GOODING COUNTY IDAHO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter

August 16, 2026 — Kathryne E. Baldwin - Wilke Fleury
George Bernard Shaw has a quote we use a lot in my family: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” This is pertinent to contractors and homeowners alike because the cost of failing to get proper signatures on documents like construction contracts, and particularly, change orders, is heavy. Both contractors and homeowners are in the same boat as far as wanting to complete a job as swiftly as possible: contractors go on to their next job and homeowners can return to peace in their home. This is prime territory for either party to suggest the work be completed today and the contract or change order executed tomorrow, or even later. However, without a contract, there is no memorialization of the communication between the parties, which can lead to confusion and missed expectations on both sides. Construction plans are rarely as neat and tidy as they originally seem to be. A contractor may uncover unforeseen conditions, an owner may request additional work or changes that require additional work, or weather interferes with project schedules or the work itself. Unfortunately, the signature that never gets collected can become one of the most expensive omissions on a project – for both sides. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Kathryne E. Baldwin, Wilke Fleury
Ms. Baldwin may be contacted at kbaldwin@wilkefleury.com

---

Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

July 27, 2026 — Annemarie Mannion - Engineering News-Record
Construction of a $1-billion Google data center planned by Ryan Cos. on 485 acres in southeastern Minnesota was expected to start in July but is now halted under a judge’s order. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

---

Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/12/26) – Data Center Momentum Increases, Multifamily Construction Projects Decline, CRE Returns as Top Investor Preference

September 01, 2026 — Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law Blog
In our latest roundup, office vacancies fall, fair housing advocacy groups sue HUD, foreign buyers reduce purchases of U.S. residential real estate, and more!

• After a brief slowdown to begin the summer, data center construction planning momentum picked up in July, again shining as the brightest sector in building. (Zachary Phillips, Construction Dive)
• The number of finished multifamily construction projects declined last year — welcome news for multifamily operators eager to work through the recent supply wave — and a record share of new apartments were high-density. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
• Fair housing advocacy groups sued the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, claiming the agency’s funding restructuring drastically reduces their ability to receive funds from the Fair Housing Initiatives Program. (Ryan Kushner, Multifamily Dive)

Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

---

Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

July 27, 2026 — David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal Updates
A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:

Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”

Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).

Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

---

USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

June 15, 2026 — Zachary F. Jacobson - The Construction Seyt
In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

---

“The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

June 02, 2026 — Andrew Lintner - Colorado Construction Litigation Blog
In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

---

The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

August 03, 2026 — William L. Porter - Porter Law Group
It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

---

Cuomo Bridge Lawsuit Adversaries Weigh Mediated S
Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One

Bad Faith Jury Verdict Upheld After Insurer's Failure to Settle Within Policy Limits

Construction Estimation: From Manual Takeoff to the AI Future

The Clock is Ticking: Construction Delays and Liquidated Damages

General Indemnity Agreement Can Come Back to Bite You

2026 Construction Outlook: Dampening Outlook With Some Potential Bright S
Arizona Is the No. 1 Merit Shop Construction State, According to ABC’s 2020 Scorecard

NYC Rail Tunnel Cost Jumps and Construction Start Pushed Back

Federal Court Reaffirms Arbitrators’ Role in Consolidation of Separate Arbitrations

The Uncertain Future of the IECC

Texas Legislative Update: Breaking Down the New Texas Laws Impacting Construction

Be a Good Neighbor: Protect Against Claims by an Adjacent Landowner During Construction

Blurred Lines: New York Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Privileged Documents in Connection with Pre-Denial Communications Prepared by Insurer's Coverage Counsel

For Breach of Contract Claim, There Needs to be a Breach of a Contractual Duty

Don’t Be Lazy with Your Tenders

Architect Not Responsible for Injuries to Guests

Manhattan Condo Lists for Record $150 Million

Critical Materials for the Energy Transition: Of “Rare Earths” and Even Rarer Minerals

Coping With The New Cap And Trade Law

Insurer Fails to Establish Prejudice Due to Late Notice

No Coverage for Hurricane Sandy Damage

Massive Danish Hospital Project Avoids Fire Protection Failures with Imerso Construction AI

TLSS Partner Burks Smith and Associate Katie Keller Win Summary Judgment on Late Reported Water Seepage Case in South Florida

Exclusion for Construction of Condominiums Includes Faulty Construction of Retaining Wall

Deescalating Hyper Escalation

Court of Appeal Opens Pandora’s Box on Definition of “Contractor” for Forum Selection Clauses

Court Narrowly Interprets “Faulty Workmanship” Provision

A Court-Side Seat: Recent Legal Developments at Supreme and Federal Appeals Courts

The 2024 Colorado Legislative Session Promises to be a Busy One for the Construction Industry and its Insurers

Maria Latest Threat to Puerto Rico After $1 Billion Irma Hit

Mitigating the Consequences of Labor Unrest on Construction Projects

Contractor Walks Off Job. What are the Owner’s Damages?

CSLB Releases New Forms and Announces New Fees!

Reminder: Your MLA Notice Must Have Your License Number

Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

Seattle Expands Bridge Bioswale Projects

Insurer Doomed in Delaware by the Sutton Rule

The Evolution of Construction Jobsite Safety: Lessons From the Field

Contractors Sued for Slip

Kahana Feld Named to the Orange County Register 2024 Top Workplaces List

PATH Station Designed by Architect Known for Beautiful Structures, Defects, and Cost Overruns

Eleven Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

Former Superintendent Sentenced in Rhode Island Tainted Fill Case

Who, Me?

Texas Allows Wide Scope for Certificate of Merit

Washington State May Allow Common Negligence Claims against Construction Professionals

Wisconsin Court Applies the Economic Loss Doctrine to Bar Negligence Claims for Purely Economic Losses

Thinking About a Daubert Motion to Challenge an Expert Opinion?

Judge Rejects Extrapolation, Harmon Tower to Remain Standing

Illinois Supreme Court Limits Reach of Implied Warranty Claims Against Contractors

Court Invalidates Project Labor Agreement Mandate on Federal Construction Projects

Duty to Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

Working Safely With Silica: Health Hazards and OSHA Compliance

Pennsylvania Mechanics’ Lien “Waivers” and “Releases”: What’s the Difference?

How AB5 has Changed the Employment Landscape

Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic