BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness Springfield Arkansas production housing expert witness Springfield Arkansas hospital construction expert witness Springfield Arkansas parking structure expert witness Springfield Arkansas multi family housing expert witness Springfield Arkansas high-rise construction expert witness Springfield Arkansas condominiums expert witness Springfield Arkansas townhome construction expert witness Springfield Arkansas custom homes expert witness Springfield Arkansas office building expert witness Springfield Arkansas institutional building expert witness Springfield Arkansas tract home expert witness Springfield Arkansas retail construction expert witness Springfield Arkansas Medical building expert witness Springfield Arkansas concrete tilt-up expert witness Springfield Arkansas low-income housing expert witness Springfield Arkansas housing expert witness Springfield Arkansas industrial building expert witness Springfield Arkansas custom home expert witness Springfield Arkansas landscaping construction expert witness Springfield Arkansas casino resort expert witness Springfield Arkansas structural steel construction expert witness Springfield Arkansas
    Springfield Arkansas construction expert witness consultantSpringfield Arkansas architectural expert witnessSpringfield Arkansas building expertSpringfield Arkansas construction scheduling expert witnessSpringfield Arkansas fenestration expert witnessSpringfield Arkansas construction expert witnessSpringfield Arkansas consulting engineers
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Springfield, Arkansas

    Arkansas Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB975: Requires that residential contractors be given notice and an opportunity to repair. Homeowners must provide 20 days notice in writing to builder prior to legal action to address defect and/or repair


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Springfield Arkansas

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    White County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0472
    PO Box 1501
    Searcy, AR 72143
    Springfield Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Greater Fort Smith Associated Home Builders
    Local # 0436
    5111 Rogers Ave Ste 531
    Fort Smith, AR 72903

    Springfield Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Crittenden County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0415
    PO Box 2204
    West Memphis, AR 72303
    Springfield Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Faulkner County
    Local # 0439
    PO Box 1228
    Conway, AR 72033

    Springfield Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cleburne County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0405
    PO Box 1325
    Heber Springs, AR 72543
    Springfield Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Cabot Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 0420
    PO Box 1291
    Cabot, AR 72023

    Springfield Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    SE Arkansas Home Builders Association
    Local # 0456
    2320 Grist Mill Rd
    Little Rock, AR 72227
    Springfield Arkansas Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Springfield Arkansas


    Construction Defect Headaches Can Be Avoided

    Change #7- Contractor’s Means & Methods (law note)

    Whether Subcontractor's Faulty Workmanship Is an Occurrence Creates Ambiguity

    Drones Used Despite Uncertain Legal Consequences

    SDOT Issues Construction Moratorium for FIFA 2026: What Contractors Need to Know and How to Prepare

    Jana Lubert & Kathleen Walker Named to Los Angeles Business Journal’s LA500 List

    July Sees Big Drop in Home Sales

    Apartment Building Damaged by Cable Installer’s Cherry Picker

    What Do I Do With This Stuff? Dealing With Abandoned Property After Foreclosure

    In a Win for Design Professionals, California Court of Appeals Holds That Relation-Back Doctrine Does Not Apply to Certificate of Merit Law

    Hurricane Harvey: Understanding the Insurance Aspects, Immediate Actions for Risk Managers

    When Does it End?

    Lender Seeks Millions From Lendlease for LA 'Graffiti Building' Suit Costs

    Ackman Group Pays $91.5 Million for Condo at NYC’s One57

    Residential Construction Rise Expected to Continue

    Colorado House Bill 1279 Stalls over 120-day Unit Owner Election Period

    Contractor Walks Off Job. What are the Owner’s Damages?

    Visual Construction Diaries – Interview with Jeff Sassinsky of Fovea Aero

    Providing Notice of Claims Under Your Construction Contract

    Building with Recycled Plastics – Interview with Jeff Mintz of Envirolastech

    SFAA Commends U.S. House for Passage of Historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill

    California MCLE Seminar at BHA Sacramento July 11th

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 49 White and Williams Attorneys

    Nevada Senate Minority Leader Gets Construction Defect Bill to Committee

    Construction Law Alert: Builder’s Alternative Pre-litigation Procedures Upheld Over Strong Opposition

    Make Your Business Great Again: Steven Cvitanovic Authors Construction Today Article

    Micropiles for bad soil: a Tarheel victory

    Two Firm Members Among the “Best Lawyers in America”

    GRSM Named “Powerhouse in Litigation” in 2026 Industry Report

    Avoid Drowning in Data: Keep Afloat with ESI in Construction Litigation

    SIGAR Report Finds +$15 Billion in “Waste, Fraud and Abuse” in Afghanistan

    BWB&O is Recognized in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®!

