BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Madison County Idaho parking structure expert witness Madison County Idaho housing expert witness Madison County Idaho custom home expert witness Madison County Idaho Subterranean parking expert witness Madison County Idaho hospital construction expert witness Madison County Idaho townhome construction expert witness Madison County Idaho high-rise construction expert witness Madison County Idaho mid-rise construction expert witness Madison County Idaho retail construction expert witness Madison County Idaho condominiums expert witness Madison County Idaho landscaping construction expert witness Madison County Idaho Medical building expert witness Madison County Idaho condominium expert witness Madison County Idaho tract home expert witness Madison County Idaho production housing expert witness Madison County Idaho institutional building expert witness Madison County Idaho casino resort expert witness Madison County Idaho low-income housing expert witness Madison County Idaho custom homes expert witness Madison County Idaho office building expert witness Madison County Idaho structural steel construction expert witness Madison County Idaho
    Madison County Idaho structural engineering expert witnessesMadison County Idaho construction safety expertMadison County Idaho expert witness roofingMadison County Idaho architectural engineering expert witnessMadison County Idaho consulting architect expert witnessMadison County Idaho architecture expert witnessMadison County Idaho building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Madison County, Idaho

    Idaho Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB133; title 6 increases builder liability by creating responsibility for attorney fees if the homeowner/HOA prevails; places stringent demands on builder to comply with statutes and repair/compromise/settle; compliance protects against liability for resultant personal property damage; NOR is triggered by any construction defect in a new or substantially remodeled dwelling; Owner must notice "professional"; pro must respond within 21 days; claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; or if the pro inspects, he must provide offer or statement within 14 days and claimant must accept/reject within 30 days; law appears, by definition, to impose same timelines on builder pro in cross-complaining


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Madison County Idaho

    License required for electrical, plumbing, pesticide, manufactured housing, landscape architecture, and asbestos removal. No state license for general contracting.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Upper Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1335
    310 North 2nd East Ste 143
    Rexburg, ID 83440

    Madison County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of SW Idaho
    Local # 1325
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Madison County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Idaho State Home Builders Association
    Local # 1300
    6206 N Discovery Way Ste A
    Boise, ID 83713

    Madison County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of Wood River Valley
    Local # 1395
    PO Box 2721
    Hailey, ID 83333
    Madison County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Snake River Valley Building Contractors Association
    Local # 1375
    1123 12 Ave S
    Nampa, ID 83651

    Madison County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eastern Idaho Builders Association
    Local # 1340
    PO Box 1782
    Idaho Falls, ID 83403

    Madison County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Contractors Association of South East Idaho Afiil w/ National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1305
    770 E Chubbuck Rd.
    Chubbuck, ID 83205

    Madison County Idaho Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Madison County Idaho


    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/10/24) – Strong Construction Investment in Data Centers, Increase Use of Proptech in Hospitality and Effects of Remote-Work on Housing Market

    Construction Defect Lawsuits Hinted for Dublin, California

    Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Tar Escaping From Roof

    4 Steps to Take When a Worker Is Injured on Your Construction Site

    EPA Can't Evade Enviro Firm's $2.7M Cleanup Site Pay Claim, US Court Says

    First Suit to Enforce Business-Interruption Coverage Filed

    Review your Additional Insured Endorsement

    The Unpost, Post: Dynamex and the Construction Indianapolis

    Consider Manner In Which Loan Agreement (Promissory Note) Is Drafted

    Condo Building Hits Highest Share of Canada Market Since 1971

    The Status of OSHA’s Impending Heat Stress Standard

    The First UK Hospital Being Built Using AI Technology

    Undercover Sting Nabs Eleven Illegal Contractors in California

    Quick Note: Burden of Proving and Defending All Risk Property Insurance Claims

    Wes Payne Receives Defense Attorney of the Year Award

    Finding an "Occurrence," Appellate Court Rules Insurer Must Defend

    Kaboom! Illinois Applies the Anti-Subrogation Rule to Require a Landlord’s Subrogating Property Insurer to Defend a Third-Party Complaint Against Tenants

    Janus v. AFSCME

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Quick Note: Procure Worker’s Compensation in the Name of Your Company If You Are a General Contractor

    When Brad Pitt Tried to Save the Lower Ninth Ward

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    A WARNing for Companies

    Violation of Prompt Payment Statutes is Not a Breach of Contract. But That’s Not the Most Interesting Part

    Wall Failure Due to Construction Defect Says Insurer

    Trump Administration Announces New Eviction Moratorium

    Glendale City Council Approves Tohono O’odham Nation Casino

    Kiewit Selected for Rebuild of Collapsed Baltimore Bridge

    Introducing Nomos LLP!

