclusion Bars Coverage

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    Digital Twins – Interview with Cristina Savian

    Fifth Circuit Affirms District Court's Grant of Summary Judgment to Insurer on Property Loss Claim

    No Coverage for Additional Insured for Construction Defect Claim

    Colorado “occurrence”

    Top 10 Take-Aways: the ABA Forum's 2024 Mid-Winter Meeting

    Toolbox Talk Series: International Arbitration for the "Domestic" Construction Lawyer

    2021 Executive Insights: Leaders in Construction Law

    Contract Change # 10: Differing Site Conditions (law note)

    America’s Factories Weren’t Built to Endure This Many Hurricanes

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    The Black Woman Architect Who Hopes to Change the Face of Design in America

    South African Building Industry in Line for More State Support

    The Advantages of Virtual Reality in Construction

    Delaware Supreme Court Allows Shareholders Access to Corporation’s Attorney-Client Privileged Documents

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    U.K. Broadens Crackdown on Archaic Property Leasehold System

    Prefabrication Contract Considerations

    Two-Part Series on Condominium Construction Defect Issues

    California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

    “Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

    Court of Appeal Holds Only “Named Insureds” May Sue for Bad Faith Under California FAIR Plan Policy

    Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plans for Contractors: Lessons From the Past

    CDJ’s #3 Topic of the Year: Burch v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 223 Cal.App.4th 1411 (2014)

    Fraud Claims and Breach Of Warranty Claims Against Manufacturer

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict
    Corporate Profile

    LITTLE YORK INDIANA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Little York, Indiana Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Little York's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Little York, Indiana

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    In the Eye of the Beholder: Court of Appeal Finds Duty of Care Owed by Owner and Contractors for Death of Minors Caused by Independent Truck Driver

    May 05, 2026 —
    I was a T.A. for my high school history teacher, a really smart and nice guy, Mr. Reynolds. In the room at the back of the classroom which served as his office he had the picture above. It’s called “My Wife and My Mother-in-Law” and is taken from a German postcard from 1888. Depending on how you look it, you might see fashionable young lady, or an old lady. Cases can sometimes be like that: You see what you want to see. The next case is also like that. In Lorenzo v. Calex Engineering, Inc., 110 Cal.App.5th 49 (2025), the 2nd District Court of Appeals reversed a motion for summary judgment granted in favor of an owner and its contractors in a case involving the death of two minors struck by a dump truck enroute to a non-permitted off-site staging area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com