    Pile Test Likely for Settling Millennium Tower

    Window Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple Occurrences

    How a $1,400 Humanoid Hints at Construction’s Robotic Future

    Wisconsin High Court Rejects Insurer’s Misuse of “Other Insurance” Provision

    Balestreri Potocki & Holmes Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Star

    The Importance of the Subcontractor Exception to the “Your Work” Exclusion

    Huh? Action on Construction Lien “Relates Back” Despite Notice of Contest of Lien

    Termination of Construction Contracts

    Why Death Follows Faulty Edge Fall Protection–And How to Fix It

    Restrictions On Out-Of-State Real Estate Brokers Being Challenged In Nevada

    Crime Policy Insurance Quotes Falsely Represented the Scope of its Coverage

    Expert Medical Science Causation Testimony Improperly Excluded under Daubert; ID of Sole Cause of Medical Condition Not Required

    Scaffolding Collapse Kills Workers at China Construction Site

    Herman Russell's Big Hustle

    Wow! A Mechanic’s Lien Bill That Helps Subcontractors and Suppliers

    SunEdison Gets Shinsei Bank Funding for Japan Solar Power Plant

    Executive Order 14275: Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement

    Employee Screening and Testing in the Covid-19 Era: Getting Back to Work
    Corporate Profile

    SPRINGFIELD ARKANSAS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Springfield, Arkansas Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Springfield's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Springfield, Arkansas

    Outer Banks Homes Collapsing Is Just a Taste of What’s to Come

    December 22, 2025 —
    On Sept. 20, 2024, a four-bedroom, three-bathroom beach house in Buxton, North Carolina, in the heart of the Outer Banks, sold for $580,000. On Oct. 28 this year, the house, known as Mermaid’s Rest, collapsed into the ocean. It was one of five homes swallowed that day by high waves churned up by an offshore storm. Few things demonstrate how climate change is already upending lives and fortunes quite like watching somebody’s stately vacation home topple into the drink. But Outer Banks houses like Mermaid’s Rest (a striking example first dug up by the New York Times but just one of many such cases), are mere showroom models for the havoc that rising seas are already threatening. First, let’s get one caveat out of the way: Barrier islands like the Outer Banks are always changing shape, regardless of the climate. Homes built on the shores of such islands have always been at risk of eventually sliding off the edge like a quarter in one of those coin-pusher arcade games. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Mark Gongloff, Bloomberg

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    Managing Rising Costs and Shifting Legal Risk for Florida High-Rise and Condominium Projects

    May 05, 2026 —
    Florida's construction defect landscape is experiencing a major shift. The convergence of material and labor cost volatility, regulatory tightening, and increasingly complex litigation strategies is forcing associations, developers, and their counsel to rethink how they approach risk management and dispute resolution. For those managing large-scale condo and high-rise projects, the stakes have never been higher. The Cost Volatility Trap Construction material prices rose at a "staggering" 12.6% annualized rate during the first two months of 2026, according to recent industry analysis. Tariff impacts are projected to lead to more increases of 5.4% to 6.8%, depending on property type. For associations facing construction defect claims, this volatility creates a cascading problem: repair scopes defined two years ago are now dramatically underpriced, and damage calculations that appeared reasonable at discovery are obsolete by the time of settlement. Courts and mediators are increasingly scrutinizing how cost estimates were developed and whether they account for existing market circumstances. Associations must now commission updated repair assessments more frequently, a practice that increases investigation costs but strengthens the credibility of damage claims. Conversely, defendants are weaponizing cost inflation as a defense, arguing that claimed damages are speculative or inflated. The practical result: repair sequencing and phasing strategies have become critical litigation tools. Associations that can demonstrate a rational, cost-effective repair plan tied to current market data are more favorably placed in settlement negotiations. Regulatory Pressure and Deliberate Timing Florida's 2026 condo compliance regime has significantly changed the defect claims landscape. Elevated transparency requirements, stricter reserve funding mandates, and tightened building safety inspection protocols mean that associations now face dual pressures: Comply with new regulations while simultaneously handling construction defect exposure. This regulatory environment is changing investigation and documentation strategy. Associations that delay defect investigation to avoid triggering reserve funding obligations or disclosure requirements are taking on considerable legal risk. Recent case law such as the Third District Court of Appeal's reaffirmation of Chapter 558's pre-suit mediation requirements, underscores Florida's intent to resolve disputes early. Associations that move deliberately and record carefully during the pre-suit phase gain leverage in mediation and reduce the risk of expensive litigation. Timing also intersects with repair sequencing. Associations must now balance the urgency of compliance inspections against the strategic advantage of phased repairs. Some associations are using compliance deadlines as a forcing mechanism to accelerate settlement discussions, while others are sequencing repairs to demonstrate good-faith remediation efforts before litigation commences. The Emerging Risk Transfer Challenge As construction defect claims grow more complex and costly, the traditional risk transfer systems, such as design-build warranties, contractor bonds, and insurance, are proving inadequate. Developers and general contractors are increasingly shifting risk to subcontractors and material suppliers, fragmenting liability and complicating recovery efforts for associations. Permitting and approval friction is also creating new litigation pressure points. Delays in municipal approvals, changes to building code interpretations, and disputes over remedial work compliance continue to spawn collateral claims that go beyond the original defect. Associations must now anticipate not only defect liability but also regulatory compliance disputes with municipalities, creating a dual-front legal challenge. For large communities, this means reconsidering the entire risk architecture. Insurance carriers are tightening coverage, and traditional indemnification chains are breaking down. Forward-thinking associations are engaging counsel earlier in the development process to negotiate clearer risk allocation provisions and more robust insurance requirements. Taking a Data-Driven Approach Managing rising costs and shifting legal risk in Florida's high-rise and condo market requires a more sophisticated, data-driven approach. Associations must commission frequent cost updates, move deliberately through pre-suit investigation and mediation, and challenge traditional assumptions about risk transfer. Developers and their counsel should view regulatory compliance not as a burden but as an opportunity to demonstrate good-faith risk management and strengthen settlement positioning. The firms and associations that succeed in 2026 will be those that treat cost volatility, regulatory change, and litigation strategy not as separate challenges but as linked elements of a coherent risk management framework. Stephen Hauptman is special counsel in Ball Janik LLP’s Fort Lauderdale office. He may be reached at shauptman@balljanik.com.

