BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado hospital construction expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado custom homes expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado landscaping construction expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado casino resort expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado multi family housing expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado low-income housing expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado condominiums expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado Subterranean parking expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado tract home expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado industrial building expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado housing expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado office building expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado parking structure expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado high-rise construction expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado Medical building expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado custom home expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado retail construction expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado concrete tilt-up expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado structural steel construction expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado mid-rise construction expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado townhome construction expert witness Clear Creek County Colorado
    Clear Creek County Colorado construction expert witnessesClear Creek County Colorado construction project management expert witnessesClear Creek County Colorado construction code expert witnessClear Creek County Colorado civil engineer expert witnessClear Creek County Colorado building code compliance expert witnessClear Creek County Colorado construction claims expert witnessClear Creek County Colorado concrete expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Clear Creek County, Colorado

    Colorado Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1161 has three significant components that effect construction defect litigation. The first is a right to remedy and notice provision (75 days written notice) The homeowner must give the builder a notice that describes the nature of the claimed construction defects, the location of the defects and a general description of the type of damages that are claimed. The second component is a limitation on the nature and type of damages that can be pursued and awarded in a construction defect case. The third is a limitation on the availability and amount of punitive damages ($250,000) under the provisions of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Clear Creek County Colorado

    State license required for electrical, asbestos removal, plumbers, and pesticides trade; no state license for general contracting. Licensing may be required on a city or county level.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Colorado
    Local # 0600
    600 Grant St Ste 550
    Denver, CO 80203

    Clear Creek County Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Denver
    Local # 0650
    9033 E Easter Pl Ste 200
    Centennial, CO 80112

    Clear Creek County Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Eagle Valley Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 0652
    PO Box 3550
    Eagle, CO 81631

    Clear Creek County Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Grand County Builders Association
    Local # 0654
    PO Box 185
    Granby, CO 80446

    Clear Creek County Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Summit County Builders Association
    Local # 0688
    PO Box 2245
    Frisco, CO 80443

    Clear Creek County Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mountain to Mesa Home Builders Association
    Local # 0670
    PO Box 2719
    Glenwood Springs, CO 81602

    Clear Creek County Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Housing and Bldng Assn of Northwestern Colorado
    Local # 0664
    569 S Westgate Dr Ste 3
    Grand Junction, CO 81505

    Clear Creek County Colorado Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Clear Creek County Colorado


    Court Says KBR Construction Costs in Iraq were Unreasonable

    Florida Governor Signs COVID-19 Liability Shield

    Important Insurance Alert for Out-of-State Contractors Assisting in Florida Recovery Efforts!

    Crypto and NFTs Could Help People Become Real Estate Tycoons

    A Race to the Finish on Oroville Dam Spillway Fix

    Re-Entering the Workplace: California's Guideline for Employers

    RONI: What You Lose by Not Investing in AI – With Sam Zolfagharian

    Claimants’ Demand for Superfluous Wording In Release Does Not Excuse Insurer’s Failure to Accept Policy Limit Offer Within Time Specified

    Loan Snarl Punishes Spain Builder Backed by Soros, Gates

    Canada Cooler Housing Market Boosts Poloz’s Soft Landing

    New Opportunities for “Small” Construction Contractors as SBA Adjusts Its Size Standards Again Due to Unprecedented Inflation

    Eleven WSHB Attorneys Honored on List of 2016 Rising Stars

    School Board Sues Multiple Firms over Site Excavation Problem

    BIM Legal Liabilities: Not That Different

    Edison Has Miles of Idle Power Lines in High Fire Risk Zones

    GRSM Now 11th Largest Law Firm in United States

    Drafting or Negotiating A Subcontract–Questions To Consider

    Trump’s Infrastructure Weak

    Apple to Open Steve Jobs-Inspired Ring-Shaped Campus in April

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Landmark Towers Association, Inc. v. UMB Bank, N.A. or: One Bad Apple Spoils the Whole Bunch

    Incorporation, Indemnity and Statutes of Limitations, Oh My!

    Indemnitor Owes Indemnity Even Where Indemnitee is Actively Negligent, California Court Holds

    Tampa Office Secures Summary Judgment for Property Owner Client in Trip-and-Fall Lawsuit

    London Is Falling Down and It's Because of Climate Change

    EPA Issues Interpretive Statement on Application of NPDES Permit System to Releases of Pollutants to Groundwater

    Three Reasons Late Payments Persist in the Construction Industry

    District Court of Missouri Limits Whining About the Scope of Waiver of Subrogation Clauses in Wine Storage Agreements

    Assert a Party’s Noncompliance of Conditions Precedent with Particularity

    Pass-Through Subcontractor Claims, Liquidating Agreements, and Avoiding a Two-Front War

    Google Advances Green Goal With AES Deal for Carbon-Free Power

    Amanda Mathieu Named to Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 2026 “Top Women of Law” List

    Hawaii Supreme Court Reaffirms an "Accident" Includes Reckless Conduct, Finds Green House Gases are Pollutants

    Insureds Survive Motion to Dismiss Civil Authority Claim

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    Designers “Airpocalyspe” Creations

    Vermont Supreme Court Finds COVID-19 May Damage Property

    DoD Will Require New Cybersecurity Standards in 2020: Could Other Agencies Be Next?

