BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Overgaard Arizona retail construction expert witness Overgaard Arizona custom homes expert witness Overgaard Arizona production housing expert witness Overgaard Arizona housing expert witness Overgaard Arizona Subterranean parking expert witness Overgaard Arizona structural steel construction expert witness Overgaard Arizona hospital construction expert witness Overgaard Arizona Medical building expert witness Overgaard Arizona condominiums expert witness Overgaard Arizona multi family housing expert witness Overgaard Arizona institutional building expert witness Overgaard Arizona tract home expert witness Overgaard Arizona casino resort expert witness Overgaard Arizona condominium expert witness Overgaard Arizona office building expert witness Overgaard Arizona landscaping construction expert witness Overgaard Arizona high-rise construction expert witness Overgaard Arizona parking structure expert witness Overgaard Arizona low-income housing expert witness Overgaard Arizona custom home expert witness Overgaard Arizona mid-rise construction expert witness Overgaard Arizona
    Overgaard Arizona forensic architectOvergaard Arizona stucco expert witnessOvergaard Arizona concrete expert witnessOvergaard Arizona construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessOvergaard Arizona structural engineering expert witnessesOvergaard Arizona construction expert witnessesOvergaard Arizona building code expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Overgaard, Arizona

    Arizona Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2620; ARS §12-1363, 1361, 1364) Current laws on the books require a purchaser of a home to provide written notice at least 90 days before commencing legal action. This gives the homebuilder time to inspect, repair or replace the defect if it falls within the specifications of the warranty. Homebuilder has 60 days to respond to written notice which may include offer to replace, repair or offer monetary compensationSB 1311 is a similar statute that covers multi-family dwellings. If no resolution is met through alternative dispute resolution procedures and a civil lawsuit is filed, the seller’s insurance company must treat a notice of a dwelling action as a notice of a claim subject to the insurance policy without affecting available coverage under the policy


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Overgaard Arizona

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License required to bid or contract.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
    Local # 0310
    16430 N Scottsdale Road Suite 150
    Scottsdale, AZ 85254

    Overgaard Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Arizona Builders Association
    Local # 0315
    1500 E Cedar Ave Suite 86
    Flagstaff, AZ 86004

    Overgaard Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Arizona Home Builders Association
    Local # 0335
    2840 N Country Club Rd Ste 100
    Tucson, AZ 85716

    Overgaard Arizona Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Overgaard Arizona


    City Wonders Who’s to Blame for Defective Wall

    Colorado Senate Bill 15-177: This Year’s Attempt at Reasonable Construction Defect Reform

    Effectively Managing Project Closeout: It Ends Where It Begins

    July 1, 2015 Statutory Changes Affecting Virginia Contractors and Subcontractors

    Nondelegable Duty of Care Owed to Third Persons

    High Court Could Alter Point-Source Discharge Definition in Taking Clean-Water Case

    Congress Addresses Homebuilding Credit Crunch

    A Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    Coping with Labor & Install Issues in Green Building

    KY Mining Accident Not a Covered Occurrence Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    American Arbitration Association Revises Construction Industry Rules and Mediation Procedures

    Couple Claims Poor Installation of Home Caused Defects

    Paola Perkins Secures Summary Judgment for Client in Slip and Fall Lawsuit

    Duty to Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Number of Occurrences Is On the Agenda at This Year's ICLC Seminar

    These Roads Aren’t Built for Wilder Weather Driven by Climate Change

    Los Angeles Times Ranks Lewis Brisbois Third Largest Firm in LA County, Largest for Litigation

    Is Your Construction Business Feeling the Effects of the Final DBA Rule?

    Safety Versus a False Sense of Security: Challenges to the Use of Construction Cranes

    OSHA Investigating Bridge Accident Resulting in Construction Worker Fatality

    How AI Can Become a Design Adviser

    California Booms With FivePoint New Schools: Real Estate

    Sixth Circuit Lifts Stay on OSHA’s COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Standards. Supreme Court to Review

    …More on Delay Claims and the Burden of Proof Substantiating Delay

    Homebuilding Design Goes 3D

    Chinese Billionaire Developer Convicted in UN Bribery Case

    Using Lien and Bond Claims to Secure Project Payments

    Solar Energy Isn’t Always Green

    Insurer Prevails on Summary Judgment for Bad Faith Claim

    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    One Shot to Get It Right: Navigating the COVID-19 Vaccine in the Workplace

    Warning! Danger Ahead for Public Entities

    Word of the Day: “Contractor”

    What is Toxic Mold Litigation?

