BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Piscataquis County Maine Subterranean parking expert witness Piscataquis County Maine Medical building expert witness Piscataquis County Maine institutional building expert witness Piscataquis County Maine housing expert witness Piscataquis County Maine low-income housing expert witness Piscataquis County Maine custom home expert witness Piscataquis County Maine production housing expert witness Piscataquis County Maine concrete tilt-up expert witness Piscataquis County Maine condominiums expert witness Piscataquis County Maine high-rise construction expert witness Piscataquis County Maine tract home expert witness Piscataquis County Maine parking structure expert witness Piscataquis County Maine landscaping construction expert witness Piscataquis County Maine multi family housing expert witness Piscataquis County Maine structural steel construction expert witness Piscataquis County Maine condominium expert witness Piscataquis County Maine mid-rise construction expert witness Piscataquis County Maine industrial building expert witness Piscataquis County Maine retail construction expert witness Piscataquis County Maine office building expert witness Piscataquis County Maine hospital construction expert witness Piscataquis County Maine
    Piscataquis County Maine expert witness structural engineerPiscataquis County Maine stucco expert witnessPiscataquis County Maine building code compliance expert witnessPiscataquis County Maine expert witness commercial buildingsPiscataquis County Maine testifying construction expert witnessPiscataquis County Maine architecture expert witnessPiscataquis County Maine slope failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Piscataquis County, Maine

    Maine Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Piscataquis County Maine


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Maine Home Builders & Rem Assn
    Local # 2020
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Piscataquis County Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern York County Home Builders Association
    Local # 2030
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Piscataquis County Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Assn of Maine
    Local # 2000
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Piscataquis County Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Modular Home Builders Association of Maine
    Local # 2015
    8 Mulliken Ct Suite 3
    Augusta, ME 04330

    Piscataquis County Maine Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Piscataquis County Maine


    Transportation Officials Make the Best of a Bumpy 2020

    In Phoenix, Crews Thread Needle With $730M Broadway Curve Revamp

    Putting for a Cure: Don’t Forget to Visit BHA’s Booth at WCC to Support Charity

    California Committee Hosts a Hearing on Deadly Berkeley Balcony Collapse

    National Lobbying Firm Opens Colorado Office, Strengthening Construction Defect Efforts

    California Statutes Authorizing Public-Private Partnership Contracting

    Terminator’s Trench Rehab Drives L.A. Land Prices Crazy

    A Primer on Insurance for Construction Projects

    Spotting Problem Projects

    House of Digital Twins

    California Court Invokes Equity to Stretch Anti-Subrogation Rule Principles

    9 Basic Strategies for Pursuing Coverage for Construction Accident Claims

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    As Natural Gas Expands in Gulf, Residents Fear Rising Damage

    Drone Use On Construction Projects

    Is There Direct Physical Loss Under A Property Policy When COVID-19 is Present?

    Need and Prejudice: An Eleventh-Hour Trial Continuance Where A Key Witness Is Unexpectedly Unavailable

    Hunton Insurance Lawyer, Jae Lynn Huckaba, Awarded Miami-Dade Bar Association Young Lawyer Section’s Rookie of the Year Award

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized as Super Lawyers

    Courts Generally Favor the Enforcement of Arbitration Provisions

    The Court-Side Seat: FERC Reviews, Panda Power Plaints and Sovereign Immunity

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (05/18/22)

    Product Manufacturers Beware: You May Be Subject to Jurisdiction in Massachusetts

    In UK, 16th Century Abbey Modernizes Heating System by Going Back to Roman Times

    Res Judicata Bars Insured from Challenging Insurer's Use of Schedule to Deduct Depreciation from the Loss

    Denial of Claim for Concealment or Fraud Reversed by Sixth Circuit

    Contractor's Agreement to Perform Does Not Preclude Coverage Under Contractual Liability Exclusion

    Seventh Circuit Confirms that Appraisers May Determine Cause of Loss in Addition to Amount of Loss

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Examining Best Practices for Fire Protection of Critical Systems in Buildings

    An Upward Trend in Commercial Construction?

