BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii condominiums expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii low-income housing expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii concrete tilt-up expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii Subterranean parking expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii housing expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii institutional building expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii high-rise construction expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii multi family housing expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii structural steel construction expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii retail construction expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii condominium expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii industrial building expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii custom home expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii townhome construction expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii hospital construction expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii landscaping construction expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii Medical building expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii parking structure expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii tract home expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii production housing expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii office building expert witness Honolulu County Hawaii
    Honolulu County Hawaii building code compliance expert witnessHonolulu County Hawaii architect expert witnessHonolulu County Hawaii soil failure expert witnessHonolulu County Hawaii ada design expert witnessHonolulu County Hawaii architectural expert witnessHonolulu County Hawaii construction code expert witnessHonolulu County Hawaii concrete expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Honolulu County, Hawaii

    Hawaii Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Contractor Repair Act 2004 SB2358 Notice to be provided by claimant no later than 90 days before filing action. Notice to be detailed and include results of any testing done. Contractor must also serve notice to subcontractors. Contractor to respond within 30 days with offer to settle without inspection or proposal to inspect. Within 30 days of inspection, claimant to provide access. Within 14 days after inspection and testing, contractor to serve written offer or rejection.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Honolulu County Hawaii

    Contractors license required for general contracting and most specialty trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Hawaii
    Local # 1220
    P.O. Box 970967
    Waipahu, HI 96797

    Honolulu County Hawaii Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Maui CA Affil. W/National Associated Home Builders
    Local # 1240
    270 Hookahi St Ste 212
    Wailuku, HI 96793

    Honolulu County Hawaii Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Contractors Association of Kauai
    Local # 1250
    4231 Ahukini Rd
    Lihue, HI 96766
    Honolulu County Hawaii Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Honolulu County Hawaii


    Perspectives from Pioneers: Kenneth C. Gibbs

    Labor Shortages In Construction

    Is Safety Compliance Putting Your Project in Jeopardy? Examining the Essentials of DOE’s Worker Safety and Health Program

    Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills

    Discovery Requests in Bad Faith Litigation Considered by Court

    How a Robot-Built Habitat on Mars Could Change Construction on Earth

    Construction Managers, Are You Exposing Yourselves to Labor Law Liability?

    Stucco Contractor Trying to Limit Communication in Construction Defect Case

    Look Up And Look Out: Increased Antitrust Enforcement Of Horizontal No-Poach Agreements Signals Heightened Scrutiny Of Vertical Agreements May Be Next

    Recent Federal Court Decision Favors Class Action Defendants

    COVID-izing Your Construction Contract

    Well-Insulated: Predict the Unpredictable Construction Costs

    Defending Against the Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine – Liability Considerations

    Quick Note: Do Your Homework When it Comes to Selecting Your Arbitrator

    Policy Reformed to Add New Building Owner as Additional Insured

    How Do You Get to the Five Year Mark? Some Practical Advice

    New Strategy for Deterring Intracorporate Litigation?: Delaware Supreme Court Supports Fee-Shifting Bylaws

    National Coalition to Provide Boost for Building Performance Standards

    Nuclear Fusion Pushes to Reach Commercial Power Plant Stage

    Pre-Covid Construction Contracts Unworkable as Costs Surge, Webuild Says

    Construction Defects Lead to “A Pretty Shocking Sight”

    Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: Known Loss Doctrine & Interpretation of “Occurrence”

    Select the Best Contract Model to Mitigate Risk and Achieve Energy Project Success

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    South Carolina “Your Work” Exclusion, “Get To” Costs

    You Should’ve Known: Colorado Holds Defendant May Have Pre-Litigation Duty to Preserve Evidence

    Breaking The Ice: A Policyholder's Guide to Insurance Coverage for Texas Winter Storm Uri Claims

    Musk Says ‘Chicago Express’ Tunnel Project Could Start Work in Months

    PSA: New COVID Vaccine ETS Issued by OSHA

    Notice Provisions in Contracts Matter

    Arizona Supreme Court Holds a Credit Bid at a Trustee’s Sale Should Not be Credited to a Title Insurer Under a Standard Lender’s Title Policy To the Extent the Bid Exceeds the Collateral’s Fair Market Value

    China Construction Bank Sued in US Over Reinsurance Fraud Losses

    Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .

    Exceptions to Privette Doctrine Do Not Apply Where There is No Evidence a General Contractor Affirmatively Contributed to the Injuries of an Independent Contractor's Employee

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Despite Construction Defects

    Thousands of London Residents Evacuated due to Fire Hazards

    Illinois Court of Appeals Addresses What It Means to “Reside” in Property for Purposes of Coverage

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    A Termination for Convenience Is Not a Termination for Default

    Nomos LLP Partners Recognized in Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    Ball Janik LLP Continues Growth of the Miami Office with the Addition of Jocelyn Rocha

    A Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020

    Insurers Need only Prove that Other Coverage Exists for Construction Defect Claims

    Anomaly in Adding a Third-Party Claimant to a Liability Insurance Coverage Dispute

    HHMR is pleased to announce that David McLain has been selected as a 2020 Super Lawyer

    Doing Construction Lead Programs the Right Way

    Washington High Court Holds Insurers Bound by Representations in Agent’s Certificates of Insurance

    Constructive Notice Established as Obstacle to Relation Back Doctrine

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Came too Late in Minnesota
    Corporate Profile

    HONOLULU COUNTY HAWAII CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Honolulu County, Hawaii Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Honolulu County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Honolulu County, Hawaii

    The ROI of Estimating Accuracy in Preconstruction

    September 15, 2026 —
    Precision is the foundation of profitability in construction. Even minor quantity or pricing mistakes can swing bids anywhere from 5-15%, leading to project delays, unprofitable jobs or margin erosion through change orders. And worse, these losses can damage client trust and jeopardize long-term relationships that drive repeat business and future bids. Consistently estimating accurately builds confidence, speeds up bidding and positions your company to win more profitable projects. Estimating accuracy is where profit is either protected or lost. In construction, you make your biggest financial decisions before a project ever starts. Once a bid is won, most of the project’s cost structure is locked in. If the estimate is wrong, no amount of execution can fully fix those mistakes. That makes estimating accuracy a business issue, not just an operations issue. Reprinted courtesy of Aaron Kivett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices

    July 27, 2026 —
    Arbitration in construction disputes is a private process where owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers or suppliers present claims to one or more neutral arbitrators instead of taking the dispute through court. The arbitrator reviews evidence, hears testimony and issues a decision that is usually binding. Construction arbitration is common because project disputes are technical, document-heavy and time-sensitive. Claims may involve schedule delays, disputed change orders, defective work, differing site conditions, payment, termination, indemnity, surety issues or professional liability. Arbitration can be faster and more specialized than litigation, but speed is not guaranteed. Poor contract language, broad discovery, weak records and unclear damages can make arbitration expensive. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    That’s a Wrap! Pennsylvania Court Holds Arbitration Clause in Online Agreement Unenforceable

    May 14, 2026 —
    In Duffy v. Tatum, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 112, 2026 PA Super 41, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Superior Court) considered whether an arbitration provision contained in the online Terms of Service on the defendant’s website were enforceable. The plaintiff, Daniel Duffy (Duffy), visited the website of defendant, Dolly, Inc. (Dolly), to purchase moving services. Duffy selected the number of movers, items to be moved and the type of vehicle needed. To complete the booking, the website required Duffy to checkmark a box labeled “By checking this box I accept the Dolly Terms of Service.” Duffy did not have to open the link or scroll to the bottom of the agreement before being able to click on the checkmark box. The Terms of Service included an arbitration provision requiring that any dispute related to the moving services to be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association. The Terms of Service did not include any statement that the user was waiving the right to a jury trial. The Superior Court found the internet Terms of Service unenforceable. During the moving process, an accident occurred and injured Duffy. In May 2024, Duffy and his wife sued Dolly and other related entities alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Dolly filed preliminary objections alleging that the parties agreed to alternative dispute resolution. The lower court overruled the preliminary objections, finding that Dolly’s website did not provide reasonably obvious notice of its Terms of Service to Duffy and, as such, Duffy never agreed to waive his constructional right to a jury trial. Dolly filed an appeal to the Superior Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy

    September 01, 2026 —
    Contract negotiation is where project expectations become enforceable business obligations. A reasonable bid can become a high-risk agreement when the final contract expands the scope, shortens notice periods, limits payment rights or transfers liability that was never included in the price. Construction attorneys help project leaders identify those consequences before execution. Their role is not to eliminate every risk or prolong negotiations. It is to determine which risks can be controlled, insured, priced, shared or rejected while preserving a workable deal. The financial stakes can be substantial. HKA's 2025 analysis of more than 2,200 distressed construction and engineering projects found that disputed costs averaged 33.4% of contract budgets. Scope changes affected more than 28% of the projects studied and remained the most common cause of conflict. In North America, the average dispute studied by Arcadis in 2024 had a value of $60.1 million and took 12.5 months to resolve. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    New Law Prompts ABC Minnesota/North Dakota to Design New Telecommunications Safety Training Program

    June 29, 2026 —
    On the first day of the year, a Minnesota law requiring installers of underground telecommunication infrastructure broadband, fiber or phone lines (when projects utilize directional drilling, and/or work is being conducted within 10 feet of existing utilities) to undergo a 40-hour certification went into effect. Originally passed in mid-2024 and proposed to go into effect in July 2025, the law’s requirements were postponed until January 2026, giving ABC Minnesota/North Dakota—in partnership with NCCER and the Minnesota Cable Communications Association—time to roll out their Safety Qualified Underground Telecommunications Installer training program, which would ensure the workforce of their contractor members were certified. Reprinted courtesy of Grace Calengor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Fatalities Edge Down: New Data Reveals a Promising Decline

    April 27, 2026 —
    Construction fatalities in the United States declined slightly in 2024, according to new data released from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The sector recorded just over 1,000 worker deaths last year—a modest decrease from the previous year but still among the highest totals of any industry. Falls remained the leading cause of death, accounting for roughly one-third of all construction fatalities. Transportation incidents—including workers struck by vehicles or equipment—ranked second, followed by contact with objects or equipment and electrocutions. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...