    Multiple Occurrences Found For Claims Against Supplier of Asbestos Products

    When Does it End?

    Spain Risks €10.6 Billion Flood Damage Bill, Sanchez Says

    South Carolina “Your Work” Exclusion, “Get To” Costs

    Paycheck Protection Flexibility Act Of 2020: What You Need to Know

    Quick Note: Staying, Not Dismissing, Arbitrable Disputes Under Federal Arbitration Act

    VOSH Jumps Into the Employee Misclassification Pool

    Keller Group Fires Two Executives in Suspected Australia Profits Reporting Fraud

    Blackstone Suffers Court Setback in Irish Real Estate Drama

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    Repeated Use of Defective Fireplace Triggers Duty to Defend Even if Active Fire Does Not Break Out Until After End of Policy Period

    PSA: Getting the First Mechanic’s Lien on a Project is a Plus

    City Covered From Lawsuits Filed After Hurricane-Damaged Dwellings Demolished

    Hunton Insurance Recovery Lawyers Ranked by Chambers as Top Insurance Practitioners

    Texas Supreme Court Cements Exception to “Eight-Corners” Rule Through Two Recent Rulings

    Atlanta Office Wins Defense Verdict For Property Manager On Claims By Vendor, Cross-Claims By Property Owner

    Brooklyn’s Industry City to Get $1 Billion Modernization

    Venue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of Us

    ASCE Report Calls for Sweeping Changes to Texas Grid Infrastructure
    Corporate Profile

    MADISON COUNTY IDAHO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Madison County, Idaho Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Madison County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Madison County, Idaho

    Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Five Partners 'Lawyers of the Year'

    September 08, 2026 —
    Best Lawyers has selected 207 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 45 offices for its 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized five Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Partner John R. Conley (Product Liability Litigation - Defendants); Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Corporate Law; Mergers and Acquisitions Law; Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law; Tax Law; Trusts and Estates); Weirton Managing Partner Michelle L. Gorman (Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants); Portland Partner Megan Cook (Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants); and San Diego Partner Craig T. Mann (Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants). Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can also see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America here. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    A Permitting Base Checklist for Data Centers and Power Plants

    June 02, 2026 —
    There is a lot of talk these days about “license to operate” for data centers, meaning management of the relationships with stakeholders and broader communities concerning both the benefits and adverse consequences of locating a facility in a particular locale. Here, we are speaking of “license to operate” more literally—namely, the legal and regulatory permitting and approval requirements for a privately owned data center whether by itself or colocated with a power generating plant. Our Base Checklist includes generally and potentially applicable permitting requirements for development and operation, using California as an example. (Taking legal authority Frank Sinatra out of context, “If you can make it there, you can make it anywhere.”) The actual requirements for a given facility would depend, in part, on local law, including planning and zoning laws and plans, and the environment of the site. Just as examples, additional permitting and mitigation requirements might apply if sensitive receptors are located nearby (e.g., noise mitigation for residential dwellings), if sensitive and protected biological resources (e.g., jurisdictional waters and/or protected species) would be impacted, or if the present or former land uses require additional measures (e.g., hazardous materials remediation, mitigation for conversion of prime farmland, or protection of cultural resources). The scope of permit requirements would ultimately be determined by the applicable regulatory agencies and by the lead and responsible agencies under the applicable state environmental land use regime—in our reference case here, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. McDonough, Pillsbury, Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury and Stacey C. Wright, Pillsbury Mr. McDonough may be contacted at michael.mcdonough@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Wright may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    June 15, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld partner Leigh Katz obtained a significant victory in a recent matter involving a videotaped alleged trip and fall on the sidewalk in front of the client’s commercial residence. The plaintiff claimed he suffered a knee injury that necessitated surgery, along with other assorted injuries that prevented him from continuing high-level athletic activities. Leigh was able to demonstrate that the fall was staged and received a voluntary discontinuance with prejudice. At mediation, Leigh emphasized that KF’s expert witness challenged the plaintiff’s claim that the fall was caused by a sidewalk height differential after reviewing the videotape footage and determining the plaintiff’s fall began before his feet made contact with the alleged defect. Based on this analysis, the expert concluded the reported height differential did not initiate the fall, which supported KF’s position that the incident depicted in the video was unrealistic and appeared staged. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Leigh Katz, Kahana Feld
    Ms. Katz may be contacted at lkatz@kahanafeld.com

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...