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    Federal Court Again Confirms No Coverage For Construction Defects in Hawaii

    Top 10 Lessons Learned from a Construction Attorney

    Texas Plans a Texas-Sized Response to Rising Seas

    Former Superintendent Sentenced in Rhode Island Tainted Fill Case

    Three Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2024 NY Metro Super Lawyers Lists

    When Can Customers Sue for Delays?

    Motion to Dismiss Insurer's Counterclaim for Construction Defects Is Granted

    Environmental Update: Regulatory Notes – April 2025

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (02/15/23) – Proptech Solutions, Supply Chain Pivots, and the Inflation Reduction Act

    One More Statutory Tweak of Interest to VA Construction Pros

    Proving & Defending Lost Profit Damages

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    Ownership is Not a Conclusive Factor for Ongoing Operations Additional Insured Coverage

    As California Faces Mandatory Water Use Reductions How Will the Construction Industry be Impacted?

    The Latest News on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

    Three's a Trend: Second, Fourth and Ninth Circuits Uphold Broad "Related Claims" Language

    Will AI Completely Transform Our Use of Computers?

    Single-Family Home Starts Seen Catching Up to Surging U.S. Sales
    Corporate Profile

    PISCATAQUIS COUNTY MAINE CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Piscataquis County, Maine Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Piscataquis County's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Piscataquis County, Maine

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    The AVOID Act: A New Timeline for Liability in New York Construction Projects

    February 23, 2026 —
    By April 18, 2026, New York construction litigation will operate on a faster—and far less forgiving—timeline. The Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (the “AVOID Act”), signed into law on December 19, 2025, fundamentally rewrites third‑party practice under CPLR § 1007 by imposing strict deadlines to bring subcontractors, suppliers, and other responsible parties into a case. For owners, developers, general contractors, and their in‑house counsel, this change will shift risk assessment, contract enforcement, and litigation strategy to the very front end of a claim—particularly in New York Labor Law and construction defect cases. What Changed—and Why It Matters to Construction Cases Historically, New York defendants could implead subcontractors and other players well into discovery. The AVOID Act ends that practice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    Segal McCambridge Recognized in 2026 Chambers USA Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    Los Angeles, CA, June 8, 2026 - Segal McCambridge is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized as a leader by Chambers USA in California. The firm is listed in the Chambers-ranked department, receiving a Band 5 ranking for construction in California. The ranking further reinforces the firm's commitment to supporting California's construction market, from owners to developers and contractors, in high-stakes disputes statewide. "Chambers' research-driven process and independence make this acknowledgment especially meaningful. We're proud of this ranking and grateful to our clients and colleagues whose consistent trust and collaboration make our work possible," said Jason P. Eckerly, Managing Shareholder of Segal McCambridge. Chambers and Partners is widely regarded as one of the legal industry's most respected and independent ranking organizations. Operating across 200 jurisdictions and relied on in more than 70 countries, Chambers has, since 1990, conducted rigorous research to identify leading lawyers and law firms through a methodology that combines analysis of firm capability, achievement, and market presence through interviews and assessment of recent matters across more than 1,400 U.S. ranking tables, covering all 50 states, Washington, DC, and nationwide. About Segal McCambridge Segal McCambridge has built a reputation as a national law firm of accomplished trial attorneys for almost four decades. Founded in 1986, the firm has grown from a four-lawyer shop in Chicago to a firm with more than 20 offices nationwide. The firm routinely counsels and defends clients, including Fortune 500 companies, corporations, and individuals, across the United States in complex litigation matters, including, but not limited to: asbestos, class action, construction, employment, environmental, food and beverage, insurance coverage and bad faith, life sciences, product liability, professional liability, technology and cyber risk, transportation, and warranty. For more information, visit: www.segalmccambridge.com.

    Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects

    March 17, 2026 —
    Introduction: The New Reality of Construction Communication Construction projects have always depended on a constant stream of communication. Today’s project managers, superintendents, and foremen have broadened the method of communication to include convenient forms of digital communication. Superintendents text photos of field conditions, owners send quick approvals through WhatsApp, architects clarify design intent in a Teams chat, and subcontractors coordinate sequencing through group texts. These channels are fast, convenient, and deeply embedded in modern project culture. Yet the legal framework governing construction contracts has not evolved at the same pace. Many contracts still assume – or require – that notice, directives, and approvals occur through formal written channels—letters, emails to designated recipients, or structured project‑management platforms. This disconnect creates significant legal risk, particularly for contractors who rely on informal messages as authorization for extra work or schedule changes. Courts are increasingly asked to interpret text messages, chat threads, and screenshots as evidence of notice, direction, or waiver. The outcomes vary, but the trend is unmistakable: informal digital communication is now part of the project record, and it can bind parties in ways they did not expect. Reprinted courtesy of Kellie Ros, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Curtis Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Ros may be contacted at kros@pecklaw.com Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Construction Liens: Liening for Amounts Not Yet Technically Due Does Not Mean Lien Is Fraudulent

