Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Chambers USA
June 29, 2026 —
Traub LiebermanIn the 2026 edition of Chambers USA, Traub Lieberman has been awarded rankings in the following categories:
Illinois – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer
In the Chambers research, clients noted: "The team are technically very strong, responsive, and on top of their cases."
Florida – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer
In the Chambers research, clients noted: "Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry distinguishes itself through a combination of deep subject-matter expertise, responsiveness, and practical risk-management orientation." Commenters went on to say: “The team has deep knowledge of Florida property insurance statutes, regulations and case law, enabling effective handling of disputes, appeals and third-party litigation."
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Traub Lieberman
New Executive Order Prohibits Federal Contractors from Engaging in DEI Through Employment and Procurement Activities
April 27, 2026 —
Laura De Santos & Monica Prieto - Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniOn March 26, 2026, President Trump signed Executive Order 14398, entitled Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, requiring federal agencies to add contractual language in all federal contracts prohibiting contractors and subcontractors from engaging in any racially discriminatory DEI activities, as defined by the Executive Order (EO).
While this EO includes language similar to prior DEI-related orders, it introduces a significant expansion in enforcement by subjecting non-compliant contractors to liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), including exposure to whistleblower actions and qui tam litigation. A qui tam claim is a civil action by a private individual on behalf of the government alleging fraud against federal programs and seeking to recover damages.
The new EO states that involvement in any racially discriminatory DEI activities is not only unethical and illegal, but also deemed fraudulent against federal programs because it is material to the government’s payment decisions. The definition of DEI activities here matters, as this EO expands a contractor’s obligations beyond the management of its employment policies and includes prohibitions against funding or expending time or resources on DEI activities and contracting with subcontractors, vendors, or suppliers utilizing DEI programs.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Laura De Santos, Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniMs. De Santos may be contacted at
ldesantos@grsm.com
Pulling the Plug, Preserving the Product: Protecting Rights to a Modular Subcontractor’s Work Post-Termination
June 08, 2026 —
Paul Williamson - ConsensusDocsVolumetric Modular Construction (VMC) is a building method where a structure is divided into large components or modules, fabricated in an offsite factory and then transported to a construction site for assembly.[
1] Proponents of VMC hail it as a cost-efficient alternative to traditional building methods that leads to more consistent quality and shorter construction duration.[
2] Due to a growing labor shortage, high demand for compressed project schedules, and stagnant construction productivity rates, the construction industry is embracing VMC.[
3] A recent report on the market size of prefabricated construction estimates that from 2026 to 2031, VMC will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.16% and become a 413.11-billion-dollar industry.[
4]
As VMC becomes more prevalent, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors must consider how to effectively contract for modular construction. One important consideration, which this article focuses on, is navigating termination of a modular subcontractor.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Paul Williamson, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Mr. Williamson may be contacted at
pwilliamson@pecklaw.com
Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim
May 26, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesIn the
prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor.
Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “
superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
$10.5M Settlement Ends George Washington Bridge Debris Liability Fight
September 15, 2026 —
Bryan Gottlieb - Engineering News-RecordA $10.5-million settlement that recently came to light has ended a six-year legal fight over whether a truck part that may have been lying on the George Washington Bridge roadway for more than 10 minutes was there long enough for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to have found and removed it before it caused a catastrophic accident.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-RecordMr. Gottlieb may be contacted at
gottliebb@enr.com
The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison
June 02, 2026 —
Eric M. Clarkson - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.1. Introduction
As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years.
The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at
EClarkson@sdvlaw.com
Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today
August 16, 2026 —
Jason Tobias - Construction ExecutiveResearch labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off.
This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences.
Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country.
Reprinted courtesy of
Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Risk Reset: Concerns Top of Mind for Top Construction Law Firms
September 28, 2026 —
David McMillin - Construction ExecutiveIn the summer of 2025, contractors were consumed by one major issue: tariffs. Owners, builders and suppliers were trying to understand how shifting trade policy would affect bid pricing and ongoing projects. While those concerns have eased after a Supreme Court ruling, some of the industry’s top legal experts—all of whom practice at some of CE’s Top 50 Construction Law Firms—point to a different set of worries that are keeping their clients up at night and keeping their offices busy.
Inflation is not fading away, creating continued price challenges. Artificial intelligence is moving at a breakneck pace, offering potential time-saving benefits paired with major liability concerns. The federal
Morrison Bridge Allegedly CrumblingPort Authority Revises Plans for $10B Midtown NYC Bus Terminal ReplacementSB800 Is Now Optional to the Homeowner?Payment Bond Claim Notice Requires More than MailingGolf Resorts Offering Yoga, Hovercraft Rides to the GreenChapman Glucksman Press ReleaseForecast Sunny for Solar Contractors in CaliforniaCongratulations to all of our 2023 Attorneys Named as Super Lawyers and Rising StarsArchitectural Firm Disputes Claim of FaultMultisensory Marvel: Exploring the Innovative MSG SphereClient Alert: Michigan Insurance Company Not Subject to Personal Jurisdiction in California for Losses Suffered in ArkansasSan Francisco House that Collapsed Not Built to PlanNew Hampshire Asbestos Abatement Firm Pleads Guilty in Federal Fraud CasePartner Yvette Davis Elected to ALFA International’s Board of DirectorsFive Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Named “Top Rank Attorneys” by Nevada Business MagazineLegal Risks of Green BuildingWhite and Williams LLP Ranked in the Chambers USA 2026 GuideLack of Credibility Can Destroy a ClaimContinuity and Disaster Recovery Plans for Contractors: Lessons From the PastThree Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising StarsPotential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory FrameworkBecause I Haven’t Mentioned Mediation Lately. . .Construction-Industry Clients Need Well-Reasoned and Clear Policies on Recording Zoom and Teams MeetingsBenefit of the Coblentz Agreement and Consent JudgmentConstruction Cybercrime Is On the RiseConsequential vs. Direct Damages and Waiver of Consequential DamagesOracle Sues Procore, Claims Theft of Trade Secrets for ERP IntegrationCongratulations to Partner John O’Meara for Being Named as One of America’s Top 100 Civil Defense Litigators for Three Consecutive Years!Supreme Court of Oregon Affirms Decision in Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, et al.Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy PetitionEPA Issues Interpretive Statement on Application of NPDES Permit System to Releases of Pollutants to GroundwaterKey Amendments to Insurance Claims-Handling Regulations in Puerto RicoCaterpillar Forecast Tops Estimates as Construction RecoversWater Damage: Construction’s Often Unnoticed ThreatExceptions to Privette Doctrine Do Not Apply Where There is No Evidence a General Contractor Affirmatively Contributed to the Injuries of an Independent Contractor's EmployeeConstruction Activity on the UpswingMore Musings on Why I MediateFederal Contractors – Double Check the Terms of Your Contract Before Performing Ordered ChangesWood Wizardry in Oregon: Innovation Raises the Roof for PDX TerminalConstruction Insurance Costs for New York Schools is Going UpHaight Proudly Supports JDC's 11th Annual Bike-A-Thon Benefitting Pro Bono Legal ServicesMontana Supreme Court Tackles Decade-Old Coverage Dispute Concerning Asbestos Mineworker ClaimsIt’s Time to Start Planning for Implementation of OSHA’s Silica RuleConstruction Defect Claim Did Not Harm Homeowner, Court RulesHirer Liable for Injury to Subcontractor’s Employee Due to Failure to Act, Not Just Affirmative Acts, Holds Court of AppealLet’s Give ‘Em Sutton to Talk About: Tennessee Court Enforces Sutton DoctrineHow One Squirrel Taught us a Surprising Amount about Insurance Investigation Lessons Learned from the Iowa Supreme CourtKeeping Detailed Records: The Best Defense to Constructive EvictionThe Four Forces That Will Take on Concrete and Make Construction SmartTrump Administration Issues Proposed 'Waters of the U.S.' Rules=631310280">
Florida Enacts Sweeping Tort Reform Legislation, Raising Barriers to Insurance Coverage ClaimsWhen Does a Claim Against an Insurance Carrier for Failing to Defend Accrue?North Carolina Soil & Groundwater Case to be Heard by U.S. Supreme CourtBHA has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports Wounded Warrior Project at WCC Seminar 
