BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island landscaping construction expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island custom home expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island high-rise construction expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island industrial building expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island structural steel construction expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island institutional building expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island casino resort expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island parking structure expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island concrete tilt-up expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island tract home expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island housing expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island Medical building expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island townhome construction expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island office building expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island Subterranean parking expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island condominiums expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island retail construction expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island multi family housing expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island custom homes expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island condominium expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island hospital construction expert witness North Smithfield Rhode Island
    North Smithfield Rhode Island construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessNorth Smithfield Rhode Island engineering consultantNorth Smithfield Rhode Island fenestration expert witnessNorth Smithfield Rhode Island expert witness commercial buildingsNorth Smithfield Rhode Island construction expert witness public projectsNorth Smithfield Rhode Island architectural engineering expert witnessNorth Smithfield Rhode Island expert witness concrete failure
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    North Smithfield, Rhode Island

    Rhode Island Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Title 5 Chapter 5-20.8 Real Estate Sales Disclosures Section 5-20.8-4 Buyer's Rights(b)(2) Existing law provides that seller must have the opportunity to cure deficient conditions and that buyer must provide seller with a report of inspection performed by a recognized and reputable inspector or inspection company within seven calendar days and seller has seven days to respond. The remedy for seller not agreeing to cure the deficiency is termination of the transfer agreement.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines North Smithfield Rhode Island

    A contractor's license is required for work on one to four-family dwellings. Licenses are required for electrical, plumbing, and mechanical work.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Rhode Island Builders Association
    Local # 4105
    450 Veterans Memorial Pkwy Suite 301
    East Providence, RI 02914

    North Smithfield Rhode Island Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For North Smithfield Rhode Island


    Treasure Island Sues Beach Trail Designer over Concrete Defects

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds That Policyholder Can “Stack” the Limits of Each Primary Policy After Asbestos Claim

    Be Careful When Requiring Fitness for Duty Examinations

    Georgia Court of Appeals Holds Lay Witness Can Provide Opinion Testimony on the Value of a Property If the Witness Had an Opportunity to Form a Reasoned Opinion

    Cardinal Change Examines the Entire, Factual Undertaking

    Little Known Florida Venue Statue Benefitting Resident Contractors

    Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Denied in Collapse Claim

    Rise in Single-Family Construction Anticipated in Michigan

    Eleven Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    Utah Digs Deep and Finds “Design Defect” Includes Pre-Construction Geotechnical Reports

    “Bound by the Bond”

    Toolbox Talk Series: International Arbitration for the "Domestic" Construction Lawyer

    Connecticut Court Clarifies Construction Coverage

    Pennsylvania Federal Court Finds No Coverage For Hacking Claim Under E&O Policy

    City Sues over Leaking Sewer System

    Number of Occurrences Depends on Who is Sued

    Curtain Wall Suppliers Claim Rival Duplicated Unique System

    Nation’s Top Court Limits EPA's Authority in Clean Air Case

    Testimony from Insureds' Expert Limited By Motion In Limine

    Collapse of Breezeway Attached to Building Covered

    The Brexit Effect on the Construction Industry

    Newport Beach Attorneys John Toohey and Nick Rodriguez Receive Full Defense Verdict

    Hawaii Federal District Court Grants Preliminary Approval of Settlement on Volcano Damage

    Potential Pitfalls Under the Contract Disputes Act for Federal Government Contractors

    The Looming Housing Crisis and Limited Government Relief—An Examination of the CDC Eviction Moratorium Two Months In

    Are Modern Buildings Silently Killing Us?

    The Great Fallacy: If Builders Would Just Build It Right There Would Be No Construction Defect Litigation

    ACEC Statement on Negotiated Bipartisan Debt Limit Compromise

    A Year Later, Homeowners Still Repairing Damage from Sandy

    Construction Termination Issues for the Architect and Engineer: Part 1– Introduction to the Series

    How to Build a Water-Smart City

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    Be Careful When Walking Off of a Construction Project

    Damage Control: Major Rebuilds After Major Weather Events

    In Midst of Construction Defect Lawsuit, City Center Seeks Refinancing

    Owner Can’t Pursue Statutory Show Cause Complaint to Cancel Lien… Fair Outcome?

    A Race to the Finish on Oroville Dam Spillway Fix

    Faulty Workmanship an Occurrence in Iowa – as Long as Other Property Damage is Involved

    Design Immunity of Public Entities: Sometimes Designs, Like Recipes, are Best Left Alone

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Courts Will Not Rewrite Your Post-Loss Property Insurance Obligations

    A Behind-the-Scenes Look at Substitution Hearings Under California’s Listing Law

    Forecast Sunny for Solar Contractors in California

    Job Growth Seen as Good News for North Carolina Housing Market

    Consider Short-Term Lease Workouts For Commercial Tenants

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Additional Insurance Coverage Determined for General Contractor

    Hybrid Contracts for The Sale of Goods and Services and the Predominant Factor Test

    Three Reasons Lean Construction Principles Are Still Valid

    Apartment Boom in Denver a Shortcut Around Condo Construction Defect Suits?
    Corporate Profile

    NORTH SMITHFIELD RHODE ISLAND CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the North Smithfield, Rhode Island Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to North Smithfield's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    North Smithfield, Rhode Island

    Four Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    March 17, 2026 —
    We congratulate our four Payne & Fears attorneys who have been named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars. This recognition highlights the next generation of legal talent, honoring attorneys who have made a strong impact in their practice areas early in their careers. Employment & Labor Taylor Brown Bree Oswald Employment Litigation: Defense Tyler Runge Business Litigation Brian Shaw Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Presumption of Prejudice Applies to All Affirmative Defenses Regarding Insured’s Failure to Comply with Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    June 23, 2026 —
    n a recent property insurance coverage dispute, an issue on appeal pertained to the “prejudice” jury instruction associated with the insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. The trial court found that the prejudice only pertained to prompt notice and not other post-loss policy conditions. This was reversed on appeal as prejudice applied to ALL the post loss policy conditions that the insured failed to comply with, not just the prompt notice requirement. The prejudice presumption applies to all affirmative defenses regarding an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions. Consider this discussion when dealing with an insurer raising prejudice as an affirmative defense to do an insured’s failure to comply with post-loss policy conditions, and the associated burdens of proof: On appeal, [the insurer] contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury that the presumption of prejudice was inapplicable to all of its post-loss obligation defenses except prompt notice. We agree. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...