    August 11, 2026 —
    A 2024 bankruptcy ruling, In re Edgewater Construction Group, Inc., 657 B.R. 668 (S.D.Fla. 2024), touched upon an interesting issue when it comes to construction liens. Is a construction lien fraudulent simply because the lien includes amounts not yet due? Not necessarily. In this bankruptcy dispute, the subcontractor debtor (that filed for bankruptcy) recorded two construction liens on projects. The general contractor argued in the bankruptcy court that the subcontractor debtor’s liens were fraudulent. As to the first lien, the general contractor argued that the lien was fraudulent because it included amounts that the debtor knew the general contractor had already paid to the debtor’s subcontractors/suppliers. The bankruptcy court disagreed: “The Court finds that, although the Debtor had been told that [the general contractor] had paid these subcontractors, in light of the ongoing dispute between Debtor and [the general contractor], it was reasonable for the Debtor to demand proof. Debtor’s subsequent filing of a partial satisfaction of lien once the Debtor received the requested proof of payment from [the general contractor] counters any claim of willful exaggeration.” In re Edgewater Construction Group, supra, at 672-673. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Scope of Products Requiring Proposition 65 Warnings in California Poised to Grow

    February 23, 2026 —
    The scope of products to be drawn into the warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65 law may soon be growing. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) requested information from the public on the reproductive toxicity of p,p’-bisphenol chemicals. OEHHA is the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, formerly known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxicity Enforcement Act of 1986. OEHHA’s request for information is a step toward regulators classifying all p,p’-bisphenol chemicals as reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65 Under Proposition 65, businesses are required to post clear and reasonable warnings before individuals are exposed to chemicals listed by the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. To date, California has listed approximately 900 chemicals that fall under Proposition 65 regulation. Businesses may be held liable for up to $2,500 per violation per day. Proposition 65 can be enforced by public prosecutors (e.g., the California attorney general or district attorneys) or by private enforcers (known as “bounty hunters”). Reprinted courtesy of Brian M. Ledger, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Chassen B. Palmer, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Mr. Ledger may be contacted at bledger@grsm.com Mr. Palmer may be contacted at cbpalmer@grsm.com Read the full story...

    4th Department Narrowly Interprets Professional Services

    August 11, 2026 —
    In the recent case of Cty. of Erie v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2026 NY Slip Op 04092 (App. Div. 4th Dept.), New York’s Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that a general liability carrier for a construction manager owed additional insured coverage to the County of Erie, notwithstanding an exclusion in the construction manager’s policy for injuries arising out of professional services. The underlying case involved injuries sustained when the underlying plaintiff fell off of her bicycle at a park owned by the County when she transitioned from the pavement edge to grass. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Craig Rokuson, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Rokuson may be contacted at crokuson@tlsslaw.com

    Cal Unity Bar Names Angela Zanin as Statewide President

    August 11, 2026 —
    The California Unity Bar has named Los Angeles Partner Angela Zanin as its statewide president for the 2026-2027 term. This appointment follows Ms. Zanin's extensive involvement in the organization, including as the founding co-chair of the Los Angeles County Unity Bar in 2024 and as its chair for the 2024-2025 term. Ms. Zanin also has served as a member of the Executive Steering Committee of the California Unity Bar since 2025. In her inaugural message as president, which the Cal Unity Bar published in its newsletter of July 2026, Ms. Zanin stated that she vowed to continue the organization’s “commitment to promoting equal opportunities and embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the State of California.” She also noted that as she assumed the role of president, she thought of “the famous words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”’ Ms. Zanin closed her message by observing, “At a time when the rule of law faces challenges, our alliance stands strong, built on trust and confidence in each other.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois