BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Moscow Idaho hospital construction expert witness Moscow Idaho industrial building expert witness Moscow Idaho townhome construction expert witness Moscow Idaho housing expert witness Moscow Idaho parking structure expert witness Moscow Idaho custom home expert witness Moscow Idaho production housing expert witness Moscow Idaho Medical building expert witness Moscow Idaho structural steel construction expert witness Moscow Idaho retail construction expert witness Moscow Idaho condominiums expert witness Moscow Idaho custom homes expert witness Moscow Idaho low-income housing expert witness Moscow Idaho tract home expert witness Moscow Idaho office building expert witness Moscow Idaho mid-rise construction expert witness Moscow Idaho Subterranean parking expert witness Moscow Idaho multi family housing expert witness Moscow Idaho landscaping construction expert witness Moscow Idaho condominium expert witness Moscow Idaho institutional building expert witness Moscow Idaho
    Moscow Idaho consulting architect expert witnessMoscow Idaho engineering expert witnessMoscow Idaho reconstruction expert witnessMoscow Idaho roofing and waterproofing expert witnessMoscow Idaho expert witnesses fenestrationMoscow Idaho structural concrete expertMoscow Idaho slope failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Moscow, Idaho

    Idaho Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB133; title 6 increases builder liability by creating responsibility for attorney fees if the homeowner/HOA prevails; places stringent demands on builder to comply with statutes and repair/compromise/settle; compliance protects against liability for resultant personal property damage; NOR is triggered by any construction defect in a new or substantially remodeled dwelling; Owner must notice "professional"; pro must respond within 21 days; claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; or if the pro inspects, he must provide offer or statement within 14 days and claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; law appears, by definition, to impose same timelines on builder pro in cross-complaining


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Moscow Idaho

    License required for electrical, plumbing, pesticide, manufactured housing, landscape architecture, and asbestos removal. No state license for general contracting.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    N Idaho Bldg Contractors Assn
    Local # 1320
    1928 N 4th St
    Coeur d Alene, ID 83814

    Moscow Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Salmon River Builders Association
    Local # 1350
    PO Box 25
    Carmen, ID 83462

    Moscow Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Panhandle Building Contractors Chapter of National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1319
    1319 N Division Ste 102
    Sandpoint, ID 83864

    Moscow Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Upper Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1335
    310 North 2nd East Ste 143
    Rexburg, ID 83440

    Moscow Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of SW Idaho
    Local # 1325
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Moscow Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Idaho State Home Builders Association
    Local # 1300
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Moscow Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of Wood River Valley
    Local # 1395
    PO Box 2721
    Hailey, ID 83333
    Moscow Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Moscow Idaho


    Mountain States Super Lawyers 2019 Recognizes 21 Nevada Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    Be a Good Neighbor: Protect Against Claims by an Adjacent Landowner During Construction

    HHMR Honored as a 2026 Denver Business Journal Best Places to Work Recipient

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    No Hiring Surge by Homebuilders Says Industry Group

    Properly Trigger the Performance Bond

    Preparing Your Business For Internal Transition

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Denies Bad Faith Claim in HO Policy Dispute

    Introducing Nomos LLP!

    Iowa Tornado Flattens Homes, Businesses and Wind Turbines

    Quick Note: Independent Third-Party Spoliation Of Evidence Claim

    Green Investigations Are Here: U.S. Department of Justice Turns Towards Environmental Enforcement Actions, Deprioritizes Compliance Assistance

    Oklahoma Finds Policy Can Be Assigned Post-Loss

    Key Legal Considerations for Modular Construction Contracts

    Assembly Bill 1701 Contemplates Broader Duty to Subcontractor’s Employees by General Contractor

    Additional Dismissals of COVID Business Interruption, Civil Authority Claims

    Tallest U.S. Skyscraper Dream Kept Alive by Irish Builder

    Liability Policy’s Arbitration Endorsement Applies to Third Party Beneficiaries, Including Additional Insureds

    Excessive Corrosion Cause of Ohio State Fair Ride Accident

    The EEOC Is Actively Targeting the Construction Industry

    Shifting Fees and Costs in Nevada Construction Defect Cases

    New California "Construction" Legislation

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code

    The Condominium Warranty Against Structural Defects in the District of Columbia

    The Practical Distinction Between Anticipatory Breach and Repudiation and How to Deal with Both on Construction Projects

    Trump Administration Announces New Eviction Moratorium

    The Best Lawyers in America© Peer Review Names Eight Newmeyer & Dillion Partners in Multiple Categories and Two Partners as Orange County’s Lawyers of the Year in Construction and Insurance Law

    Engineer TRC Fends Off Lawsuits After Merger

    Record Keeping—the Devil’s in the Details

    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2024 “Atlanta 500” List

    Insurer's In-House Counsel's Involvement in Coverage Decision Opens Door to Discovery

    Arkansas: Avoiding the "Made Whole" Doctrine Through Dépeçage

    Endorsement Excludes Replacement of Undamaged Property with Matching Materials

    Changes To Commercial Item Contracting

    SFAA and Coalition of Partners Encourage Lawmakers to Require Essential Surety Bonding Protections on All Federally-Financed Projects Receiving WIFIA Funds

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Meet the Forum's ADR Neutrals: TOM NOCAR

    Does “Faulty Workmanship” Constitute An Occurrence Under Your CGL Policy?

    Consumer Product Safety Commission Recalls

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: J. PAUL ALLEN

    Pay-if-Paid Clauses, Nasty, but Enforceable

    Should Post Contract Award Tariffs be Reimbursable? Why Public Works Contractors Deserve Clarity

    Maryland Legislation Prohibits Condominium Developers from Shortening Statute of Limitations to Defeat Unit Owner Construction Defect Claims

    Bad Faith Claim for Inadequate Investigation Does Not Survive Summary Judgment

    Manhattan Gets First Crowdfunded Condos

    NIST Florida Condo Collapse Probe Develops Dozens of Hypotheses

    10 Year Anniversary – Congratulations Greg Podolak

    Is the Manhattan Bank of America Tower a Green Success or Failure?

    Changes to Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Code
    Corporate Profile

    MOSCOW IDAHO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Moscow, Idaho Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Moscow's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Moscow, Idaho

    Did You Know: Unique Legal Considerations for Animal Care Facilities

    August 24, 2026 —
    Animal care facilities are highly specialized environments that require expertise far beyond traditional commercial or even standard medical construction. Whether designing and building animal shelters, doggy daycares, veterinary clinics or full-service animal hospitals, these facilities operate under conditions that introduce unique challenges related to sanitation, durability, animal behavior and operational workflows. Because of these complexities, projects that fail to account for animal care requirements adequately often encounter costly issues—many of which result in litigation. Below are real-world examples drawn from expert witness work, followed by proactive best practices construction professionals should apply to future animal care projects. Reprinted courtesy of Hannah Skidmore, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    April 20, 2026 —
    For 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve. What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results. This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    March 24, 2026 —
    The idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information. The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows. Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Construction Liens and the “Substantial Performance” Doctrine

    April 08, 2026 —
    In a recent case dealing with a construction lien, the driving issue was whether the air conditioning contractor “substantially performed” before recording its construction lien against residential property. The importance here pertains to the substantial performance doctrine with respect to construction liens. The Third District Court of Appeal explained, with relevant citations, this doctrine as follows: Under Florida law, a contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien if he complies with all provisions of Chapter 713, governing construction liens, and “has substantially performed the contract.” Grant v. Wester, 679 So. 2d 1301, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quotation omitted); Langley v. Knowles, 958 So. 2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“The substantial performance doctrine recognizes that a contactor who complies with all of the provisions of the contactor’s lien statute is entitled to enforce a lien if he has substantially, but not completely, performed his contractual obligations.”). Substantial performance is performance “so nearly equivalent to what was bargained for that it would be unreasonable to deny the promisee the full contract price subject to the promisor’s right to recover whatever damages may have been occasioned him by the promisee’s failure to render full performance.” Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So. 2d 72, 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego Office Ranked #1 “Best Place to Work” by the San Diego Business Journal

    September 01, 2026 —
    SAN DIEGO – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its San Diego office has been named the #1 Best Place to Work in the Large Business category by the San Diego Business Journal as part of its 2026 Best Places to Work awards. The annual recognition honors outstanding employers across the San Diego region that are setting the standard for workplace culture and employee engagement. Rankings are based on confidential employee surveys conducted by Workforce Research Group, which evaluate organizations on leadership, corporate culture, communication, employee engagement, and other key workplace factors. “Being recognized as the #1 Best Place to Work in the Large Business category is an incredible honor because it reflects the experiences and feedback of our own team,” said Bardia Moayedi, managing partner of Snell & Wilmer’s San Diego office. “Our people are the foundation of everything we do, and this recognition speaks to the collaborative, inclusive, and supportive culture they have helped create. I am grateful to every member of our San Diego office for making this an exceptional place to build a career, serve our clients, and give back to our community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    AI Can Now Train the Soft Skills Construction Ignored

    August 03, 2026 —
    Most AEC professionals learn to work in teams and across teams through trial and error. There are, however, opportunities to better prepare for the real world with formal training. Until now, it has required human facilitators. Now, generative AI is emerging as a scalable alternative, which I’m also exploring. A Gap in Curricula When I studied architecture, most of the teamwork happened with co-students in the same department. However, one course focused on industrial projects where future architects and engineers collaborated on a simulated project. I’m not sure if a similar course is still in the curriculum, but it was certainly worthwhile and should have been much more extensive. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...