Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict
May 26, 2026 —
Gray Development GroupPHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction.
The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale.
The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market.
According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona.
Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing.
ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997.
About Gray Development Group
Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.
SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release
April 08, 2026 —
Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Trumbull, Connecticut – Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV) is proud to announce the celebration of its 30th anniversary.
Founded in 1996 by three attorneys in a small New Haven, Connecticut office, SDV was built on a clear and focused mission: representing policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Three decades later, that commitment remains at the core of the firm’s identity and has been instrumental in its continued success and reputation nationwide.
Today, SDV is a nationally recognized boutique firm with 50 attorneys serving policyholders across the United States. Building on its longstanding reputation for excellence and client advocacy, the firm is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Massachusetts—an exciting milestone that reflects SDV’s continued growth. The new office is led by Managing Partner Anna Perry.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers
June 02, 2026 —
Ryan J. Regula - Snell & WilmerDevelopers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state.
The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders
Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ryan J. Regula, Snell & WilmerMr. Regula may be contacted at
rregula@swlaw.com
AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook
August 11, 2026 —
Bryan Gottlieb - Engineering News-RecordAI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-RecordMr. Gottlieb may be contacted at
gottliebb@enr.com
Chambers USA 2026 Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Attorneys and Practices
August 11, 2026 —
Snell & WilmerPHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its attorneys have received 57 individual recognitions in their respective fields, by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2026. These prestigious rankings are driven by independent interviews with clients of the firm and members of the legal community.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Snell & Wilmer
Predict Risk, Not Incidents: A New Analytics Framework for Your Construction Safety Data
August 03, 2026 —
Tabrez Zahoor - Construction ExecutiveBehind every “zero-incidents” company report, hidden hazards may already be accumulating—
risks that could become serious injuries tomorrow. The question every executive should be asking is not, “Did anything go wrong last month?” It is: “Where is risk building on my projects right now?”
Most construction organizations cannot answer that question. Not because the data does not exist—it does. Every active project generates daily inspection findings, labor records, near-miss reports and audit results. The problem is that standard safety systems collect this data and then report it in ways that make it operationally useless for prevention. They describe the past. They predict nothing.
The predictive safety analytics framework (PSAF) is a practical, deployable system developed from years of applying data science to large-scale construction portfolio operations that takes the safety data construction organizations already collect and transforms it into a forward-looking risk signal. The result? A single weekly score that tells executives where risk is concentrating across their portfolio before anyone gets hurt.
Reprinted courtesy of
Tabrez Zahoor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Massachusetts Settlement Targets Mortgage-Backed “Homeowner Benefit” Agreements
April 08, 2026 —
A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Mehul N. Madia & Maxwell Earp-Thomas - SheppardOn March 11, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced a consent order with a real estate-related lender’s subsidiary, and affiliated individuals resolving allegations that the company violated the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act by deceptively marketing mortgage-backed “Homeowner Benefit Agreements” to financially struggling homeowners.
According to the complaint, the company offered homeowners relatively small upfront cash payments, typically less than $1,500, in exchange for a 40-year exclusive right to act as the listing broker if the homeowner later sold the property. The Attorney General alleged that the agreements also triggered substantial payment obligations upon other transfers, including death or foreclosure, and that the transactions were secured by recorded mortgages that could interfere with refinancing, home-equity access, or the ability to sell the home. The complaint further alleged that the company marketed the product to vulnerable consumers searching for loans or public benefits while obscuring the true nature of the transaction.