    Don’t Hire Me! (Principle Is Expensive, and Lawsuits Based on Principle Are Even More Expensive)

    February 10, 2026 —
    I spend a lot of time trying to convince my clients to NOT hire me. I’m not crazy—let me explain. Litigation is costly. Very costly. And it is time consuming. Don’t get me wrong—I will go to Court and fight just as hard as you want me to, but I want you to know what you are facing before you go down that road. Now, obviously, if you are the one that is being sued, you have no choice but to defend yourself and your Firm. But if you are considering suing someone else, think long and hard about it before you pull the trigger. There are ways to reduce cost, time, and risk: for example, pre-suit or early mediation, or agreeing to arbitration in lieu of trial. But I always want my clients to know that real law is not like Law & Order. Things take time. A trial is often a year or more away from when you first file the lawsuit. Make your decisions on not just your heart, but your economic brain as well. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    How to Fireproof a Neighborhood

    March 17, 2026 —
    As builders in fire-prone areas like California race to reimagine homes for a more fiery future, one developer is zooming out to build entire fire-resilient neighborhoods. KB Home’s developments tackle an issue that’s hard for any individual homeowner to overcome: “You can do your home perfectly, but if your neighbor didn’t, you still have a fire risk,” said Roy Wright, chief executive officer of the research nonprofit Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety. In other words, to slow the spread of urban fires it takes a village. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    GRSM Attorneys Named Finalists in 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards

    March 10, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani attorneys have been shortlisted as finalists for Corporate Counsel’s 2026 Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) Awards, which honor women leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to advancing the empowerment of women in the legal profession. In the Law Firm Internal Collaborative Leadership category, Stephanie Jones was recognized for her exceptional ability to foster collaboration, mentor talent, and align colleagues across GRSM. Jones has consistently demonstrated leadership rooted in trust, inclusion, and shared purpose, qualities that have strengthened the firm during a period of extraordinary growth. Her impact on the firm’s culture and success will continue as she steps into her role as Chief Operating Partner in June 2026, where she will further build on her leadership in fostering teamwork, mentorship, and alignment across the firm’s national platform. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Contracting Chaos? How Mid-America v. US Department of Transportation is Upending DBE Certifications

    December 02, 2025 —
    Since the early 1980s, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) programs including the one implemented by the US Department of Transportation (DOT) have been in effect. The DBE program began under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and has been reauthorized by Congress in various bills over the years. Generally, these DBE programs have required that ten percent of federal highway construction funds be paid to small businesses controlled and owned by “socially and economically disadvantaged individuals.” Certain minority and women owned businesses have been given a presumption of disadvantage to facilitate their participation in federally‑assisted DOT contracting. While any person may qualify as socially and economically disadvantaged regardless of their race or gender, certain racial groups and women are rebuttably presumed to be disadvantaged. All other applicants seeking DBE status who are not presumed disadvantaged on the basis of their racial or female status must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that they are socially and economically disadvantaged. Many states have enacted similar requirements governing state and local projects. Recently, the presumption of disadvantaged status has come under attack in Mid‑America Milling Company v. U.S. Department of Transportation[i] pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. The results of Mid-America represents a drastic change to the DOT’s DBE program for federal DOT contracting. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew G. Vicknair, D'Arcy Vicknair, LLC
    Mr. Vicknair may be contacted at agv@darcyvicknair.com