    California Reinstates COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

    A Survey of Trends and Perspectives in Construction Defect Decisions

    Construction Defect Coverage Barred Under Business Risk Exclusion in Colorado

    Contractor Liable for Soils Settlement in Construction Defect Suit

    Appraisal Ordered After Carrier Finds Loss Even if Cause Disputed

    Hybrid Contracts for The Sale of Goods and Services and the Predominant Factor Test

    Appellate Court reverses district court’s finding of alter ego in Sedgwick Properties Development Corporation v. Christopher Hinds (2019WL2865935)

    Brian Slome Named to the Daily Journal’s List of Top Professional Responsibility Lawyers for 2025

    When is a Residential Subcontractor not Subject to the VCPA? Read to Find Out

    Miami Building Boom Spreads Into Downtown’s Tent City

    Fourth Circuit Confirms Scope of “Witness Litigation Privilege”

    Zurich American Insurance Company v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company

    He's the Top U.S. Mortgage Salesman. His Daughter Isn't Buying It

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    U.S. Firm Helps Thais to Pump Water From Cave to Save Boys
    Corporate Profile

    OVERGAARD ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Overgaard, Arizona Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Overgaard's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Overgaard, Arizona

    Quick Note: If You Want to Recover Attorney’s Fees In a Contractual Dispute, Include a Prevailing Party Attorney’s Fees Provision

    January 21, 2026 —
    If you want the ability to recover attorney’s fees in the event of a contractual dispute, include a prevailing party attorney’s fees. Negotiate this point on the front end. Not doing so will hinder your ability to make the argument that you should be entitled to attorney’s fees due to a breach of the contract. In a recent case, the prevailing party relied on an indemnification provision to create the argument for attorney’s fees even though the action had NOTHING to do with indemnity. This was shot down on appeal as a party can’t use an indemnification provision to create that attorney’s fees argument UNLESS the provision is expressly clear on this point. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in Hudson Valley Magazine’s 2026 Top Lawyers List

    March 24, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that six Partners from the White Plains, NY office have been included in the 2026 edition of the Hudson Valley Magazine’s Top Lawyers in the Hudson Valley list. This annual guide recognizes more than 270 of the region's leading attorneys. Insurance:
    • Copernicus Gaza
    • Jonathan Harwood
    • Lisa Rolle
    • Lisa Shrewsberry
    Reprinted courtesy of Copernicus T. Gaza, Traub Lieberman, Jonathan R. Harwood, Traub Lieberman, Lisa M. Rolle, Traub Lieberman, Lisa L. Shrewsberry, Traub Lieberman, Christopher Russo, Traub Lieberman and Hillary J. Raimondi, Traub Lieberman Mr. Gaza may be contacted at cgaza@tlsslaw.com Mr. Harwood may be contacted at jharwood@tlsslaw.com Ms. Rolle may be contacted at lrolle@tlsslaw.com Ms. Shrewsberry may be contacted at lshrewsberry@tlsslaw.com Mr. Russo may be contacted at crusso@tlsslaw.com Ms. Raimondi may be contacted at hraimondi@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    Sheppard has been recognized by Chambers Global 2026 in the following practice areas:
    • Privacy & Data Security in the United States
    • Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional in the United States
    • Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy in the United States
    Additionally, the following Sheppard partners have been recognized by Chambers Global 2026:
    • Justin Boose (Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy – USA)
    • Will Chen (Intellectual Property: International Firms – South Korea)
    • David Chun (Intellectual Property – South Korea)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Amended Again?! Critical Changes to RPAPL § 881: What New York Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know

    March 10, 2026 —
    Recent amendments to New York’s RPAPL § 881 will significantly change how project teams obtain and maintain access to adjoining properties for construction-related work. The 2025 amendment signed into law by Governor Hochul, and the newly enacted 2026 revisions, will directly impact general contractors (GCs) and construction managers (CMs), as well as their trade contractors who regularly confront neighbor‑access, support‑of‑excavation, and protection‑of‑adjoining‑property challenges. Although we do not advise that GCs and CMs get involved in the “weeds” of license agreements or the prosecution of an action to obtain access pursuant to an RPAPL § 881 action, which are typically owner responsibilities, GCs and CMs should understand the change in law, as there may be circumstances where they are responsible for securing access. This alert outlines the key statutory changes and explains the operational, scheduling, insurance, and risk‑management implications for the New York construction industry. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and David Polazzi, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Polazzi may be contacted at dpolazzi@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Construction of $3B Data Center in North Dakota Spurs Annexation Battle

    January 13, 2026 —
    Construction of a $3-billion data center on a 320-acre site in southeastern North Dakota has sparked an annexation dispute between the small city where it is being built and its much larger neighbor, Fargo. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    Scope of Products Requiring Proposition 65 Warnings in California Poised to Grow

    February 23, 2026 —
    The scope of products to be drawn into the warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65 law may soon be growing. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) requested information from the public on the reproductive toxicity of p,p’-bisphenol chemicals. OEHHA is the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, formerly known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxicity Enforcement Act of 1986. OEHHA’s request for information is a step toward regulators classifying all p,p’-bisphenol chemicals as reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65 Under Proposition 65, businesses are required to post clear and reasonable warnings before individuals are exposed to chemicals listed by the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. To date, California has listed approximately 900 chemicals that fall under Proposition 65 regulation. Businesses may be held liable for up to $2,500 per violation per day. Proposition 65 can be enforced by public prosecutors (e.g., the California attorney general or district attorneys) or by private enforcers (known as “bounty hunters”). Reprinted courtesy of Brian M. Ledger, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Chassen B. Palmer, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Mr. Ledger may be contacted at bledger@grsm.com Mr. Palmer may be contacted at cbpalmer@grsm.com Read the full story...