Reprinted courtesy of
A.J. S. Dhaliwal, Sheppard,
Mehul N. Madia, Sheppard and
Maxwell Ear
Texas School District Accepts Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect CaseDowntown Sacramento Building Riddled with DefectsThird Circuit Holds That Duty to Indemnify "Follows" Duty to DefendA New Digital Twin for an Existing BridgeA New Study: Unexpected Overtime is Predictable and ControllableEighth Circuit Affirms Finding of Bad Faith, Award of Costs and Prejudgment InterestGolf Resorts Offering Yoga, Hovercraft Rides to the GreenWashington High Court Holds Insurers Bound by Representations in Agent’s Certificates of InsurancePanthers Withdraw City, County Deal Over Abandoned FacilitySometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .Texas Jury Finds Presence of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Causes “Physical Loss or Damage” to Property, Awards Over $48 Million to Baylor College of MedicineDeadly Fire in Older Hawaii High-Rise Causes Sprinkler Law DiscussionThe Problem with One Year WarrantiesHousing Buoyed by 20-Year High for Vet’s Loans: MortgagesProject-Specific Policies and Products-Completed Operations Hazard ExtensionsLook Out! Texas Building Shedding Marble PanelsJudge Rejects Extrapolation, Harmon Tower to Remain StandingStop by BHA’s Booth at WCC and Support the Susan G. Komen FoundationLooking for a Way OutPreventing Common Electrical Injuries on the JobsiteRemote Trials Can Control Prejudgment RiskMaybe California Actually Does Have Enough WaterUnderstanding Indiana’s New Home Construction Warranty ActInsured's Expert Qualified, Judgment for Coverage AffirmedHaight has been named a Metropolitan Los Angeles Tier 1 “Best Law Firm” and Tier 2 for Orange County by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” in 2023California Indemnity and Defense Construction Law Changes for 2013Sales of Existing Homes in U.S. Fall to Lowest Since 2012Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/30/24) – Life Science Construction to Increase, Overall Homeownership Is Majority Female, and Senators Urge Fed Chair to Lower Interest RatesRhode Island Examines a Property Owner’s Intended Beneficiary Status and the Economic Loss Doctrine in the Context of a Construction ContractLos Angeles County Sues Utility Edison Over Deadly WildfireContractor Not Liable for Flooding HouseLet’s Get Surety Podcast – #126 Building the Future: AI, Construction and LawColorado Court of Appeals Defines “Substantial Completion” for Subcontractors’ Work so as to Shorten the Period of Time in Which They Can Be SuedContractual Fee-Shifting in Litigation: Who Pays the Price?A Relatively Small Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t MixQuick Note: Not In Contract With The Owner? Serve A Notice To Owner.Insurance Law Alert: Ambiguous Producer Agreement Makes Agent-Broker Status a Jury QuestionUnderstanding Common Risk-Shifting Provisions in Construction ContractsCalifornia Supreme Court Holds that Prevailing Wages are Not Required for Mobilization Work, for NowModular Construction’s Hidden Risk: Where Things Go Wrong Between the Factory and the FieldAngela Cooner Named "Top Lawyer" by Phoenix Magazine in Inaugural PublicationNinth Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend CERCLA Section 104 (e) LetterChoice of Laws Test Mandates Application of California’s Continuous and Progressive Trigger of Coverage to Asbestos ClaimsSan Francisco Bucks U.S. Trend With Homeownership GainsThe Tech Divide: How Construction Firms Embrace Emerging TechnologiesWhen Coronavirus Cases Spike at Construction JobsitesArizona Is Smart About Water. It Should Stay That Way.How to Deal with Contractor Delays – Bad Contractor Series Part 2Residential Interior Decorator Was Entitled to Lien and Was Not Engaging in Unlicensed ContractingPresident Trump’s Infrastructure Plan Requires a Viable Statutory Framework (PPP Statutes)[i]ey Fee Awards
Maximizing Contractual Indemnity Rights: Problems with Common LawEmpowering Success: The Advantages of Female Attorneys in Construction Defect Law1st District Joins 2nd District Court of Appeals and Holds that One-Year SOL Applies to Disgorgement ClaimsIndiana District Court Finds Crane Inspection Services Do Not Trigger “Professional Services” Exclusion in Liability PolicyDelays in Filing Lead to Dismissal in Moisture Intrusion LawsuitCourt Finds that Subcontractor Lacks Standing to Appeal Summary Judgment Order Simply Because Subcontractor “Might” Lose at Trial Due to OrderAppraisal Appropriate Despite Pending Coverage IssuesOSHA Issues Final Rule on Electronic Submission of Injury and Illness DataInsurers Need only Prove that Other Coverage Exists for Construction Defect ClaimsVenue for Miller Act Payment Bond When Project is Outside of UsConstruction Injuries Under the Privette Doctrine. An Electrifying, but Perhaps Not Particularly Shocking, Story . . .COVID-19 Pandemic Preference Amendments to Bankruptcy Code Benefiting Vendors, Customers, Commercial Landlords and TenantsDon’t Do this When it Comes to Construction LiensWater Seepage, Ensuing Mold Damage Covered by Homeowner's Policyer
Lease-Leaseback Fight ContinuesTop Developments: 2025 - Issue 2 