    Effective July 1, 2022, Contractors Will be Liable for their Subcontractor’s Failure to Pay its Employees’ Wages and Benefits

    Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway Construction

    UK Court Rules Against Bechtel in High-Speed Rail Contract Dispute

    Summary Judgment Granted to Insurer for Hurricane Damage

    A Lawyer's Perspective on Current Issues Dominating the Construction Industry

    Insured's Experts Excluded, But Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment Denied

    Disaster Remediation Contracts: Understanding the Law to Avoid a Second Disaster

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected for the 2024 Edition of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (3/19/25) – Data Center REITs, AI-Based Tools and CHIPS on the Chopping Block

    Suing a Local Government in Land Use Cases – Part 2 – Procedural Due Process

    To Ease Housing Crunch, Theme Parks Are Becoming Homebuilders
    Corporate Profile

    CLEAR CREEK COUNTY COLORADO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Clear Creek County, Colorado Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Clear Creek County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Clear Creek County, Colorado

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Trial-Tested Property Litigator Kimberlee Martin Joins Ball Janik LLP's Orlando Construction Defect Team

    October 06, 2026 —
    ORLANDO, FL, September 30, 2026 — Ball Janik LLP has added Kimberlee A. Martin to its Construction Defect Practice Group as an associate in the firm's Orlando office. For more than a decade, she has litigated matters in the fields of criminal defense, first-party property, and insurance disputes, taking cases and claims from inception through jury trial. It's the same path many of Ball Janik's clients face when construction goes wrong, and her arrival deepens the firm's trial bench in Central Florida. "Florida property owners are dealing with complex building problems and less time to act on them. That puts a premium on attorneys who can take a case the distance," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "Kimberlee has carried property and insurance claims from pre-suit all the way through trial, working hand in hand with experts along the way. Community associations and commercial property owners need exactly that combination, and she brings it to our team on day one." Most recently, Kimberlee served as Litigation Director, where she oversaw homeowners' property claims in pre-suit and litigation, managed a substantial caseload, and guided associate attorneys on litigation strategy. Her civil work includes jury trials, summary judgment and dismissal motions, expert and witness depositions, mediations, and site inspections, along with close coordination with contractors, consultants, and other experts. That skill set maps directly onto construction defect and insurance recovery litigation, where cases often turn on site evidence, expert testimony, and a credible readiness to go to trial. "I've seen firsthand how much is at stake when a building has problems: owners' investments, residents' homes, and everyone's peace of mind," said Kimberlee. "Ball Janik is focused on exactly those clients, which made this a natural next step for my practice. I'm excited to join this team and help property owners hold the responsible parties accountable and get their buildings repaired." Kimberlee earned her J.D., cum laude, from Florida International University College of Law and her B.A. in political science, with a minor in legal studies, from the University of Central Florida. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.

    Miller Act Payment Bond Claim “No Nos!”

    October 06, 2026 —
    A recent federal district court opinion, Sauer Construction, LLC v. United Structures of Georgia, LLC, 2026 WL 2522849 (M.D.Fla. 2026), addressed two worthy considerations when it comes to a Miller Act payment bond claim. And, when I am talking about considerations, I am really talking about “no-nos.” These are things you don’t do. First, don’t file an untimely Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. Make sure, as a claimant, you file that lawsuit within one year from your final furnishing. In this case, the subcontractor claimant did not and tried to argue around the statute of limitations with an equitable tolling argument, i.e., that the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled to accommodate the late filing of the lawsuit. Guess what? The subcontractor was not successful. You are fighting an uphill (losing) battle when arguing equitable tolling because “traditional equitable tolling principles require that the claimant demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, such as fraud, misinformation, or deliberate concealment.” Sauer Construction, supra. This means you need ultra-persuasive evidence to support such equitable tolling principles. Actually, having this evidence is doubtful. Thus, timely file the Miller Act payment bond lawsuit. There is no legitimate reason not to. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Chambers USA Recognizes GRSM as 2026 Industry Leader

    June 29, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has once again been recognized by Chambers USA, a prestigious directory of the country’s top law firms. In addition to the firm’s practice recognitions, eight partners, David Capell, Nancy Erfle, Matthew Foy, Ashlee Grant, Craig Heryford, Andrew Port, Todd Regan, and Angela Richie, were recognized among the nation’s top lawyers in their respective fields. Chambers USA recognized the firm in the following eight categories: USA – Nationwide – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer, Band 4 The firm is widely sought after by national insurance sector clients facing a wide array of coverage disputes as well as bad faith claims. The firm has additional capabilities in class actions and appellate litigation. Its broad base of experience includes professional liability, construction, and bankruptcy-related issues. This is the third year the firm has received this recognition. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Leading Boutiques Combine to Form SDV Fenchurch, A Global Law Firm for Insurance Policyholders

    September 15, 2026 —
    TRUMBULL, Conn., and LONDON, Sept. 1, 2026 — Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), Fenchurch Law, Wesolowski Abogados, and CLIR & Fenchurch and their partner members in Asia, Europe and North America combined today to launch SDV Fenchurch, a global law firm built exclusively to represent policyholders and the brokers who advise them. Structured as a Swiss verein, SDV Fenchurch unites dedicated insurance-recovery practices across eight jurisdictions in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Turkey, and Singapore. With over 90 lawyers devoted to insurance coverage matters, the firm is among the largest policyholder-side practices in the world and, by number of jurisdictions with full-time policyholder counsel capabilities, the most geographically extensive. The founders are brought together by a single shared mission: to act solely for policyholders, never the insurers, in insurance disputes. This is in stark contrast to most international firms with insurance practices, which mostly represent insurers only. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of SDV Fenchurch

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

    September 28, 2026 —
    Continuing the trend from last year, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is excited to announce that thirteen members of our firm have received recognition from Best Lawyers® in America for 2027. The Best Lawyers in America® has been an annual publication since 1983 and focuses on the top legal talent across the United States and the globe. Through its rankings, Best Lawyers® provides a comprehensive guide to legal representation for individuals and businesses alike. Over time, Best Lawyers® has been recognized as one of the leading publications for attorney achievements and references. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com